|
22nd December
|
|
|
|
MCT moves satellite
|
|
22nd December
|
|
Largest sex machine retailer in Europe
FREE UK next day delivery
SexMachines
|
|
MCT moves satellite
|
From MCT
|
MCT notifies all its customers from 15th December 2008 bouquet of channels will switch to satellite EuroBird 9 (9 degrees East) with the new bouquet: Sex Channel Television.
Contact MCT for information about a free dual feed.
The Sex Channel Television bouquet is made up of the following channels:
-
Black
-
SCT
-
Super
-
Strong
-
Reality
-
Amateur
-
Gay
-
Trans
-
Fantasy
-
Top
-
Don't Panic
-
Hot
|
|
30th October
|
|
|
|
Nuts TV to leave Freeview and spend more time with its online family
|
|
29th October
|
|
|
|
Ofcom have their regular whinge about the babe channels
|
|
27th October
|
|
|
|
Redlight TV goes dark on Hotbird
|
|
23rd October
|
|
|
|
Media multinationals line up against publican subscribing to Greek Nova TV for football
|
|
18th October
|
|
|
|
190 Euro porn channels
|
|
16th October
|
|
|
|
Minor updates to program code, adult TV still banned
|
|
15th October
|
|
|
|
Babe channel bashing
|
|
5th October
|
|
|
|
Free to Air Playboy One closes and is replaced by Paul Raymond TV
|
|
3rd October
|
|
|
|
TV censor has a whinge at LiveXXXBabes
|
|
2nd October
|
|
|
|
Sex on TV channels and forum chat about EuroBird 9
|
|
26th September
|
|
|
|
Parliament meeting about Sky prices and legality of subscription to foreign TV
|
|
7th September
|
|
|
|
So TV censor bans Sexcetera on Virgin 1
|
|
3rd September
|
|
|
|
TV censor Ofcom has a go at Spice free-to-air trailers
|
|
28th August
|
|
|
|
Ofcom pandering to the likes of John Beyer
|
|
27th August
|
|
|
|
20,000 fine for fun on a Babe channel
|
|
22nd August
|
|
|
|
Stimulating the growth of Canadian industry is seen as a bad thing
|
|
16th August
|
|
|
|
Canada licenses porn channel with condition of 50% local content
|
|
16th August
|
|
|
|
TV censors continue their crusade to banish sex from free-to-air TV
|
|
24th July
|
|
|
|
TV censor fines TelevisionX for perfectly legal porn shown under PIN protection to adult customers
|
|
23rd July
|
|
|
|
Europe to decide on the legality of geographical restrictions to satellite subscriptions.
|
|
22nd July
|
|
|
|
Ofcom define the rules for promoting adult websites from licensed UK adult TV services
|
|
11th July
|
|
|
|
TV censor fines babe channel GBP 17500
|
|
9th July
|
|
|
|
Muslims threaten to blow up Canal+ headquarters over monthly porn film
|
|
30th June
|
|
|
|
The case to use foreign viewing cards moved to European Court
|
|
28th June
|
|
|
|
French TV regulator inquires into 70 European adult channels
|
|
2nd June
|
|
|
|
Babe channel throws in the towel?
|
|
30th May
|
|
|
|
Ofcom continue to whinge at babe channels
|
See full article
from Ofcom
|
Early Bird
Turn On TV, 28 October 2007, 07:15 – 09:00
Turn On TV (now broadcasting as Tease Me) is a free-to-air unencrypted channel shown in the “adult section” of the Sky Electronic Programme Guide (“EPG”). It broadcasts programmes based on interactive chat services: viewers are invited to contact
on-screen female presenters via premium rate telephony services (“PRS”).
A viewer complained that the presenter on the channel'
s Early Bird programme broadcast in the early morning was shown rubbing her crotch over a pair of skimpy knickers and tweaking and blowing on her nipples to make them erect. The complainant objected that the presenter'
s behaviour was unsuitable for the time of broadcast.
Ofcom Decision
Ofcom has repeatedly made clear its concerns about inappropriate, sexually explicit content being shown on “babe” channels whose programmes are based on interactive “adult” chat. Turn On TV has itself previously been found in breach of the Code for the
inappropriate scheduling of sexual content (Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin issue number 85).
In this case, Ofcom considers that the actions of the presenter were not explicit. However, they were clearly sexual in nature and unsuitable for the time of broadcast. We note the broadcaster has taken certain remedial steps as a result of the
complaint, but are concerned that at the time of these breaches it did not have sufficient procedures in place to satisfy itself that the material it transmitted was fully compliant with the Code.
Breach of Rules 1.3, 1.17 and 2.1
|
|
26th May
|
|
|
|
Triple X on Hispasat gives way to old westerns
|
Thanks to Ian
|
lWhat has happened to the free to air Triple X on Hispasat?
They went off air about a month ago with a caption saying they were suspending transmissions for about a month and now there appears to be very old westerns in their time slot after 23:30.
|
|
16th May
|
|
|
|
Judgement reserved in foreign satellite subscription case
|
See full article
from Morning Advertiser
|
The Judge in the landmark High Court legal battle between the Premier League and foreign satellite suppliers QC Leisure and AV Station has retired to consider his verdict.
The Premier League is seeking a ban on importing, selling, hiring, advertising, installing and maintaining decoders.
The defendants deny breaking copyright law and claim that the attempt to stop them selling the decoder cards is in breach of the EC Treaty, which guarantees the right of free trade between member states.
It is not known when Mr Justice Kitchin will deliver his verdict.
|
|
3rd May
|
|
|
|
New cut down SexView satellite viewing package
|
News from Satellites.co.uk
|
Sex View, the European satellite hardcore service, have created a new subscription package. Sex View 4 Plus Smartcard.
This is a new "shrinked" Sex View package with only 4 channels in Viaccess or Irdeto for six months. Price ~ £50
The line-up of channels are:
- Sex View Info
- Sex View Extra
- Sex View 247
- Sex View DP
Presumably the same low bitrate video and audio quality, low budget indoor shooting content from the US and without a daily programming schedule.
|
|
29th April
|
|
|
|
A new blog watching UK adult TV get screwed by Ofcom
|
|
|
The Ofrum blog is intended to give viewers of adult services available via Sky a chance to air their views and opinions about the treatment they receive Ofcom
From Billy on Ofrum
It is my opinion that media regulators, Ofcom, are doing everything in their power to bring to an end the broadcasting of pay-per-view and free-to-air adult channels, currently available through the adult section of Sky's EPG. However, because an
outright ban is not an option, Ofcom have opted for a 'bullying' tactic by continually targeting these shows, often hitting them with hefty fines for even the mildest of offences. Meanwhile, mainstream channels that break similar regulations, often
escape with little more than a warning.
Update: Blogged Off
The blog is already discontinued
|
|
20th April
|
|
|
|
Euro TV card supplier given suspended jail sentence
|
Thanks to Nick
See full article
from Morning Advertiser
|
The boss of a firm that supplied foreign satellite football systems to pubs has been given a 10-month suspended sentence.
Mark Elsdon of Digisales was also ordered to do 150 hours unpaid work and pay £6,000 costs at Caernarfon Crown Court.
In March, Elsdon pleaded guilty to four offences relating to breaches of the copyright and fraud act in a landmark case at Mold Crown Court.
Elsdon was the first supplier to be arrested back in July following a raid on his premises by Conwy police and trading standards.
He faced 18 counts of offences against the Copyright Designs & Patents Act, Fraud Act and attempting to pervert the course of justice.
Elsdon pleaded guilty to four specimen counts of supplying unauthorised ART (North African) decoder cards and four specimen counts of offering unauthorised Nova (Greek) decoder cards for sale for receiving Premier League football.
Judge Hughes told the court in March that the offences were serious and crossed the threshold for a custodial sentence.
|
|
19th April
|
|
|
|
Putting commercial interests above free trade
|
Based on article
from the Independent
|
The Premier League has launched a High Court action yesterday to ban cheap live televised matches. The League is seeking damages and an order to stop companies supplying equipment which enables British viewers to receive the games via a foreign
broadcaster rather than the more expensive domestic broadcaster BSkyB.
James Mellor QC, representing the Premier League, told Mr Justice Kitchin at the London court: It is a good old-fashioned rip off. He said QC Leisure and AV Station are supplying domestic decoding cards from Greece and North Africa which allow
British viewers access to broadcasting services to which they are not entitled. In this country you can watch Premiership football courtesy of Sky. You pay your Sky subscription.
He said that if publicans want to show the matches to customers, they have to pay a more expensive commercial subscription. If a publican takes a domestic Sky card and uses it to display Premiership football in his pub, he is obtaining unauthorised
access. It is a breach of contract and a criminal offence. There have been upwards of 180 prosecutions of publicans who have used domestic Sky cards for commercial purposes.
The companies claim that European law allows the free movement of goods throughout the community and if the cards are available on the market, then they can be sold anywhere within the EC.
Mellor said the case is not about free movement of goods but about illegal infringement of copyright. It is about dealers making a fat profit. All they do is get hold of a foreign card and apply a substantial mark up of up to 100 per cent. They are
just acting as a postal service. How do they get hold of these cards? They get them through deception.
He said the defendants provide false names and addresses in Greece and North Africa to apply for the cards. The cards cannot be sold outside the particular country where they are issued and when the authorised suppliers find out about the deception, the
contracts are terminated and the service is switched off, he said.
The case is expected to last up to two weeks.
|
|
10th April
|
|
|
|
Ofcom propose that Babe Channels go PIN protected as tele-shopping
|
If the Babe channels go PIN protected then surely they could at least offer softcore fun. Surely PIN protection would restrict the number of viewers but allowing softcore may make it worth typing in a PIN
See full article
from the Times
see also proposal from Ofcom
|
Babe channels featuring scantily clad women enticing viewers to call premium-rate phone lines will be forced out of business if new rules from Ofcom work as planned.
The communications regulator wants to crack down on the 17 “babe TV” channels, which can be found, free to watch, on the outer reaches of cable and satellite services.
It is part of an exercise to control television phone-ins, which were hit by a series of scandals last year. As mainstream broadcasters have already cut back on phone-ins, its principal impact is on unconventional broadcasters and channels such as
Babe-station and Babeworld TV.
The new rules state that phone-ins can be used in programmes only whose primary purpose is editorial , such as Big Brother . The “babe” channels, which transmit only phone-line advertisements, can continue only if they opt to be governed by
similar rules as home-shopping channels. This means they will be allowed to remain on air only if viewers have to enter a PIN to access the channel.
|
|
3rd April
|
|
|
|
Playboy One now censors nudity
|
Thanks to MichaelG on Melon Farmers Forum
|
I must admit, it's come to something when Playboy One have even started digital fogging of the girls front bums. It's not even like they're doing open-leg stuff either. It would seem the merest glimpse of a wizard's sleeve is deemed likely to be harmful
to us in some way.
But if that's the case, how come it'd be quite safe for us to view exactly the same kind of female anatomy on TV if it were shown in some arty European movie like Sex & Lucia or Beyond The Clouds ?
It's all a load of utter bollox. We've all either got a vagina ourselves, have seen someone else's up close and personal, or failing that, emerged from one at the beginning of our lives, so what on earth is there to be so afraid of? It's time the people
who decide what is acceptable to be shown on TV (AFTER the watershed, I might add) just fucking GREW UP!
|
|
29th March
|
|
|
|
Babe channels now as dull as you can imagine
|
See full article
from Independent Babe Channel Watchdog
|
Thanks to the narrow-minded fools at Tosscom... sorry, that should be Ofcom, the babe channels are currently about as dull as you can imagine. Several fines and warnings issued by the watchdogs mean that none of the channels are prepared to test the
water anymore.
Night after night, these 'presenters' (and I use the term quite wrongly) sit there on their beds, trying their very best not to look bored, and failing miserably.
The producers of these shows shouldn't be too concerned, however, the girl's desperation is nothing compared to the viewer's.
|
|
26th March
|
|
|
|
TV censors cover up the Naked News on Playboy One
|
Thanks to Bob
|
Playboy One have just started blurring the pubes of the girls from Naked News.
Naked News is shown at 10pm and Playboy have been digitally blurring the pubes of some presenters (not all). It is a mystery as to which hairstyles offend the TV censors, Ofcom.
Playboy is shown free to air (or at least open to general entertainment subscribers) on UK satellite (and presumably cable). Ofcom have recently issued 3 statements restricting what can be shown on open TV.
First the censors whinged about the Babe Channels, then they banned erotic thrillers and softcore erotica from general film channels. And most lately, they have been whinging about the free view advertising segments on the adult subscription channels.
Ofcom's basic policy is that any material created with the intention of sexual arousal, however mild, is banned from open TV. And for those that pay subscriptions for PIN protected adult specialist channels, then all you get for your money is lame
softcore.
|
|
22nd March
|
|
|
|
Exploring the legality of subscribing to a foreign satellite service
|
See full article
from Morning Advertiser
|
The final part of licensee Karen Murphy’s foreign satellite football appeal will be heard on 25 and 26 June.
High Court judges will hear arguments on the legality of screening football in pubs using foreign satellite systems under European competition law.
Judges ruled against Murphy last December, saying the satellite signal was broadcast from England and the fee payable was to Sky and not Greek channel Nova.
But Murphy’s team were told they could argue their case under European competition law at a later date.
The cases are being prosecuted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, which centres on whether the publican dishonestly receives a programme provided from a place in the UK, with intent to avoid payment of any charge applicable to the
reception of the programme.
The installers say that their clients are not avoiding making a payment because they are paying the European broadcasters - and in any case, have no charge to avoid since there is no UK broadcaster providing games live at 3pm on a Saturday.
|
|
17th March
|
|
|
|
Euro TV card suppliers under threat of jail
|
See full article
from Google News
|
A foreign satellite supplier has pleaded guilty to four offences relating to breaches of the copyright and fraud act in a landmark case at Mold Crown Court.
Mark Ronald Elsdon of foreign satellite supplier Digisales has been remanded on bail until 11 April for pre-sentence reports but Judge Mervyn Hughes warned a custodial sentence could be on the cards.
Elsdon was the first supplier to be arrested back in July following a raid on his premises by Conwy police and trading standards.
He faced 18 counts of offences against the Copyright Designs & Patents Act, Fraud Act and attempting to pervert the course of justice.
Elsdon pleaded guilty to four specimen counts of supplying unauthorised ART (North African) decoder cards and four specimen counts of offering unauthorised Nova (Greek) decoder cards for sale for receiving Premier League football.
Judge Hughes said it was extremely unfortunate and ill advised for Elsdon to have sought the advice of the European Satellite Television Association (Esta).
A Premier League spokesman said: This sends out a clear message to the trade that supplying cards as well as using them is illegal. It also confirms that Esta and its propaganda message should be disregarded.
|
|
26th February
|
|
|
|
Ofcom make it clear that all free-to-air sex is banned
|
A ban on free views will surely hit the UK channels hard. The ban on satellite hardcore means that the channels surely cannot appeal to many regular viewers. They therefore rely on snagging new viewers who are gullible to the misleading free view
advertising suggesting that they will be subscribing to hardcore.
Interesting also to note that Ofcom don't say a word about the blatantly misleading promotional material suggesting that people are subscribing to hardcore when the channels are in fact softcore by dictate of Ofcom
See Broadcast Bulletin 103
from Ofcom
|
Ofcom issued the following 'no sex warning' about 'free views' for encrypted channels
In Broadcast Bulletin 95 (published 22 October 2007 ), Ofcom highlighted its concerns about compliance by channels that transmit in the ‘adult' section of the Sky Electronic Programme Guide (‘EPG'). In that Bulletin, which made
specific reference in findings to ‘babe-style' channels, Ofcom also noted its serious concerns about some free-to-air content on encrypted channels. The following findings are the result of investigations into this area. In addition to the cases detailed
below, Ofcom has a number of other on-going investigations. These concern both encrypted and unencrypted channels in the ‘adult' section of the EPG. Some may result in consideration of further regulatory action.
All providers of encrypted channels which also offer free-to-air content should study the findings below carefully. Ofcom strongly reminds all such channels that the broadcast of sexually explicit material within free-to-air content is not normally
acceptable and that any breach of a similar nature by an encrypted channel in future is likely to result in consideration of further regulatory action. Providers of ‘babe-style' channels should also take careful note of these findings for the guidance
they provide on compliance with Rules 1.2, 2.1 and 2.3 of the Code.
Red Hot Amateur , 26 July 2007, 22:00
The Red Hot and Fantasy channels are shown in the ‘adult' section of the Sky Electronic Programme Guide (‘EPG') and broadcast encrypted sexual material after 22:00 . The channels also broadcast 10 minute free-to-air promotions each hour between 22:00 and
00:00 - between encrypted material - which promote content on the station encouraging viewers who are not subscribers to sign up for the service.
A complaint stated that this channel showed full nudity and an erect penis within its free-to-view promotion. The complainant also said one of the female presenters encouraged viewers to watch the dirtiest hardcore fucking ever shown on TV.
Ofcom noted that the material included various sequences involving sexual activity, including a promotion called Rim Junkies , which showed men and women having their buttocks spread apart before their partners' heads approached them from behind,
as if about to lick their anuses. There was also an extremely brief image (of a half second or less) of a woman masturbating a man with an erect penis. The language included terms such as You'll get nothing but hard fucking all night and We've
got women of all shapes and sizes getting properly fucked.
Fantasy 1, 26 July 2007 , 21:30
A complainant said the channel showed full nudity and simulated sex, with viewers being told women would be seen getting “fucked”.
Ofcom noted that the material included various sequences involving sexual activity, including one promotion called Man Bitch , which appeared to showcase aggressive sexual behaviour. It contained shots of men being stripped and ordered to perform
sexual tasks, including being approached from behind by a woman with a strap-on dildo and, separately, a man being ordered: Come lick me out, you bitch. The language also included a woman in a promotion saying Fantasy. I'm dripping with
excitement and I'm Suzy, and you can see me getting fucked good and hard on Fantasy.
In both the above cases, Ofcom asked the owner of the channels, Portland Media Group to comment on how the content complied with the following Code rules:
* Rule 1.2 (protection of under eighteens);
* Rule 2.1 (generally accepted standards); and
* Rule 2.3 (offensive material to be justified by content).
Portland said, in general, the content complained about was no stronger than material that had been broadcast on the channels for “over a decade”, without attracting regulatory interest. It believed all of the material was appropriately scheduled bearing
in mind protection of under eighteens and that the content was within generally accepted standards for free-to-air content broadcast in the ‘adult' section of the Sky EPG. Portland added that it considered the material was justified by the context in
which it was broadcast.
Portland accepted that showing a brief image of a woman masturbating a man with an erect penis would not generally be acceptable for broadcast. It said this was an isolated incident and the result of human error, as the image was so fleeting
(approximately a third or half a second in duration) that the editor and compliance officer missed the material. Portland apologised for this error.
The broadcaster defended the material within the Rim Junkies segment. It commented that the sequence was edited together to give an impression of a theme of programming common in the adult genre. It said the sequence was fast paced and did not
actually feature any contact between any actor or actresses' face and buttocks/anuses. It added the content did not show any “‘spread leg' shots or visible genitalia or anuses.
With regard to the Man Bitch sequence, Portland said it was mindful that overly aggressive sexual behaviour is potentially highly inappropriate. However it considered the sequence did not contain any of the kind of sexual violence that would cause
viewers harm or offence. Portland said there was no suggestion any of the performers were engaged – or even appeared to be engaged – in non-consensual activities. It said the promotion was for an encrypted fetish programme, where there is
dominant/submissive role-play which would be in line with audience expectations on any adult channel, but that this was fantasy-based material which did not depict or encourage sexual violence towards non-consenting people.
Ofcom Decision
It is a requirement of the Code that content which is considered to be ‘adult-sex' material must be pin protected and encrypted (Rule 1.24). In both these cases, Ofcom did not consider the content complained of to be ‘adult- sex' material. This decision
was reached taking all the relevant circumstances into account, including the sexual explicitness and nature of the images (including such factors as their length and editing) and language, the purpose of broadcasting this material and the overall
context in which it was broadcast.
Red Hot Amateur, 26 July 2007 , 22:00
The offensive language was not particularly prominent and, although it was scripted and pre-recorded material that was presented by topless females, it appeared unlikely that it would have exceeded viewers' expectations of a channel found within the
‘adult' section of the EPG.
However, Ofcom was concerned about the content of the Rim Junkies promotion. It repeatedly showed the same situation, involving different couples: either a man or a woman had their trousers or skirt removed by their partner, who then approached
the participant from behind to spread their bottom and put his/her face between their open buttocks. While there was no explicit nudity or actual contact between the actors' faces and the anuses of the other participants, the whole segment had a graphic
sexual element to it.
Ofcom concluded that it went beyond generally accepted standards of what is acceptable to broadcast free-to-air, even in a channel within the ‘adult' section of the EPG and shown over an hour after the watershed.
With regard to the brief image of masturbation (erect penis), we acknowledge both the apology made by Portland and that such a brief sequence could have been missed by a compliance officer. However, the use of material potentially suitable for broadcast
only under encryption in promotional trails shown free-to-air requires particular care, precisely to avoid the inclusion of inappropriate material, however brief. We therefore found this sequence, although extremely limited, had not complied with
generally accepted standards.
In summary, both the Rim Junkies promotion and the promotion containing the image of male masturbation breached Rules 2.1 and 2.3 of the Code.
Fantasy 1, 26 July 2007 , 21:30
The ‘background' material in the information provision sections showed images of each woman licking and touching the body of the other and sucking and licking dildos. These ‘background' images in the promotions, in that they focused on the women's bodies
and each woman fondling the other, were very sexually suggestive and were in Ofcom's view inappropriate to be broadcast at 21:30 (so soon after the 21:00 watershed). Additionally, the strong language used in this self-promotion segment contained a very
strong sexual element which was inappropriate for broadcast at 21:30 . The licensee also failed to protect adequately under-eighteens from potentially harmful and offensive sexually explicit imagery and offensive language and was in breach of Rule 1.2.
We take into account Portland 's view that the Man Bitch sequence showed dominant and submissive sexual behaviour rather than aggressive sexual behaviour or allusions to sexual violence. However, the sequence contained the overt use of fetish
accessories. Images also included a man and, separately, a woman, approaching their partners from behind to spread the cheeks of their buttocks and put his/her face between them. The entire Man Bitch sequence was unacceptable for broadcast on a
free-to-view channel, even one located in the ‘adult' section of the EPG. Considering the time the material was broadcast, the Fantasy channel also failed to protect adequately under-eighteens from potentially harmful or offensive material.
This sequence therefore breached Rules 1.2, 2.1 and 2.3.
18 Plus Movies promotion
British Sky Broadcasting, 29 August 2007, 22:00
18 Plus Movies is a pay-per-view encrypted film service operated by British Sky Broadcasting which shows adult material of a sexual nature, and is broadcast within the ‘adult' sector of the Sky electronic programme guide (“EPG”). Before these films are
broadcast late at night, a trail of different film clips is broadcast without encryption. Ofcom received a complaint that the content of the free-to-view trail broadcast on 29 August 2007 showed explicit sexual scenes.
Sky said that material was carefully edited to ensure it met with Rule 2.3 and that it believed the content was in line with viewer expectations on the promotional and other free-to-view material available on other services in the ‘adult' sector of the
EPG. In addition, it felt the name of the channel and the clear warning given immediately before the complained of material would have alerted viewers to the nature of the material to be shown and minimised any potential offence.
However, in light of the complaint, and Ofcom's general concerns regarding free-to-view material in the ‘adult' sector of the EPG (communicated to Sky shortly after it had been informed of the complaint), Sky removed the promotion featuring these
trailers from the service and it has not since been broadcast. In addition, in response to Ofcom's general concerns, Sky said it is conducting a review of the content of its free-to-view promotions on the channel.
Ofcom Decision
In this case Ofcom did not consider the content complained of to be ‘adult- sex' material as referred to in the Code. This decision was reached taking all the relevant circumstances into account, including the sexual explicitness and nature of the images
(including such factors as their length and editing) and language, the purpose of broadcasting this material and the overall context in which it was broadcast.
Ofcom notes the promotion was preceded by information which alerted viewers to its sexual content and that it was broadcast late in the evening on a channel within the ‘adult' sector of the EPG and it took these factors into account.
However, while the trailer lasted only one minute forty seconds, it was shown on a loop between repeated listings information and the warning. Therefore the chance that viewers could come across the material unawares was increased.
The material itself consisted of a montage of brief sequences where naked and semi-naked actors engaged in representations of various sexual activities, including oral sex and intercourse. This was interspersed with voiceover promoting the channel and
its content.
Ofcom accepts that a promotion for encrypted material within the ‘adult' sector of the EPG will contain a certain amount of sexual activity. Nevertheless, even though the individual shots lasted no more than a few seconds, the trailer included a number
of portrayals of sexual intercourse which largely focused on the actors' bodies and shots of other sexual activity. Although not very explicit, the frequency and nature of the images went beyond what was acceptable free-to-air.
Breach of 2.1 and 2.3
|
|
2nd February
|
|
|
|
But surely without any XXX
|
From WildSat
|
Live XXX has re-appeared in Sky's satellite line up at channel 957.
Surely the channel will not feature any 'XXX' material whatsoever as restricted by Ofcom's censorial code.
Meanwhile HappyHourGirls has moved from channel from channel 887 to channel 956.
|
|
|
Free shipping to Europe
British Girl DVDs
|
Selected releases
|
British Porn
The Very Best in British Adult DVD
All the top UK porn girls are here - Alicia Rhodes, Ashley Long, Beverley Cocks, Cathy Barry and many more.
Our British porn online shop has over 1,200 British girl XXX DVDs
British Porn
|
|