| 25th November |
|
|
| |
Ofcom rejects complaints about EastEnders stabbing Permalink full story: Eastenders...Eastenders TV programme complaints
|
Based on
article
from
broadcastnow.co.uk
|
An
EastEnders episode that featured a violent stabbing was acceptable
for a pre-watershed audience, Ofcom has ruled.
The TV censor has rejected 45 complaints that an episode of the BBC1 soap
broadcast on 28 August was too violent.
The episode featured the death of ex-football hooligan Jase Dyer, who was
stabbed in the chest by his former gang leader Terry Bates.
The BBC itself received 134 complaints from viewers but defended the
scenes on the grounds that the violence was implied rather than
explicit.
|
| 27th June |
|
|
| |
Ofcom whinge at the usual string language before the watershed Permalink
|
Based on article from Ofcom
|
Battle
of the Hollywood Hotties
E! Entertainment, 8 April 2008, 17:00
Battle of the Hollywood Hotties is a light entertainment
documentary which features the careers of various international
celebrities.
Ofcom received one complaint about the use of word “fucking” by the
narrator in the programme in view of fact that it was broadcast before
the watershed.
Decision
Ofcom welcomed the remedial actions taken by the broadcaster, we are
concerned that such a clear example of strong language was allowed to
pass undetected by its quality control team. Our research indicates that
the word “fuck” and its derivatives are considered by respondents to be
the most offensive language.
Breach of Rule 1.14 (the most offensive language must not be
broadcast before the watershed).
Look
Who’s Talking
LIVING, 5 April 2008, 17:00
Look Who’s Talking is an adult comedy film made in the late 1980s
about parents whose new-born baby can talk. Ofcom received one complaint
about the frequent use of the words “bastard” and “shit” in this
broadcast. Ofcom noted that in addition one character used the word
“fuck”.
Decision
Ofcom notes that it had recently upheld a similar complaint concerning
the most offensive language against LIVING concerning the reality show
Dirty Cows. Ofcom also notes that in this case the broadcast of
the incorrect version was not deliberate and welcomes the new measures
taken by Virgin Media Television to improve compliance in future as
regards editing out inappropriate material.
Additionally, we noted several instances of offensive language
throughout the film, which Ofcom considered to be too frequent to be
acceptable before the watershed. It was also noted that the film was
transmitted on a Saturday.
Breach of Rules 1.14 (the most offensive language must not be
broadcast before the watershed) and 1.16 (which requires
broadcasters to avoid frequent use of offensive language in programmes
shown before the watershed)
|
| 26th June |
|
|
| |
David Currie steps down at Ofcom Permalink
|
Based on article from Ofcom
|
Ofcom
have announced that David Currie will step down as Chairman of the Ofcom
Board after Easter 2009. David was named in July 2002 as the inaugural
Chairman of the then new regulator for the communications sector and has
been instrumental, during two terms as Chairman, in guiding Ofcom
through its formative years and establishing the strong censorial
reputation that Ofcom has built within the sector.
The process to appoint his successor, which is an appointment by the
Department for Culture, Media and Sport and the Department for Business,
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, has begun and the intention is to
advertise for the role of Chairman in September 2008.
|
| 26th June |
|
|
| |
Radio trailer not bleeped enough for the radio censors Permalink
|
See
full article from
Digital Spy
|
GCap
radio station GWR 96.3 FM has breached Ofcom's Broadcasting Code.
A promotion for GWR broke rules on strong language with a trailer aired
during The Bush And Troy Show in March.
Swearwords were bleeped but not sufficiently, leaving it absolutely
clear that the most offensive language could still be heard, said
Ofcom. The trailer said: Easter bunny here. If you laugh at my big
teeth again, I’ll knock yours out. Happy f***ing Easter, you fat motherf***er.
GCap apologised and said the presenters had believed bleeping out part
of the words would be sufficient.
|
| 25th June |
|
|
| |
Ofcom whinge at trailers for Supernatural Permalink
|
Thanks to Nick
Based on
article from
Digital Spy
|
ITV2
has been criticised by Ofcom for repeatedly showing supposedly
frightening Supernatural trailers before the 9pm watershed.
Scenes of characters morphing into demons, "menacing" images of the
paranormal and violence linked to the supernatural prompted complaints
to the regulator in January.
Ofcom had also expressed concerns about trailers for the US drama in
spring last year.
Ofcom said the "dark and sinister" clips - including a car being driven
through a ‘ghost woman’ and a man hitting a demonic figure with a weapon
- were shown too early on several occasions.
ITV2 blamed the scheduling on an "isolated failure" and said it had
revised procedures.
|
| 24th June |
|
|
| |
Ofcom whinge at the burial alive in EastEnders Permalink full story: Eastenders...Eastenders TV programme complaints
|
Based on article
from the BBC
|
An
EastEnders storyline which involved a live burial has been ruled
"offensive" by Ofcom.
The TV censor received 116 complaints from viewers who thought the
scenes, featuring character Max Branning, were "unsuitable" for the time
of broadcast.
The BBC said the storyline, aired in March, was crafted in a
"responsible manner" and took into account any pre-watershed audience
"sensitivity". But Ofcom has ruled that the BBC was in breach of its
rules.
'The BBC noted that the two episodes involved "no explicit violence" and
the lead up to the burial scenes were "carefully paced with several
indications of the direction of the storyline offered". However, the
Corporation admitted more than 600 complaints had been made following
two pre-watershed episodes which saw Branning drugged, put into a coffin
and buried alive by his wife, Tanya.
Ofcom said the scenes of the burial alive had a seriously disturbing
element to them. Overall the storyline and its treatment had more in
common with a dark psychological thriller than a pre-watershed drama.
Further, in our view, the information supplied at the start of the
programmes did not adequately prepare viewers for the extent of the
distressing scenes that followed. For the reasons already stated the
scenes of Max being buried alive were offensive and not justified by the
context.
|
| 13th June |
|
|
| |
Channel 4 regularly cut the Simpsons Permalink
|
Thanks to Andrew
|
In
regards to the complaints about the use of "wankers" x2 on the Simpsons,
not sure how this slipped through, as Channel 4 regularly cut this show.
On quite a few occasions "GAY" comments have been removed, (homer drives
by Lenny and Carl shouting about something incomprehensible, Lenny asks
Carl what Homer said, Carl replies with I dont know, something about
being gay, in the channel 4 version the pair just look confused and
are cut away from before the line). This happens on quite a few
episodes.
Yet the now infamous John waters/gay steel mill episode is shown in its
entirety, yet it contains some of the bluntest stereotyping of the gay
community could ever wish to see. Strange.
Plus several episodes seem to have been cut for advertising space/time.
The Halloween specials seem to suffer from this the most, but they did
on Sky one for a vast portion of the 90's. Not as bad as the U.S.
though, great chunks of footage are constantly cut for syndicated
airings. Most famously Treehouse of Horror 3 which at one point was due
to have an entire story removed for advertising time, as the show
reached its peak of popularity.
|
| 12th June |
|
|
| |
Government sides with Ofcon against pan-Europe TV regulator Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
PC Pro
|
The
Government has sided with Ofcom against EU plans for a pan-European
telecoms regulator.
The Government have never been convinced of the case for a new pan-EU
regulator, notes Baroness Vadera, parliamentary under-secretary of
state for business and competitiveness in a ministerial statement:
You will be reassured to know that none of my opposite numbers in other
member states, or indeed the views from the European Parliament, support
the Commission's original proposals.
She goes on to confirm that Britain, together with Germany and France,
intend on laying out their objections during a meeting with telecoms
Commissioner, Viviane Reding in Luxembourg.
Vadera says that rather than a pan-EU authority the Government is in
favour of a much smaller entity comprising the chairs of all 27
National Regulatory Authorities complemented by a small permanent
secretariat appropriate only to undertake the revised remit.
Ofcom will undoubtedly take heart from the Government's stance,
following a spat with the EU when the proposals were first announced. At
the time Ofcom chief executive Ed Richards questioned whether such a
body would undermine the watchdog's authority.
|
| 10th June |
|
|
| |
Complaints about The Simpsons Permalink
|
See
full article from
Digital Spy
|
Channel
4 has issued an apology after airing an episode of The Simpsons
in which Mr. Burns calls U2 "wankers".
Earlier in the show, U2 member Larry Mullen is seen using the insult -
which is not considered offensive in the US - on his bandmates. Mr.
Burns imitates him during the closing credits.
Usually such language would be cut out for British television but the
offending instances slipped past Channel 4 staff preparing the April 15
episode.
Ofcom received 31 complaints about the show.
Channel 4 apologised for this offensive language and acknowledged
that it was unsuitable for broadcast at 6pm. The broadcaster explained
that it has robust compliance procedures for The Simpsons.
Channel 4 blamed human error and said it was the first time in over
ten years such a mistake had occurred.
The word was clearly offensive language, Ofcom said. However,
taking into account Channel 4's otherwise "robust" compliance
performance, the regulator did not record a breach of its Broadcasting
Code.
|
| 5th June |
|
|
| |
Protecting kids lest they grow up as dickheads like Ofcom Permalink
|
Based on article
from the BBC
|
MTV
has been fined £255,000 by Ofcom for broadcasting strong language before
the watershed.
The broadcaster was censured for "persistent" breaches on some of its
European channels on programmes that were likely to appeal to children.
Reality shows repeated during the day contained swearing and music
videos not suitable for children were shown before 2100, the media
regulator said.
MTV blamed the mistakes on human error and technical problems. A
spokesman for the broadcaster said: We take this sanction and fine
very seriously. He added that the network had taken a series of
steps to minimise as much as possible any breaches in the future.
Totally Jodie Marsh - a reality programme shown on the TMF
channel in the UK - prompted a number of complaints because of the
model's use of bad language.
Ofcom said in a statement: Pop video and entertainment channels like
those controlled by MTV Networks attract large numbers of viewers under
15. They have a responsibility to these children and their parents to
ensure their compliance arrangements are robust and effective.
TMF was also criticised for playing the video to Windowlicker, a
track by dance producer Aphex Twin, which contained repeated swearing
and also attracted complaints.
And the network's viewer-based text message show Mr Know It All
came under fire for screening sexually explicit content. Ofcom concluded
that the material contained in the text messages was grotesque,
unpleasant and offensive.
MTV France's text programme Belge Chat fell foul of broadcasting
regulations by showing a series of racist and homophobic comments, the
regulator added.
The continental station was fined £35,000 of the total fine while MTV UK
and TMF were hit the hardest with penalties of £80,000 each. MTV Hits
was handed a fine of £60,000 to make a total of £255,000 across the
network.
|
| 31st May |
|
|
| |
Ofcom whinge at UKTV Gold Permalink
|
See
full article from Ofcom
|
The
American President
UKTV Gold, 13 January 2008, 14:55
The American President is a film about the difficulties of an
emerging romance for a fictional president of the United States in the
midst of a re-election campaign. It was transmitted in UKTV Gold'
s
regular Sunday afternoon movie slot.
Ofcom received complaints that this film contained highly offensive
language (“fuck”), which was inappropriate for a pre-watershed
transmission when children could be watching.
Decision
Rule 1.14 of the Code states that the most offensive language must
not be broadcast before the watershed or when children are particularly
likely to be listening. The broadcast of the word “fuck” three times
within this film in an afternoon slot when children were particularly
likely to be viewing was clearly unacceptable. We welcome UKTV'
s
broadcast apology as soon as it was alerted to the issue, and its review
of scheduling processes. However, it is the licensee'
s clear
responsibility to ensure that material originally intended for post
watershed transmission is scheduled correctly and in accordance with the
requirements of the Code, to ensure that viewers under eighteen are
protected from broadcast of harmful or offensive material.
In this instance the most offensive language was broadcast before the
watershed. UKTV have encountered similar problems before in that
technical and human errors have resulted in inappropriate material being
broadcast before the watershed. We treated the issues as resolved on
those occasions, given UKTV's assurances that it had reviewed its
compliance processes. However, as there have been repeated lapses in
compliance procedures of this nature at UKTV, on this occasion we have
recorded a breach of the Code.
|
| 30th May |
|
|
| |
Ofcom continue to whinge at babe channels Permalink
|
See
full article from Ofcom
|
Early
Bird
Turn On TV, 28 October 2007, 07:15 – 09:00
Turn On TV (now broadcasting as Tease Me) is a free-to-air unencrypted
channel shown in the “adult section” of the Sky Electronic Programme
Guide (“EPG”). It broadcasts programmes based on interactive chat
services: viewers are invited to contact on-screen female presenters via
premium rate telephony services (“PRS”).
A viewer complained that the presenter on the channel'
s Early Bird
programme broadcast in the early morning was shown rubbing her crotch
over a pair of skimpy knickers and tweaking and blowing on her nipples
to make them erect. The complainant objected that the presenter'
s
behaviour was unsuitable for the time of broadcast.
Ofcom Decision
Ofcom has repeatedly made clear its concerns about inappropriate,
sexually explicit content being shown on “babe” channels whose
programmes are based on interactive “adult” chat. Turn On TV has itself
previously been found in breach of the Code for the inappropriate
scheduling of sexual content (Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin issue number 85).
In this case, Ofcom considers that the actions of the presenter were not
explicit. However, they were clearly sexual in nature and unsuitable for
the time of broadcast. We note the broadcaster has taken certain
remedial steps as a result of the complaint, but are concerned that at
the time of these breaches it did not have sufficient procedures in
place to satisfy itself that the material it transmitted was fully
compliant with the Code.
Breach of Rules 1.3, 1.17 and 2.1
|
| 28th May |
|
|
| |
Ofcom whinge at Blackpool Medics for muffled 'cunt' Permalink
|
See
full article from Ofcom
|
Blackpool
Medics
BBC1, 28 January 2008, 19:30
Blackpool Medics is a fly-on-the-wall three-part documentary
series about the difficulties faced by NHS staff in Blackpool.
Ofcom received a complaint that this episode contained the words “Oi,
you fat cunt”, which they found unacceptable for broadcast at this
time of the evening when children could be watching.
The BBC agreed that the inclusion of this language was inappropriate in
a programme broadcast at that time of the evening when there was a
strong likelihood that a significant number of children may have been
watching. It apologised unreservedly for its error.
The offending word was contained in a sequence illustrating night life
in Blackpool and was in one of a series of shots edited to music and
commentary. The spoken words which were distant and muffled. In
particular the expletive complained of was not spotted during the later
stages of production, including the technical review stage which was the
final viewing for both technical quality and editorial content.
Ofcom Decision
Rule 1.14 of the Code states that the most offensive language must
not be broadcast before the watershed or when children are particularly
likely to be listening. The inclusion of the words Oi you fat
cunt within this programme, albeit slightly muffled but still
audible, was clearly offensive and inappropriate before the watershed.
We note the BBC'
s apology. However, the BBC'
s broadcast of this language
before the 21:00 watershed was a breach of Rule 1.14 of the Code.
|
| 17th May |
|
|
| |
Ofcom have been surveying PINs passwords and games Permalink
|
See
full article from Ofcom
|
Ofcom'
s
Media Literacy Audits are part of a programme of Ofcom research into
Media Literacy in the UK.
The audits are used to provide a base of evidence to develop new
policies and initiatives to help consumers access and use digital media
services and technologies.
The report draws on quantitative research in which 2905 UK adults and
2068 UK parents and children were surveyed.
PINs and Internet Filters
There has been a significant increase in using PIN/password protection
on multi-channel television in households of 8-11s since 2005 (25% to
31%) and as a result this younger age group is now more likely than
12-15s to have such restrictions to their television viewing.
There has, however, been a decline in households with internet access
having blocking software or controls regarding online access, particular
in households with older children (55% to 51% of 8-11s and 50% to 43% of
12-15s). This is mainly due to parents'
beliefs in their child'
s ability
to self-regulate their internet behaviour. Four in five parents who have
not set controls have not done so because they trust their child to be
responsible.
Mobile phones
One in three adults has a concern about mobile phones. Concerns include
risks to society, e.g. “happy slapping”, affordability and risks to
health.
Games and downloads
Although academic research to date has largely failed to demonstrate a
proven link between violent games and behaviour, children appear to
share the wider public concern around this issue.
Around two-thirds of older children agree that violence in games affects
people'
s behaviour outside the game. There are high levels of agreement
with controls setting age ratings for some games.
Around the same number of adults also show concern about gaming, with
68% believing that violent games can affect behaviour in the real world.
For children, awareness of online shops and free file sharing services
is high, even among non-internet users. However, most (77%) are not
aware that downloading music or videos from some file sharing services
is illegal. Of those who are aware, 50% believe that such downloads
should be free.
|
| 14th May |
|
|
| |
MPs discuss 9pm watershed for the internet Permalink full story: Harmful Content...Parliament Inquiry: Internet And In Video Games:
|
Thanks to Nick
See
full article from the
Guardian
|
Ofcom
has dismissed claims by a group of MPs that the 9pm watershed is failing
to protect young children because they can now access television online.
Giving evidence at a culture, media and sport committee hearing today,
the Ofcom chief executive, Ed Richards, denied the regulator had put
itself in an "impossible and absurd position" by not doing more to
regulate objectionable content on the web.
Richards was responding to claims made by Nigel Evans a
conservative MP who argued that Ofcom's powers over broadcasting should
be more rigorously applied to internet content.
It's important to remember that the watershed isn't dead,
Richards said: Despite the internet, television remains remarkably
resilient as a medium. The watershed is still a very important and I
think it will remain so for several years.
The cross-party group of MPs raised concerns about services such as the
BBC iPlayer, which make it possible for anyone to view post-watershed
content at any time of the day.
The Ofcom partner for content and standards, Stuart Purvis, said a lot
of the responsibility rested with parents to make sure their children
were not watching inappropriate material: If you look at the iPlayer,
it immediately asks you if you are over 16. The question that
arises is: Are children going to understand that or are they going to
override it?
He added that new technology had in a sense disadvantaged parents
who might not necessarily know how to use access locks to protect
children from post-watershed content.
However, both Purvis and Richards dismissed suggestions that it was the
role of Ofcom on its own to encourage parents to become more aware of
their children's online activities.
Richards said: We are definitely not the right body to deliver a mass
campaign to promote media literacy. We are not qualified enough
to do it. We don't have the skills to do it. I think somebody does have
to do that, but it's not the duty of Ofcom. That sort of mass campaign
to bring parents understanding of literacy issues is not appropriate for
us.
Update:
Related
15th May 2008
Back bench Labour MP Margaret Moran has introduced a private members
bill in the House of Commons calling for online retailers to take
reasonable steps to establish the age of its customers when selling
adult goods and services.
The Online Purchasing Of Goods And Services (Age Verification) Bill gets its second reading on 16th May.
Update:
No Mention
21st May 2008
No mention of the Bill in Hansard on the 16th May so presumably
parliament didn't find time to debate it. So presumably it is no more.
|
| 13th May |
|
|
| |
Geo TV censured for murderous prayers Permalink
|
See
full article from
Digital Spy
|
A
Pakistani TV channel was wrong to broadcast a prayer in which a Muslim
scholar called for God to "ruin" Salman Rushdie, Ofcom have ruled.
During a live broadcast on Geo TV, in Urdu and from Pakistan, scholar
Dr. Aamer Liaquat Hussain said:
O God I beg you for the sake of this night;
ruin those who have blasphemed against Your beloved Prophet Muhammad,
Peace be upon Him.
Ruin them. Ruin Rushdie, I beg you for his death. O God, give him death,
O Provider; he has blasphemed your beloved. Oh God, we beg in Your Court
for his death.
Some Muslims judged Rushdie's 1988 novel The Satanic Verses to be
blasphemous against Islam.
Two viewers complained that the statements made on the Shabeqadar
programme in October were offensive. Under Ofcom's broadcasting code,
offensive statements are allowed but must be justified by the
context.
Geo TV said Rushdie had, in its view, committed serious blasphemy,
and the host had exercised his freedom of expression, in this very
specific context, by condemning the blasphemous act.
Ofcom said offensive material, where broadcast, had to be justified by
the context. Dr. Hussain'
s remarks, albeit primarily addressed to a
specific audience outside the UK (i.e. Pakistan), and in the context of
a prayer, were broadcast without, for example, comment or editorial
narrative.We therefore concluded the remarks complained about were not
sufficiently justified by context and so were in breach of [Broadcasting
Code] Rule 2.3."
|
| 29th April |
|
|
| |
A new blog watching UK adult TV get screwed by Ofcom Permalink
|
|
|
The
Ofrum blog is intended to give viewers of adult services available via
Sky a chance to air their views and opinions about the treatment they
receive Ofcom
From Billy on Ofrum
It is my opinion that media regulators, Ofcom, are doing everything in
their power to bring to an end the broadcasting of pay-per-view and
free-to-air adult channels, currently available through the adult
section of Sky's EPG. However, because an outright ban is not an option,
Ofcom have opted for a 'bullying' tactic by continually targeting these
shows, often hitting them with hefty fines for even the mildest of
offences. Meanwhile, mainstream channels that break similar regulations,
often escape with little more than a warning.
Update:
Blogged Off
The blog is already discontinued
|
| 21st April |
|
|
| |
Bad language rules seek to protect the innocent. But who are they exactly? Permalink full story: Catherine Tate Show...Wound up by Catherine Tate Christmas Special
|
See
full article from the
Guardian
by Mark Lawson
|
You
might think that, at the moment, the television regulator Ofcom doesn't
know whether it's coming or going on the question of whether it's
permissible to speak on TV the slang words for, well, coming and going.
This week it turned down complaints about the use of the F-word in The
Catherine Tate Christmas Special, but, a few days earlier, had forced
the BBC to make a long on-screen apology for sexual and scatological
language during the Live Earth concerts.
Viewers may well wonder, according to taste, what the fuck is going on
or, alternatively, what the f**k is going on?
...Read the
full article
|
| 15th April |
|
|
| |
Ofcom clears Catherine Tate Christmas Special Permalink full story: Catherine Tate Show...Wound up by Catherine Tate Christmas Special
|
See
full article from the
Guardian
|
Ofcom
have cleared BBC1's Catherine Tate Show of breaching broadcast
regulations with an expletive-littered Christmas Day episode that became
the most complained-about programme of the festive period.
Forty-two people complained to Ofcom about the number of four-letter
words and stereotyping in the show, which featured a sketch in which a
Northern Ireland family exchanged presents including a knuckleduster,
balaclava and chocolate penis.
More than 100 viewers also complained to the BBC about the show,
including the excessive use of the word "fuck" by Tate's foul-mouthed
character Nan Taylor in the first sketch of the show. Nan's catchphrase
is "what a fucking liberty".
The regulator cleared the show, saying viewers were already aware that
the show was likely to contain offensive language. It said it had been
preceded with a warning about offensive language and was broadcast 90
minutes after the watershed.
Overall this episode was typical of the Catherine Tate Show and would
not have gone beyond the expectations of its usual audience, said
Ofcom in its ruling: For those not familiar with the show, the
information given at the start was adequate.
The regulator said the depiction of the Northern Irish family, who
discover that their son is gay, did not breach broadcast standards:
In Ofcom's view it would have been clear to the audience that, in a
comedy show such as this, exchanging Christmas gifts of terrorist
paraphernalia was absurd in the extreme. Comedy has a long
tradition of engaging with challenging subjects and confronting taboos.
The Catherine Tate Christmas Special, which guest-starred George
Michael, was broadcast at 10.30pm on Christmas Day and was watched by
6.4 million viewers. In all it received more than 100 complaints.
The regulator reported: As for the use of this language on Christmas
Day, the BBC said that it does not regard any word as being more obscene
on one day than on another. It did take account of the different
audience expectations on different occasions, but in its view it was not
the general expectation of audiences that everything broadcast on
Christmas Day should reflect its character as a religious festival.
John Beyer 'Confused' by Watershed
Concept
From Mediawatch-UK
Speaking
today John Beyer, director of Mediawatch-uk said that this finding “is a
disgrace” and “seriously inconsistent” with Ofcom's finding last week
about the obscenities used in the Live Earth concert.
No wonder the viewing public is confused and have lost confidence in
the regulation of broadcasting. Considering that Ofcom has itself found
that the majority of viewers believe there is too much swearing on
television, this finding is all the more extraordinary. The
Communications Act 2003 requires that “generally accepted standards” are
applied to the content of television and radio services and it seems to
me that Ofcom is failing to take public opinion into account - and that
is a breach of trust and certainly not what Parliament intended when
setting up the new regulatory regime.
|
| 10th April |
|
|
| |
Ofcom propose that Babe Channels go PIN protected as tele-shopping Permalink full story: Babe Channels...Ofcom have it in for free to air babe channels
|
If the Babe channels go PIN protected then surely they could at least
offer softcore fun. Surely PIN protection would restrict the number of
viewers but allowing softcore may make it worth typing in a PIN
See
full article
from the
Times
see also
proposal from Ofcom
|
Babe
channels featuring scantily clad women enticing viewers to call
premium-rate phone lines will be forced out of business if new rules
from Ofcom work as planned.
The communications regulator wants to crack down on the 17 “babe TV”
channels, which can be found, free to watch, on the outer reaches of
cable and satellite services.
It is part of an exercise to control television phone-ins, which were
hit by a series of scandals last year. As mainstream broadcasters have
already cut back on phone-ins, its principal impact is on unconventional
broadcasters and channels such as Babe-station and Babeworld TV.
The new rules state that phone-ins can be used in programmes only whose
primary purpose is editorial, such as Big Brother. The
“babe” channels, which transmit only phone-line advertisements, can
continue only if they opt to be governed by similar rules as
home-shopping channels. This means they will be allowed to remain on air
only if viewers have to enter a PIN to access the channel.
|
| 10th April |
|
|
| |
Ofcom whinge at strong language in Live Earth Permalink
|
Based on an article from The Register
See also
Ofcom adjudication [pdf]
|
Ofcom
sanctioned the BBC over unexpurgated, pre-watershed swearing during its
coverage of Live Earth on 7 July last year, and has directed the
channel to broadcast a summary of its findings on both BBC1 and 2.
The Ofcom adjudication explains: 22 viewers complained that the BBC
broadcast unacceptable language before the watershed during this
programme. There were six instances of performers using the most
offensive language, such as 'motherfucker' and other variants of the
word 'fuck'.
Although the BBC broadcast an apology for the multiple outrages, Ofcom
notes that there was in some cases a considerable delay in the
broadcast of an apology.
- The breaches involved the repeated use of the most offensive
language before the watershed
- the breaches involved the transmission of some of the most
offensive language at a time children were likely to be in the
audience (in the afternoon on a Saturday)
- the BBC had previously been made aware that Ofcom had serious
concerns over compliance failures with regard to the broadcast of
similar and/or comparable events
- the BBC had failed to deploy effective and appropriate
procedures to prevent the broadcast of the most offensive language in
a 'live' music event.
Ofcom said it would not impose a financial penalty for the breaches, but
ordered: The Committee considered that a direction to broadcast a
statement of Ofcom's findings on each of BBC1 and BBC2 in a form to be
determined by Ofcom and on a specified occasion is a sufficient, and the
most appropriate and proportionate sanction in this case.
Such a statement would alert viewers to Ofcom's decisions and the BBC's
repeated failure to comply with the Code, and through the adverse
publicity created, act as an effective disincentive for the BBC not to
repeat the sanctionable conduct.
|
| 5th April |
|
|
| |
Ofcom whinge at afternoon repeat of MidSomer Murders Permalink
|
See
full article from the
Telegraph
|
ITV
has been criticised by Ofcom for screening an episode of MidSomer
Murders in the afternoon that showed a man being electrocuted.
Ofcom upheld a complaint that the episode, which featured a body with a
severely burnt hand, was "inappropriate" for a 4pm slot when
"significant" numbers of children could be watching.
The ruling comes a few months after Ofcom criticised ITV and Channel
Television, the company responsible for checking that the detective
series complies with the broadcasting code, for screening two episodes
in the afternoon that showed strangulation, bad language and a man
cutting his throat with a razor.
advertisement
In the latest incident, a viewer complained about the second episode of
a two-parter called The Electric Vendetta, which was aired last
November.
Channel Television said that the electrocution scenes were "shortened
and made less explicit" for the afternoon show, which was a repeat of an
episode normally screened at 8pm.
|
| 1st April |
|
|
| |
Complaints about the Brit Awards not upheld Permalink
|
Based on an
article from the Scotsman
|
The
Brit Awards have been cleared of breaching the Ofcom's broadcasting
code. The TV censor received 128 complaints about bad language and
alcohol at the music awards ceremony.
The incident which provoked the most complaints saw the host Sharon
Osbourne verbally attack the comedian Vic Reeves, whom she accused
of being drunk at the televised bash.
As Reeves apparently struggled to announce the award for Best
British Album, Osbourne turned to him and said: Get on with it,
you pisshead! Shut up, you're pissed, piss off. Piss off you bastard
piss off!
At another point, Sheffield band the Arctic Monkeys launched what
appeared to be an alcohol-fuelled attack on the Brits school for
performing arts, before being cut off.
But watchdog Ofcom said the show, broadcast from 8pm on ITV1 in
February, had a "particular reputation" and the swearing would be
considered "quite mild". It also said images where alcohol appeared
would have been cautionary rather than glamorised.
It said: While we understand this language may have been
offensive to some viewers, it was broadcast after the watershed and
in a programme with a particular reputation.
We believe regular viewers would have been aware of the likelihood
of this kind of material. Further, Ofcom research indicates that the
examples of language quoted are generally considered quite mild.
As to the portrayal of the use of alcohol, Ofcom considered this was
limited and incidental to the coverage.
|
|
Ofcom
Office of Communications A regulator with multiple
roles. Roles of Interest to Melon Farmers are:
-
TV censors for nearly all radio/TV/cable/satellite except for the
BBC
-
Internet censors for Video on Demand. This task has been
delegated to ATVOD but Ofcom retain teh absiolute authority
-
Internet censors for copyright/file sharing issues
-
Advert Censors for the limited role of TV channels which exist
mainly to advertise premium rate telephone services (such as babe
channels)
Websites:
Melon Farmers Pages:
|
|