A
regional press ad, for Sandown Free Presbyterian Church, was
headlined THE WORD OF GOD AGAINST SODOMY. Further text
stated:
Last year in the 'gay pride parade' a
banner stating "Jesus is a Fag" was carried by one of the
participants. The supporter of homosexuality was able to walk
through the streets of Belfast displaying this offensive placard
in spite of the presence of the PSNI, representatives from the
Commission and the march organisers. The act of sodomy is a
grave offence to every Bible believer who, in accepting the pure
message of Gods precious Word, express the mind of God by
declaring it to be an abomination. (Leviticus, ch18 v22, Thou
Shalt not lie down with mankind, as with womankind; it is an
abomination.) This unequivocal statement clearly articulates
Gods judgement upon a sin that has been only made controversial
by those who are attempting to either neutralise or remove the
guilt of their wrongdoing. As a result, we are now witnessing a
hostile spirit being exerted against the testimony of Gods
precious Word and those who adhere to its teachings. It is
imperative that everyone whose faith is centred upon the
authority of the divinely inspired scriptures maintain a strong
and public stand for the ethical and moral standards that will
ultimately exalt the nation. (Proverbs, ch14 v34, Righteousness
exalteth a nation; but sin is a reproach to any people.)
The issue of human rights is no longer a
basis for this parade, as successive governments have legislated
for the lowering of the age of consent, the authorisation of
civil partnerships and the inheritance rights of a nominated
partner. It is a cause for regret that a section of the
community desire to be known for a perverted form of sexuality,
which in certain incidences has provoked the unacceptable and
totally unjustifiable response of violence. Such a response,
however, must not intimidate the church into silence.
...
The ASA received seven complaints:
1. four complainants believed the ad's content was homophobic
and, therefore, offensive and
2. six complainants believed the ad was likely to provoke hatred
and violence against the lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender
(LGBT) community.
ASA
Assessment
1. Upheld
The ASA noted the ad prominently stated Published by the Kirk
Session of Sandown Free Presbyterian Church and recognised
that readers would understand that the text was representative
of the beliefs of a specific group and indicative of their
opinion only. We considered, however, that some of the text used
in relation to homosexuality, for example, ... declaring it
to be an abomination ..., ... God's judgement upon a sin
..., ... remove the guilt of their wrongdoing ...,
... a cause for regret that a section of the community desire
to be known for a perverted form of sexuality ..., went
further than the majority of readers were likely to find
acceptable.
We considered that particular care should be taken to avoid
causing offence on the grounds of sexual orientation, and
concluded that this ad had caused serious offence to some
readers.
On this point, the ad breached CAP Code clause 5.1 (Decency) but
did not breach 8.1 (Matters of opinion).
The ad should not appear again in its current form.
2. Not upheld
We understood that the complainants were concerned because the
ad called for an outdoor meeting to be held in protest of the
act of sodomy and to voice disapproval of the Belfast Gay Pride
parade on the same day as the parade was arranged; they believed
this action could be read as an attempt to spread hatred and
incite violence against supporters and members of the Pride
movement and LBGT community.
While we appreciated the complainants' concern, we considered
that the ad did not in itself incorporate language likely to
incite a violent emotional response. We considered that it would
be clear to readers that it represented the views of a specific
group, which were not universally held, and would be deemed
extreme by some. We acknowledged, therefore, that the ad
conveyed an opinion that was controversial for some readers but
concluded that it was unlikely to provoke hatred or violence
against the LGBT community.
On this point, we investigated the ad under CAP Code clauses 8.1
(Matters of opinion) and 11.1 (Violence and anti-social
behaviour) but did not find it in breach.
Nutters Consider Judicial Review
Based on
article
from
newsletter.co.uk
Two senior lawyers have advised the church that the ASA ruling
had gone too far legally and a groundswell of public
support has begun behind the Rev David McIlveen of Sandown Free
Presbyterian Church in Belfast.
McIlveen said he had been inspired by the level of support he
had since received: After Wednesday's Press conference I had
missed 24 calls on my mobile and when I got home I had to spend
some time going through about 50 messages of support on my
answer machine.
A legal expert who specialises in both sexual orientation and
freedom of speech said the ASA had got the balance wrong between
the two issues, and that its ruling could be open to judicial
review.
Dermot Feenan of the University of Ulster School of Law
explained that rights to express religious views must be
balanced with the right not to be discriminated against on the
basis of sexuality.
He said the advertising code used by the advertising authority
prohibits adverts likely to cause serious offence, but that the
authority did not show how the offence caused by this advert was
serious enough to warrant censorship: There was no
evidential basis for its finding that the ad went further than
the majority of its readers were likely to find acceptable.