Satellite X News 2007

23rd December		Turn On Relegated to Tease...

	Babe channel no longer a turn on
	From WildSat
	The free to air babe channels Turn On TV have been replaced by Tease Me. Tease Me is now on channel 912 and Tease Me 2 is on channel 948. Maybe the new names reflect Ofcom's recent prohibition on babe channels. The channel simply can't show or even talk about anything that is remotely a 'turn on' so now can only be a 'tease'.

18th December

Ofcom Ramp Up the Censorship...

Softcore erotic thrillers now banned on broadcast TV

Dangerous Sex Games is a standard erotic thriller. It is strictly softcore and has a plot as well as sex scenes. It is a US film directed by Veronica Hart in 2004.

From Ofcom see full article

Dangerous Sex Games
Bravo, 25 August 2007, 23:00

Bravo is a channel in the entertainment sections of the Sky EPG which broadcasts content aimed at men aged between 18 and 44 years of age.

Ofcom received a complaint about explicit sex and full female nudity in Dangerous Sex Games, a film broadcast on the channel.

The broadcaster commented that they did not believe the content was equivalent to �adult-sex� material. While Virgin Media TV acknowledged Dangerous Sex Games contained scenes of a sexual nature, it argued these were in the context of a plot and such scenes were not continuous throughout the film�s hour and a half duration.

It said the material was an �erotic thriller� and Virgin Media TV believed the sex scenes did not mean the programme should have been encrypted as it judged these scenes were not explicit or sustained.

Virgin Media TV said the film had been viewed prior to transmission by an experienced compliance executive who felt that no cuts or blurring were necessary to make the content suitable for broadcast. It said that while there was �little ambiguity� as to the adult nature of the sex scenes, the footage employed specific camera angles to avoid gratuitously explicit sexual interplay between the actors. The broadcaster therefore considered the film was not �hardcore� but rather �erotica�, a genre it felt UK audiences were familiar with.

The broadcaster said the channel had become sufficiently well-established for viewers to be generally aware of the adult nature of its late-evening schedule. A warning was given prior to the film which stated it contained strong scenes of a sexual nature from the start,

Decision

Under the Code, content classified as �adult-sex� material can be broadcast only under encryption (Rule 1.24) with appropriate protection mechanisms in place. Ofcom�s guidance on this Rule states that in deciding whether content is �adult-sex� material Ofcom is guided by the definitions used by the BBFC and its reference to �sex works�. The BBFC defines a �sexwork� as works�whose primary purpose is sexual arousal or stimulation.

Taking all the relevant factors into account, Ofcom has concluded that the material complained of was �adult-sex� material as defined under the Code. We noted that the total duration of Dangerous Sex Games was approximately 90 minutes, of which around 30 minutes Ofcom assessed to consist of �narrative� material linked to the plot. About 60 minutes of the material was dedicated to scenes of a sexual nature. While these scenes included some dialogue, their focus was predominantly the depiction of sexual activity.

The sexual scenes themselves showed naked actors � although genitalia were not seen � engaged in what appeared to be various sexual activities including oral sex, vaginal penetration and masturbation. The focus of the camera was on the actors� bodies throughout. Taking into account all the circumstances (including the style and focus of the camerawork on the actors� bodies, the considerable duration of the sex scenes, and the clear predominance of sex scenes compared to narrative scenes), the primary purpose of the film appeared to be the sexual arousal/stimulation of the audience. The content overall amounted in Ofcom�s view to a series of strong and prolonged sex scenes joined together by limited narrative. Material of this nature should only be broadcast under encryption.

We also concluded that the inclusion of such material on a channel situated in the general entertainment section of the EPG went beyond the generally accepted standards required by Rules 2.1 and 2.3 to be applied to the contents of such a channel. We recognise that Bravo is aimed at an adult male audience - and broadcasts programmes to attract that audience. Ofcom also acknowledges the film was broadcast late in the evening and preceded by an announcement which indicated the sexual content of the broadcast. However, this material was so strong as to be �adult-sex� material. As a result it cannot be justified by the context � for example by means of information about content provided to viewers. �Adult-sex� material should not be broadcast unless all the required protection mechanisms have been put in place. As Bravo is an unencrypted channel, this material should not have been broadcast at any time on the channel.

Due to the serious nature of this breach, Ofcom considered whether the matter should be referred to the Content Sanctions Committee for consideration of a statutory sanction. However, taking into account all the circumstances including the fact that this is the first time Bravo has breached the Code for the transmission of adult content, Ofcom decided not to take further regulatory action on this occasion.

Breach of Rules 1.24, 2.1, 2.3

1st December

Fine Babes...

Ofcom fines Babeworld TV

Based on an article from the Guardian see full article
See also Ofcom Sanctions

Ofcom have fined a free-to-air adult channel �25,000 for transmitting sexually explicit material 15 minutes after the 9pm watershed.

The regulator ruled that Babeworld TV, an unencrypted channel available in the adult section of the Sky Digital satellite service, had committed "serious and repeated" breaches of broadcasting rules aimed at protecting under-18s from unsuitable material.

Babeworld TV also fell foul of Ofcom's code by inviting viewers to contact "off-screen" girls through premium-rate phone services that strayed outside the editorial content of programming.

Describing this programme, on February 12 this year, Ofcom said: The presenters were dressed provocatively in underwear and behaved in an extremely sexual manner, for example thrusting their breasts and buttocks directly at the camera and appearing to masturbate. They encouraged viewers to call them using explicit sexual language.

Just after 10pm, Ofcom noted, the presenters removed their tops and continued to act in a sexually explicit manner"

Ofcom said that the explicit sexual content ... both language and visuals was in breach of rules protecting under-18s.

The content was so explicit, and in particular the language, it was considered to be 'adult-sex' material, Ofcom said. This meant it should have been broadcast under encryption.

In deciding on a �25,000 fine, Ofcom's content sanctions committee - chaired by former Trinity Mirror chief executive Philip Graf - said it had taken into account that Connection Makers had a "record of poor compliance". Last year Ofcom twice reminded the company of its obligations to restrict the degree of sexual content on Babeworld and to separate advertising from programme content.

20th October

Ofcom Pinheads...

Suggest that all material intended to arouse requires PIN protection

From Ofcom see Complaints Bulletin 95

Notice to Broadcasters re Babe Channels

In 2006, Ofcom wrote to broadcasters operating channels in the adult section of Sky�s Electronic Programme Guide (EPG) that transmit programmes based on viewer interaction with on-screen presenters (known as babes). These channels, which are broadcast free-to-air without encryption, invite viewers to contact the presenters via premium rate telephony services (PRS). The letters were written because Ofcom had a number of concerns about the material shown on the channels, including:

the appropriateness of sexual content broadcast before the 21:00 watershed, including the promotion of premium rate services offering adult chat

the explicitness of sexual content broadcast after the watershed

the promotion of premium rate services within programmes.

As a result of these letters and Ofcom investigations in 2006, significant improvements were made to the daytime content on the channels. However, concerns have remained about the degree of sexual content broadcast after the 21:00 watershed as well as continued problems relating to the promotion, within programmes, of PRS that appear to contribute neither to the editorial of the programme nor meet the definition of programme-related material.

The following Findings result from recent investigations in this area. In addition to the cases detailed below, Ofcom has a number of other on-going investigations, some of which may result in consideration of further regulatory action. Due to Ofcom�s serious concerns about levels of compliance in the �adult� sector, by both �babe-style� channels and free-to-air content on encrypted channels, Ofcom is considering amendments to the Code so as to require that all material transmitted in the adult section of the EPG is protected by a mandatory PIN. Any such proposals would be subject to a full public consultation.

Due to the serious nature of the Code and Licence breaches recorded in this Bulletin concerning babe channels, Ofcom considered whether some of these matters should be referred to the Content Sanctions Committee for consideration of a statutory sanction. However, Ofcom has monitored the output of babe channels in recent months and noted some significant improvements in compliance after the watershed (e.g. there was less or no very crude or explicit language or visual content). In view of the remedial action taken by relevant broadcasters to improve compliance, we decided against referring these matters to the Committee. Nevertheless, any breach of a similar nature by a broadcaster of a babe channel in future is likely to result in further regulatory action.

All providers of babe style channels should therefore study carefully the findings
below

Get Lucky TV

Grandiose Limited, 6-7 March 2007, 23:00-01:00

Ofcom found that the broadcaster failed to adequately demonstrate that the following services contributed to the editorial of the programme or met the definition of Programme Related Material:

the off-screen chat service

the private text service

the service that allowed viewers to submit photos to the channel.

Additionally, the promotion of the services that provided viewers with photos of presenters was unduly prominent.

Breach of Rules 10.4 and 10.9

Lucky Star

Escape Channel Limited, 17 March 2007, 23:37 & 7 May 2007, 00:20

The recordings provided by Lucky Star, through their provider EBS, were not adequate for Ofcom�s investigation. The condition in licences obliging broadcasters to provide material as broadcast is a crucial one, since Ofcom relies on it for evidence when investigating potential breaches of the Code. The broadcaster�s failure to supply a recording of adequate quality was a breach of its licence conditions. Breaches of Rules 10.2, 10.3 and 10.9 Breach of Licence Condition 11

Star Bazaar

7/8 May 2007, 00:00-01:00

Ofcom judged that the promotion of the PRS within the programme was in breach of the Code.

When judging what constitutes �adult-sex� material, Ofcom guidance for broadcasters takes account of definitions used by the BBFC for �sex works at 18�. These are defined as: works� whose primary purpose is sexual arousal or stimulation.

We consider that the actions of the presenters (e.g. masturbation) and the explicit sexual language used demonstrated quite clearly that one of the main aims of the programme was to arouse viewers sexually: there was no other significant editorial context for the explicit images and language. Such explicit material is suitable for broadcast only on subscription/pay per view channels that have appropriate protection mechanisms in place. The broadcast of the programme was contrary to viewer expectations for a free-to-air unencrypted channel (albeit one situated in the adult section of the EPG and broadcasting after the 21:00 watershed). The broadcast was inconsistent with the application of generally accepted standards to ensure protection for viewers from harmful and/or offence material.

Breach of Rules 1.24, 2.1, 2.3 and 10.9 Breach of Licence Condition 11

LivexxxBabes

17 April 2007, 21:00-01:00 & 18 April 2007, 21:00�01:00

Ofcom was particularly concerned by the sexual language and behaviour used shortly after the 21:00 watershed. In view of the above matters, the programme was in breach of Rule 1.3.
The content on 17 and 18 April exceeded generally accepted standards and there was insufficient context to justify the potential offence. It was therefore in breach of Rules 2.1 and 2.3.

Moreover, Ofcom considered that one of the primary purposes of the sexual content broadcast on 18 April 2007 after 22:00, which included highly explicit sexual language and prolonged scenes of vigorous masturbation with a dildo, was sexual arousal or stimulation. This content therefore in Ofcom�s opinion comprised �adult sex� material and its broadcast on an unencrypted channel was in breach of Rule 1.24.

For clarity, Ofcom considers that depictions of masturbation, simulated or otherwise, are not appropriate for unencrypted broadcast unless there is strong editorial justification. In this case, there was not sufficient justification.

Breach of Rules 1.3, 1.24, 2.1 and 2.3

21st December		SexView HQ...

	First High Definition XXX European Satellite Channel
	Thanks to Alex & turbosat.com From pulsat.com
	There is a new satellite channel, SexView High Quality Home Cinema on hotbird 8 at 13 degrees east, 12.360GHz horizontal. It is Europe's first high quality adult XXX channel, using the latest mpeg4 compression technology to give the best picture possible. To receive the channel, there are options: Any normal standard definition set top box with spare common interface (CAM) slot along with the special Viaccess np4 extra cam required to decode the mpeg 4 signal on a standard mpeg 2 receiver. High Definition set top box with Viaccess/Irdeto embedded High Definition set top box with CI slot and CAM When you subscribe to the Sexview HQ channel, you will also get the following free: Viaccess mpeg 4 decoding CAM Viewing of the original SexView channel Viewing of the mpeg 4 SexView 264 channel

8th December	Update:	Babe Channels...

	Nothing to see anymore
	From the bgafd forum
	The Ofcom sanctions against Babeworld seem to have taken their toll on the Babe Channels From the bgafd forum: Does anyone know why they stopped shagging and lesbo action? All you see now is some bird on the phone for hours..., what's going on? I flicked over to Sexstation the other day for the first time in ages and it looked like they've toned it all down as well. I work on House of Fun and yes we have been told to tone it down! The sport girls work next door to us and they have to behave as well!

14th October		Spanish Gold...

	Redlight Gold to start on Hispasat
	Thanks to Big Ed
	It seems a new channel, Redlight GOLD, is soon to launch on Hispasat 1C at 30 degrees West. This service will be out on a limb, as the rest of the Redlight channels live on Hot Bird at 13 degrees East. The looped promo film shows a link to the Redlight website, but I had a quick glance around and couldn't find any reference to GOLD on this website. The promo film also shows a Spanish telephone number. This suggests to me that GOLD will be encrypted, although there is nothing in the promo confirming or denying that. Also no launch date has been displayed yet. There is nothing that explicitly says GOLD will be a hardcore service either, although I imagine it will be - in keeping with every other Redlight channel. No other service on the same transponder is currently encrypted, although that proves nothing really! The frequency is 11.972 Vertical, with a symbol rate of 27500 and FEC of 3/4. This is one of the stronger transmissions from Hispasat, which means it should come storming in on a correctly-aligned 60cms dish in all but the extreme north of the UK. I wonder if the name - GOLD - gives a clue to the content? Ancient Spanish hardcore in low picture quality, maybe...?

10th October		Multi Choice Rationalisation...

	Update to MCT satellite channel line up
	From Multi Choice Television
	Multi Channel Television have announced a rationalisation of their hardcore channel line up to: MCT-Premium MCT-Asian/Ultra MCT-Elegance/Amateur MCT-Fantasy/Free MCT-Gay/Trans MCT-Lux/Best MCT-Plus/Glamour MCT-Reality/Full MCT-Sct MCT-Sex MCT-Super/Dream Red Light Mix Red Light USA Red Light Germany Red Light Italia Red Light Latino

18th December		Ofcom Ramp Up the Censorship...

	Softcore erotic thrillers now banned on broadcast TV
	Dangerous Sex Games is a standard erotic thriller. It is strictly softcore and has a plot as well as sex scenes. It is a US film directed by Veronica Hart in 2004. From Ofcom see full article
	Dangerous Sex Games Bravo, 25 August 2007, 23:00 Bravo is a channel in the entertainment sections of the Sky EPG which broadcasts content aimed at men aged between 18 and 44 years of age. Ofcom received a complaint about explicit sex and full female nudity in Dangerous Sex Games, a film broadcast on the channel. The broadcaster commented that they did not believe the content was equivalent to �adult-sex� material. While Virgin Media TV acknowledged Dangerous Sex Games contained scenes of a sexual nature, it argued these were in the context of a plot and such scenes were not continuous throughout the film�s hour and a half duration. It said the material was an �erotic thriller� and Virgin Media TV believed the sex scenes did not mean the programme should have been encrypted as it judged these scenes were not explicit or sustained. Virgin Media TV said the film had been viewed prior to transmission by an experienced compliance executive who felt that no cuts or blurring were necessary to make the content suitable for broadcast. It said that while there was �little ambiguity� as to the adult nature of the sex scenes, the footage employed specific camera angles to avoid gratuitously explicit sexual interplay between the actors. The broadcaster therefore considered the film was not �hardcore� but rather �erotica�, a genre it felt UK audiences were familiar with. The broadcaster said the channel had become sufficiently well-established for viewers to be generally aware of the adult nature of its late-evening schedule. A warning was given prior to the film which stated it contained strong scenes of a sexual nature from the start, Decision Under the Code, content classified as �adult-sex� material can be broadcast only under encryption (Rule 1.24) with appropriate protection mechanisms in place. Ofcom�s guidance on this Rule states that in deciding whether content is �adult-sex� material Ofcom is guided by the definitions used by the BBFC and its reference to �sex works�. The BBFC defines a �sexwork� as works�whose primary purpose is sexual arousal or stimulation. Taking all the relevant factors into account, Ofcom has concluded that the material complained of was �adult-sex� material as defined under the Code. We noted that the total duration of Dangerous Sex Games was approximately 90 minutes, of which around 30 minutes Ofcom assessed to consist of �narrative� material linked to the plot. About 60 minutes of the material was dedicated to scenes of a sexual nature. While these scenes included some dialogue, their focus was predominantly the depiction of sexual activity. The sexual scenes themselves showed naked actors � although genitalia were not seen � engaged in what appeared to be various sexual activities including oral sex, vaginal penetration and masturbation. The focus of the camera was on the actors� bodies throughout. Taking into account all the circumstances (including the style and focus of the camerawork on the actors� bodies, the considerable duration of the sex scenes, and the clear predominance of sex scenes compared to narrative scenes), the primary purpose of the film appeared to be the sexual arousal/stimulation of the audience. The content overall amounted in Ofcom�s view to a series of strong and prolonged sex scenes joined together by limited narrative. Material of this nature should only be broadcast under encryption. We also concluded that the inclusion of such material on a channel situated in the general entertainment section of the EPG went beyond the generally accepted standards required by Rules 2.1 and 2.3 to be applied to the contents of such a channel. We recognise that Bravo is aimed at an adult male audience - and broadcasts programmes to attract that audience. Ofcom also acknowledges the film was broadcast late in the evening and preceded by an announcement which indicated the sexual content of the broadcast. However, this material was so strong as to be �adult-sex� material. As a result it cannot be justified by the context � for example by means of information about content provided to viewers. �Adult-sex� material should not be broadcast unless all the required protection mechanisms have been put in place. As Bravo is an unencrypted channel, this material should not have been broadcast at any time on the channel. Due to the serious nature of this breach, Ofcom considered whether the matter should be referred to the Content Sanctions Committee for consideration of a statutory sanction. However, taking into account all the circumstances including the fact that this is the first time Bravo has breached the Code for the transmission of adult content, Ofcom decided not to take further regulatory action on this occasion. Breach of Rules 1.24, 2.1, 2.3

1st December		Fine Babes...

	Ofcom fines Babeworld TV
	Based on an article from the Guardian see full article See also Ofcom Sanctions
	Ofcom have fined a free-to-air adult channel �25,000 for transmitting sexually explicit material 15 minutes after the 9pm watershed. The regulator ruled that Babeworld TV, an unencrypted channel available in the adult section of the Sky Digital satellite service, had committed "serious and repeated" breaches of broadcasting rules aimed at protecting under-18s from unsuitable material. Babeworld TV also fell foul of Ofcom's code by inviting viewers to contact "off-screen" girls through premium-rate phone services that strayed outside the editorial content of programming. Describing this programme, on February 12 this year, Ofcom said: The presenters were dressed provocatively in underwear and behaved in an extremely sexual manner, for example thrusting their breasts and buttocks directly at the camera and appearing to masturbate. They encouraged viewers to call them using explicit sexual language. Just after 10pm, Ofcom noted, the presenters removed their tops and continued to act in a sexually explicit manner" Ofcom said that the explicit sexual content ... both language and visuals was in breach of rules protecting under-18s. The content was so explicit, and in particular the language, it was considered to be 'adult-sex' material, Ofcom said. This meant it should have been broadcast under encryption. In deciding on a �25,000 fine, Ofcom's content sanctions committee - chaired by former Trinity Mirror chief executive Philip Graf - said it had taken into account that Connection Makers had a "record of poor compliance". Last year Ofcom twice reminded the company of its obligations to restrict the degree of sexual content on Babeworld and to separate advertising from programme content.

20th October		Ofcom Pinheads...

	Suggest that all material intended to arouse requires PIN protection
	From Ofcom see Complaints Bulletin 95
	Notice to Broadcasters re Babe Channels In 2006, Ofcom wrote to broadcasters operating channels in the adult section of Sky�s Electronic Programme Guide (EPG) that transmit programmes based on viewer interaction with on-screen presenters (known as babes). These channels, which are broadcast free-to-air without encryption, invite viewers to contact the presenters via premium rate telephony services (PRS). The letters were written because Ofcom had a number of concerns about the material shown on the channels, including: the appropriateness of sexual content broadcast before the 21:00 watershed, including the promotion of premium rate services offering adult chat the explicitness of sexual content broadcast after the watershed the promotion of premium rate services within programmes. As a result of these letters and Ofcom investigations in 2006, significant improvements were made to the daytime content on the channels. However, concerns have remained about the degree of sexual content broadcast after the 21:00 watershed as well as continued problems relating to the promotion, within programmes, of PRS that appear to contribute neither to the editorial of the programme nor meet the definition of programme-related material. The following Findings result from recent investigations in this area. In addition to the cases detailed below, Ofcom has a number of other on-going investigations, some of which may result in consideration of further regulatory action. Due to Ofcom�s serious concerns about levels of compliance in the �adult� sector, by both �babe-style� channels and free-to-air content on encrypted channels, Ofcom is considering amendments to the Code so as to require that all material transmitted in the adult section of the EPG is protected by a mandatory PIN. Any such proposals would be subject to a full public consultation. Due to the serious nature of the Code and Licence breaches recorded in this Bulletin concerning babe channels, Ofcom considered whether some of these matters should be referred to the Content Sanctions Committee for consideration of a statutory sanction. However, Ofcom has monitored the output of babe channels in recent months and noted some significant improvements in compliance after the watershed (e.g. there was less or no very crude or explicit language or visual content). In view of the remedial action taken by relevant broadcasters to improve compliance, we decided against referring these matters to the Committee. Nevertheless, any breach of a similar nature by a broadcaster of a babe channel in future is likely to result in further regulatory action. All providers of babe style channels should therefore study carefully the findings below Get Lucky TV Grandiose Limited, 6-7 March 2007, 23:00-01:00 Ofcom found that the broadcaster failed to adequately demonstrate that the following services contributed to the editorial of the programme or met the definition of Programme Related Material: the off-screen chat service the private text service the service that allowed viewers to submit photos to the channel. Additionally, the promotion of the services that provided viewers with photos of presenters was unduly prominent. Breach of Rules 10.4 and 10.9 Lucky Star Escape Channel Limited, 17 March 2007, 23:37 & 7 May 2007, 00:20 The recordings provided by Lucky Star, through their provider EBS, were not adequate for Ofcom�s investigation. The condition in licences obliging broadcasters to provide material as broadcast is a crucial one, since Ofcom relies on it for evidence when investigating potential breaches of the Code. The broadcaster�s failure to supply a recording of adequate quality was a breach of its licence conditions. Breaches of Rules 10.2, 10.3 and 10.9 Breach of Licence Condition 11 Star Bazaar 7/8 May 2007, 00:00-01:00 Ofcom judged that the promotion of the PRS within the programme was in breach of the Code. When judging what constitutes �adult-sex� material, Ofcom guidance for broadcasters takes account of definitions used by the BBFC for �sex works at 18�. These are defined as: works� whose primary purpose is sexual arousal or stimulation. We consider that the actions of the presenters (e.g. masturbation) and the explicit sexual language used demonstrated quite clearly that one of the main aims of the programme was to arouse viewers sexually: there was no other significant editorial context for the explicit images and language. Such explicit material is suitable for broadcast only on subscription/pay per view channels that have appropriate protection mechanisms in place. The broadcast of the programme was contrary to viewer expectations for a free-to-air unencrypted channel (albeit one situated in the adult section of the EPG and broadcasting after the 21:00 watershed). The broadcast was inconsistent with the application of generally accepted standards to ensure protection for viewers from harmful and/or offence material. Breach of Rules 1.24, 2.1, 2.3 and 10.9 Breach of Licence Condition 11 LivexxxBabes 17 April 2007, 21:00-01:00 & 18 April 2007, 21:00�01:00 Ofcom was particularly concerned by the sexual language and behaviour used shortly after the 21:00 watershed. In view of the above matters, the programme was in breach of Rule 1.3. The content on 17 and 18 April exceeded generally accepted standards and there was insufficient context to justify the potential offence. It was therefore in breach of Rules 2.1 and 2.3. Moreover, Ofcom considered that one of the primary purposes of the sexual content broadcast on 18 April 2007 after 22:00, which included highly explicit sexual language and prolonged scenes of vigorous masturbation with a dildo, was sexual arousal or stimulation. This content therefore in Ofcom�s opinion comprised �adult sex� material and its broadcast on an unencrypted channel was in breach of Rule 1.24. For clarity, Ofcom considers that depictions of masturbation, simulated or otherwise, are not appropriate for unencrypted broadcast unless there is strong editorial justification. In this case, there was not sufficient justification. Breach of Rules 1.3, 1.24, 2.1 and 2.3

4th September	More Babes...
	Essex Babes join Sky's free to air lineup From WildSat A free to air channel has been added to the Sky EPG called Essex Babes at 968. No babes yet though, just music. Meanwhile Blue Kiss TV has replaced Smile TV on channel 964.

13th April	More Ero...
	and Arab Live Sex From Transponder News Arab Live Sex, Ero4Fun, Ero Pulse and Ero Live 1 have started on Hotbrid. They broadcast from transponder 11.785 GHz h (SR 27500, FEC 3/4).

25th March	More Erotik...
	New adult satellite channels From Transponder News Sex Chat has launched on Hotbird at 11.411 GHz horizontal (SR 27500, FEC 5/6) Erotik Sat TV has started on Astra 1 at 12.633 GHz horizontal (SR 22000, FEC 5/6). It has replaced VIC TV. There is more information in German about this channel at www.erotik-sat.tv

12th March	Ofcom are Pants...
	Mandatory 2 pairs of knickers on babe channels? From Arginald on the bgafd forum I have seen it all, or not as it turns out. Tonight we see a new level of censorship on British TV. All the girls on SKY's FTA adult channels are wearing 2 pairs of knickers!! Even Angel Long on Sport XXX! Pathetic when Playboy One shows full frontal open leg shots.

31st January	Frequent Changes...
	Private Spice & Dorcel TV change frequencies From Transponder News The Astra 1 versions of Private Spice and Dorcel TV have moved transponder to 12.344 GHz h (SR 27500, FEC 3/4), encoded in Irdeto 2/Mediaguard 2.

3rd January	High Definition Sex...
	Sex View will start an HDTV service From Transponder News Sex View is planning to start a HDTV service. The program will be broadcast in MPEG4 on Hot Bird, transponder 12.360 GHz h (SR 27500, FEC 3/4). Sex View is coded in Viaccess 2 and the package currently offers 12 channels. No firm starting date for the HDTV service has been set yet.