UK Legal News


2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   Latest  


No Better than a Lynch Mob...

Another disgraceful CPS persecution of an innocent man who watched 'twink' porn. The victim was saved when the defence was able to follow up the 2257 proof of age records mandated for US websites

Link Here 3rd November 2013
A man whose life was ruined when he was charged with child sex offences after looking at legal gay pornography in a hotel room has accused the police and Crown Prosecution Service of a homophobic witch-hunt after his case was finally thrown out.

The defendant endured a two-year nightmare after being arrested in front of his family, charged with 10 offences almost a year later and repeatedly bailed, before every charge was dropped.

The CPS, which spent tens of thousands of pounds of taxpayers' money pursuing the case, offered no evidence in court -- in effect conceding there was no case to answer. His lawyers say they gave the CPS conclusive documentary evidence three months ago that all models featured in the pornography were of legal age.

The defendant's nightmare began during a business trip in September 2011 when he viewed images on a website specialising in twink pornography. Twink is a well-known term in gay slang for small or young-looking men who are aged 18 or over. Perhaps a male equivalent to 'barely legal'

When a female guest who stayed in the same room the following week saw the computer's browsing history she complained to the hotel and staff called the police. Six months later, in March 2012, the man was arrested at his father's home.

Speaking after the trial closed the man said:

I can only conclude that the police officers and the CPS showed institutional homophobia throughout this case. I doubt I would have been treated the same way if heterosexual pornography was involved. Police... were obviously clueless about pornography -- as were the CPS.

In January this year the CPS charged the man with nine counts of making indecent images and one count of possessing indecent images.

He was represented by Myles Jackman, the leading obscenity lawyer who has won several victories in so-called porn trial cases. Mr Jackman obtained signed USC 2257 documents, required by adult websites to prove models they use are not underage, and photographs of all the men involved in the website holding up their passports, which clearly show their dates of birth.

Mr Jackman told The Independent: The CPS has at best showed an ignorance of gay culture and at worst showed itself to be institutionally homophobic. USC 2257 is extremely stringent US federal legislation which the defendant said the police were completely unaware of.

Mr Jackman said he had complained to Keir Starmer, the outgoing Director of Public Prosecutions, about the CPS's conduct in what he called the Twink Trial but is yet to receive a reply.

Comment: The CPS clearly didn't bother trying to investigate whether the pictures were actually underage

See  The evidence is mounting. Is the CPS institutionally homophobic? from by Myles Jackman

Throughout these aborted proceedings, we repeatedly stated that all the performers in question were over the age of 18. Despite this, the prosecution has always maintained that it was a matter for a jury to decide the age of the performers. However, we were able to prove how old the performers were. In spite of this the police and prosecution consistently failed to make further inquiries regarding the source and context of the images.

In June, our IT expert Paul Vella contacted the website directly. It confirmed it complied with USC Title 2257 legislation, which requires adult websites to keep records verifying a performer's age against their passport details, as well as keeping signed model release forms .

It supplied us with all these details for all the performers on the entire website. We presented these details to the prosecution immediately. It was possible to compare the passport photos of the performers in question with their pictures on the website.

Unfortunately, the prosecution in this case refused meaningfully to engage with the evidence we supplied. As a final resort, we complained to Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer QC's office. We failed to receive the reply we were promised.



Sentenced to 3.75 years for brothel keeping linked to trafficking...

Link Here 30th October 2013
A man and a woman have been jailed for operating a brothel and controlling prostitution.

Andrea Tiborne Fazekas-Vigh, 44, and Bela Halasz, 40, of Church Lane, Kingsbury were sentenced at Harrow Crown Court yesterday after earlier pleading guilty.

Fazekas-Vigh was jailed for three years and nine months for controlling prostitution and keeping a brothel for prostitution and Halasz was jailed for two years keeping a brothel.

In February this year a Hungarian woman who had been trafficked to the UK was forced to work in the brothel in Church Lane.



Dogged by Bad Judgement...

Man falls victim to an internet scam and then the Dangerous Pictures Act

Link Here 18th September 2013
  A man was found with almost 700 images of women performing sex acts with animals, including some unlikely sounding examples such as snakes, elephants and tigers  Stephen Thresh walked into a police station after receiving a scam warning message on his computer that the law authorities were monitoring him.

He handed in two laptops containing hundreds of extreme pornography without realising the spam warnings were false.

Thresh pleaded guilty at Hull Crown Court to six counts of possessing the extreme images which the judge described as a very serious matter. Thresh said he had not realised it was illegal to view such images after the law changed in 2009.

Thresh was given a four-month prison sentence, suspended for 12 months. He was ordered to have 12 months' supervision from the Probation Service and perform 60 hours of unpaid work. Thresh will not be placed on the Sex Offenders Register and the judge declined to make a Sexual Offences Prevention Order.  Judge Mark Bury told him:

You went to the police station with two laptops. You did so because one of them had effectively closed down as a result of you accessing sites containing extreme porn images. One contained 689 extreme images involving females taking part in some sex acts with animals, mainly dogs and horses.

I'm told that other animals were involved, snakes, tigers and an elephant. That number of images, depicting that level of extreme activity, is a very serious matter. Whatever the mitigation, this offence crosses the custody threshold. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

However, you handed yourself in, you were frank in interview and you pleaded guilty. It is of note that none of the images concerned involved children.



Updated: Short Changed...

Four men convicted of adult video piracy in Hull.

Link Here 15th September 2013

Four men were found guilty of pirating porn DVDs after customers complained about the poor quality of the videos to Trading Standards. In addition to being recorded badly, they were also too short.

Fred Thompson, who formerly ran an unlicensed sex shop in Hull called Adult Erotica, ran the operation aided by Shaun Langley, Nigel Maw and his son David Maw. They distributed their products, under the name Fantasy Dome, via mail order and through the Internet.

The prosecutor claimed that viewers somehow benefit from censorship by the BBFC. Somehow neglecting to mention how many films are not available to view simply because it expensive BBFC fees are uneconomic for small distribution.

Prosecutor Charlene Sumnall said:

This is not a case about the morality of porn or adult entertainment. Whether you like it or not, there is a market for legitimate porn and thousands of customers use it every day. Those customers, like any others, deserve protection from being defrauded. Just like any other release, it has to go before the film board to see if it is lawful and OK to be sold.

A jury unanimously convicted the four men after a three-week trial. Judge Murk Bury of Hull Crown Court said that sentencing will be forthcoming and may very well include jail time.

Update: Suspended prison sentences

15th September 2013. See  article from

The four men who ran a counterfeit porn DVD operation in Hull have been spared jail. The men, led by former sex shop owner Frederick Thompson, were given suspended prison sentences for their involvement in the operation.

The group copied and distributed tens of thousands of pornographic pirate DVDs.

The operation was not particularly lucrative and taxpayers will have to foot the £54,000 bill for prosecuting the group because none of them can afford to pay towards the costs.

All four were convicted of conspiracy to make, distribute and defraud customers. Shaun  Langley and both Nigel and David Maw were also convicted of possessing extreme pornographic images.

The court heard they were planning to launch a new side of the business, the Extreme shop, and had produced 10,000 flyers which were about to be sent to customers.

Fred  Thompson and Nigel Maw were both sentenced to 18 months in prison, suspended for two years. Langley was given a 12-month jail term suspended for two years, while David Maw was sentenced to a six-month prison sentence, also suspended for two years.



Party Poopers...

Miserable authorities in Hackney Wick prosecute sexy party organisers

Link Here 3rd September 2013

Three men who hired porn stars and sex workers for a series of sex parties have been convicted but thankfully spared jail.

Patrick Stewart, Russell Staddon, and Shahid Latif, hosted fun parties featuring a bondage area, a porn room, and double beds to watch each other have sex and swap partners. The orgies - advertised as gentlemen's parties - were held in Fairfield Road, Bow, and at a unit called Fun Times in Queen's Yard, Hackney Wick.

The party goers enjoyed sex with South American and eastern European women, who were paid around £ 150 for four hours work. The fun was ruined by miserable undercover police raided both addresses in September 2012.

Judge David Higgins described the orgies as deplorable , but said his sentence reflected the fact that the women were more than ready to participate.

Staddon also fell victim to the Dangerous Pictures Act after police found 28 extreme pornographic images, including two DVDs, showing women having sex with dogs.

Stewart was handed a 14-month sentence, suspended for two years, and will complete 200 hours unpaid work and pay £ 750 costs.

Staddon got 10 months, suspended for two years, and will complete 150 hours unpaid work and pay £ 250 costs.

Latif received a four-month sentence, suspended for two years, and must pay £ 75 and complete 80 hours unpaid work.

All three admitted conspiracy to control prostitution for gain and money laundering (nothing sinister, it just means spending the money gained from the business), and Staddon also admitted possessing extreme pornography.



Dangerous Justice...

Extreme sentence reduced for victim of the Dangerous Pictures Act

Link Here 25th August 2013

A victim of the Dangerous Pictures Act who was caught with a few extreme porn images has had his jail term slashed by Court of Appeal judges.

Keith Livesey had a laptop containing about 300 images, including five videos, all featuring unspecified extreme pornography. He was initially jailed for 14 months at Preston Crown Court in June, after admitting three counts of possessing extreme pornographic images. But, at a hearing in London, his sentence was cut to four months, with three of the country's most senior judges saying the original term was too long .

The court heard Livesey handed over his laptop to police and told them what they would find on it after they went to his house for an unrelated matter in October last year.

Sentencing him, the original crown court judge claimed some of the women in the images looked as though they were being exploited and that a trade in such images was only possible because of men like him who who downloaded them for pleasure.

His lawyers argued his sentence was over the top, given that he didn't pose a danger to anyone and was not likely to reoffend. The barrister said:

If there was ever a case where the clang of the prison gates itself would have been deterrent enough, bearing in mind the appellant's remorse, then this was it.

Allowing his appeal, Mr Justice Lewis said the circumstances of the case justified an element of leniency :

In our judgment, the sentence in the present case was manifestly excessive. Even though the number of extreme images involved was large and the appellant had deliberately sought them out, he had no previous convictions, was of good character and had demonstrated remorse for his actions.



Brothel Tax...

Salford man fined 75,000 for running a brothel

Link Here 12th May 2013

A Salford brothel owner who made was ordered to pay back money made from his illegal gains.

Victor Caplan ran Daniella's Massage Parlour on Bridge Street, Swinton, which police raided in 2011 -- finding prostitutes at work.

Now Caplan has been told that unless he repays £75,000 of his gains within six months he be locked up for just under two years.

Caplan was earning up to a modest £3,000 a month tax-free by running the brothel and £1,835 was discovered in cash at his property.

He pleaded guilty to two counts of assisting in the management of a brothel on June 14 last year at Manchester Crown Court and was sentenced to 12 months in prison, which was suspended for two years. He was also forced to carry out 240 hours unpaid work.



Unlicensed News...

Newcastle newsagent fined for selling R18 DVDs without a licence

Link Here 6th May 2013

The owner of a Newcastle newsagent has been fined after selling R18 porn DVDs without a sex shop licence.

The films were discovered at Mohammed Nasir's North shop when Trading Substandards staged a raid in April last year.

Among the catalogue of DVDs seized by council workers were titles including Teen Idol and Viv Thomas' La Corsetry La Femme.

Eight sample DVDs were sent to the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) who confirmed they were R18-Rated films which required a licence to sell.

Magistrates fined Nasir £ 800 and ordered him to pay £ 95 in court costs and a £ 20 victim surcharge.



16 Months Suspended Jail Sentence for Just a Few Animal Porn Pics...

Another extreme sentence for a victim of the Dangerous Pictures Act

Link Here 28th March 2013

Burnley Crown Court heard how John Turpin, 64, was snitched up by his former business partner's son when he checked the company computer.

Turpin admitted three counts of possessing extreme pornography and had been committed for sentence by Pennine magistrates. He was given 16 weeks in prison, suspended for 18 months, with a three-month curfew, seven days a week, between 8pm and 6am. He must pay £ 250 costs.

The computer was examined by police staff who found 71 animal porn images, of which a lot were in the recycle bin.

Turpin was not a collector and he had no previous convictions, the court was told.

Sentencing, Judge Robert Altham said:

It seems to me that this is a sentence that ought to be suspended. The reasons that I am suspending the sentence are that you are somebody who is unlikely to commit any further offences The fact of appearing in this court will be a highly salutary lesson to you.



Extreme Sentence...

Victim of Dangerous Pictures Act sentenced to a year in jail

Link Here 16th March 2013

A former presenter on Chinese TV has been jailed for a year for having more than 800 extreme porn videos, including footage of women being tortured, presumably BDSM videos.

Sen Luo had more than 800 video images on his laptop and hard drives, which also included bestiality. Police found the porn while conducting the usual computer scan on an unrelated fraud inquiry.

Luo was convicted at the Old Bailey last month of possessing extreme pornography. Jurors found him guilty of two counts of possessing the videos by a majority of 11-1.



Health and Safety in Reverse...

Man is fined 140K for providing safe venues for sex workers

Link Here 26th February 2013

A man hit out at authorities after he was hit with a £ 140,000 fine for running two brothels in Leeds.

Raymond Telford who has been operating the businesses in the city for more than 25 years, was ordered to pay the sum after a Proceeds of Crime Act hearing at Leeds Crown Court.

The case related to police raids on a flat in the city centre on Kirkgate and an address on Bayswater Road, Harehills, in December 2010, where prostitutes were found to be working and clients accepted they were paying for sexual services.

Reacting to the decision of the court, Telford pointed out that British law endangers sex workers:

What most people don't understand is that by closing me down they are just endangering more working girls.

They will continue working whatever happens but this time they will be doing it on their own where they are more vulnerable.

At my place the working girls were much safer, they had health visits each month by a doctor and got condoms and everything they needed. We have got to look at things in perspective.

I think if it went to a vote most people would agree that prostitution should be legalised as long as brothels are properly regulated.



Update: Arbitrary Prosecution Thrown Out...

East Staffordshire Borough Council prosecute sexy shoe shop over licence requirements

Link Here 25th January 2013

Heelz Adult Store in Burton upon Trent is being prosecuted by East Staffordshire Borough Council for trading without a licence, even though, according to the store, the council has not actually stated what percentage of sex products constitute a significant degree , and would thus require a licence.

Mike McGee, co-owner of R18 film publisher and distributor DVM Enterprises and also boss of Heelz Adult Store, told ETO:

We've been in talks with [the council] from when we first opened the shop two years ago. They visited us and said we needed a licence due to the 'significant degree' of sex products we stocked. They weren't able to put a figure to what a significant degree was at the time, but we had an interview with them last December -- under caution, making us feel like criminals, and recording it -- and asked why we'd not applied. We only hold a small range of what they class as stimulating items -- toys, whatever -- and explained this.

After the meeting they came back down in the New Year and saw that we'd taken it upon ourselves to reduce the number of 'sex items' to a small range -- as they'd not been able to tell us what was too much. They said at that time that we should ignore the deadline they'd given us to apply for a licence and we didn't hear anything more from them. Although that stockholding's not changed, we did put up a new sign calling Heelz an Adult Store -- not a sex shop -- and soon afterwards they were back in again, giving us a letter saying we needed to apply for a licence.


I'd say we've a smaller proportion of sex lines than Ann Summers, but that's not been good enough for them. A few weeks ago we were asked to go in for another meeting but while trying to get dates together for that a court summons has arrived.

...Read the full article

Update: Case dismissed due to vague council rules and definitions

25th January 2013. See article from

Stafford Magistrates Court was the scene of a sex establishment licensing row when a case brought by East Staffordshire Borough Council against Heelz Adult Store of Burton-Upon-Trent was heard by three magistrates.

Two separate charges relating to running an unlicensed sex shop were dismissed.

Earlier, the magistrates had heard from East Staffs BC's chief licensing officer Margaret Woolley who'd visited the shop in the preceding December and January, Brian Davies, an environmental health officer, and the two men sent in to make a test purchase. These men, Dwaine Drew and Liam Gratty gave conflicting evidence about the size, nature and product split of the business, and like Woolley and Davies, hadn't conducted a formal count of products, or taken measurements or photos.

Arguments centred around what constituted a sex article , with the prosecution pushing for the shop's footwear, lingerie and clothing lines to be included in a very loose interpretation of products designed to stimulate.

Magistrates explained that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the shop was selling or displaying significant numbers of sex articles and that items such as clothes, shoes and boots could not reasonably be included in their count. And since the council had no clear policy on what percentages and products made the unit trade as an unlicensed sex shop , it was unreasonable to expect Mike McGee to comply with invisible guidelines. He was found not guilty on both counts.

An application for costs was made against East Staffordshire Borough Council and they have 21 days to appeal, but this can only be done on points of law, which seems unlikely.

McGee was advised to request official, written guidance on the shop's product mix, to avoid a repeated prosecution.

...Read the full article


2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   Latest  

melonfarmers icon















Cutting Edge


Sex News


UK Internet

UK Sex News

US Sex News

World Sex News

UK P4P News
US P4P News

World P4P News

Sex Aware

Sex Toys News

Gay News
Satellite X News

UK Extreme Porn

UK Sex Shops

UK Legal News

Magazine News

Sex for Fun News

Internet Porn News

Latest R18s

Site Reviews

Latest Reviews

Online Shop Ads

Adult DVD + VoD

New & Offers

Sex Sells Links

Sex Machines

Satellite X List

Lap Dancing List

Sex Shops List

FAQ: Porn Legality

Adult DVD+VoD

Online Shop Reviews

Online Shops

New  & Offers
Sex Machines
Fucking Machines
Adult DVD Empire
Adult DVD Empire
Simply Adult
30,000+ items in stock
Low prices on DVDs and sex toys
Simply Adult
Hot Movies
Hot Movies