| 30th April |
|
|
| The first sex 'trafficking' conviction in Northern Ireland featured no coercion whatsoever Permalink
|
See article
from bbc.co.uk
|
A
man has been convicted by Belfast Crown Court of prostitution and supposed
human trafficking offences. Matyas Pis was convicted of the 'trafficking' of
two women into the UK, controlling prostitution and brothel keeping.
It is is the first conviction for 'trafficking' in Northern Ireland.
Recorder Tom Burgess imposed a sentence of 18 months imprisonment
followed by 18 months on licence.
On three occasions, between December 2010 and March 2011 Pis arranged for
two women to work in Belfast as prostitutes. The women said they asked the
Hungarian national to book their air tickets, and he provided them with an
apartment in Belfast. The women paid the defendant rent for the apartment
and paid back their travelling expenses. There was no allegation that the
women were brought or held against their will.
Judge Burgess claimed that even though there was no coercion involved,
any case of trafficking human beings was a serious case.
As this was the first time that the courts in Northern Ireland have had
the opportunity to sentence someone for trafficking offences, the recorder
set out guidance for the courts to follow until the Court of Appeal has had
an opportunity to provide an authoritative guideline.
|
| 21st April |
|
|
| Permalink |
See article
from bbc.co.uk
|
Two
women who admitted managing a brothel at a Belfast apartment block have been
jailed for two months.
Natacha Pociana from Brazil, and Sofia Matas, from Portugal, were
arrested at Victoria Place.
Belfast Magistrates' Court was told both women, of no fixed
abode, had admitted during police questioning they were working as
prostitutes.
Bail was refused to an Antrim man who appeared in court alongside
the women.
Robert Weir, 53 was charged with controlling the two women's
prostitution for gain, managing a brothel and possessing criminal
property (ie the money earned). He was remanded in custody.
|
| 28th March |
|
|
| Permalink |
See article
from bbc.co.uk
|
A
man and a woman from Birmingham have been jailed for sexually exploiting a
Romanian woman who they tricked into coming to the UK.
Romanian nationals Ionut Nicolae and Vasillica Tirei lured the victim
into leaving her homeland with a job offer. She was then forced to work as a
prostitute at a house in Birmingham and made to sleep with nearly 2,000 men.
At an earlier hearing, a jury at Birmingham Crown Court had returned
unanimous guilty verdicts.
The man, Ionut Nicolae, was sentenced to 10-and-a-half years. Vasillica
Tirei received a nine-year sentence.
|
| 25th March |
|
|
| Permalink |
See article
from maidenhead-advertiser.co.uk
|
A
man who ran a chaon of sex parlours in Maidenhead and Slough has been jailed for
three and a half years.
Kunyi He ran 10 brothels across the South-east including branches in
Portsmouth and Cambridge. He was found guilty of conspiring to keep brothels
for the purpose of prostitution by a jury following a two-week trial.
Judge Peter Ross told the court Kunyi He worked as a partner in crime
with his ex-girlfriend Ai Ju Su and Manjit Singh to run the brothels. But He
took home the largest share of the profit which amounted to at least
£200,000.
Kunyi He used fake ID's to pay rent, council tax, and to buy
advertisement in the local press advertising high class oriental massages
with a full, passionate service. Judge Ross said: One of the most
serious features in relation to your case is the use of a forged passport.
This court has seen this item and its high quality.
He's partners are due to be sentenced later at the same court.
|
| 13th March |
|
|
| Victim of the Dangerous Pictures Act fined 1,200 and placed on supervision for 3 years Permalink
|
See article
from halesowennews.co.uk
|
A
victim of the Dangerous Pictures Act who was caught in possession of around
2,400 pornographic images has been placed on Supervision for three years.
Judge John Warner made it a condition Robert Dunkley attends
the Sex Offenders Group as he stressed, Some effort must be
made to address your predeliction for this sort of sexual
behaviour.
Dunkley, a man of previous good character, said he had
downloaded the images and he admitted he was interested in
bestiality. He pleaded guilty to possessing extreme pornography
and he was further made the subject of a Sexual Offenders
Protection Order and told he must pay
£1,200 costs.
The judge said Dunkley had already been punished by his
admission to having the images which featured bestiality and it
was clear he had also engaged in chatroom conversations about
the subject. He told Dunkley:
Having these items is firmly against the law. Although
you tried to delete them you weren't successful and there
was always the risk someone else could come across them.
Havinderpal Dhami prosecuting said a visitor to Dunkley's
home accessed his computer and after the images were found the
police were notified.
|
| 27th February |
|
|
| Woman jailed for 3 years for running brothels in north London Permalink
|
See article
from london24.com
|
Tugba
Atila was sentenced to 3 years in jail for managing 15 brothels in Tottenham and
Wood Green.
They were staffed largely by women from eastern Europe who serviced local
Turkish men, Southwark Crown Court heard.
The business was ended after undercover police carried out test
purchases at one establishment in Seven Sisters Road, South Tottenham.
Atila denied four charges of controlling prostitution for gain and
another of possessing criminal property at a trial last month -- but is on
the run after failing to turn up to court a week later.
Sentencing her in her absence, Judge Michael Gledhill QC said: I'm
satisfied she ran these premises in a bullying and dictatorial way,
exploiting the vulnerability of these women, who for whatever reasons had
fallen into prostitution as a means of making a living and who ended up
working for her.
Susannah Stevens, prosecuting, said Atila and other brothel managers
shared the working girls between 15 addresses. The working girls had to give
up to half of their earnings to the brothel's controller.
Atila's helper Nesrin Coskun was jailed for eight months after being
convicted of assisting in the management of a brothel.
|
| 4th February |
|
|
| London campaign to close unlicensed sex shops aims to complete by the start of the Olympics Permalink full story: Sex Shops in London...God created sex shop whingers in Islington
|
See article
from westendextra.com
|
Another
unlicensed Soho sex shop on Walkers Court has been warned to cease
trading as part of Westminster Council's long-running campaign against
unlicensed shops selling hardcore DVDs.
Westminster Council allows a limited number of vendors of adult DVDs,
magazines and sex toys to trade in the West End, but such businesses are
obliged to pay extortionate licence fees that cost about
£30,000 per year.
Enterprise chief Councillor Brian Connell said licensing council
staff were working hard to put the remaining unlicensed sex shops in the
streets and alleyways around Brewer Street out of business. Connell told
the West End Extra:
In my view, cleaning up the worst excesses
of this trade is good for London and good for Westminster.
It's what we said we would do prior to the
Olympics, so it is delivering on a commitment, and it also has the
effect of making sure that legitimate businesses don't run the risk
of losing market share.
In 1999 Soho had 61 unlicensed sex shops. It now has nine, and of
these, the courts are set to hear three closure hearings in the coming
year. The council's declared intention is for no unlicensed sex DVD
shops to remain operational by the start of the Olympics.
Update: Meanwhile in Islington
3rd February 2012. See article
from islingtontribune.com
Islington's last unlicensed sex shop has shut after a council raid
found unclassified DVDs on the premises. Trading SubStandards and
licensing staff visited DJD Retail, trading as Bookshop, at York Way in
May last year, and seized DVDs and videos.
The sole officer of the company, David Darbo, pleaded guilty to eight
offences under the Video Recordings Act 1984 at Highbury Magistrates'
Court last month.
Darbo was fined £3,150 and
ordered to pay £1,449 costs. DJD
Retail admitted eight offences and was fined
£100 for one offence.
|
| 9th January |
|
|
| Making a Fist of It: The Law and Obscenity Permalink full story: Obscenity in the UK...Gay fisting, urolagnia and BDSM found not obscene by jury
|
See
article from
freedominapuritanage.co.uk by Chris Ashford
|
Chris
Ashford has written an excellent report of the trial:
On Friday 6 January 2012, a historic case came to a
conclusion in Courtroom 7 of Southwark Crown Court in Courtroom 7.
Michael Peacock was unanimously acquitted, after a four-day trial that
saw the outdated obscenity law of England and Wales in the dock.
Peacock had been charged under the Obscene
Publications Act 1959 for allegedly distributing obscene gay
DVDs, which featured fisting, urolagnia ('watersports') and BDSM.
Peacock had advertised the DVDs through Craigslist,
his own website (which also promoted his services as a male escort), and
in a magazine. The Human Exploitation and Organised Crime Command (SCD9)
or London's Metropolitan Police --- which encompasses the former Obscene
Publications Squad --- saw the advert and began an investigation.
...Read the full
article
|
| 7th January |
|
|
| Jury clears gay fisting, urolagnia and BDSM DVDs of obscenity Permalink full story: Obscenity in the UK...Gay fisting, urolagnia and BDSM found not obscene by jury
|
See article
from solicitorsjournal.com
|
R
v Peacock
Michael Peacock has been acquitted of all charges after a unanimous jury
decision to find Peacock not guilty on 6 counts of obscenity.
Michael Peacock (referred to in the gay porn world as Sleazy Michael) had been
charged for distributing supposedly obscene DVDs including representation of gay
fisting, urolagnia and BDSM.
The trial was heard before the Southwark Crown Court. The
films in question feature: gay fisting (the insertion of five fingers of the
fist into the rectum of another male); urolagnia (in this case men urinating
in their clothes, onto each others' bodies and drinking it); and BDSM (in
this case hard whipping, the insertion of needles, urethral sounds and
electrical torture). Also there was an example of a staged non
consensual scene.
The Obscene Publications Act 1959 features the contentious and ambiguous
deprave and corrupt test, whereby an article (for example a DVD) is
obscene if it tends to deprave and corrupt the reader, viewer or listener.
The Test is defined in Section1 of the Act as:
An article shall be deemed to be obscene if its
effect or (where the article comprises two or more distinct items) the
effect of any one of its items is, if taken as a whole, such as to tend
to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all
relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the matter contained or
embodied in it.
Peacock was represented by Nigel Richardson and Sandra Paul of Hodge
Jones and Allen
Myles Jackman, a solicitor specialising in obscenity law, said this
outcome was a significant victory for common sense suggesting that the
OPA has been rendered irrelevant in the digital age.
In a tweet, Jackman said that SCD9, the Metropolitan Police unit dealing
with human exploitation and organised crime, will meet with the Crown
Prosecution Service and the British Board of Film Classification to review
guidelines on obscenity.
And of course the authorities will be considering whether the law itself
now needs changing. No doubt nutter campaigners will now be pushing for
something new to replace the OPA now that it no longer supports their
censorial views.
Speculation: So what may be the outcome at least
in terms of BBFC censorship of R18s?
The
BBFC have been cutting all such material citing the current interpretation
of the Obscene Publications Act. But now of course this will change. The
BBFC will still be at liberty to cut scenes off their own bat. And indeed
the board has been regularly cutting scenes involving penetration by objects
that could possibly result in harm justified via its own guidelines.
I think there will be a few changes welcomed by all sides. The current
prohibition of female squirting leaves everyone totally baffled as to why.
This prohibition can now be rapidly dropped. Perhaps urolagnia can now be
generally allowed albeit with restrictions when it is considered by the
censors to be degrading.
Perhaps something similar with fisting which could be generally allowed
with a proviso that it must not be seen to be causing any discomfort to
those participating.
The BDSM issue is not going to be easy. The current ban is at least easy
to explain. To allow any level of hurt beyond trifling may prove very
difficult to define. Maybe it is still banned by legislation examined during
the notable Spanner Case, the judgement of which basically disallows people
from giving consent to be hurt. So perhaps the BBFC will just switch
justifications but continue to ban BDSM.
And I don't suppose that the non-consensual scene will impact BBFC
guidelines at all. This will no doubt continue to be banned from R18s.
|
| 7th January |
|
|
| Requesting a Judicial Review to ask if Westminster Council is really spending 30,000 to administer a single sex shop licence? Permalink
|
See article
from westendextra.com
|
A
sex shop owner hopes to mount a court challenge against Westminster Council in
what could be a landmark case for Soho's erotica retailers.
Tim Hemming, who owns Simply Pleasure in Brewer Street, fears the
cash-strapped council may be exploiting sex shop licence fees as a way of
filling its coffers. He is seeking a judicial review.
A Westminster licence to operate a sex shop costs nearly
£30,000 a year. Hemming, who owns 35
licensed sex shops nationwide, said:
This is supposed to be a non-profit-making fee, so
they should be spending all this money on enforcement and
administration. We don't believe they have got the evidence to prove
they have been doing that.
I pay somewhere in the region of
£200,000 yearly in licence fees.
It's a strain on our bottom line.
He said the fees should be capped at £1,000
a year.
A decision on his review bid is due later this year.
The West End Extra understands his bid is being backed by five other
central London adult DVD retailers who have attended summits on the
issue over the past months.
|
| 5th January |
|
|
| Contested jury trial seems to be accepted as a test case to decide on the legality of depictions of fisting, urolagnia and BDSM Permalink full story: Obscenity in the UK...Gay fisting, urolagnia and BDSM found not obscene by jury
|
3rd January 2012. See article
from obscenitylawyer.blogspot.com
|
The
3rd January 2012 marks the first day of the most significant obscenity trial
of the decade; which will ultimately clarify the law on the representation
of gay fisting, urolagnia as well as BDSM.
The defendant in the case, Michael Peacock, is charged on indictment with
numerous offences under the Obscene Publications Act for distributing
supposedly obscene DVDs.
The Obscene Publications Act 1959 features the contentious and ambiguous
deprave and corrupt test, whereby an article (for example a DVD) is
obscene if it tends to deprave and corrupt the reader, viewer or listener.
The Test is defined in Section1 of the Act as:
An article shall be deemed to be obscene if its
effect or (where the article comprises two or more distinct items) the
effect of any one of its items is, if taken as a whole, such as to tend
to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all
relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the matter contained or
embodied in it.
In this trial, which will be heard before the Southwark Crown Court, the
films in question feature: gay fisting (the insertion of five fingers of the
fist into the rectum of another male); urolagnia (in this case men urinating
in their clothes, onto each others' bodies and drinking it); and BDSM (in
this case hard whipping, the insertion of needles, urethral sounds and
electrical torture).
These activities feature on the current list of what the Crown
Prosecution Service (CPS) currently consider to be obscene. Ultimately
though, it is a matter for a jury to decide whether these acts are obscene
by virtue of whether they deprave and corrupt the viewer.
Interestingly this case seems to have found unofficial tacit support from
the BBFC; and the Metropolitan Police's Abusive and Extreme Images Unit (the
Met's old obscene publications squad is now part of SCD9): on the basis that
this case will establish whether the depiction of fisting and urination
pornography is legal or not.
Hence, if the jury decides that such pornography is not obscene, on the
basis that it does not deprave and corrupt the viewer; then it is entirely
likely that both the producers and distributors of pornography will make
such material available for sale, for example via licensed sex shops.
Consequently, this significant obscenity prosecution will either reaffirm
or rearrange the boundaries of obscenity law.
Mr Peacock is represented by Hodge Jones and Allen LLP..
...Read the full article
Update: Follow Live on Twitter
5th January 2012. See article
from lawandsexuality.blogspot.com
The
#ObscenityTrial involving the issue of fisting (among others) goes into day
three today.
If you're not already doing so, be sure to follow on twitter the
excellent activist and scholar,
@lexingtondymock. I'd also suggest following the journalist
@NichiHodgson. Both have been providing fascinating coverage through
their live tweets from the courtroom.
Many of the exchanges today would be comical, were they not so serious.
|
| 5th January |
|
|
| An end to the case of police and CPS persecution of the victim of a violent robbery Permalink full story: Sheila Farmer...Sex worker persecuted for trying to work safely
|
See press
release via thierryschaffauser.wordpress.com
|
Sheila
Farmer, a sex worker who worked with other women from premises for safety
had charges of brothel-keeping dismissed in Croydon Crown Court. She worked
with other women since being viciously raped and attacked whilst working
alone.
Ms Farmer left court with over 20 supporters delighted and
relieved that she no longer faces a criminal conviction and
possible prison sentence. Ms Farmer suffers from severe diabetes
and a malignant brain tumour. Her doctor had provided evidence
that an onerous and stressful trial would have exacerbated her
condition.
Sheila Farmer commented:
Whilst I'm relieved not to be
facing trial I am angry that I was prosecuted. Will the
person who made that decision now be held accountable for
the 18 months of distress and upset I have suffered while
waiting for this case to come to court? Safety and survival
has always been my priority. Like hundreds of other women I
was working to support my son and more recently to pay for
cancer treatment. I would never have got through this ordeal
without the English Collective of Prostitutes. Without
campaigning we may not have got this result.
Cari Mitchell, English Collective of Prostitutes commented:
Sheila Farmer's bravery in publicly
fighting these charges should be commended. She, like many
other sex workers, should never have been forced to choose
between safety and legality. Why is it legal to work alone
but not with others? The prostitution laws are endangering
women and should be abolished. Why are police wasting time
and money prosecuting sex workers while rapists and racists
go free?
Ms Farmer's trial was thrown out because of police and
prosecution incompetence -- witnesses had not been asked to
attend court and a key witness could not be found. Ms Farmer has
attended court six times and the case has been listed to start
on two previous occasions.
How much public money has been squandered on this
investigation and prosecution? How many other investigations are
being neglected as a result?
The conviction of two of Stephen Lawrence's murderers reminds
us once again that the priorities of police and prosecution fly
in the face of public opinion. Why did it take 18 years to try
and convict these dangerous criminals while sex workers who do
no harm are quickly arrested and jailed? The ECP has received
multiple reports of violent robberies by a gang of five men in
East London. The only police action has been to threaten the
victims with prosecution. Why are women who report violence
arrested while their attackers are not pursued?
Ms Farmer's legal team requested figures on the number of
attacks against sex workers to demonstrate the high level of
violence they face when working alone and the need for
protection. The Metropolitan police said that no such figures
are gathered. Why not? How can prostitution law and policy be
assessed if their impact on sex workers' safety and welfare is
not known?
Ms Farmer was represented by solicitor Nigel Richardson,
Hodge, Jones and Allen and barrister Anna Morris, Garden Court
Chambers. Supporters in court included representatives from
Women Against Rape, the Sex Worker Open University and X:talk.
|
|
|