The
Vatican condemned Britain's proposed equality law, complaining that
legislation to give homosexual equal rights violates natural law.
The Vatican launched an unprecedented attack on the human rights
policies of Gordon Brown, claiming that they threatened religious
freedom and urging Catholic bishops to fight back with missionary
zeal.
The Archbishop of Westminster, the Most Rev Vincent Nichols, added
his voice to the assault, describing the new equality legislation as
unjust.
In what was interpreted as an attack on Harriet Harman's Equality
Bill, which is going through Parliament, the Pope urged the 35 Catholic
bishops from England and Wales in Rome on a five-yearly ad limina visit
to make a united stand against it. He claimed that the proposed equal
rights laws threatened longstanding British traditions of freedom
of speech.
The Pope's words indicated the level of Catholic anger, shared at the
highest levels of the Church of England, at the Labour Government's
repeated moves to marginalise religion in public life.
The Pope said: Your country is well known for its firm commitment
to equality of opportunity for all members of society. Yet, as you have
rightly pointed out, the effect of some of the legislation designed to
achieve this goal has been to impose unjust limitations on the freedom
of religious communities to act in accordance with their beliefs. In
some respects it actually violates the natural law upon which the
equality of all human beings is grounded and by which it is guaranteed.
Protest the Pope
Based on
article
from
timesonline.co.uk
Surprise
at the Pope's remarks is giving way to more determined opposition to his
views, with the National Secular Society vowing to set up a Protest the
Pope campaign to hold demonstrations during Benedict's visit this year.
Aware of the growing controversy, the Most Rev Vincent Nichols, in
Rome leading the 34 other bishops of England and Wales on an ad limina,
or five-yearly visit to see the Pope, said that Benedict XVI was only
saying publicly what many devout people believed.
I think [the Pope's] words will find an echo in many in our
country who are uneasy that perhaps one of the unintended consequences
of recent legislation is to drive religious belief and practice into the
sphere of the private only, the Archbishop said. Related Links
Archbishop Nichols told the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 that the
Pope had a right to express his views, which he denied were party
political: The way in which our public life is organised is something
to which everybody has a right to contribute.
The National Secular Society has threatened to bring together gay
groups, victims of clerical abuse, feminists, family planning
organisations and pro-abortion groups in a new group, the Protest the
Pope Coalition, to be launched later this week.
The taxpayer in this country is going to be faced with a bill of
some £20 million for the visit of the Pope, a visit in which, he has
already indicated, he will attack equal rights and promote
discrimination, said Terry Sanderson, the society's president: We
have a petition online where people can make clear their opposition to
the state funding of this visit.
Peter Tatchell, the human rights campaigner, was also among those
planning online petitions against the visit: [The Pope] seems to be
defending discrimination by religious institutions and demanding that
they should be above the law.
Comment:
A Bloke in a Dress
7th February 2010. Based on
article
from
readingchronicle.co.uk
Reading MP Martin Salter came under fire when he enraged Catholics by
attacking the Pope in an internet blog.
The Labour MP sparked lively debate on a national newspaper website with
his near 700 word defence of the Government's Equality Bill in which he
described the Pontiff as a bloke in a dress.
Salter accused Pope Benedict XVI of being deliberately misleading in his
argument against the proposed legislation, adding: I find the
hypocrisy of the Pope reprehensible, especially in a leader of a Church
that internationally covered up its own institutionalised abuse.
See
Salter's blog post
from
blogs.telegraph.co.uk