| 1st February |
|
|
| |
BBC Trust explain why the BBC censored the words 'Free Palestine' from a rap performance Permalink
|
See article
from indcatholicnews.com
|
The
BBC has admitted it was overcautious in editing the word Palestine
from an artist's performance on Radio 1Xtra and has said it is looking to
learn from the way it handled the situation.
However the BBC Trust said the final content that was
broadcast on the music programme Charlie Sloth Hip Hop
M1X, was not biased and therefore did not breach its
editorial guidelines.
The Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) has spent eight
months trying to find out why the decision was made to censor
the lyrics of a freestyle performance by the rapper, Mic
Righteous. Appearing on the Charlie Sloth show in February 2011,
he sang: I can scream Free Palestine for my beliefs.
BBC producers replaced the word Palestine with the
sound of breaking glass, and the censored performance was
repeated in April on the same show.
Amena Saleem, of PSC, said: In its correspondence with us,
the BBC said the word Palestine isn't offensive, but 'implying
that it is not free is the contentious issue, and this is
why the edit was made.
|
| 15th January |
|
|
| |
Complaints about the not quite so nude scenes in the pre-watershed TV show Sherlock Permalink
|
5th January 2012. See article
from guardian.co.uk
|
Yesterday
the Daily Mail ran one of their
nonsense outrage stores saying:
Families settling down to watch the
Corporation's latest Sir Arthur Conan Doyle adaptation,
Sherlock, were shocked to see actress Lara Pulver,
playing the great detective's romantic interest Irene Adler,
strolling around with no clothes on a full 25 minutes before
9pm.
And of course to back up their claims of 'shocked' families they could no better
than find a few random tweets on the subject.
Now the Guardian reports that the BBC have received 100
complaints about the nude scenes. The BBC also adds that it will
not edit out nude scenes from the new series of Sherlock when
the hit drama is repeated from 7pm this weekend on digital
channel BBC3.
The Guardian also points out that perhaps the scenes weren't
quite so nude as we were led to believe:
In the New Year's Day episode, A
Scandal in Belgravia, Benedict Cumberbatch's Sherlock
Holmes meets his match in the form of Adler, who is naked
when they first meet. However, thanks to the camera angles
and Pulver's carefully placed arms and hands, viewers do not
see her completely naked.
The footage of actress Lara Pulver, who
plays dominatrix Irene Adler, led to criticism from the
Daily Mail for showing the scenes before the 9pm watershed.
Sherlock was broadcast on BBC1 over 90 minutes from 8.10pm
on Sunday.
The Guardian also asks whether the complaints were in
response to the actual TV showing or perhaps more to do with the
Daily Mail story:
A spokesman for the BBC said that due to
the bank holiday it could not tell when the complaints had
been made, or how many came before and after the Daily Mail
story.
Update: BBC Response
15th January 2012. See article
from bbc.co.uk
Complaint
We've received complaints from some viewers
who felt certain scenes in Sherlock, which was broadcast on 1st
January 2012, were unsuitable before the watershed.
Our response
We were very careful to make sure the
portrayal of any nudity was discussed during the early stages of
planning for this episode of Sherlock, in order to ensure it was
appropriate for a pre-watershed audience.
The sequence where Irene Adler meets
Sherlock for the first time was filmed in such a way as to offer
a suggestion of her nudity. Each scene was carefully framed and
the actors positioned so any explicit nudity was avoided, the
aim being a slightly flirtatious and humorous encounter between
the characters.
With regards to any suggestive language and
innuendo which featured in the episode, this was also carefully
considered and we believed was sufficiently mild enough and
wouldn't exceed the expectations of a pre-watershed audience.
It certainly wasn't our intention to cause
offence and in large we've received very positive feedback from
viewers.
|
| 15th December |
|
|
| |
Christy Moore song winds up the easily offended in Ulster Permalink
|
See article
from belfasttelegraph.co.uk
|
The
BBC have apologised over a song aired by Radio Ulster in a late morning slot.
Veteran broadcaster Gerry Anderson played a song about a lads
mini-break in Amsterdam, which featured drunken escapades,
rolling joints, bar brawls and dancing with transvestites.
Listeners to Radio Ulster were reported to be 'shocked' by
the language in the song, which included the 'uncensored swear
word' 'shite' and plain English references to sex toys and drug
taking.
The song, Weekend in Amsterdam by folk musician
Christy Moore, led to complaints after Anderson played it on his
show before lunchtime.
An angry Belfast Telegraph reader said they were outraged
after hearing the song on a morning programme at a time when
young children could have been listening: Surely this must be
the most obscene song ever broadcast on BBC Radio Ulster. No
bleeps either, mind.
The song details a madcap weekend in the Dutch capital, which
begins in a cafe where they smoke hashish and go to a bar to
listen to a band they criticise as being shite. They then
go to the red light district, where one of them dances with a
transvestite before getting into a fight and running from the
local police.
One verse goes:
Macker sez while we're here we'll go and
have a look at the kinky gear
I said a quiet prayer I wouldn't bump into anyone from
Kildare
Big dildos, blow-up dolls, snap-on tools and hairy balls
Vibrators, whips and chains, zips and fanny ticklers
God between us and all harm
0 The Weekend that we spent in Amsterdam
East Londonderry MP, Gregory Campbell. said such lyrics
should not be aired before the 9pm watershed. Given that this
was a morning listening audience, hopefully the BBC will take
fairly stringent action to put in place procedures to make sure
that similar types of lyrics aren't broadcast at that time of
the day again.
A spokesperson for Radio Ulster said the song has now been
removed from the playlist. We apologise for any offence
caused, she said.
|
| 14th December |
|
|
| |
BBC director general defends Jeremy Clarkson from parliamentary calls for his sacking Permalink full story: Top Gear...Top Gear and Jeremy Clarkson wind up whingers
|
See article
from independent.co.uk
|
BBC
director general Mark Thompson defended Jeremy Clarkson to the House of Commons
Culture, Media and Sport Committee. He said that Clarkson's comments were
said entirely in jest and were not intended to be taken seriously and that
he would not be sacked.
Challenged by committee member Jim Sheridan to sack Clarkson,
BBC Trust chairman Lord Patten said: Were we to sack him for
saying something pretty stupid that would set precedents that
mean a lot of people would never get to broadcast.
Thompson said: Although clearly he's a polarising figure
for the BBC, there are many millions of people who enjoy and
support Jeremy Clarkson. That has to be balanced against a
couple of flippant remarks in one programme.
|
| 10th December |
|
|
| |
BBC postpones Stephen Fry's QI lest nutters are offended by the rapid reappearance of Jeremy Clarkson Permalink full story: Top Gear...Top Gear and Jeremy Clarkson wind up whingers
|
Thanks to David who comments
Cowards, giving in to a campaign by the tabloids, who have
mobilised tens of thousands of people who never even saw the One
Show incident but were told what to think he said. And
the thing about train suicides wasn't two days later, it was in
the same show...
See
article from
uk.news.yahoo.com
|
The
BBC has postponed an episode of QI featuring Jeremy Clarkson to avoid
being criticised for putting him back on air so soon after his joke
unappreciated joke about shooting striking public employees.
The programme was filmed over the summer but the channel
said, in light of the recent events, some of his comments might
be taken out of context. The BBC said:
It is not unusual for the running order
of programmes to change. The billed episode of QI will be
shown at a later date.
Yahoo! reports incorrectly that Two days after his rant about
the protesters, the 51-year-old became embroiled in further
controversy after calling people who throw themselves under
trains selfish.
|
| 6th December |
|
|
| |
Clarkson successfully winds up 31,000 easily offended whingers Permalink full story: Top Gear...Top Gear and Jeremy Clarkson wind up whingers
|
See article
from mirror.co.uk
See
Clarkson Powered Up from
amazon.co.uk
|
Top
Gear presenter Jeremy Clarkson's appearance on The One Show is set to
be one of the most complained-about TV shows of all time after the number of
complaints made topped 31,000.
As of this morning, the tally complaints morning had reached
31,057, more than 10,000 up on the last published figure from
Friday morning of 21,000.
Ofcom also received hundreds of complaints about the
interview. The media regulator is not set to publish an update
until Wednesday, but reports suggest there have been an
additional 500 to 1,000 complaints, taking the total number of
complaints close to 32,000.
Clarkson Powered Up
See
article from
guardian.co.uk
HMV says sales of Clarkson's Powered Up DVD have
soared after he said public sector strikers should be shot
Powered Up, in which Clarkson relocates with the Stig
to the south of France to find his favourite car of the Year,
doubled on Thursday and saw a similar jump on Friday.
The retailer would have expected sales of the title, along
with man other DVDs, to spike in the runup to Christmas. But
industry sources suggested that the Clarkson controversy and
ensuing media coverage would have been responsible for as much
as a 25% to 50% increase across high street and online sales.
An HMV spokesman said:
We've found in the past that controversy
involving artists, with all the media coverage this
generates, can often boost sales of their products.
Clarkson is one of those 'Marmite'
personalities that you probably either love or hate, and the
chances are that many of the public he upset weren't likely
to be among his fans in the first place, while people who do
appreciate his sense of humour and follow him on TV may have
felt prompted to go out and buy his Powered Up DVD over the
weekend.
|
| 5th December |
|
|
| |
BBC issues a response to complaints about Jeremy Clarkson's strike joke and a nutter MP tries to invoke a parliamentary rebuke Permalink full story: Top Gear...Top Gear and Jeremy Clarkson wind up whingers
|
See article
from bbc.co.uk
|
The
BBC has published a response to complaints about Jeremy Clarkson's jolly gape
that strikers should be shot. The BBC said:
As has now been widely reported, we had
many complaints about a number of Jeremy Clarkson's comments
on the show. The One Show is a live topical programme
which often reflects the day's talking points. Usually we
get it right, but on this occasion we feel the item wasn't
perfectly judged.
The presenters apologised at the end of
the programme to viewers who were offended by his comments
and the BBC and Jeremy would like to apologise for any
offence caused. Jeremy has said: I didn't for a moment
intend these remarks to be taken seriously -- as I believe
is clear if they're seen in context. If the BBC and I have
caused any offence, I'm quite happy to apologise for it
alongside them.
Meanwhile the Labour MP of Kingston Upon Hull East, Karl Turner, has proposed an
early day motion whingeing about Clarkson as follows:
That this House condemns the disgraceful
and disgusting remarks made by Jeremy Clarkson on the BBC;
notes that his comments have been criticised by thousands of
licence payers, hon. Members and unions; believes that his
remarks were inflammatory and have left workers and their
children shocked and upset; further believes that high
profile TV presenters have influence on their audience and
should act with responsibility at all times; calls on the
Government to give a full response; and urges the BBC
Director General to commence disciplinary proceedings.
|
| 5th December |
|
|
| |
BBC answers criticism that its shortlist for the BBC Sports Personality of the Year 2011 features only men Permalink
|
See article
from bbc.co.uk
|
Complaint
We received complaints about the lack of
women nominated for the BBC Sports Personality of the Year 2011.
BBC response
We recognise that the all-male line-up has
created much debate amongst viewers of the programme,
sports-lovers in general and those that champion the cause of
Women's sport in this country. We have had many different points
made in the reaction we receive which informs our editorial
discussions and we do value it. We have reported all this
feedback widely across the BBC and in order to ensure we use the
licence fee as efficiently as possible we are sending this
response to the issues from our Director of Sport, Barbara
Slater to everyone who has contacted us which addresses as many
of the detailed points raised by everyone as we are able to:
The shortlist comprises some of the
finest sports stars on the planet. Everyone is rightly proud of
their achievements over the last year, the role they play in
inspiring younger generations and the credit they deliver back
for the UK. I share the disappointment that the independently
determined shortlist does not include any British Sportswomen.
There were some worthy female candidates and I should recap how
the selection process works.
The shortlist of the ten British sports
stars is determined by the combined votes of a panel of industry
experts based on their assessment of relative sporting
achievements during the year. The panel consists of the sport
editors of the national newspapers, selected regionals and
magazines. These are chosen because of their expertise in the
area, their coverage of a wide range of sports throughout the
year and the extent of their readership. In total, we received
27 responses from the 35 invitations that were issued this year.
The panel included publications such as the Sunday Times, the
Daily Mail, the Irish News, the Mirror, the Daily Telegraph,
Sport Magazine and the Herald. It is worth noting that most of
the publications did include at least one sportswoman in their
shortlist.
The inclusion of publications such as
Nuts and Zoo in the shortlisting panel is for a variety of
reasons. These magazines have a dedicated sports section which
every week covers a range of sports including Women's sport and
minority sports. They also have a readership profile which
reaches younger audiences and helps contribute to a balanced
panel which is representative of all the BBC's audiences. There
are very few other widely-read publications that cover such a
breadth of sporting news, features and reports on a regular
basis. We do not include specialist sporting publications given
their potential inherent bias to one particular sport nor do we
canvas the views of non-sporting publications.
The current system was introduced in 2006
and at least two women have always previously been shortlisted
for the main award. Having considered a wide range of
alternative mechanisms, we remain convinced that the current
system is fair, independent and robust. Previous top 10
candidates included in 2010 Jessica Ennis (3rd) and Amy Williams
whilst 2009 saw Jessica Ennis (3rd) and Beth Tweddle. In 2008
Rebecca Adlington (3rd), Nicole Cooke, Christine Ohuruogu and
Rebecca Romero all made the Top 10 as did Paula Radcliffe and
Christine Ohuruogu in 2007. In 2006 Nicole Cooke, Beth Tweddle
and Zara Phillips were nominated with Zara winning the award.
This is therefore the first time there has been no female
representation since the current system was put in place five
years ago. The ultimate winner of the award is determined solely
by a public telephone vote during the show itself.
We stand by the current voting process
but have committed to take on board what has happened this year
and we will review the shortlisting process for next year's
show. It is too early to say what, if any changes will be made
to the process but please rest assured that we will seek the
opinions of people both within and outside of the BBC before
deciding on the appropriate methodology for 2012.
The current focus on the shortlist for
the Sports Personality of the Year Award has shone a bright
light on the wider issues surrounding the media coverage and
profile of Women's sport in the UK. As I'm sure you are aware,
the BBC is committed to covering a broad range of sports and
events and this includes a significant commitment to Women's
sport. The BBC is proud to have followed the achievements of
many successful sportswomen through our coverage of events such
as the Olympics, the Commonwealth Games, Wimbledon and the
Women's Football World Cup.
I trust that I have addressed your
questions satisfactorily and made clear the BBC's commitment to
a fair selection process. This year's shortlist for the main
award represents six very different sports and has candidates
from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. It is
disappointing that the independent process did not result in the
shortlisting of a female candidate; but we believe it does not
detract from the incredible array of British talent that will
compete for the 58th Sports Personality of the Year Award.
Barbara Slater, Director of Sport
|
| 2nd December |
|
|
| |
BBC boss enjoys a little strong language in her comedy Permalink
|
See article
from telegraph.co.uk
|
One
of the BBC's most senior executives, Caroline Thomson, has
reportedly said it is acceptable to feature strong language in
television comedies.
The BBC's chief operating officer suggested one of the main
criteria for comedy shows was to cause offence and to make her
flinch. But I think sometimes that is one of the
points of comedy. It is very tricky because language that
will give you offence, won't give me offence. And language
which gives me serious offence won't give my son offence.
Speaking at the annual Voice of the Listener and Viewer
conference, she explained that there was an enormous
intergenerational difference about what is acceptable.
Vivienne Pattison, director of campaign group Mediawatch UK,
claimed the comments were out of step with her audience.
Ofcom do research every year asking if there is too much
swearing on TV. And every year, more than 50 per cent of the
viewers say there is too much, she told the newspaper.
The idea that bad language in comedy is good -- it's not
big, it's not clever and it's not funny.
|
| 14th November |
|
|
| |
Chris Patten of the BBC speaks against Ofcom style censorship for the press Permalink
|
Based on
article from
bbc.co.uk
|
Speech
by Chris Patten, Chairman of the BBC Trust, to the Society of
Editors Annual Conference on 13th November 2011.
Why the BBC needs a free press
I may have in due course to explain the
standards we apply to our journalism at the BBC to the Leveson
Inquiry. If so, I hope I can make a convincing case that the
sort of regulation that covers us is appropriate for
broadcasters but would not work for newspapers.
There is a kind of symbiosis between the BBC
and the press. We do different but complementary things. The BBC
depends on the press for some of its news agenda and it gives
some stories back to the press to pursue further. The style of
the tabloids is not something we could or should try to match.
But nor should we be snobbish or squeamish about it. The Sun
under Kelvin McKenzie added (to use the word in the
old-fashioned sense) to the gaiety of the nation. I still have a
copy of The Sun's front page Up Yours Delors, written of
course by our Diplomatic Correspondent. Trevor Kavanagh
is plainly one of the outstanding political writers of his
generation. I have not always agreed with The Daily Mail
(perhaps I am guilty of understatement) but I greatly admired
its brave campaign in pursuit of the murderers of Stephen
Lawrence and -- which I trust won't annoy him too much -- I try
not to miss Quentin Letts. It may be that I have always been
more relaxed about the tabloids than some former political
colleagues because I have never been convinced that they set the
political agenda decisively. I used to be the Chairman of the
Conservative Party. When after the election in 1992 we heard
that it was the Sun wot won it, I reflected on the fact
that our polling throughout the election campaign had shown that
most of the public and its readers thought it was a Labour
newspaper. Max Hastings is right to argue that political leaders
demean themselves by the amount that they court the press.
Looking back over the years it is clear that at least one very
famous proprietor waited until it was pretty plain who would win
an election and then threw his weight behind the predicted
victor.
So I have no wish to turn our tabloids into
trimmed down versions of The Church Times. Their vigour is an
important part of the liveliness of our democracy. Free speech,
and therefore that vitality, would truly be damaged if a single
group of people, beholden to and perhaps even appointed by
politicians, were to have the power to decide what should or
should not be published. Statutory regulation of the press would
in my view be more than wrong-headed, it would pose a real
danger to the public discourse that underpins our democracy.
Only the press can reform the press
So the responsibility to ensure high
standards of professionalism rests with journalists, their
editors and their proprietors. My rather prosaic conclusion is
that newspapers have to be given the chance to find their own
solution -- although I note that already there is talk of
Ombudsmen and backstop powers to help make any new system work.
But how can you give a system of
self-regulation -- a form of accountability that newspapers
invariably scorn when others advocate it for their own
industries and professions -- the credibility that the public
seek?
It is particularly important because
newspapers have played and continue to play a fundamental role
in our democratic life. They can continue to do so - in
particular if they can carve out a distinctive role and a
position of trust in and amongst the din of the internet. They
can help to close the democratic deficit that risks opening up
in that new online world of endless unmediated opinion and
information.
|
|
|