Milton Newspapers are working with the government to help tackle the problem of human trafficking for the sex industry -
with a focus being put on the small ads which appear in the local and regional press.
The move follows a meeting between ministers and newspaper and advertising industry representatives.
The meeting between the government and news and advertising industries, chairman by Home Office Minister Vernon Coaker, included Ms Harman, Margaret Hodge, Hodge, a junior minister at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Solicitor General
Vera Baird, Newspaper Society Director David Newell, Christopher Graham from the Advertising Standards Authority, Baroness Buscombe of the Advertising Association and Roger Wisbey of the Committee of Advertising Practice.
Coaker said after the meeting, on November 1: We agreed a number of important steps today, and will continue to work together. The Government will continue to work with the Police and Local Authorities, and the Newspaper Society has committed
to strengthen its guidance to local papers on what adverts to accept, and to raise awareness of this link to trafficking.
Guidance issued by the Newspaper Society points out that while prostitution itself is not a criminal offence, brothels and other venues where sexual services are offered are illegal.
It says that the Sexual Offences Act 2003 created offences of causing or inciting prostitution for gain(S52) and controlling prostitution for gain (S53), and adds: Advertisements offering such services or requesting such service providers,
should not be accepted if the publisher knows or has reason to believe that such activities are taking place.
On the issue of advertisements for massage services, the guidance says:
When deciding policies on the acceptance of massage advertisements publishers are advised to bear in mind the following points:
Massage advertisements can disguise services of a sexual nature. Publishers could be acting unlawfully if they publish an advertisement in the clear knowledge that it offers sexual services. To avoid any question of such
knowledge, publishers should be wary of advertisements which could be construed in a compromising way. For example, obvious phrases such as 'Let me take you to heaven' should be avoided.
Publishers may wish to adopt a policy of only accepting massage advertisements from advertisers with the appropriate qualifications.
Bona fides checks can be made to ascertain the legitimacy of such services.
More attempts to correlate between foreign sex workers and the nearly mythical trafficking problem
From Rye and Battle Observer
Milton Keynes MP, Phyllis Starkey, told the House of Commons notices were appearing in local newspapers advertising women
from around the world. She said: Just this week my local newspapers, MK News and the Milton Keynes Citizen, described 'Thai ladies and new Japanese and Chinese girls weekly'. It is difficult to see how any of those could be legally working in
She asked for assurances that the police would follow up such adverts and check for evidence of vulnerable women being trafficked in the UK and forced into prostitution.
Home Office Minister Vernon Coaker said he had already met with the Newspaper Society to see what more could be done.
Renault has pulled an ad campaign that used the phrase "N-word" over fears it may cause offence.
Renault has moved to pull the press ad, which used the phrase For 10 days, we can't use the 'N' word , despite the fact the Advertising Standards Authority has yet to decide whether the ad warrants an investigation.
However, the watchdog has already received a number of complaints. The general crux of the complaints is that the ad is offensive, inappropriate and in bad taste because of the connotations of the N-word, said an ASA spokesman.
The ad, designed to promote a limited-period promotion where Renault dealers were supposedly not allowed to say "no" to customers, is one of three press ads and three radio spots.
A spokesman for Renault UK said: Any misunderstanding of the N-word is totally unintentional. However, this specific print advertisement will be removed with immediate effect, so as not to cause any offence.
A series of tongue-in-cheek adverts for Eurostar depicting stereotypical images of British life have
prompted complaints that they are offensive.
The images, promoting services to Brussels, have gone up on hoardings and posters in four Belgian cities.
One which shows a half-naked skinhead relieving himself in a teacup, received five complaints from British people in Belgium, a Eurostar spokeswoman said.
She said the firm had apologised to them, but the adverts would remain.
The spokeswoman for Eurostar said the campaign had become popular and was specifically for Belgium. In a statement Eurostar said: They've [Belgian people] been trying to get hold of copies of the posters and have sent in emails and letters of
congratulation on how successful the campaign is. For those few who have complained we are sending them a personal letter apologising if we caused offence and explaining the thinking behind the creative and the use of humour.
The Advertising Standards Authority has announced that it will be launching an investigation into the use of violence in advertising, in
what is being seen as a move in anticipation of the results of the Byron Report.
The ASA also claims that the report is in response to an increasing number of complaints over time about violence and aggression in advertising, according to an article in Marketing Week.
The report will look at the ASA's past judgements, with a debate launched by chairman Lord Chris Smith on how violent imagery should be used in advertising, and how children should be protected from harmful or offensive ads.
Harriet Harman tries to get escort small ads banned
No doubt politicians would get stroppy if we labelled them all as corrupt because of a few. Yet they have now embarked on a policy of labelling all working girls as 'trafficked' when in fact the vast majority are working totally consensually.
The Minister for Women Harriet Harman is to discuss banning adverts for escort services with the Newspaper Society.
Harman linked advertisements in some local titles with human trafficking. She said: The Newspaper Society and us need to sit down together and discuss whether this is acceptable in local newspapers, that girls are for sale.
Harman said the "ugly" adverts were published in some local newspapers and added: You see 'girls for sale - girls from Europe, from Africa, from Thailand, fresh girls every week, 18 to 25.
What sort of message does this send in the 21st century? We do know that there is a big problem of people trafficking."
Italy's advertising watchdog has banned an ad campaign for a fashion label showing a naked anorexic woman, saying it breached
its code of conduct.
The image, bearing the words "No Anorexia", was first displayed during Milan Fashion Week in September. It was shot by controversial Italian photographer Oliviero Toscani, who called the ban "censorship" and said he was
considering legal action.
The image showing anorexic French actress Isabelle Caro, for Italian fashion label Nolita, was published in newspapers and featured on billboards during fashion week. Most of the billboards have already been removed, but one remains in Rome.
The Publicity Control Institute (IAP) ruled that the image "commercially exploited" the illness and breached articles 1 and 10 of its code of conduct.
Article one states that advertising must be honest, truthful and accurate. It must avoid anything that could discredit it. Article 10 states that advertising must not offend moral, civic and religious beliefs and must respect
human dignity in all its forms and expressions.
Last month, France's advertising watchdog, the Advertising Verification Bureau (BVP) also ruled that the image breached its code of conduct.
During Milan fashion week, Italian health minister Livia Turco backed the billboard, saying it could "promote responsibility towards the problem of anorexia".
A taxi advert featuring "provocative" drawings of ladies' lingerie - and the slogan:
Knickers to Glasgow - has been banned from the city's cabs.
Reasons cited for refusing permission for the advert, for upmarket underwear firm Agent Provocateur, ranged from what you would tell "the grandweans" if they asked for an explanation to the potential damage to Glasgow's 2014 Commonwealth
One councillor said while the advert might be all right for Paris, "this is Glasgow".
But leading women's rights campaigners lampooned the decision, describing the wording in the advert as little more than Blue Peter humour and claiming local authorities should concern themselves more with the bigger picture of dwindling funds for
tackling violence against women.
At yesterday's Licensing Committee meeting there was virtual unanimity that the advert, which would have covered a cab with images of corsets, whips, g-strings, bras, masks and leather boots, would be likely to offend.
The London-based lingerie firm has 28 days to appeal against the decision.
A spokeswoman said: We would never put out an advert which we felt was offensive to public taste. The licensing laws in Glasgow must be incredibly strict.
A television advert that 'trivialised' domestic violence has been banned after
complaints from viewers.
The commercial for MFI shows a couple rowing after the man leaves a toilet seat up. The woman yells, You've done it again, haven't you? before slapping him twice.
It then emerged the scene took place in an MFI showroom, along with a voice-over, saying: When your bathroom's designed by MFI you'll feel right at home.
It breached seven advertising guidelines and should never have been broadcast, according to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). It was one of a group of five TV adverts for the furniture chain that prompted 217 complaints to the ASA.
The ASA said: Several found the ads distressing and particularly offensive because they believed they trivialised the issues of child and domestic abuse. The woman's action of slapping her husband twice as punishment for leaving the toilet seat
up gave the impression that aggression and violence enabled people in everyday life to get their own way. The scene of domestic violence was likely to cause serious or widespread offence and could be seen to condone intimidation, domestic violence
and aggression as an acceptable way to resolve issues.
The ASA found the commercial had breached the advertising code relating to offence, violence and cruelty, personal distress, mental harm and scheduling.
None of the complaints about the furniture chain's four other commercials were upheld by the watchdog.
Catholic bishops in Belgium have protested against a TV ad depicting Jesus as a pot-bellied hippy picking up half-naked women in a nightclub. The Catholic Church says this sort of portrayal of Jesus is
disrespectful to believers and that it is wrong to use him for advertising.
The advertisement is being aired on the country's main TV channel to promote youth channel Plug TV . The TV advertisement shows a long-haired hippy Jesus grooving along as he tries to get into a nightclub and is refused entry by the
bouncers. Jesus makes the sign of the cross and sweeps aside the bouncers, shrinking them so they are left in his wake as dwarves.
This Plug TV version of Jesus then drinks whiskey at the bar and magically turns two brown haired frumpy women into blonde babes wearing bikini tops and red horns like devils.
The Jesus character then disappears into a huge limousine with the women but his attention is distracted by an advertisement for Plug TV before he is recalled by God who is standing on a cloud, wearing a T shirt with "Number one dad"
written on it.
The God figure tells Jesus off for wanting to watch Plug TV as well as everything else - saying "you still want more".
The Catholic Church has expressed its disapproval to the TV channel - saying advertising is not the same as journalism and should not share the same concerns about freedom of expression. The Church believes this advertisement crosses the limits of
Plug TV however argues it is not blasphemous but contains a message about a laid-back Jesus addressing youth.
P Diddy is being censored. The advertisements for his Sean Combs’
fragrance, Unforgivable Woman, are too hot for TV, and are unsuitable even for cable channels!
In the overly long adverts, Diddy is seen “going at it” with Jessica Gomez in a stairwell and hotel room. But once MTV had screened the offending footage, the big cats at the top sent a list of edits that the Bad Boy will have to make in order for
it to be shown again.
Page six reports the offending footage to consists of Diddy “hiking up” Gomez’s skirt, putting his hand under her dress, and a scene with a another woman holding Gomez’s breast and pulling down her underwear.
Diddy is refusing to edit the commercial.
Update: Forgiven in Britain
30th September 2007
Several versions of the advert causing hassles in the US have been passed for showing in the UK with the stipulation that they are shown after the 9pm watershed
A TV trailer for horror film Paradise Lost should not have been aired before 9pm watershed, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has ruled.
The "gory" advert, featuring blood and surgical instruments, could "cause distress to children," it said.
A viewer complained after watching the 10-second advert on TV at 20:00.
Distributor Lions Gate had referred the advert to the Broadcast Advertising Clearance Centre (BACC) which said it should not be broadcast before 1930.
A 30-second version of the advert, which was more graphic, had been restricted until after 2100. Lions Gate argued that this was adequate.
But the ASA disagreed, and upheld the complaint, ruling that the 10-second version should also only be broadcast after the watershed.
n a written judgment, the ASA said: Although the ad was 10 seconds long only, it showed blood flowing through a tube and an incision being made on the stomach of a woman on an operating table. It showed a man wearing robes and surgical gloves
holding a large syringe and dropping a bloodied rag. The woman said in a distressed tone 'I want to go home'; the inference was that she was being held against her will. We considered this was no less gory or violent than the 30-second ads. We
concluded that if scheduled before 9pm those images could cause distress to children.
The BACC said it had approved the 10-second advert because it felt it was not of such a violent nature that it should receive a post-9pm restriction . The organisation added it had "taken notice" of the ASA ruling.
Advertising in Las Vegas started a new era on Friday. For the
first time ever, a legalized brothel bought a moving billboard to drive around Las Vegas. The world famous and historic Chicken Ranch became the first brothel to advertise.
Two state laws had previously banned brothels from advertising anywhere. On July 12, a federal judge overturned those laws, saying they were "overly broad," clearing the way for this.
The Chicken Ranch Brothel in Pahrump paid for the moving billboard. The Chicken Ranch billboard may actually seem tame for Las Vegas standards. There are no girls anywhere on it -- although it does offer free transportation. Ads pushing Las Vegas
shows reveal much more.
A spokesman for the Chicken Ranch says the brothel wants the advertisements to be done with taste and discretion. Meredith says it hit the mark.
State law allows counties in Nevada to have legal brothels if the population is under 400,000 people. That means prostitution is not legal in Clark County and Washoe County. The closest brothels to Las Vegas are 60 miles to the west in Pahrump in
National Lottery and BarclayCard have pulled online ads off of Amazon’s Internet Movie Data Base
(IMDB) after finding the banners placed next to listings for adult movie titles.
As company policy, we seek to advertise only on reputable websites and temporarily removed our adverts from this site while we carried out a full investigation and spoke to the website, a Barclays Group spokesperson said.
The Internet Movie Database seeks to list all the movies which have ever been made, including adult ones, but by no stretch of the imagination could it be described as a porn site, the Barclays spokesperson said.
Recently, social networking website Facebook had several advertisers, including Vodafone, pull advertising off the site after the ads were placed next to member profiles that did not meet company standards for appropriate content.
The incidents raise questions about future online advertising campaigns on sites in which the marketers have very little control over ad placement or advertising on sites that are comprised mostly of user-generated content.
Bosses at high street sex retailer, Ann Summers, are
hopping mad with Transport for London for vetoing the poster for the Rampant Rabbit.
The commercial, which has already appeared in a number of magazines and newspapers, had already been cleared by the Advertising Standards Authority.
Inspired by a famous Japanese tsunami painting it features a floating mermaid and carries the slogan wave after wave of pleasure.
Ann Summers chief executive Jacqueline Gold said: I don’t understand. There is nothing remotely offensive about it. This is censorship gone mad.
But transport executives reportedly told Ann Summers’ advertisers they would only reconsider their decision if the words Rampant Rabbit were removed from the ad, along with any mention of pleasure.
A TfL spokesperson said: Consumers purchasing magazines make a conscious choice to read a magazine. Millions of people travel on the London Underground each day and they have no choice but to view whatever ads are posted there. We have to take
account of the full range of travellers and endeavour not to give offence in the adverts we display.”
Find Madeleine McCann cinema adverted cleared by ASA
From The Guardian
The advertising watchdog has cleared a controversial cinema
advertisement about missing toddler Madeleine McCann after parents complained it was shown before a children's movie.
The Advertising Standards Authority received 23 complaints about the ad, shown in cinemas to appeal for help to in finding the four-year-old, who went missing in Portugal in May.
After it was screened before U-rated film Shrek the Third , some parents argued it was distressing to children and unsuitable to be shown in conjunction with a family film.
Nine of the complainants said that their children had been upset by the ad.
Framestore, the company that developed the ad, said the ad had been passed by the BBFC to be aired in U-certificate films. The company also argued the ad had been shown on television and on the internet and no complaints had been made.
The ASA acknowledged that the idea of a young child disappearing was likely to be inherently upsetting. However, the watchdog considered that it did not contain any distressing images or use sensationalist language.
It ruled that because the ad highlighted a well-publicised issue in this way it was not unsuitable to be shown before a U-certificate film, was not socially irresponsible and was unlikely to cause undue fear and distress.
A New York company has angered anti-abortion activists
by using the contentious issue to advertise its storage business, by showing a wire coat hanger and the slogan: Your closet space is shrinking as fast as her right to choose.
It's trashy and its vulgar and it's in your face with its crudity, Kiera McCaffrey, of the Catholic League said about the Manhattan Mini Storage billboard.
The Roman Catholic group, a vocal opponent of abortion rights, has been urging people to complain to the company.
Mary Alice Carr, of NARAL Pro-Choice New York, which advocates abortion rights, said such advertisements reminded people to stay active, even in a city like New York, where the majority of residents support abortion rights.
Intel has pulled an advertisement which it acknowledged was 'culturally
insensitive and insulting'
The ad, which was for a new generation of micro-processors, showed six black sprinters crouched in the start position in front of a white man wearing a shirt and chinos in an office.
Above the image was a slogan which read: Multiply computer performance and maximise the power of your employees.
Blogs were quick to spot the connotation of a white master surveying a group of black workers apparently bowed at his feet.
It was intended that the advertisement convey the performance capabilities of our processors through a number of visual metaphors, Don MacDonald, director of global marketing for the company, wrote: Unfortunately, this ad using
African-American sprinters did not deliver our intended message, and in fact proved to be culturally insensitive and insulting.
Intel said it had pulled the ad from hundreds of publications, but was unable to stop two which had already shipped.
Government to ban advertising for offshore gambling
The ramifications on the UK internet industry could be far reaching, how will it effect Google, or sites running syndicated advertising such as Google Adsense. How does one know where companies are based? and how does one define a
And worst of all, the Government will surely be tempted to extend advertising bans to all sorts of other sites.
The government has banned about 1,000 off-shore gambling websites, including well-known operators such as William Hill, from advertising in the UK.
The ban applies to any gambling companies operating outside the European Economic Area, affecting popular websites such as William Hill Casino, Betfred Casino and Poker, Interpoker.com and Littlewoodscasino.com.
From September, when the Gambling Act comes into force, any online firm based in gaming company havens such as Costa Rica, the Netherlands Antilles and Belize will not be able to market in the UK and the Department of Culture Media will crackdown
on illegal advertising.
Because most of the companies have no operations in the UK to legally pursue, websites, broadcasters and advertising companies that create campaigns for such companies will face fines or imprisonment.
I make no apology for banning adverts for websites operating from places that don't meet our strict standards, said the culture minister, James Purnell.
Countries that want to be exempted from the ban - which applies to all forms of media including TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, taxis, buses, the tube and websites that publish in the UK - have to pass a strict test of regulatory standards to
then join a "white list".
Alderney and the Isle of Man are the only jurisdictions to have so far made the "white list" after sufficiently demonstrating a rigorous licensing regime designed to stop children gambling, protect vulnerable people, keep games fair and
keep out crime.
One thing that's not cool to show is a little bald European man sitting
in a bathtub, especially when said European is a mercenary, holding a gun and saying he listens to Giacomo Puccini.
The Advertising Standards Authority have banned an internet ad featuring Kovac, one of Sony's "This is Living" PS3 ad campaign characters.
The ad reads: You on my side? Listen up, I've killed for less. The music plays Puccini in my head.
This displays over a shot of Kovac pointing a handgun at the bathroom roof, which the ASA has branded unacceptable: We considered that there was an underlying tone of violence in the ad and we were concerned that the images of Kovac holding the
knife and the gun, in conjunction with the text, 'You on my side? Listen up I've killed for less..." could be seen to glamorise violence or anti-social behaviour.
MFI has amended one of its controversial new adverts following complaints to the
Advertising Standards Authority.
The company has taken the ad featuring a mother who accosts her teenage daughter for being out late, and put it in Spanish with subtitles. It opens with a board saying the furniture retailer has amended it because it was not to everyone's tastes.
The ads have now attracted more than 191 complaints from viewers who have taken offence at the overriding aggressive tone of the ads, and the ASA says formal investigations are under way. The complainants have voiced concerns that the ads set a
bad example, encourage antisocial behaviour and glorify a 'bullying and disrespectful attitude'.
The ads show families acting out 'typical' at-home situations in MFI stores. Families and couples are seen arguing among themselves, and in one ad, a mother accosts her teenage daughter for being out late, demanding to know whether she has been
drinking. The daughter shouts back and storms out of the room, pushing into an MFI sales adviser.
A TV ad, for clothes designed by Madonna, showed a young woman
being led up to Madonna, who was sitting at the head of a conference table, surrounded by fashionably dressed women. Madonna said How can I help you? .
One of the young woman's socks rolled down her leg and she pushed the other one down to match. Madonna said I like it. The shot cut to her striking a whiteboard, which had the word FASHION projected on it,
with a riding crop saying "IT, IT, IT, IT, IT". She then slammed the crop onto the table and asked What is it? .
The young woman hesitated and said, Well I think it ... Madonna replied, Don't think it, you need to know it. The young woman was escorted into a dressing room by two men, who undressed and redressed
her in more fashionable clothes while Madonna repeated Doesn't have it. Doesn't have it. Doesn't have it. The young woman then returned to the boardroom wearing the same outfit as Madonna, who said You made it . A designer rushed
over and threw himself at Madonna's feet and cried No, no, no, no, no, you made it. Madonna and the young woman then strode away together and Madonna said And I love it.
The ad was given an ex-kids restriction by the Broadcast Advertising Clearance Centre (BACC).
1. 18 viewers complained that the ad was offensive, because they believed it depicted a young girl being stripped by force by two men and under threat of physical punishment.
2. Seven viewers challenged whether the ad was harmful, because they believed the depiction of the young girl would appeal to, and encourage, paedophiles.
1. Not upheld:
Although the ASA acknowledged that some people had found the ad disturbing, we considered that the quick change of clothes undergone by the interviewee was likely to be seen as a reference to catwalk fashion and the riding crop as a symbol of
Madonnas perceived artistic style, not a threat of physical punishment. Because of that, we considered that the ex-kids restriction for the ad was sufficient to avoid frightening young children and concluded that the ad was unlikely to cause
serious or widespread offence, or be seen to encourage or condone violence or cruelty.
2. Not upheld:
We noted the actress who portrayed the role of the interviewee was 24 years old and considered that most viewers would not infer from her style of clothing that she was a school girl. We also considered that it was clear, from the ad, that she was
applying for a job within Madonnas fashion company and therefore likely to be past school age. We further considered that the quick change of clothes was likely to be seen to contain a sense of urgency, rather than being sexually suggestive or
titillating. Because of that, we concluded the ad did not portray a child in a sexually provocative manner or contain material that could harm children by encouraging paedophiles.
A poster for a bidet company was to be put up in Broadway's
theater district on a building that houses a church. The billboard featured bare buttocks, but has been temporarily banned by a judge in New York City. State Supreme Court Justice Mary Friedman ordered the temporary restraining order against the
bidet company billboard yesterday after hearing the complaints of Reverend Neil Rhodes, the pastor of the interdenominational Times Square Church. Bidets, buttocks, and religion don't mix in Times Square.
The billboard ads were for the Washlet, a bidet-toilet seat that uses warm water and air to clean the buttocks. The ads featured naked buttocks with smiley faces. Sounds quaint.
To get the billboards banned, Reverend Rhodes had to pay a $90,000 bond pending a decision on the issues at a conference between the parties. The bond will go to the bidet company for damages and costs, including lost revenue, if the restraining
order is overturned and the court rules that the church wasn't entitled to an injunction.
The advertising watchdog has launched an investigation into a campaign
by children's charity Barnardo's, featuring a boy who tells parents and social workers to "F**k off", after complaints that it is offensive and in poor taste.
The Barnardo's campaign, labelled Believe in Children, launched last week across newspapers, radio, posters and online.
The Advertising Standards Authority is launching an investigation into one of the ads, the "F**k off story", which could set a precedent on how the swear word can be used in newspaper ads.
The ad, created by agency Bartle Bogle Hegarty, features a picture of a child. Text running alongside says: He told his parents to f**k off. He told fourteen social workers to f**k off. He told us to f**k off. But we didn't. And we still
Another version of the ad, which ran in national newspapers, removes the "k" leaving the offensive word written as "f***".
The ASA has so far only received two complaints on the basis that the use of the word is offensive and in poor taste. However, because the Barnardo's ad features such an offensive word the ASA decided the campaign requires investigation by its
A couple have been ordered to remove
their cheeky car wash firm slogan that promised: “The best hand-job in town.”
The sign on the side of a lorry also showed a bikini-clad blonde soaping down a pink Cadillac. But councillors in Goole, East Yorks, branded it inappropriate and Soapy Rides owners Nigel and Michaela Kennings were fined £400 with £600
costs by magistrates.
Michaela said: It’s absolutely ridiculous. The sign has caused great amusement to customers. We are surrounded by old warehouses and this brightened up the area.
A retrospective planning application submitted by Soapy Rides to keep the advertising sign in place was refused by East Riding of Yorkshire Council in October last year.
Nigel Kenning said of the council: They claim that the sign is discordant and intrusive, has dominant visual impact and detracts from the character and amenity of the locality. I don't know who they think they are kidding.
A spokesperson for the council said in February: ERYC contacted the owners of the unauthorised hoarding, requesting it be removed a number of times. Unfortunately, the sign remains. This has left the council with no alternative but to refer the
matter to the courts, as placing an advertisement without the consent required for it is an offence.
Run it up the lap dancing pole and see how it flies
From ic Surrey
A marketing company has admitted it lied to the public after
it was discovered that a massive advert of a naked stripper wrapped around a pole across in a paddock does not exist.
In what is thought to be the biggest hoax to hit the area, the Horley Mirror can confirm that the so-called advert is nothing more then a marketing stunt which cost less than £100 to produce.
The doctored image of what appeared to be a 100,000 square foot advert for an online lap dancing club was the creation of Flightpath Media, a London-based advertising agency, using the computer design program Photoshop.
The farcical stunt tricked a number of regional newspapers, including the Mirror, gained national media attention in newspapers such as The Sun and The Times, and was even reported by international media outlets based as far afield as Australia.
Tandridge District Council has spent the past three weeks searching for the advert in the Burstow area at the expense of taxpayers.
Flightpath Media told the Mirror the advert was placed in the paddock and took eight people three days to paint.
Flightpath Media owner, Stephen Pearson, claims the hoax generated "several million of pounds" and a number of subscriptions for the online lapdancing club.
An unrepentant Mr Pearson now believes his company will win an award for the best marketing campaign "in the last few years". He said: It's all a marketing stunt that has worked perfectly.
An advert for the upcoming PlayStation 2 game, Burnout: Dominator
from EA, has been labelled as 'irresponsible' by the UKAdvertising Standards Authority.
The advert was the subject of 37 complaints and features a crashed car under the slogan Inner peace through outer violence .
An ASA spokesperson said: The complainants described the advert as offensive as it condoned and was likely to encourage violence, dangerous driving and anti-social behaviour such as vandalism... The Advertising
Standards Authority determined that the implication of the advertisement was likely to cause serious or widespread offence.
Reruns of a TV commercial from the 1950s which urged viewers to
"go to work on an egg" have been banned.
An advertising watchdog said the slogan went against the principle of eating a varied diet.
The Egg Information Service had wanted to screen the advert, which featured comedian Tony Hancock, to celebrate its 50th birthday.
Author Fay Weldon, who headed the team which came up with the slogan, has described the decision as absurd.
The Broadcast Advertising Clearance Centre (BACC) defended its decision, insisting that the adverts did not suggest a varied diet.
BACC spokesman Kristoffer Hammer said: Dietary considerations have been at the centre of the new rules for advertising and in consideration of this we felt that these adverts did not suggest a varied diet. The concept of eating eggs
every day for breakfast goes against what is now the generally accepted advice of a varied diet and we therefore could not approve the ads for broadcast.
British Egg Information Service spokesperson Amanda Cryer said: We have been shocked by this ruling as eggs are a healthy, natural food which are recommended by nutritionists.
What's more, there are no restrictions on the number of eggs people can eat, which was recently confirmed by the Food Standards Agency, and between five and seven eggs a week would be totally acceptable for most people.
In addition, many other advertisers clearly promote their products to be eaten every day such as breakfast cereals so we are very surprised that eggs have been singled out in this way.
Comment: Eggstreme Censorship
Unelected advertising censor, bans a new version of the TV advert I've never known anything so daft. I've emailed 'em to tell 'em so too.
Interestingly "Go to work on an egg" was coined by Fay Weldon, who was on the panel at the BBFC appeal which finally made hard core videos legal. She was one who voted in favour. Now she has a famous phrase
of her own censored. I wonder what she thinks about that?
A giant silhouette of a pole dancer painted on a field
beneath Gatwick Airport's flight path is said to be disturbing the British countryside.
The 9,300 square metre advertisement is nearly invisible from the ground, but can be seen by airline passengers.
Tandridge District Council spokeswoman Giuseppina Valenza said that the ad was painted on the field without proper permission and that the council would take legal action if it was not removed.
Stephen Pearson of Sports Media Gaming Ltd, the company behind the ad, said the council had no grounds for removing it: I think they're unsure about their own regulations to be honest. We're not going to remove it at all.
The advert is for a pay per view/subscription website featuring pictures and videos of pole dancers.
The Spanish airline Iberia has withdrawn a cartoon ad that depicts a baby
boy frolicking on a beach with buxom black Cuban ladies after consumer groups complained it is insulting to women and encourages sexual tourism.
The pair of women — with exaggerated lips and tiny, tight shorts on broad hips — massage and pamper the white Spanish infant after he arrives in Havana on a free trip from Iberia. At one point, lounging at a seaside bar, he sings: Come on
honey, take me to the crib.
Iberia's web site ran the video as part of a contest offering free trips to celebrate the site's 10th anniversary. The clip was yanked last week after less than 10 days on the page, following a complaint by the Federation of Consumers in Action.
Ileana Fuentes, executive director of the Miami-based Cuban Feminist Network, said the cartoon plays to the idea that for Spanish men, Cuba is the place to go for easy sex with poor, black women.
A health campaign which showed smokers being snatched by fish hooks in
their mouths has been criticised for frightening children.
The Advertising Standards Authority received 744 complaints about the Department of Health TV commercials and posters.
The campaign attracted the highest number of complaints to the Advertising Standards Authority for two years. The ASA criticised the handling of the Government-health initiative. They said most of those who complained considered the images were
"offensive, frightening and distressing", particularly to children.
It ruled that the commercials cannot be shown during children or family viewing times. It seems the posters will be banned outright.
The Department of Health said the adverts were designed to confront smokers with the controlling nature of their addiction and were not meant merely to attract attention or to be gratuitous.
Featuring a claim from the Gay Police Association of a link between homophobic attacks and religious motivation. Several Christian groups complained saying it was offensive to them and discriminatory in tone.
Revenue and Customs ad, 271 complaints
The advert offended many self-employed people, and plumbers in particular, who said the advert made them look like tax evaders.
Dolce & Gabbana 166 complaints
A new concern from 2006 was the glamorisation of knives.
Motorola ad, 160 complaints
Another appearance for D&G whose joint advert with Motorola, complainants said, "condoned knife-related violence" and "glamorised sexual violence".
Carphone Warehouse ad, 145 complaints
The familiar Carphone Warehouse adverts riled customers and competitors, particularly claims that its service would be "free forever".
French Connection ad, 127 complaints
A TV advert in which two women had a martial-arts contest, culminating in a kiss.
Channel 5 ad, 99 complaints
Five ran a teaser poster campaign saying that "nothing good ever came out of America". Some people complained that the teaser was racist towards Americans and socially irresponsible in that it could incite racial violence.
Kellogg's ad, 96 complaints
Objections to a Kellogg's television ad featuring a man riding a dog claimed that it portrayed cruelty to animals and would encourage viewers to try the same stunt at home.
National Federation of Cypriots ad, 93 complaints
An advert drew complaints from a human rights organisation which was concerned it was offensive to the Turkish community and likely to incite racial hatred.
Dolce & Gabbana, 89 complaints
D&G and the politics of same-sex relations appeared three times each in the top 10. D&G's TV ad showed a brief kiss between two men, and was followed by complaints that it was unsuitable for children to see, and some that it was
unsuitable to show at any time.
Thanks to Alan who points out more from The Portman Groups press release on the ban:
David Poley, Chief Executive of The Portman Group, said: Some people might think this is harmless fun but there is a serious issue involved. Drinking excessively can affect people’s judgement and behaviour
leading to them engaging in sexual activity which they later regret. [Sounds like he is referring to beer goggles]
Our Code disallows drinks marketing being linked to sexual success. The industry has set itself strict marketing rules and this drink has fallen short of those high standards.
All complaints are heard by an Independent Complaints Panel which is Chaired by Sir Richard Tilt, former Director General of the Prison Service. The Panel looks at each case on its merits and decides
whether the complaint should be upheld. A single complaint from a member of the public, or any interested party, is enough to trigger an investigation. The other members of the Panel are Morven Proctor, Callum Jacobs, Angela Sarkis
CBE, Nigel Long, Jon Eggleton, Revd. Canon Professor Martyn Percy and Barbara O'Donnell.
And as Alan says, Interesting to see the make-up of the allegedly "independent" group who adjudicate, including such establishment figures as a knight (and former chief jailer!) a CBE and a canon. Who do these prats think
Sergio wryly makes an observation about the great and the good: Being in a position of power can also affect people’s judgement and behaviour leading to them engaging in sexual activity which they later
The Department of Health is to be reprimanded formally by the
Advertising Standards Authority over its £7 million anti-smoking advertising campaign, which depicted smokers with giant fishhooks piercing their mouths.
According to a confidential document seen by The Times, the campaign breached strict codes designed to protect children from disturbing images.
It attracted 771 complaints, most of them from parents who described the advertisements as offensive, frightening and distressing to children.
One television advert, screened before the 9pm watershed, showed an office worker with a giant fishhook through his cheek being dragged from his desk to a smoking spot in a freezing car park. Another showed a hook pulling a mother away from her
small daughter. A third depicted a man being dragged through traffic and into a newsagent’s shop to buy cigarettes.
Billboard adverts showed the contorted faces of smokers being pierced by giant hooks.
Arpan Boyall, an investigations executive for the Advertising Standards Authority, is to recommend that the adverts breached strict codes that are designed to protect children and that therefore the authority should uphold the complaints against
the posters and television adverts and reprimand the Department of Health.
In a confidential report, Boyall wrote: We noted the posters showed the hooks clearly piercing the cheeks of the addicted smokers who, we considered, looked distressed and in pain. We noted that, although the posters had not been placed near
schools, they had appeared in places where they could easily be seen by children. We considered that, although the posters highlighted the perils of tobacco addiction and discouraged the dangerous activity of smoking, because they were untargeted
and realistically and graphically showed the piercing of the cheek with a hook, they were likely to frighten and distress children.
A TV commercial for the Xbox 360 games console broke advertising rules
by glamorising street car racing, according to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA)
It showed a car weaving through traffic during a chase scene in a busy city. The Advertising Standards Authority said the commercial broke rules relating to health and safety and driving standards and ordered it not to be shown again: We
concluded that the ad glamorised street car racing and could be seen to condone dangerous driving,
Responding to the ASA's investigation on behalf of Microsoft, which makes the Xbox 360, advertising agency McCann Erickson said the advert didn't show cars exceeding speed limits and the on-screen text explained all stunts were performed by
Dolce & Gabbana will pull all advertising from Spain to "protect their
creative liberty", the Italian designers said after authorities there called for a ban on their latest campaign for humiliating women.
Spain, with its climate of censure, shows that it wants to read negative messages even where they don't exist, the designers said in a statement.
One advert, which Dolce & Gabbana have also withdrawn in Italy, shows a bare-chested man holding down a woman by her wrists while other men look casually on. It garnered criticism from human rights group Amnesty International and a union in
Dolce & Gabbana said they would organise "alternative initiatives" for promotions in Spain. [controversial news coverage perhaps?]
Dolce & Gabbana are wowing the fashion world on the catwalks of Milan, but
feminists in Spain have condemned their latest advertising campaign as sexist and violent, throwing the flamboyant duo into a hissy fit and prompting withdrawal of the images.
The ads, which appeared in Spain, show a half-naked man holding a scantily clad woman to the ground by her wrists while four predatory hunks look on. Spain's Women's Institute, a government organisation linked to the Labour Ministry, described the
scene as offensive to women's dignity and an incitement to sexual violence.
Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana announced they would drop their campaign in Spain and covered their retreat with acid-drenched sneers. We will withdraw that photo from the Spanish market alone, since they are behind the times. What does an
artistic photo have to do with the real world? If Spanish views held sway, you'd have to burn museums like the Louvre and all the paintings of Caravaggio , they added.
But Spanish women objected not to the supposed sensuality or eroticism but the image's glorification of sexual violence. The advert suggests it is acceptable to use force as a way of imposing oneself on a woman, reinforced by the passive
complicity of the men looking on, the Labour Ministry said.
Last month, a D&G campaign featuring bloodstained models brandishing knives was banned in Britain after the Advertising Standards Authority received scores of complaints that the pictures glorified violence. The ads appeared in newspapers
alongside stories about mounting British gun crime.
An ad for the new Times Online website featuring
a woman in a bra with money stuffed into her cleavage could be investigated by the advertising watchdog after a member of the public complained. The ad is accompanied by a quote from Top Gear presenter and Sunday Times columnist Jeremy Clarkson:
Money and rumpy-pumpy are the twin engines powering everything we do. The twin engines allude to "news plus views".
The nutter said the poster ad, which is part of a campaign to promote last week's launch of the new-look Times Online, was irresponsible and should not be shown where it can be seen by children.
The Advertising Standards Authority is considering whether to launch an investigation into the campaign, on the grounds that it could be in breach of the advertising code for taste and decenc
A Snickers commercial that aired during the Super Bowl
and featured two car mechanics accidentally kissing has been immediately withdrawn following complaints from several gay rights organisations that labelled it as “homophobic.”
Mars Inc. also erased all related content on their website in response to the criticism. The company apologised for the infraction in a public statement, saying the commercial was intended to be funny, not offensive.
In the commercial, two auto mechanics are seen to be biting into a Snickers bar, each from either end. As a result, the two unintentionally kiss each other and become instantly uncomfortable.
Pro-homosexual organisations took offence to the commercial when later the two men begin tearing hair from their own chests so they could appear more “manly.” The characters’ reactions were viewed as demeaning.
The Snickers website also featured alternate endings to the commercial which viewers could vote on. One depicts a man grabbing a wrench to strike his coworker, who then responds by placing the other man’s head under the hood and slamming it shut.
I don't know what kind of mind-set it takes to think it's okay to slug another guy because of a mistaken kiss, said Neil G. Giuliano, president of Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation: It's just
Based on an article from ASA
Spotted by MediawatchWatch
A King is Born!
An ad in The Grocer magazine, for The Big Prawn Company, featured an image of a framed painting depicting the nativity. A king prawn was shown in the manger in place of the baby Jesus. Text underneath the picture
stated A KING IS BORN' ORDER NOW TO ENSURE A CHRISTMAS DELIVERY THE BIG PRAWN CO . The Big Prawn Company launches its new King prawn in December.
Nutters from Food Chain Solutions and the public thought the image of the nativity scene with a prawn in the place of the baby Jesus was offensive, especially to Christians.
The Big Prawn Company said they had not intended their ad to offend and had believed that most readers would understand that the approach was meant to be light-hearted. They did not believe the ad was disrespectful or mocking of religion and
explained that they had a running theme of using puns involving prawns to advertise their company and did not believe that the ad would cause serious or widespread offence. The Big Prawn Co. said they printed an apology in the subsequent issue of
The Grocer and said that they would not use the ad again. The Big Prawn Company received 16 complaints.
The Grocer said they had given serious consideration to the ad before running it. They thought the ad was intended to be humorous, rather than offensive, and because The Grocer was a specialist title, with a diverse readership encompassing all
faiths, they concluded that it was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence. They Grocer said that they had received 28 complaints about the ad.
The ASA acknowledged that the Big Prawn Co. had issued an apology to those who complained to them about the ad and that they had also published an apology in The Grocer. We noted they had no plans to use the ad again.
While we noted some readers had been offended by the depiction of a prawn in place of the baby Jesus, we considered that the approach would be seen as light-hearted by most readers of The Grocer; it was unlikely to cause serious or widespread
offence. The ASA did not find the advert in breach and no further action is necessary.
London Underground has banned an ad campaign by bookmaker Paddy Power that features a man who appears to be breastfeeding a baby.
The poster ad has been banned by LU operator Transport for London's compliance committee.
A spokesman for Paddy Power said that the poster, which uses the strapline Where have all the women gone? , was banned on the grounds that it had the "potential to offend public decency".
The Irish bookmaker said: We are completely astonished by the reaction of the London Underground to our advert. Fun is central to the Paddy Power brand and we strive to communicate this in all of our advertising.
Prosecutors in Russia say they are studying a complaint accusing Coca-Cola of insulting Orthodox Christian beliefs in an advertising campaign.
They say the complaint was lodged by 440 residents of the Russian city of Nizhny Novgorod earlier this month.
It accuses Coca-Cola of blasphemy through using adverts with images of Orthodox churches and crosses, some of which were even put upside down.
" Coca-Cola uses all these Orthodox symbols in a blasphemous way by placing images of Coca-Cola bottles inside the pictures," the complaint said: Some images are deliberately turned upside down, including the crosses .
Coca-Cola officials have defended the company's marketing approach, saying it was promoting Russia's cultural heritage.
The advertising regulator is considering investigating Des Lynam's Setanta Claus TV ad after complaints that it degrades women by referring to breasts as "puppies".
Setanta's ad features Des Lynam dressed in a yellow Santa suit in a grotto, while his scantily clad helper "Tinseltoes" flashes a large amount of cleavage.
This prompts a male visitor to the Setanta grotto to grin, stare and absentmindedly mention a "couple of puppies".
The Advertising Standards Authority has received 23 complaints about the TV ad and is considering launching an investigation to see if it breaks the advertising standards code.
Complainants have objected that the ad is offensive and degrading to women because of the use of the word "puppies" as a reference to breasts. Others argued that the ad is sexist, objectifies women and is running at inappropriate times of the
day for such content to be shown.
An angry Italian priest has persuaded soft drinks company Red Bull to withdraw an advertisement setting its product in a nativity scene on the grounds it is disrespectful to Christianity.
Father Marco Damanti, from Sicily, wrote to the makers of the drink denouncing their commercial as "a blasphemous act" and said he had received a prompt reply promising to remove it from Italian television.
The advert depicted four wise men, instead of three, visiting Mary and the Baby Jesus in Bethlehem. The fourth wise man bore a carton of Red Bull.
The image of the sacred family has been represented in a sacrilegious way, Father Damanti told Corriere della Sera. Whatever the ironic intentions of Red Bull, the advert pokes fun at the nativity, and at Christian sensitivity.
The priest also objected to the company's slogan, "Red Bull gives you wings", said by angels in the animated advert.
The Children's secretary Ed Balls is poised call for a 9pm watershed for drinks advertising.
The move will be seen as the strongest indication yet that the Government intends to push through the restrictive measure.
Balls is understood to have been influenced by a report by Alcohol Concern that claims there is a spike in alcohol ads between 3pm and 5pm.
According to insiders, he has briefed national Sunday newspaper political editors in a bid to get maximum coverage of his views on the subject.
The drinks industry has maintained that a 9pm watershed is an unnecessary measure as the scheduling rules around already prevents them appearing during or around children's programmes. They cannot be shown at other times if the percentage of child
viewers rises to 20% above the proportion of children in the general population.
Provocative radio ads for Uwe Boll's new horror film Postal have been banned by stations in his native Germany - because he jokes profits from the movie will help to fund Osama Bin Laden's terrorism plans.
Radio bosses are afraid that listeners will take the satirical promotions in a literal context. In one commercial an actor parodies Bin Laden and informs the audience that 5% of the box-office receipts will be used to support Al-Qaeda.
But angry Boll has lashed out at the radio executives, alleging they think listeners are dumb. He rages, No German would be so naive and stupid as to believe that Bin Laden is talking in German via a German radio station. "This is a huge scandal
and definitely the wrong signal as this self-censorship only helps these religious fanatics gain control. Tolerance as well as art, freedom of speech and freedom of expression has always been one of the strong pillars of strong democracies.