| 16th May |
|
|
| Website offers a reward for the murder of an Iranian rapper based in Germany Permalink
|
See
article from
guardian.co.uk
|
IAn
Iranian rapper has become the Salman Rushdie of music after
clerics in the Islamic republic issued fatwas calling him an
apostate, which is considered punishable by death under the
country's sharia law.
Shahin Najafi, a Germany-based Iranian singer, recently released
a song with references to Ali al-Hadi al-Naqi, the tenth of the 12
Shia Muslim Imams, a senior religious character.
The clip posted on Youtube, watched by hundreds of thousands
online, has divided opinions in the country with many finding it
'offensive' and 'insulting' to their beliefs and others defending
the song, saying it broke taboos especially in regards to expressing
views about religious characters.
When asked for a religious ruling on the fate of Najafi and his
blasphemous music, clerics unanimously declared that such a
person must be considered an apostate.
Ayatollah Naser Makareme Shirazi said:
Any outrage against the infallible imams ...
and obvious insult against them would make a Muslim an apostate.
Najafi has denied claims that his song Naqi is meant to
insult people's religious beliefs, though the song criticises
Iranian society. He told Deutsche Welle:
I thought there would be some ramifications.
But I didn't think I would upset the regime that much. Now they
are taking advantage of the situation and making it look like I
was trying to criticise religion and put down believers.
An Iranian religion website, Shia-Online.ir, has offered a
$100,000 reward for anyone who kills Najafi.
|
| 16th May |
|
|
| Extremists threaten chaos in Jakarta should Lady Gaga's performance go ahead. Permalink full story: Lady GaGa...Winding up the nutters with sex and religion
|
10th May 2012. See
article from
thejakartapost.com
|
The
extremist Islam Defender Font (FPI) says it will take to the streets
if US singer Lady Gaga does not cancel her upcoming Jakarta concert
on June 3.
FPI chairman Habib Rizieq said:
FPI is strongly rejecting Lady Gaga's
concert because we know very well how she is during the
performing in concerts everywhere.
He promised that he would join FPI members in taking to the
streets if the concert went ahead. He said:
If you want chaos in Jakarta, just continue
to hold the concert,
Rizieq said that he would directly convey the group's opposition
to the President
Update: Police Consider Ban
14th May 2012. See article
from thejakartaglobe.com
Lady Gaga's sold-out Jakarta concert is scheduled for June 3, but
police have yet to decide whether Indonesia's 40,000 ticket-holders
will be able to see Lady Gaga perform. The planned concert has
attracted the ire of extremist Islamists of the Islamic Defenders
Front (FPI), who ludicrously called Lady Gaga to the devil during
rallies and warned that her concert will degrade the nation's sense
of morality.
The Jakarta Police recommended that the concert be canceled. But,
in the end, the decision is not theirs and permits are issued by the
National Police who are still undecided whether to allow the
perfomance.
We ask the National Police to take into consideration the
public's opposition to Lady Gaga's concert, said M.
Mahendradatta, board chairman for the Muslim Defenders Team, an
organization known for representing hard-line Islamists and alleged
terrorists. Mahendradatta claimed that the pop diva promotes devil
worship and that her concert will corrupt the moral sensibilities of
young Indonesians. He spewed:
Whether you like it or not, Lady Gaga
teaches [fans] to worship the devil. That goes against the
teachings of any religion. We don't approve of that.
FPI's leader Rizieq Syihab furthered the devil worshiping claims,
adding that the singer was planning to build Lucifer's kingdom in
Indonesia.
Update: Threats pay off
16th May 2012. See article
from bbc.co.uk
Indonesian
police have banned a concert by US pop star Lady Gaga in the capital
next month. This follows follows the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI)
threats to intercept Lady Gaga at the airport and stop her getting
off the plane.
Saut Nasution, a spokesman for the Indonesian police, told the
BBC's Indonesian service:
It is better that we don't give permission
rather than that [the concert] ends up being stopped by the
people. We have already received a letter requesting us to
consider the people's plea [for cancellation]. And the
Jakarta Police also refused to recommend a permit for the
concert because we don't want people to clash [on the matter].
Habib Salim Alatas, the Jakarta head of the FPI said: She's a
vulgar singer who wears only panties and a bra when she sings.
He also described her as dangerous for Indonesia's younger
generation, and claimed that Lady Gaga had referred to herself as
the devil's messenger.
|
| 14th May |
|
|
| Extremists threaten chaos in Jakarta should Lady Gaga's performance go ahead. Permalink full story: Lady GaGa...Winding up the nutters with sex and religion
|
10th May 2012. See
article from
thejakartapost.com
|
The
extremist Islam Defender Font (FPI) says it will take to the streets
if US singer Lady Gaga does not cancel her upcoming Jakarta concert
on June 3.
FPI chairman Habib Rizieq said:
FPI is strongly rejecting Lady Gaga's
concert because we know very well how she is during the
performing in concerts everywhere.
He promised that he would join FPI members in taking to the
streets if the concert went ahead. He said:
If you want chaos in Jakarta, just continue
to hold the concert,
Rizieq said that he would directly convey the group's opposition
to the President
Update: Police Consider Ban
14th May 2012. See article
from thejakartaglobe.com
Lady Gaga's sold-out Jakarta concert is scheduled for June 3, but
police have yet to decide whether Indonesia's 40,000 ticket-holders
will be able to see Lady Gaga perform. The planned concert has
attracted the ire of extremist Islamists of the Islamic Defenders
Front (FPI), who ludicrously called Lady Gaga to the devil during
rallies and warned that her concert will degrade the nation's sense
of morality.
The Jakarta Police recommended that the concert be canceled. But,
in the end, the decision is not theirs and permits are issued by the
National Police who are still undecided whether to allow the
perfomance.
We ask the National Police to take into consideration the
public's opposition to Lady Gaga's concert, said M.
Mahendradatta, board chairman for the Muslim Defenders Team, an
organization known for representing hard-line Islamists and alleged
terrorists. Mahendradatta claimed that the pop diva promotes devil
worship and that her concert will corrupt the moral sensibilities of
young Indonesians. He spewed:
Whether you like it or not, Lady Gaga
teaches [fans] to worship the devil. That goes against the
teachings of any religion. We don't approve of that.
FPI's leader Rizieq Syihab furthered the devil worshiping claims,
adding that the singer was planning to build Lucifer's kingdom in
Indonesia.
|
| 10th May |
|
|
| Government proposes that music, sport and religious videos should be expensively vetted by the BBFC if it is felt that they would be rated 12 or higher Permalink
|
See article
from culture.gov.uk
See consultation
paper [pdf]
from dcms.gov.uk
|
As
announced in the Queen's Speech, the Department for Culture, Media, Sport
and Censorship is seeking views about the exemptions in the Video Recordings
Act and about how advertisements shown in cinemas are censored.
Consultation Open date: 09 May 2012
Closing date: 01 August 2012
Please send your comments or if you have any queries about this
consultation to:
AdsExempt@culture.gsi.gov.uk
or by post:
Advertising and Exemption Consultation Department for Culture,
Media and Sport
2-4 Cockspur Street
London SW1Y 5DH
Cinema Advertising Censorship
The government is asking whether the BBFC really needs to get involved in
the censorship of cinema adverts. At the moment it is mandatory that the
BBFC rate such advertising, but the Government is asking if the more general
system of advert censorship provided by CAP and ASA is sufficient.
Option 0: No change
Under this option cinema advertisements would
continue to be referred to the BBFC for age rating whilst also being
subject to mandatory self-regulation overseen by the ASA.
This regime has been in place for a number of years
and it could be considered that it should remain on the grounds that it
appears to work effectively to ensure that children are not exposed to
inappropriate content via cinema advertisements and consumers' rights
are properly observed. Some may feel also that the statutory backing is
an essential element of the regime.
However, as set out earlier in the preceding
paragraphs, others may consider that the age rating role provided by the
BBFC in relation to cinema advertisements is already adequately covered
by the self-regulatory approach of the industry and that it therefore
represents an unnecessary burden on business.
Option 1: Remove the requirement for BBFC
classification of cinema advertisements
This option would potentially remove the financial
and administrative burdens on the cinema advertising industry of having
to submit each advert to the BBFC for an age rating. Arguably, this
would also make matters simpler for industry, reducing the additional
time constraints resulting from both BBFC and CAA clearance.
The BBFC has indicated that the current average
classification cost is around £111 per ad classified. There is an
additional administrative burden for industry attached to this process
in supplying the BBFC with hard copies of the adverts requiring
classification. The impact on the BBFC of removing the classification
requirement would simply relate to their resourcing of this function.
However, could removing the requirement to age rate
adverts shown in cinemas by the BBFC result in a reduction in consumer
and child protection? The industry bodies and the CAA believe the
existing advertising clearance system as set out in paragraphs 4.6 to
4.23, underpinned by the ASA's non-broadcast advertising code (CAP
Code), is robust enough to ensure there are no regulatory gaps,
particularly in relation to child protection, and that suitable consumer
safeguards will be maintained.
This option would also not place additional
enforcement burdens on local authorities
On music censorship the government is nominally considering 4 options:
option 0: Leave the existing exemptions in place and
untouched, on the basis that either the present arrangements do not give
rise to concerns to an extent that would justify legislative change, or
that removing exemptions would place unnecessary or disproportionate
burdens on industry for limited benefit.
option 1: Remove the exemptions from age rating for
music, sports, religious and educational video works. This requires
primary legislation to achieve. Removing the exemption would mean that
producers would have to submit all film material to the BBFC for
classification before making them available for sale in the UK
regardless of genre.
option 2: Lower the existing content thresholds for
exemption so that more products are brought within scope of the age
rating requirement (as we have done recently for video games). This can
be achieved by secondary legislation.
option 3: Ask other parts of the video industry to
introduce a self-regulatory parental advisory system for the
currently exempt genres, similar to the BPI's PAS labelling scheme for
the music-themed products.
Option 2 is noted as the Government's preference
|
| 29th April |
|
|
| Christians have a whinge about Lady GaGa's upcoming concert Permalink full story: Lady GaGa...Winding up the nutters with sex and religion
|
23rd April 2012. See article
from news.pinkpaper.com
|
A
group of Christian nutters from South Korea are planning to hold a
prayer meeting in protest of Lady Gaga's show in Seoul on 27th
April.
AFP reports that 300 members of Alliance for Sound Culture In
Sexuality are planning to attend the meeting.
Kang Ju-Hyun, a prayer organiser, told AFP: We will pray to
God that the concert will not be realised so that homosexuality and
pornography will not spread around the country. The group have
accused Lady Gaga of spreading unhealthy sexual culture
through lewd lyrics and performances.
Under 18s have been banned from the concert, after the Korea
Media Rating Board deemed the show unsuitable for young audiences.
Update: A small group of Christians
29th April 2012. See
article from
bbc.co.uk, Thanks to Nick
A small group of Christians staged a rally outside Seoul's
Olympic Stadium, where around 45,000 fans saw the singer perform
hits like Poker Face and Judas.
The poster for Lady Gaga's Seoul concert said it had adult
certification Activists in Seoul have been protesting over the
concert for weeks, claiming the singer was obscene and could
taint young people.
A group calling itself the Civilians Network against the Lady
Gaga Concert said her performance was too homosexual and
pornographic.
|
| 23rd April |
|
|
| Parliamentary motion querying a lack of action about requiring state censorship of music videos Permalink full story: VRA Exempt...Video Recordings (Exemption from Classification) Bill
|
See article
from parliament.uk
|
Early
day motion 2968: Age Ratings For Music Videos
That this House
-
is concerned about the lack of progress being made
in the formulation and introduction of age ratings for music videos
which currently are exempt from any restrictions in the UK;
-
believes this to be totally unacceptable as many
contain material which is often highly inappropriate for children in
respect of language, violence and sexual imagery;
-
is alarmed that despite promises made, the
Department for Culture, Media and Sport has so far failed to even
establish a consultation process on this most important matter; and
-
calls on the Government to act quickly to protect
children from being exploited by such unacceptable commercial practices.
Primary sponsor: Alan Meale, Labour, Mansfield
Signed by:
- Peter Bottomley, Conservative, Worthing West
- Ronnie Campbell, Labour, Blyth Valley
- Martin Caton, Labour, Gower
- Katy Clark, Labour, North Ayrshire and Arran
- Jim Dobbin, Labour, Heywood and Middleton
- Mark Durkan, Democratic and Labour, Foyle
- Mike Hancock, Liberal Democrats, Portsmouth South
- Margaret Ritchie, Social Democratic and Labour , South Down
- Steve Rotheram, Labour, Liverpool Walton
- David Simpson, Democratic Unionist, Upper Bann
|
| 23rd April |
|
|
| Iran jails popular musician over songs supporting opposition protests Permalink
|
Via
article
from guardian.co.uk
|
A
popular Iranian singer who publicly defied regime censorship by releasing
pro-opposition songs on the internet has been sentenced to a year in jail.
Arya Aramnejad fell foul of the authorities after singing
political songs in condemnation of the regime's crackdown
against the Green movement. Aramnejad, whose works are banned
inside Iran, initially released two songs in support of the
movement during the campaign period before the country's
disputed presidential elections in 2009.
In the unrest following the elections, which saw dozens of
protesters killed and hundreds arrested, Aramnejad released
music that particularly infuriated officials and led to his
arrest.
Shortly after the protests, Aramnejad released a song called
Ali Barkhiz (Wake-up Ali), which spoke out against the
violent crackdown against the opposition. One version of the
song, which made it into a video clip posted on YouTube, has
been viewed more than 80,000 times.
Security forces arrested Aramnejad for the first time in
February 2010 after his song attracted a great deal of
attention. He spent 45 days in solitary confinement before being
allowed to contact his family. He was later sentenced to six
months, a term he served from November 2011 until recently, when
he was allowed out of prison for the Persian new year.
A friend of Aramnejad said: Arya has been recently
informed that he has been given a one-year jail sentence for his
other songs released since 2010. He's been accused of acting
against national security and spreading propaganda against the
regime, the friend said.
|
| 11th April |
|
|
Permalink full story: Reg Bailey Report...Mothers Union boss pens governement reportDaily Mail run the expected nonsense article supporting Big Brother Dave's call for age classifications for internet music videos. By Sonia Poulton |
See article
from dailymail.co.uk
|
|
|
| 10th April |
|
|
| Moroccan jailed on remand over song lyrics criticising the political situation Permalink
|
See
article from
anhri.net
|
The
Arab Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI) condemns the arrest of rapper
and activist of the 20 February movement, Megaz El Haked, by the Moroccan
security forces on March 29 claiming that one of his songs is offensive to a
public institution.
El Haked was summoned for interrogation on a charge of
offending a public authority by a Casablanca Cour. In one of his
songs, El Haked criticized the political situation in Morocco,
which authorities considered a defamatory insult against public
officials. The activist jailed on remand to stand trial on 4
April.
It is worth noting that this is not the first time that El
Haked has been arrested for his songs. He was imprisoned for
four months on trumped-up charges before being released in
January 2012.
El Haked's arrest for the content of his songs for the
second time is unacceptable and is a clear violation of freedom
of expression, which includes freedom of creativity and art,
stated ANHRI: Freedom of expression is an inherent right and
no one should be punished for expressing his opinions, whether
that was critical of the system or not.
ANHRI calls upon the Moroccan authorities to immediately
release El Haked and ensure that peaceful free expression is
protected.
Update: Still Jailed
20th April 2012. See article
from hrw.org
Moroccan authorities should drop charges and release a rapper
who has spent three weeks in pretrial detention on charges that
he insulted the police in his songs and a video set to his
music, Human Rights Watch said today.
Police arrested Mouad Belghouat, known as al-Haqed
(the sullen one), on March 29, 2012, because of a YouTube video
with a photo of a policeman whose head has been replaced with a
donkey's. The lyrics denounce police corruption.
The offending material cited in the case file consists
of a rap song Belghouat composed and recorded, entitled Kilab
ed-Dowla (Dogs of the State), and a YouTube video containing
a photo-montage set to the song. The song denounces police
corruption with lines like, You are paid to protect the
citizens, not to collect people's money and take it to your
chief.
|
| 8th April |
|
|
| Reportedly he wants music videos on the internet to be subject to age verification Permalink full story: Reg Bailey Report...Mothers Union boss pens governement report
|
Thanks to Sergio
See article
from telegraph.co.uk
|
It
is understood the Prime Minister is considering new rules that
would oblige websites hosting such videos to introduce robust
age verification systems similar to those used to safeguard
children online gambling.Music videos are currently exempt
from BBFC censorship under the Video Recordings Act 2010. There
are currently no legal restrictions on children downloading
music videos of any kind.
The Prime Minister is understood to be disappointed
with the music video industry's response to a Government report
that whinged about sexualisation of childhood.
Cameron is to summon leading figures in the music video and
social media world to Downing Street for a summit next month and
threaten censorial new laws if more is not done to protect
children.
Campaigners claim there has been a dramatic increase in the
amount of sexual content and explicit language in music videos
which can be accessed by very young children on computers and
mobile phones.
Around 200 million videos are watched each month on Vevo, a
music video website popular amongst the young. Although MTV, and
other television channels, censor sexual content before the 9pm
watershed the same is impractical for video-sharing websites.
Music videos were singled out for strong criticism in Let
Children be Children, a Downing Street commissioned report
written by anti-sexualisation campaigner Reg Bailey, head of the
Mothers Union, a Church of England campaign group.
The government also remains 'concerned' by the style
and promotion of so-called Lads' mags, such as Loaded,
FHM and Nuts. This industry is also set to be called in to
Downing Street over the summer to be asked what steps they are
taking to protect children.
There is likely to be strong opposition to Government
restrictions on accessing music videos online. Rio Caraeff, the
chief executive of Vevo, has said that age ratings are
unnecessary and would be difficult to enforce. Vevo has claimed
the move would be bad for business and would cut the
royalties earned by some acts.
|
| 1st March |
|
|
| Indonesian music censors whinge at sexy lyrics in a modern popular genre of music named dangdut Permalink
|
See article
from thejakartaglobe.com
|
Ten
dangdut songs with the titles Jupe Likes 69 Best, Rocking Van, Sorry I Got
You Pregnant, Accidentally Pregnant, Anything Goes, Just One Hour, Pimping Love,
Breaking Womens' Law, Here's Something Long and Crocodile Hole have
been banned for broadcasting by Indonesian provincial censors.
Dangdut is a genre of Indonesian popular music that is partly
derived from Malay, Arabic, and Hindustani music. It developed
in the 1970s among working-class Muslim youth, but beginning in
the late 1990s reached a broader following in Indonesia,
Malaysia, and the southern Philippines.
The West Nusa Tenggara Broadcasting Commission (KPID) has
decreed that radio and television broadcasters are prohibited
from airing the songs, which it claims have pornographic
lyrics.
The KPID took two weeks to examine 300 of the most popular
dangdut songs after receiving a complaint from a nutter group
which it said included academics and cultural scientists from
the province.
KPID head, Badrun A.M., claimed that the body did not
take the step to impose censorship lightly.
In principle we do not wish to curb the
creativity of anyone's art,...BUT...the KPID
also wishes to protect the public from the negative impacts
of listening to these songs. There's the potential for
children and teenagers to copy what they hear.
The head of the broadcasting supervisory agency said that the
words to Julia Perez' song Jupe Likes 69 Best were
delivered in an erotic voice, with lustful sighs and emphasis on
lyrics which portrayed intimate relations and the singer's
preferred mode of sexual intercourse.
More vulgar still, according to Badrun, was Rocking Van
by Lia M.J. and Asep Rumpi, which he said, promoted sex outside
of marriage, and went into details of sex positions.
This is very vulgar, and completely inappropriate to be
heard by our community here in West Nusa Tenggara. Not to
mention 'Pimping Love' which tells the story of a husband who
sells his wife as a prostitute --- this does not represent our
Eastern culture, he said.
|
| 24th February |
|
|
| Ofcom confirms ATVOD decision that a music video service on the internet is TV-like Permalink
|
See press
release
from atvod.co.uk
See
Ofcom Decision [pdf] from
atvod.co.uk
|
Ofcom
has made an appeal decision that Ofcom was correct to determine that the MTV
online service Viva TV Music is subject to expensive censorship as an
on-demand programme service
An appeal by MTV Networks Europe against an ATVOD
determination that its web- based music video service Viva TV
Music is an on demand programme service and therefore subject to
regulation has not been upheld by Ofcom.
The decision means that MTV is required to pay a substantial
fee for its own censorship and ensure that the Viva TV Music
service complies with a range of statutory requirements .
In order to fall within the scope of the censorship overseen
by ATVOD, a service must satisfy a number of statutory criteria,
as set out in section 368A of the Communications Act 2003. One
of these is that the principal purpose of the service is the
provision of programmes the form and content of which are
comparable to the form and content of programmes normally
included in television programme services.
In the case of Viva TV Music, the decision turned on a number
of issues, including whether the Viva TV Music section of the
website constituted a service in its own right, and whether
music videos are 'TV-like programmes.
|
| 20th February |
|
|
| Sri Lanka to introduce a bill to pre-censor song lyrics and TV dramas Permalink
|
See article
from colombopage.com
|
Sri
Lanka Ministry of Culture and the Arts says it plans to bring a
new bill soon to censor Teledramas and songs on TV deemed
unsuitable for all audience.
With the implementation of the proposed act, the Teledrama
producers will have to obtain the approval for the production
from the Public Performances Control Board before telecasting it
through TV channels.
The song writers will have to submit their lyrics to the
Public Performances Control Board and the songs will be
inspected by the board even after music is composed, the
Ministry says.
Currently the Public Performance Control Board pre-censor
only movies and stage drama.
|
| 27th January |
|
|
| Britain set to relax live music restrictions Permalink full story: Licensed Music Censors...Licensing sets up authorities as music censors
|
In a Britain being impoverished by suffocating state fees and
restrictions, is this the first minor improvement in actually
letting entertainers earn some money?
See article
from bbc.co.uk
|
A
private member's bill, introduced by Liberal Democrat Don
Foster, will lift some of the state control and restrictions
imposed on gigs by the 2003 Licensing Act.
The changes will mean that a licence will no longer be
required for unamplified live music taking place between 08:00
and 23:00, and for amplified live music taking place between the
same times before audiences of no more than 200.
The bill passed unopposed and will have to go back to the
House Of Lords on the 10th of February before becoming law.
The MP from Bath was steering the bill through the House Of
Commons on behalf of his Lib Dem colleague, Lord Clement Jones.
The success is a relatively rare example of a House of Lords
private member's bill making it into law.
Foster explained:
It was said the Licensing Act 2003 was
going to lead to an explosion of live music but, in the
event, in small venues it was drastically cut.
We saw village halls, school halls, pubs
and clubs reducing the the amount of live music, not
increasing it.
Hopefully the bill, when it comes into
law, will reverse that.
Separate to the private member's bill, the government is
conducting its own review of the Licensing Act.
|
| 19th January |
|
|
| Feminists who campaign against hip-hop are like the Christian squares who railed against rock'n'roll Permalink
|
See article
from blogs.telegraph.co.uk
by Brendan O'Neill
|
There
is always someone campaigning against the allegedly evil lyrics
on hip-hop records. Back in the late 1980s, it was Tipper Gore,
wife of Al, and her posse of perfectly manicured, perfectly
white Washington wives who spent sleepless nights panicking that
hip-hop artists' allusions to sex and violence would warp young
people's minds. (This was before the Gores realised that global
warming was a bigger threat to mankind than gangsta rap.) Today,
the anti-hip-hop baton has been passed from the prim and
well-off arm-candy of politicians to feminists and black
activists, who fancy that their campaign to excise words like
bitch and ho from hip-hop is radical and edgy, when
in fact it is only a spin-off of the squeamish censoriousness of
Tipper and her girlfriends.
...Read the full article
|
|
|