Children in reception class, who are aged just four and five, are increasingly using bad language, talking back to staff and throwing tantrums when they don't get their own way – re-enacting scenes they have seen on screen, according to members
of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers.
Even programmes aimed at improving children's behaviour, such as Supernanny, are giving pupils ideas about how to create havoc in the classroom.
In a motion at the union's annual conference next month, teachers will vote to lobby broadcasters to cut swearing, routine violence, inappropriate name-calling and unruly behaviour from programmes which are likely to be seen by children.
Daniel Hannan is a conservative MEP who had the opportunity to tell Gordon Brown what he thought of his handling of the economy in recession.
Most of us, I suspect, have a thing or two that we'd like to say to Gordon Brown. But few of us get the opportunity. On Tuesday, I was one of those few. The Prime Minister was in the European Parliament, trying to persuade
the rest of the EU to react to the financial crisis in the way that he has, viz by fire-hosing cash at it. I was one of the eight MEPs who got to respond, and was given three minutes to make my point.
According to convention, Mr Brown had to remain in his place while I spoke. Right, I thought, for once you're going to have to listen to what people are saying. The country was in negative equity, I said; the weight of his debt would press down
on our children yet unborn and unbegot, I said; surely he could see that his bail-outs and nationalisations had failed, I said; we should stop throwing good money after bad, I said.
No doubt you can imagine how Mr Brown reacted; you might have watched him do it week after week at Prime Minister's Questions. He chatted ostentatiously to his neighbours; he pretended to doodle; he pulled his face into that grin that makes us
think of the cold glint of moonlight on a silver coffin plate. Not for the first time, it struck me that the PM won't listen to criticism. I don't mean that he won't respond to criticism; I mean that he literally won't listen to it.
Daniel Hannan's speech was ignored by British media services but was a big hit on YouTube where it was viewed hundreds of thousands of times.
Commentators have been asking how come the BBC and others ignored such a powerful speech of such obvious public interest.
Janet Daley wrote:
Yes indeed, Dan Hannan has become a global internet phenomenon. And he is absolutely right to say that the stupendous impact of his speech proves that the web is a new force in the political game. But it is also true, as so
many commenters and bloggers have noted, that this entire incident constitutes a shameful note in British broadcasting history - perhaps even a turning point.
For this splendid speech and all the dramatic significance of a prime minister having to face a relentless critique across a democratic chamber, was ignored not just by the BBC but by all of the mainstream television and
radio news media in this country.
Belatedly, and presumably out of sheer embarrassment, one BBC programme, The Daily Politics showed a brief clip of the speech followed by a discussion between two bloggers - the whole segment being designed to depict this
phenomenon as a rather amusing internet story rather than a political one. On the BBC website, the item is now being carried under a headline implying that an obscure MEP has become a surprise hit on the web by attacking Gordon Brown: so Dan's
speech is categorised as a kind of weird popular oddity, like a skate-boarding duck.
But the really significant thing to remember is that it was not just the BBC that systematically ruled his performance out: all of the news and current affairs programmes on the terrestrial and digital channels did the same.
(Channel Four's seven o'clock news eventually made an effort, on very similar lines to The Daily Politics: this was a story about the power of the internet.)
BBC Breakfast is an early morning news and entertainment programme transmitted weekdays on BBC1. At 06:55 the programme featured part of a sound clip of the Hollywood actor Christian Bale losing his temper on a film set. The incident,
which, when played in full, featured a number of expletives, had been recorded and distributed to the media and was widely reported at the time.
The programme's presenter introduced the Christian Bale item and almost immediately the word “fucking” was heard. The clip was immediately stopped and the presenters apologised stating that the clip should have been edited. 16 viewers complained
to Ofcom that the word “fucking” was broadcast.
Ofcom considered Rule 1.14 which requires that: The most offensive language must not be broadcast before the watershed…
The BBC said that it accepted that the transmission of the word “fucking” before the watershed was in breach of Rule 1.14. It said that the broadcast of this word was the result of human error. Two versions of the item existed in its production
database – one containing the most offensive language and one with this language bleeped out for transmission. The original unedited version was played by mistake because the two different versions were not clearly labelled.
Ofcom Decision: Resolved
Ofcom acknowledged the swift action of the director to take the clip off-air immediately once the first swear word was heard, therefore avoiding any further offence to viewers. We also note the swift steps taken to apologise to viewers for this
error and to put in place revised procedures to prevent a recurrence. Ofcom therefore considered the matter was resolved adequately by the broadcaster.
The Qur'an was a two-hour documentary made by the film-maker, Antony Thomas. It was broadcast as part of Channel 4's Islam Unveiled season, a week of programmes dealing with Islam. The Qur'an examined what the Qur'an itself
says on a range of issues such as crime and punishment, violence and conflict, and the treatment of women. The programme attempted to relate present-day Islamic practice and beliefs to the Qur'anic source text.
The programme contained several sequences discussing Shi'a practice and beliefs. In particular, it focussed on “intercession”. Intercession is the practice of directing prayers and requests to God through certain members of the family of the
Prophet Mohammed. This includes Imam Ali Reza and his descendents, the eighth of the twelve Imams who are perceived by some to be the religious and political successors to the Prophet Mohammed.
Ofcom received 21 complaints from individuals on the grounds that it portrayed Shi'a Muslims in a negative, unbalanced and irresponsible light , with a series of misrepresentations of the Qur'an's teachings. Ofcom also received a detailed
complaint from 12 organisations representing Shi'a Islam within the UK.
The complainants said the film risked increasing tensions within the Muslim community between Sunnis and Shi'as, and inspiring violence against Shi'as. They also chastised it for not using Shi'a scholars and commentators in the UK and for giving
insufficient time to Shi'a contributors in general.
Ofcom ruled that the programme did not mislead viewers on Shi'a belief and practices and that it could not be judged as likely to inspire violence against Shi'as.
The regulator was unable to rule on the grounds of balance, as its remit in this area covers only news and factual output relating to political or industrial controversy or public policy.
C4 commissioning editor, religion and multicultural Aaqil Ahmed said: Hopefully we can now remember this film for what it was - a truly original piece of landmark television. Antony Thomas and Samir Shah's amazing efforts to
get it made and made so well should be applauded and from now on any film made on the subject will have a remarkable benchmark.
I am pleased that Ofcom has endorsed the views of TV critics, who described The Qur'an as 'scrupulously fair-minded', 'exhaustively researched' and 'an exemplary piece of programme making.
I am grateful that this ruling, by the independent regulatory body responsible for broadcasting, completely dismisses the unfounded allegations
David Jason apologised yesterday for a joke he made about Pakistanis on a radio show.
Appearing on the Christian O'Connell Show on Absolute Radio, the Only Fools And Horses star was asked to leave a question for the next guest as part of the Who's Calling Christian? feature.
The actor replied with a joke, he asked: What do you call a Pakistani cloakroom attendant? before delivering the punchline: Mahatma Coat.
O'Connell immediately said, No more jokes like that, and the incident was edited out of the show before it was put on the station's website as a podcast.
A spokeswoman for Sir David said: He is very sorry if he has offended anyone. He was horrified when he found he had given offence. He hadn't thought it was a racist joke, but if people took it that way, he's very sorry about it.
some viewers are struggling to stomach the lingering death scenes on Nature's Great Events on BBC1.
The series, fronted by Sir David Attenborough, has attracted a flurry of complaints, while on wildlife message boards the debate has raged over whether the distressing nature of some of the footage made the show too difficult to watch.
The series was broadcast on Wednesdays at 9pm but repeated on Sundays at 6pm, before the watershed and causing concerns for parents watching with children.
One episode followed a lion pride close to death as they struggled to find food in the Serengeti. The weakest cub was shown with its bones jutting through its skin before being abandoned. Viewers faced 45 seconds of footage as the cub curled up
to die alone.
In another episode, a gannet chick was shown being beaten by waves as it attempted to fly for the first time. As it lay dying the camera panned to a close-up of its face. The whole sequence lasted for more than 90 seconds.
Other episodes saw a sea lion beaten to death by a group of killer whales, and seal pup drowning. The BBC said it had received 11 formal complaints about the series, most about the cub and the gannet.
The show's executive producer Bruce Leith dismissed complaints that it lingered too long on animal deaths: It is important to reflect the reality of what we find. Sometimes-that can be difficult for some viewers but if we only showed one side
of things that would be misleading.
And a spokesman for the International Fund for Animal Welfare said that while some scenes might be distressing> this series encourages humans to think about the daily struggle of individual animals to survive.
Die Hard with a Vengeance deserves the kind of censorship cult status that only classics like The Toxic Avenger, Cannibal Holocaust and The Evil Dead can whip up. Sadly, it never will never gain such
notoriety. And why should it? Its a Die hard movie. It doesn't need any help, or media publicity.
However since its release in 1995 the 3rd film has gone through something of an Enter the Dragon trend, with every living room format re-release being a little different. The only similarity between them all is the fact that a very under
rated and (surprisingly) clever action film, is constantly butchered by the ghost of James Fermans scissors.
Some releases have been laughable, some 90% complete (on the action front anyway), and all have retained the cringe worthy dubbing.................. Until today. This morning on Sky action we had both, and then some. A full screen pan and scan
(which really messes with the action sequences on this film, even on my 60"), with all the swearing and hardly any violence.
I've seen a lot of versions of this film, but never this one. I'd say it loses maybe another 12 seconds of violence compared to the Buena vista (so called) special edition. Not having seen the British Theatrical release since the initial release
I can't tell if this is that.
The Brit release was cut for Theatrical, but only for violence. So there is a good chance that this is what this is. It does contain some tell tale age signs, namely, print rot, speckles, and significant grain, not present on the DVD release.
It does seem strange that this version should surface now, what with the BBFC having waived all previous cuts, and UK gold showing it totally unedited this time last year.
Comment: Half Cut Strong Language
16th March 2009. Thanks to Gav
Whilst the usual Sky version of Die Hard with a Vengeance is certainly not the widescreen original ratio of 2.35:1, it is a actually a 1.78:1 version extracted from the original.
In terms of strong language, The BBFC did actually cut the cinema version. They requested: Throughout film, reduce the cumulative incidence of sexual swearwords by half, retaining those justified by dramatic tension.
Strangely, the usual Sky version includes the uncut lift shootout scene so notably excised by the BBFC
Coronation Street, EastEnders, Emmerdale and Hollyoaks have been accused of sending out harmful messages to youngsters by airing drinking scenes too frequently.
An article in the Mirror newspaper found that the pre-watershed soaps are the worst offenders for showing characters consuming alcohol.
ITV1's Emmerdale contained 21 booze scenes in a one-week period. Coronation Street and BBC One's EastEnders both had 16, while Channel 4's Hollyoaks featured 11.
Alcohol Concern's Don Shenker has described the results as shocking , adding: Children learn to familiarise themselves with alcohol as another commodity, like bread or milk, rather than a potentially harmful substance. Alcohol on film
and television often leaves out the possible harm it can cause - binge-drinking may be glamorised and humourised. If young people in particular see their favourite characters and role models drinking heavily, we need to think about what kind of
message that puts across.
A spokesman for the BBC insisted that the corporation is always careful to show the consumption of alcohol in context. EastEnders is mindful of its family audience and is careful to portray responsible drinking. As with most continuing dramas,
it features a pub.
A BBC News presenter has apologised after comparing fellow newsreader George Alagiah to a chimpanzee live on air.
Chris Eakin made the comment as he handed back to Alagiah following a newspaper review at the end of a 10pm bulletin on the BBC News Channel.
Alagiah, who was born in Sri Lanka and is of Tamil descent, subsequently called the incident unfortunate and inappropriate but said he had accepted Eakin's apology.
Eakin pointed to a copy of the Guardian showing a photograph of a chimp at a zoo in Sweden which collects stones to throw at visitors when he asked: Can you see any likeness? before handing back to Alagiah.
The newsreader looked surprised before attempting to laugh it off.
In a statement, Eakin apologised for the remark: This was a light-hearted comment with absolutely no other intended overtones and I know that George did not interpret it as anything other than that .
A BBC spokeswoman said it was an inappropriate remark that shouldn't have been made. We have accepted the explanation given by Chris and he has reassured us that it will not happen again.
The spokeswoman added that one complaint had been received following the remark, which occurred at 10.25pm on Monday night.
I am grateful to all of you who support our work. For years mediawatch-uk has been sounding an independent clarion voice, challenging the decline of decent standards on television. It was then, a great encouragement, when
our voice was suddenly joined by over 40,000 ordinary people, politicians, celebrities and other media personnel in a unified chorus of objection to the level of swearing on TV, thanks to the antics of Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand.
Suddenly those of us who had been campaigning for years along with those who had protested silently in our chairs for a very long time, felt a surge of people power! There really were others who felt like us - we were reassured that we were part
of a majority not a minority - although of course the statistics had always told that story!
Suddenly the number of people joining mediawatch-uk online started to rise; the media was jostling for John Beyer's take on issues of taste and decency; and we were encouraged that all the work carried out on making the new website accessible,
interesting and attractive was producing results. People were deciding it was time to put their money where their mouth is! It is important that we maintain the momentum of this campaign.
The BBC has announced new policy guidelines to make it clearer who is responsible for editorial compliance when the on-screen/on-air talent owns the company making the programme or has a senior role in the production team.
Applying immediately to all BBC commissions in television and radio, the new guidelines state that for in-house and independent programmes, on-screen/on-air talent or their agents must not be responsible for editorial standards or compliance
procedures for the programme in which they appear, and therefore should not be credited as the Executive Producer.
In exceptional circumstances, an additional Executive Producer must be appointed to take responsibility for editorial controls and compliance procedures.
The BBC Trust's Editorial Standards Committee recently asked the BBC Executive to assess the editorial controls and compliance procedures in place for all programmes where the production company is owned and/ or managed by the featured performer.
George Entwistle, Controller of Editorial Standards, BBC Vision, said of the changes: On-screen and on-air talent plays a vital role in BBC productions, both independent and in-house, and their creative input is very highly valued. But
creative input must not be confused with responsibility for editorial standards and compliance.
Artists and their agents need to be free to focus on the creative process while another senior member of the team takes responsibility for ensuring that compliance procedures are followed and editorial standards are met.
Lord Denning: Much that is obscene has escaped
the reach of the law.
John Beyer to Julian Petley:
In 1972 Lord Denning, then Master of the Rolls, observed that the 1959 Obscene Publications Act had misfired so far as prosecutions are concerned. Much that is obscene, he said, has escaped the reach of the law. This remains
the position today.
In criminal cases under this act, jurors are asked not if the material before them is obscene but if an imaginary third party who is likely to see it would tend to be depraved or corrupted. Given that it was parliament's intention to strengthen the law concerning pornography
there can be no doubt that the law has failed because of this fundamentally flawed test. Any objective examination of the volume and nature of pornography now compared with 50 years ago surely proves the point conclusively.
I would argue that the act should be replaced with one that actually achieves what parliament intended. Several attempts to amend the law have failed, not because they lacked popular support, but because of parliamentary procedures. The best
option for reform, I believe, was that proposed by the late Earl of Halsbury in the House of Lords in 1980 in a debate he initiated about the Williams report, which examined the issue in the late 70s. Halsbury suggested drawing up a list of
obscene sexual imagery, but this proposal was criticised by Williams, as it could never be exhaustive. Halsbury asked: If it catches 90% of what you want to catch, is that not better than catching nothing at all?
Channel 4 has come under fire from Islamic leaders over a television documentary showing how gay and lesbian Muslims suffer under their laws.
Its director has already had death threats. Now station chiefs are bracing themselves for a backlash. Its digital channel More 4 will show A Jihad For Love tonight.
It lifts the lid on the battle gay and lesbian Muslims face as they struggle with their faith and their sexuality. The documentary not only shows gay Muslims daring to kiss, holding hands and talking about getting married, it also provides
harrowing reports on the suffering they have faced under Islamic law. And it reveals the death threats and punishments handed out to gays in countries including Egypt and Iran.
Indian film maker Parvez Sharma – who spent six years making the programme – revealed: I have had death threats on my blog after making this film. Some countries have even banned it. I've been called an apostate because Muslims think I have
insulted Islam but I think it will open up a debate.
Islamic leaders in the UK have attacked the documentary, saying it will offend, anger and shock. An Imam from Europe's largest mosque The Baitul Futuh based in Surrey condemned the film last night, saying: These people should not be confessing
their sins to the television cameras. They should be doing it in private to God and seeking forgiveness.”
Last night a Channel 4 spokesman defended the documentary. She said: This is a sensitively made documentary that has played to critical acclaim at film festivals internationally and is a legitimate area for a documentary film-maker to explore.
True Stories: A Jihad For Love will be shown on More 4 at 10pm tonight.
Comedienne Jo Brand will not be prosecuted over her remarks about the British National Party during a BBC comedy programme.
Referring to the leaking of the BNP's membership on to the internet, Brand told the asudience at the Hammersmith Apollo: Hurrah. Now we know who to send the poo to.
Following complaints from the BNP, Brand was investigated for allegedly committing an act of incitement to cause racial harassment but the Crown Prosecution Service said yesterday: We have advised the police to take no further action.'
Pop star Bono wound up the Daily Mail's soundbite ntters on BBC radio after the broadcaster kicked off a day-long promotion of his band U2.
The band were being interviewed by Radio 1 DJ Jo Whiley when Bono called Coldplay star Chris Martin a 'wanker'.
A shocked Whiley immediately interrupted the star to demand an apology for the word which was being broadcast at 11.45am.
The corporation issued an on-air apology on behalf of Bono. The BBC later uploaded the interview onto it's iPlayer website without edits.
The incident occurred after Whiley played a Coldplay track ahead of the band's arrival in the studio. She asked Bono if he thought that Martin was as talented as Paul McCartney.
Bono replied: I think he's that good a melodist, but he's a wanker.
Whiley then cut the star off mid way through his answer saying: Would you like to apologise for what you've just said live on my show?
Bono joked: I'm a reformed character, I don't do that any more. Whiley retorted: You're not showing any signs of being reformed.
Whiley made an apology herself and added: I'm sorry if anyone is listening at the moment who were offended by the words that Bono said. I will apologise on his behalf.
Bono then added: I'm sorry, it's early.
Tory MP, broadcaster and Daily Mail sound bite nutter, Ann Widdecombe hit out at the BBC for failing to learn from past mistakes, including the Andrew Sachs fiasco.
She told the Daily Mail: If the BBC are really serious about trying to clean up their act then this not the way to go about doing it. It just shows complete contempt for the public.
John Beyer, director of Mediawatch UK, ccused the corporation of failing to warn its guests about the use of bad language.
He said: They should have edited the interview they put online. This type of language is not acceptable. The public opinion on this is clear and most people do not want to hear it. The BBC need to be able to properly advise the interviewees
about the use of bad language and make sure it is not offensive on-air. If the artists can't accept this they should not be invited back again.
The BBC said they had received six complaints from listeners after the outburst.
Comment: Sometimes 'Wanker' is very appropriate indeed
1st March 2009. Thanks to Alan:
Beyer: This type of language is not acceptable.
To whom is it not acceptable? I've used it in the car when cut up by a wanker, in the pub when I've thought the pub bore was a wanker, in the factory canteen when I thought the managing director was a wanker, in the senior common room when
I thought the vice-chancellor was a wanker. In fact I've just used it in front of my computer when I thought the odious, Pooterish, sanctimonious, fun-hating, authoritarian Gruppenfuhrer von Beyer was a wanker.
Just who does this noisome little pillock think he is?
A disabled CBeebies presenter has been the victim of a disturbing campaign after parents complained that she was scaring toddlers.
They claimed that host Cerrie Burnell - who was born with one arm - is not suitable to appear on the digital children's channel.
Miss Burnell and co-presenter Alex Winters took over the popular Discover and Do slot and The Bedtime Hour programme last month.
But the decision to hire her has prompted a flurry of complaints to the BBC and on parenting message boards.
Incredibly, one father said he wanted to ban his daughter from watching the channel because he feared it would give her nightmares. Others claimed that they were forced to discuss difficult issues with their young children before they were ready.
Some even accused the BBC of hiring Miss Burnell because of political correctness and solely to meet employment quotas.
A BBC spokesman said the broadcaster had received nine formal complaints about Miss Burnell. But she insisted the new presenter had also received messages of support and that many parents were keen to have a range of people on screen.
Miss Burnell hit back at her critics, branding them small minded and their remarks terrible ' Admitting she was upset by the comments, she added: It can only be a good thing that parents are using me as a chance to talk about
disability with their children. It just goes to show how important it is to have positive disabled role models on CBeebies and television in general.
Ofcom has announced that it will launch an investigation after receiving viewer complaints about Dancing On Ice judge Jason Gardiner.
A small number of fans contacted the TV censor after Gardiner compared Roxanne Pallett to a Cabbage Patch doll and Ellery Hanley to Mr. Potato Head on last weekend's live show.
A Dancing On Ice spokesperson said: During the Dancing On Ice '80s special on Sunday, Jason Gardiner gave feedback to a number of the celebrities. In his critique of Roxanne and Ellery, Jason compared them to particular toy characters. This
was not meant offensively and was intended to be in the spirit of the themed show.
Gardiner recently complained that the contestants are taking his behaviour too seriously, insisting that his comments are intended to be fun.
TV censor Ofcom is preparing for a wave of complaints this week over the language used in a Channel 4 sitcom.
'cunt' featured three times in the new comedy, Free Agents , first aired last Friday.
Actor Anthony Head plays the head of a talent agency in the six-part series, written by Chris Niel and described as a caustic romantic comedy.
Head, who became famous in the cult show Buffy The Vampire Slayer, said : Free Agents is a very adult show but it is very funny, and I get to say words I've never said on television before. It's very liberating.
In the first few minutes, Head's character Stephen Cauldwell said: Good morning, my dear cunts. 'fuck' also featured 22 times in the half-hour episode.
Mediawatch spokesman John Beyer said: The obscene language in this programme is appalling by any standard. It shows a disregard of public concern that is completely unacceptable from a public service broadcaster.
We invite readers to sign our Stop Swearing on TV online petition to the Prime Minister and we call again on the regulator, Ofcom, to rewrite the terms of its Broadcasting Code so that offensive language of this sort and intensity
attracts substantial financial penalties.
Free speech controversies involving Prince Harry, Carol Thatcher and Jeremy Clarkson show the new thought police are in danger of running riot.
Ever since ‘Sachsgate' – the BBC controversy involving Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand – it has been a constant story of another day, another ‘scandal' about some celebrity or other being banned, investigated, suspended or censured for saying
something offensive or outrageous. It is not only the frequency of these media controversies that stands out lately. Something new is happening in the free speech wars. It has become a war on words.
BBC radio presenter Simon Mayo apologised after two guests used derogatory terms while talking about Geert Wilders.
Writers Quintin Jardine and Dennis Lehane were speaking on Radio 5 Live at about 4pm. Their discussion about books had been broken off to cut to to a live interview with the Dutch MP.
Quintin Jardine blurted out 'wanker' while referring to Dutch MP Geert Wilders. When the station returned to the discussion Mayo apologised for the interruption. Scottish author Jardine said it was fine as 'wankers' like him need to be given
airtime so that people can hear what they are.
Mayo immediately apologised to listeners. But no sooner than he had finished than American writer Lehane blurted out: Wanker is such a great word.
The host said: It might be a great word in America, we can't use it, it's not an appropriate word and we apologise for it.
Simon Mayo: I'm so sorry
Last night, a BBC spokesman confirmed the chain of events and said: During a live programme, two guests used inappropriate language which presenter Simon Mayo immediately apologised for. We are sorry for any offence caused.
The BBC had received one complaint about the incident last night.
Social services are considering legal action to stop the final two parts of the Channel 4 documentary Boys And Girls Alone being aired.
The four-part series involves a group of children aged from eight to 11 who are left to their own devices in isolated cottages in Cornwall.
Two episodes of the programme have so far been broadcast and include scenes of children fighting and crying.
Now Cornwall County Council's assistant director for social care and family services has written to both Channel 4 and Ofcom calling for the final two programmes to be axed due to serious concerns of emotional and psychological abuse.
Ruby Parry said her department would have intervened to safeguard the children had they been made aware of their circumstances at the time it was recorded. She also said the programme makers breached performance licensing legislation as one of
the children involved is from Cornwall but a performing licence was not obtained from the county council. Parry said as any application for a licence would have resulted in detailed enquiries about the nature of the programme she 'can only
surmise that this was a deliberate omission'.
Andrew Mackenzie, head of Factual Entertainment at Channel 4, denied they had breached performance licensing legislation as the children are not performing but are being observed.
Mackenzie said that Channel 4 regards children's welfare 'as our first priority when filming' and all programmes are made in consultation with the relevant Ofcom guidelines. He said: All the children were carefully chosen and screened by
appropriately qualified experts, including a clinical psychologist, to make sure they could cope well with the experience of being in the series. The response from the parents and children to the series has been a very positive one. The mums and
dads have learnt a huge amount about their children from having the opportunity to see them in this way. Furthermore many parents report more confident and able children following this stimulating and happy experience.'
The international television channel al-Jazeera has been criticised by MPs for broadcasting the sermons of a Muslim cleric in which he celebrates the Holocaust and prays for the killing of all Jews.
John Whittingdale, chairman of the House of Commons Media Select Committee, urged al-Jazeera yesterday to apologise for broadcasting the messages of Yusuf al-Qaradawi and to ban the cleric, one of the network's top hosts, from appearing on
I would hope that anybody who watches it or is aware of it may change their attitude towards al-Jazeera, he told The Times: I would've thought it is very damaging. Al-Jazeera should apologise.
But the network refused to apologise for Sheikh al-Qaradawi's statements, which were broadcast on al-Jazeera's Arabic station, saying that it could not control the words and opinions expressed during live broadcasts.
Andrew Dismore, the Labour MP for Hendon, condemned al-Jazeera for associating itself with Sheikh al-Qaradawi — who hosts one of its most popular segments, Shariah and Life — saying the network should not use live coverage as a means of
justifying the broadcast of the sheik's comments: If they put on somebody who has known racist views they should not be surprised what comes out at the other end.
The Board of Deputies of British Jews said: These sermons represent hatred in its purest form and epitomise the worst of Islamist anti-Semitism.
The complaints relate to a sermon and a lecture by Sheikh al-Qaradawi in which he described the Holocaust as a divine punishment and prayed to Allah to kill Jews down to the very last one.
The BBC apologised after broadcasting strong language on Breakfast News.
The show was doing an item on an expletive-laden rant by actor Christian Bale on the set of the new Terminator film.
His four-minute outburst at the film's director of photography, Shane Hurlbut, has become a hit on YouTube.
Ashen-faced: BBC presenters Charlie Stayt and Susanna Reid were left stunned as Christian Bale's foul-mouthed rant turned the airwaves blue
Ashen-faced: BBC presenters Charlie Stayt and Susanna Reid were left stunned as Christian Bale's foul-mouthed rant turned the airwaves blue
Before playing a clip at 6.55am presenter Charlie Stayt told BBC1 viewers they may want to cover their ears because of its aggressive nature.
The clip was then aired with Bale heard shouting ‘fuck' before producers, realising their error, cut the video short.
A shriek was heard in the studio before the programme returned to the two presenters, open-mouthed and supposedly pale with shock, not at the language, but at the fear of the usual media spotlight.
Susanna Reid said: An enormous apology. That was definitely supposed to be edited. We are very sorry. You won't hear that again. We do apologise.
The BBC received more than 50 complaints, with many supposedly concerned that it was heard by schoolchildren, but really enjoying the expected BBC embarrassment.
The BBC blamed a technical error. A spokeswoman said: We apologised on air immediately afterwards and another apology was given at the end of the programme. We also pulled a later repeat of the item. We are sorry for any offence caused.
John Beyer, of Media Watch accused the BBC of being careless particularly as younger children getting ready for school could have been watching.
He added: Given the controversy about bad language on television they should have been far more careful. It's language that the audience watching BBC Breakfast would not expect.
The BBC should have been alert to the problems when airing clips like these. They have apologised and are right to do so promptly.
Bale's astonishing tantrum has been viewed by millions since it was posted online earlier this week. In the clip he is seen shouting and swearing profusely at the film's director of photography Shane Hurlbut. The four minute outburst contained
around 35 expletives, and was simply prompted by Hurlbot distracting him during a scene. It also sees the star threaten to quit his lead role as John Connor in the multi-million pound film unless Hurlbot is fired.
Thousands of viewers have complained to the BBC over the sacking of Carol Thatcher.
The corporation has been condemned for its decision to fire Baroness Thatcher's daughter from her roving reporter role on The One Show after she referred to a black tennis player as a golliwog during an off air conversation.
Last night at least 2,200 had complained about the decision. Even The One Show 's official website was packed with comments critical of the BBC. So far, the BBC has received 60 messages backing its move.
Thatcher's comments came in a conversation after the broadcast of last Thursday's edition with One Show host Adrian Chiles and comedienne Jo Brand. They had been discussing the Australian Open tennis championships and the black French
tennis player Jo-Wilfried Tsonga – who Thatcher referred to as a golliwog'.
Some senior BBC staff have expressed concerns that this will lead to a culture of people reporting each other to the authorities all the time.
The BBC said there had been 12 people present when the comments were made in the green room after the show aired.
BBC1 controller Jay Hunt said: What Carol decides to say in the privacy of her own home and in a conversation with friends is one thing. What she says in a green room space where there are 12 people present, in her capacity as a roving
reporter for The One Show, is a rather different thing. On this occasion her using that phrase, it being overheard and having caused offence to a number of people, was totally inappropriate.
Perhaps Gordon Ramsey should
try his hand at sorting out
failing morality campaigns
Beyer's predictably jumped on the Gordon Ramsey bandwagon:
Gordon Ramsey is apparently in record breaking form after swearing 243 times in one show.His guests took the total to 312 expletives.
Friday night's programme broke the record for the most swearwords in a TV show set by the comic Paul Kaye in 2007. Ramsay used the F-word 187 times in his programme that ran for 103 minutes.
Ann Widdecombe, the former Tory minister, has led calls for Ramsay to be sacked: Anybody who swears that much on a cooking show must be fired. Most people were already fed up with him. This is the final straw. Just how far does he have to go
before Channel 4 bosses accept that he has caused real and genuine offence and broken all acceptable boundaries of good taste? What is their limit?
Mediawatch director John Beyer went one step further and called for Channel 4 to be sacked. He said: This is a serious political issue. Ramsay's behaviour was unacceptable and Channel 4 is ultimately responsible for it. They know what he is
like and it's completely wrong for them to let this go when it has caused so much offence.
The channel's whole remit as a public service broadcaster needs to be investigated by the Government if it refuses to take on board the concerns of viewers and politicians.
Channel 4, which received 69 complaints from viewers, said no action would be taken against Ramsay. A spokesman said: He is a well-known TV personality and viewers know what to expect when watching these programmes. This was an extended
two-hour programme shown after the watershed and preceded by an on-air warning about its content. The swearing is a genuine expression of Gordon's passion and frustration.
Too much television and time spent on the internet can make children mentally ill, according to a survey into British childhood.
Excessive exposure makes a child materialistic, which in turn affects their relationship with their parents and their health.
That is one of the conclusions of the new wide-ranging survey produced for the Children's Society.
It says that children are part of a new form of consumerism, with under 16 year-olds spending their money on clothes, snacks, music, video games and magazines.
The report claims that some advertisers explicitly exploit the mechanism of peer pressure, while painting parents as buffoons and that in its most extreme form, advertising persuades children that you are what you own.
In addition the constant exposure to celebrities through, TV soaps, dramas and chat shows is having a detrimental effect. It says: Children today know in intimate detail the lives of celebrities who are richer than they will ever be,
and mostly better-looking. This exposure inevitably raises aspirations and reduces self-esteem.
The Good Childhood inquiry, compiled by more than 35,000 contributors is independent of the Church of England affiliated society but has been endorsed by the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams. It takes an in-depth look at the changing
face of childhood and family life in Britain, and the challenges facing youngsters today.
The Good Childhood study was carried out by a panel of independent experts for the charity. They included Lord Layard, a former adviser on well-being to Tony Blair; Children's Commissioner for England Sir Albert Aynsley-Green, and a group of
prominent academics. Two religious figures also took senior roles: the Right Reverend Tim Stevens, Church of England Bishop of Leicester, and Dr Muhammed Abdul Bari, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain.
The report claims that the upward trend of violence in the media in general, is making children violent and causing tension within the family.
The report says: We know from controlled studies that exposure to violence can breed violence. So it seems likely that the upward trend in media violence is helping to produce the upward trend in violent behaviour - and also the growth of
psychological conflict in family relationships.
The report also notes that commercial pressures have led to the 'premature sexualisation' of young people. It notes that young people are having sex earlier because of many forces , including more privacy when both parents work, more
contraception, commercial pressures toward premature sexualisation, and fundamental changes in attitude.
For some reason Sunday night ITV 2 showed the original BBFC "15" cut of Die Hard 2 . Forgot just how much silly stuff was dubbed out and cut (especially Dennis Franz saying FREAKING so many times).
I might be wrong but I think this actually WAS the video they showed, as the picture quality was very saturated and the print seemed dirty and full of blemishes, Plus it was the full screen version, which was cut quite heavily, until the film was
re-rated on video in the early nineties due to the popularity of "WIDESCREEN" releases (mostly by CBS/FOX). Both the first 2 Die Hards were front runners for this trend.
Comedienne Jo Brand is at the centre of a police investigation over quips she made on the comedy programme that temporarily replaced Jonathan Ross's TV chat show.
A senior producer on the Friday night Live At The Apollo show has been questioned by the Metropolitan Police about the incident.
Outspoken: Jo Brand's remark on the BNP party was cheered by the Hammersmith Apollo audience. The remarks concerned the leaking of the British National Party's membership list. Brand joked that as a result of the list becoming public knowledge on
the internet, she now knew the addresses where to send the ‘poo' through the post.
Brand's routine was a hit with the live audience, who laughed and cheered at her remarks. However, the joke, which was broadcast on the late-night BBC1 show from Hammersmith Apollo on January 16, offended members of the BNP.
The following day, Simon Darby, the BNP's deputy leader, made an official complaint to Hammersmith police alleging that Brand's comment had been an act of incitement to cause racial harassment. Further complaints from the BNP followed, to the BBC
and the police, and a formal review was launched two weeks ago.
A police spokesman last night confirmed: We have received a complaint and officers will be reviewing the programme to see if any offences have occurred.
But a senior police source said: It is an absurd case and very unlikely to get to court. A lot of police time and money appears to have been wasted investigating what for all intents and purposes is just a TV show joke.
A file was sent to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) last week to determine if there is enough evidence for a successful prosecution to be made against Miss Brand or the BBC. A decision will be made by the CPS in the next few days.
A BBC spokesman said last night: We do not comment on police matters. However, we believe the audience would have understood the satirical nature of the remarks.
The Mirror is reporting about viewers fury at 312 swear words in 103 mins including Gordon Ramsay's 240 used of 'fuck'
Viewers were said to have flooded Channel 4 with complaints after Friday's Gordon's Great British Nightmare.
And it all came on the same day the fiery chef promised not to swear on the US version of his live cookalong show for fear of upsetting American viewers.
Ramsay's show on Friday drew three million viewers and went out just after the 9pm watershed with a warning about strong language.
Labour MP Denis MacShane said: Gordon Ramsay might be a good chef, but he is a terrible role model to every child and adolescent in Britain. He is giving two-fingers to people who care about the English language. Channel 4 should give Britain
a break from this foul-mouthed soup-stirrer. This is a clear breach of Ofcom's rules on swearing and it should launch an investigation into the programme immediately.
Lib-Dem MP Don Foster said: This is getting beyond a joke. When you hear about this much swearing in a single programme, you're tempted to utter an expletive yourself. We have got to tone it down because bad language on TV is seeping into
An Ofcom spokesman said they were unable to comment on complaints received over the weekend until next week.
A Channel 4 spokesman said: Gordon Ramsay is a well-known TV personality and viewers know what to expect. The swearing was a genuine expression of his passion and frustration.
Is it me or are watchdogs bored? Well, more bored. How many of them were sat by their radios and televisions over the weekend waiting for Jonathan Ross to be Jonathan Ross? He makes a comment about a woman who nobody knows (because nobody
mentioned her name) and once again the papers are full of pictures of people nobody gives a flying fuck about. Some dithering old cow looking for a handout.
Once again the words FIRE, SACK, and DISCIPLINED are zipping around. How many of the listeners Saturday morning were listening just to hear what Ross would say? The fact of the matter is the BBC will never boot this man. Why? because they don't
have anything else. He is quite simply the biggest one man ratings magnet. If they do get rid of him, he will simply go to a network who are liberal enough for his brand of comedy, and he'll take the listeners/viewers with him.
Prince Phillip twice publicly called blue collar factory workers 'niggers' and 'Pakis', but for some reason neither him nor his wife, the queen, were asked to advocate the throne. Jonathan Ross makes a passing comment and theirs uproar.
All of this started because of an incident of truth. Russell Brand DID sleep with Andrew Sachs granddaughter (who by the way watchdogs, is a stripper). So where's the problem? Oh and Andrew Sachs, he's a white guy famous for playing a racially
stereotypical Spaniard waiter.. In a BBC comedy!!! Bit one sided this isn't it?
Jonathan Ross is a fantastic presenter/interviewer, and the BBC know this. If they think they had complaints over the Andrew Sachs incident, get rid of Ross, and you'll have truck loads. It'll make the Sachs complaints look like fan mail.
Over half of people think that there is currently too much strong language on TV and radio, a poll commissioned for the BBC's Panorama programme suggests.
55% of those polled said swearing is at an unacceptable level.
68% of those questioned said that swearing on programmes had increased in the last five years.
The poll was conducted for Panorama's Have I Got Bad Language for You? in which comedian Frank Skinner looked at taste and decency in UK broadcasting.
The programme predictably comes in the wake of a row over calls made by presenters Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand on Brand's BBC Radio 2 show. Skinner, who has experimented with dropping swearing from his stand up comedy routine, spoke to both
broadcasters and performers for the episode of Panorama.
Comedienne Joan Rivers expressed concern over censorship saying: It pulls you back so much, it makes you so fearful that you're scared to do a step in any direction that ordinarily I would have done to be funnier.
As part of its research for the programme Panorama commissioned a poll asking questions about people's attitudes to bad language on terrestrial television and on radio.
A total of 1001 people over the age of 16 were questioned in the telephone poll, carried out by GfK NOP between 16-18 January.
Of those polled, 58% said that broadcasters do not take enough notice of audience views in the amount of swearing on TV and radio, as opposed to 39% who said that they do.
However, 55% of those questioned, said that they thought the 9pm watershed, after which more adult content can be shown on television, is being effectively enforced by broadcasters.
Sir David Attenborough has revealed that he receives hate mail from viewers for failing to credit God in his documentaries.
In an interview with this week's Radio Times about his latest documentary, on Charles Darwin and natural selection, the broadcaster said: They tell me to burn in hell and good riddance.
Telling the magazine that he was asked why he did not give credit to God, Attenborough added: They always mean beautiful things like hummingbirds. I always reply by saying that I think of a little child in east Africa with a worm
burrowing through his eyeball. The worm cannot live in any other way, except by burrowing through eyeballs. I find that hard to reconcile with the notion of a divine and benevolent creator.
Attenborough went further in his opposition to creationism, saying it was terrible when it was taught alongside evolution as an alternative perspective. It's like saying that two and two equals four, but if you wish to believe it, it
could also be five ... Evolution is not a theory; it is a fact, every bit as much as the historical fact that William the Conqueror landed in 1066.
Are there voting nomination telephone lines for the Republic of Ireland for Celebrity Big Brother ? The C4/BB website does not list any, unlike last year's Big Brother 2008 , when they had 2 sets of numbers
listed for the UK and RoI. Is this a sign that next year's BB will not have telephone numbers for the Republic?
Secondly, the censorship of the celebrities is extreme this year. Tina was bleeped during Diary Room Uncut broadcast starting at 10.40pm, well after the watershed, when she said the words He's a selfish cunt in
reference to Coolio. She wasn't bleeped in the same episode saying " fuck " or " fucker ". Was this a C4 editorial decision or was it insisted on by Ofcom? Adult TV should be just that, adult TV.
Aside from that, political conversations between Tommy and Terry are being cut. Why?
I'm aware of the standard reply (libel, taste & decency prior to the watershed, privacy of third parties) but these things are subjective and I think your editors/lawyers are being over zealous and ruining the
Reply from Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries
Thank you for contacting Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries regarding Celebrity Big Brother .
Due to issues experienced with the phone voting lines in the Republic of Ireland last year we have decided not to make voting available for this series of Celebrity Big Brother . It is unfortunate, but as we are not
confident that these problems will not occur again we cannot, in all fairness, make this service available at this time.
Channel 4 has taken the Editorial Decision to bleep certain words that we deem too strong to broadcast. In the instance that you have quoted, Tina used a word which is widely offensive which the Production Company decided
not to broadcast.
Big Brother is subject to very tight guidelines as set by Ofcom and certain conversation topics cannot be broadcast and the political conversations that Tommy and Terry have had cannot be broadcast for that reason.
Your comments are important to us and these have been logged. Thank you again for taking the time to contact us.
The family of an 86-year-old Alzheimer's sufferer condemned Jonathan Ross after he cracked a joke about having sex with her.
The broadcaster marked his return to his BBC Radio 2 show with the gag which was immediately pounced on by those gunning for him to be sacked.
Elderly Francisca Guzman's son expressed deep hurt that his frail mother, who has had dementia for three years, was the butt of Ross's joke.
Jose Maria Moreno said: It is offensive. My mother's mental health should not be a subject for comedy and Ross should be sacked. What he said is unforgivable and offensive. I don't understand how he can continue working for an organisation
like the BBC.
Ross and his producer Andy Davies were discussing how they had spent their time during the suspension. Davies said he had done some bricklaying in the garden of his villa in Spain but kept getting grabbed by a frisky 80-year-old woman.
Ross declared: Eighty, oh God! I think you should, just for charity. Give her one last night, will you? One last night before the grave. Would it kill you?
Although Mrs Guzman was not named, she is well known in the Andalusian village of Conchar, near Granada, where Davies has his villa.
Last night there were new calls for Ross to be sacked. Tory MP David Davies said: There is a place for humour but it has to be appropriate to the time of the day. And that clearly wasn't.
Mediawatch director John Beyer said: Jokes like this are not on. He should have gone months ago.
Ross told the News of the World yesterday: Absolutely no offence to any individual was intended. It was a spontaneous, light-hearted remark made in response to an anecdote set in Spain, where no one was named or ever likely to hear the
broadcast. As far as I was concerned, the story may even have been apocryphal or exaggerated for comedic purposes.
Jonathan Ross was heavily censored when his chat show was aired on Friday night.
Despite swearing several times and making a series of crude remarks during the pre-recording of Friday Night with Jonathan Ross on Thursday morning, Friday's broadcast of his chat show was radically toned down, with all of Ross's bad
language and sexually suggestive remarks cut from the final version of the programme.
Ross twice directed 'fuck' at Tom Cruise, one of the guests on the show, during the pre-record.
He also swore at the comedian Lee Evans, another guest of the show, who used the word 'shit' shortly after he came on. In response, Ross said: Don't come on here with your 'fucking' foul mouth. This is a brave new world.
All of Ross's swear words were cut from the programme when it was aired on Friday night.
During the pre-record, Ross also asked Cruise to feel his right biceps, before claiming that his right bicep is better toned thanks to what he does with that hand. This was also cut from the final version of the show.
Ross also made several joking references to Russell Brand, all of which were cut from Friday's broadcast.
John Beyer, the director of the pressure group Media-Watch UK, said: The BBC would have been very foolish to continue giving a completely free rein to Jonathan Ross. Let's hope this brings a more sensible approach to this sort of programme and
that viewers' trust in broadcasting is restored.
Celebrity Big Brother star Verne Troyer has stirred up a few nutters.
A very late night showing on Tuesday night’s C4 highlights show featured him and the other celebrities making a movie of their favourite moments in the BB house as part of a task.
Verne decided to re-enact his antics from last week when he got drunk on champagne and flirted with all the girls.
He grabbed a toy doll and pretended it was former housemate Mutya Buena.
Egged on by rapper Coolio, he snogged the baby doll on the lips for several seconds, gasping: Oooh Mutya. Oooh Mutya. Verne then drew away, stuck out his long tongue, wiggled it around and went back in for another smacker.
Last night a spokeswoman for anti-child sex abuse charity Kidscape blasted: It seems there are no moral guidelines on this show. The fact this was broadcast suggests that it’s okay to be indecent. It’s misusing a symbol of
childhood. The fact that people will see a celebrity doing something like this almost gives credence to it.”
An Ofcom spokesman said: We have received complaints. We shall be investigating them to see if any codes or guidelines have been breached.
John Beyer, of nutter group Mediawatch, said: It seems they have broadcast this to create controversy to try to boost their ratings.
Furious fans have accused Celebrity Big Brother bosses of double standards for not giving bullying Coolio the boot.
TV censor Ofcom launched an official investigation after viewers complained about the rapper’s relentless intimidation of housemates.
They are furious the American star has not been kicked out over claims of verbal attacks and threats of violence – after the Daily Star revealed the true extent of his aggressive behaviour in a shock report.
Last night a spokesman for Ofcom said: I can confirm we have had complaints about Wednesday night’s show over issues concerning Coolio. We will be investigating.
I think everyone should listen to this rubbish on Radio4. It doesn't seem very balanced to me
I'm going to complain about this to Ofcom - I think others should do the same.
From the BBC description:
Penny Marshall examines the effects of the rapid expansion of online pornography on UK society. She talks to those who use online porn, including couples trying to repair the trust and intimacy dented by the persistent and
secretive use of porn sites. She also hears from psychologists who are concerned that young people are in danger of having their understanding of sexual relationships permanently damaged by what they see online.
The ITV is under investigation by TV censor Ofcom for screening a drama in which an unconscious woman was raped before having her tongue bitten off. After receiving a few complaints, Ofcom has launched a preliminary assessment to see if the
drama breached the Broadcasting Code.
Above Suspicion, written by thriller veteran Lynda La Plante was made into a two-part drama about a hunt for a serial killer was screened on successive nights last week, with each episode attracting about seven million viewers. It was
shown after the 9pm watershed
In the complained about scene, a woman in her 20s was knocked unconscious by having her head banged against a car window, before being carried to a piece of waste ground and raped. When she regained consciousness, during the attack, her assailant
bit off part of her tongue before continuing to rape and eventually kill her. The programme also
showed images of nudity and one of drug-taking.
John Beyer, director of Mediawatch UK, said: Graphic brutality of this nature is not appropriate for television audiences. While we understand that Lynda La Plante has a reputation for writing graphic scenes, showing this sort of
gratuitous brutality against a defenceless woman is unacceptable. If it didn’t breach the Broadcasting Code, the code obviously needs addressing.
Beyer also pointed out that screening this type of programme highlighted the dangers of free internet video services, which allow users to watch TV shows at a time of their choosing.
Beyer said: The Government must address the situation urgently. We know the Culture Secretary Andy Burnham is concerned but the ground rules should have been set before technological innovations like the ITV Player were introduced.
Tory MP Philip Davies, who sits on the Commons Culture Select Committee, said: Watching adult, graphic material on TV is a matter of personal taste. As for this sort of material being available on the internet, it is up to parents to monitor
what their children are watching. But this type of programme being on an internet video service is a huge moral dilemma for all broadcasters.
A spokesman for ITV said: Above Suspicion is a gritty police drama that was broadcast post-watershed. Both episodes were preceded by a warning about the content. We are sorry if viewers missed the warning. We have received many positive
comments in praise of this drama.’
The BBC has been forced to apologise to an acclaimed psychologist and writer after editing her derogatory comments about religion so that a radio programme broadcast the opposite of what she had said.
Dorothy Rowe complained to the corporation that her interview on the Radio 2 programme What Do You Believe? had been edited so that the final version misrepresented her views. During a 50-minute recorded interview, Rowe had attempted to
comment on the subject proposed by the programme's producer: Why so many people want to believe in God and search for faith. But she was aghast to hear how her words were eventually used.
In an email to the corporation Rowe stated: My words were edited to make it sound that I held a favourable opinion of religion in that it gave a structure to a person's life. What was not broadcast was what I had said about how such structures
can be damaging to people. Being misquoted in this way concerned me greatly.
She said the interview sounds like I am giving unqualified praise to religious belief. There is no mention of what I talked... about at length, that religious belief can cause immense misery. I often summarise this with: 'The church keeps me
The row has provided ammunition for secular critics who accuse the BBC of using its programmes to promote religion. Terry Sanderson, president of the National Secular Society, who was interviewed for the same programme as Rowe, said: I gave a
long interview, but when I listened to the finished product it contained just a couple of very brief soundbites from me which were not representative of the thoughts I had expressed... This programme was the most blatant piece of religious
propaganda I have heard for a long time.
A spokeswoman for the corporation said: The BBC's religion and ethics department acknowledged that extracts from an interview with Dorothy Rowe - broadcast in the programme What Do You Believe? - misrepresented her views on religion and has
apologised to her.
The controller of Radio 4, Mark Damazer defends keeping Thought for the Day reserved for religious believers:
I regard this as a genuinely difficult question. There may be a case for widening the pool of contributors on Thought for The Day by having someone with an avowedly non-religious perspective. However on balance the BBC's
position is that it is reasonable to sustain the slot with believers. Let me now set out the reasoning.
Thought for the Day is a unique slot in which speakers from a wide range of religious faiths reflect on an issue of the day from their faith perspective. In the midst of the three hour Today programme devoted to overwhelmingly secular concerns -
national and international news and features, searching interviews etc - the slot offers a brief, uninterrupted interlude of spiritual reflection. We believe that broadening the brief would detract from the distinctiveness of the slot.
Within Thought for the Day a careful balance is maintained of voices from different Christian denominations and other religions with significant membership in the UK. We are broadcasting to the general Radio 4 audience which regularly engages
with the comments and ideas expressed by our contributors from the world's major faiths - whether they are believers or not.
Outside Thought for the Day the BBC's religious output contains both religious and non-religious voices in programmes such as Sunday, Beyond Belief, Moral Maze. In these programmes atheists, humanists and secularists are regularly heard, the
religious world is scrutinised, its leaders and proponents are questioned.
Non-religious voices are also heard extensively across the general output in news, current affairs, documentaries, talks, science, history. These programmes approach the world from perspectives which are not religious. As, of course, do the other
2 hours 57 minutes of Today.
The armchair humour police are rampant right now. The Advertising Standards Authority has just received 115 complaints about a Matrix-type fight in a VW Golf advert and five viewers rang the BBC to vent their spleen about a goldfish being
killed in Casualty (even though it was a prop).
An outraged Peter Tatchell is demanding DJ Spoony is suspended after a tongue-in-cheek suggestion on BBC3's Most Annoying People Of 2008 that "fit" women should be saved for straight men.
Encouraged by Jonathan Ross's humiliation, this self-proclaimed moral majority believe they've got the whiphand now and want to drag us all into an age of humour prohibition.
2009 has begun with complaints about a BBC Three show called The Most Annoying People of 2008 , which was broadcast several times over the festive period. People are complaining about a bit that featured Ron Jeremy when he described what
he wanted to do to Lindsay Lohan and her gal pal Sam Ronson.
Human rights activist Peter Tatchell blasted the show, saying: The remarks by BBC Radio 5 presenter DJ Spoony and straight US porn actor Ron Jeremy were gratuitously sexist and homophobic. The BBC should have never broadcast them. A public
apology is due from the BBC.
Okay, these comments may be pretty dumb, but c'mon! Surely a human rights activist has better things to do with his time than throw his penny in about some crappy clip show on BBC Three? Here we have a man who tried to slap a citizen's arrest on
Mugabe and slags off the pope for homophobia... good causes... but a stupid throwaway comment on a rubbish TV show?
Half an hour after the 9pm watershed adult film actor Ron Jeremy – captioned on screen as a porn legend – described in graphic detail lewd acts that he wanted to perform on Hollywood star Lindsay Lohan and her lesbian lover.
Nutter politicians and lobby groups reacted in supposed anger to the segment on the programme Most Annoying People 2008 .
It was first broadcast on December 29 but repeated over the New Year period and is still available to view online.
Another guest on the BBC3 show, Radio 5 Live presenter DJ Spoony, referred to lesbians as munters and mingers, prompting supposed fury from gay rights activists.
Nutter MP Anne Widdecombe has demanded to know who sanctioned broadcast of the programme: What was their reasoning behind choosing a porn star as an interviewee at all – and why was the pre-recorded show screened?
You would think that following the debacle with Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand, they would have gone out of their way to ensure anything going out was within the limits of decency. This was a holiday period when children tend to stay up later
and there is a strong risk that children would have seen it.
Indecency is just ingrained at the BBC. They are institutionally indecent.
Jeremy, who has appeared in almost 2,000 hardcore movies, said of Lohan and Ronson: ‘These two girls are very good-looking. I would love to be in the middle of that: They will do each other, do me, do each other, do me, back and forth.
Jeremy also said of Lohan: Men are wishing they could be with her and change her mind, thinking “Yeah, she is a lesbian now because she never met me.”
BBC Radio 5 Live presenter Spoony, 38, said of lesbians: Let the munters and mingers get each other. That's cool because nobody wants them. But referring to Mean Girls star Lohan and Ronson, he added: When they're hot and fit -
Hollywood superstars - they should be saved for the guys.
Gay rights activist Peter Tatchell branded the remarks by Jeremy and Spoony gratuitously sexist and homophobic. The BBC should have never broadcast them and should issue a public apology. Spoony should be suspended by the BBC and only
be allowed to continue presenting his Radio 5 Live programme after he has apologised on air and promised not to repeat his homophobic garbage.
Ron Jeremy's comments were needlessly offensive. He's a sexist pig, which no right-thinking woman, lesbian or straight, would want to meet, let alone have sex with.
The BBC today said that it had received 13 complaints about the programme to date.
A spokeswoman said: Most Annoying People 2008 is a light-hearted and comedic look at people and events that have annoyed, amused or appalled us over the last 12 months. The contributors to the programme are expressing their own views and
opinions, which are meant in a light-hearted way with no malicious intent.
An issue has arisen recently. It isn’t strictly a matter of censorship however it does involve a kind of restriction on broadcasting so I thought it was appropriate.
Radio 4’s Thought For The Day program, which provides a platform for religious viewpoints whilst deliberately excluding atheistic or humanist viewpoints. There is an organised campaign of opposition
More than 1600 people have pledged to write to the BBC and the organiser has just asked these 1600 to write in during the coming week (5/1/09). If you’re interested you can sign up or just send in an email or letter of complaint to the
Beeb. Here is an
It should be interesting to see what happens. The Controller of Radio 4 said that he hears no appetite for change, but with the exception of the recent Jonathan Ross incident, Aunty usually only receives 50-100 complaints a quarter.
I've always enjoyed Thought for the Day ( TFTD ), that two-minute spot in the middle of Radio 4's Today programme, which seems to be a brief respite from the hard news, and a chance for someone to give moral or ethical reflections
on current events. The trouble is that only religious speakers are invited. Rabbis, priests, imams, chaplains, and monks are there, but never humanists, agnostics, or atheists.
Why not? Wouldn't it be better if they were? Morality is not the sole prerogative of the religious – there are even reasons to think that the irreligious are more moral. So why shouldn't we be invited to speak on TFTD ?
Northamptonshire shock jock Jon Gaunt has begun legal action against TalkSport after the radio station sacked him.
The controversial radio presenter was given the boot in November for branding a guest a 'Nazi' live on air.
In a message on his personal website, Gaunt said his efforts to make peace with his former bosses had been ignored: I have tried to offer an olive branch to TalkSport chief executive Scott Taunton but he has declined my overtures, He claims he
will not reinstate me despite the tens of thousands of e-mails that you have sent in. Therefore he has left me with no choice but to take legal action and that has now started.
Gaunt said: People keep asking me how many complaints there were about the interview with Councillor Stark and I can now tell you that according to Ofcom's own website there were only 16.
Gaunt also promised fans that he would be back on the radio soon.