Melon Farmers Original Version

Ofcom Watch


2026: Oct-Dec

 2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025   2026   Latest 
Jan-March   April-June   July-Sept   July-Sept   Oct-Dec    

 

Imposing an onerous mountain of expensive red tape for nothing...

Ofcom reports that the Online Safety Act proves ineffective in protecting children (but totally effective in suffocating internet businesses stupid enough to be based in Britain)


Link Here 24th October 2026
Repressive new online safety measures have failed to limit the proportion of children suffering harm from social media, the UK's internet censor has admitted.

The proportion of children being fed unsafe content that often left them frightened, confused and upset, was almost unchanged, according to an Ofcom review of the first nine months of supposedly strict requirements on social media platforms such as TikTok and Instagram.

Under the Online Safety Act, the tech giants had to protect children from harmful content including pornography, serious violence, suicide material, racism, misogyny and bullying, with a series of specific duties introduced in summer 2025. But Ofcom found that at a total level there was no significant change in the proportion of children encountering harmful content over the first nine months after the children's safety duties came into force in July 2025. It called the finding concerning and said there was no evidence indicating a change in the severity of harm.

The regulator is already facing a wave of legal actions from tech companies challenging its powers including the Instagram operator Meta, as well as TikTok and X. It has warned it risks being absolutely clobbered legally by deep-pocketed individuals and firms.

Of course Ofcom has spun the abject failure as a reason for doubling down on censorship. The censor has proposed adding additional censorship rules banning content that makes children feel bad about their bodies or else somehow makes them feel unhappy (with the right think terminology  equivalencing this to mental health issues like depression).

 

 

The USA geo-blocks Ofcom...

Ofcom seem to have hit a brick wall in enforcing its censorship rules on US companies without a presence in the UK


Link Here 21st October 2026
Full story: Online Safety Act...UK Government legislates to censor social media
Ofcom were grilled by Parliament's Culture, Media and Sport Committee on 20th October 2026. The committee is investigated the effectiveness of Ofcom in enforcing internet censorship laws contained in the Online Safety Act.

The act has been in force for about 15 months and in that time Ofcom have issued 11 fines mostly to porn websites for failing to implement ID/age verification. Other websites targeted were the US based free speech forum 4Chan, and also the widely reviled Sanctioned Suicide forum.

Ofcom boss Melanie Dawes admitted that tech firms have paid just the two smallest of the eleven fines handed out under the Online Safety Act since March last year. She conceded nine remain unpaid, albeit one of these has not yet passed its due date and another is being appealed.

She did point out that two of the nine have now implemented the required ID/age verification and four have self geo-blocked all users with a UK IP address. Three are totally defying Ofcom by continuing on unchanged.

Dawes added that enforcement measures have run against a brick wall for foreign companies without a presence in the UK. She said:

We won't be able to recover every single fine on online safety. If foreign courts decide try and get in our way, there will be a point at which we have to accept that we won't be able to recover that money.

The US lawyer representing some of the US victims of the censorship law Preston Byrne had been particularly vocal about Ofcom's censorship attempts by shredding Ofcom's censorship letters and using them at hamster litter. He continually challenged Ofcom to fight him in the US courts where the famous First Amendment to the US Constitutions guarantees free speech for all Americans. Byrne colourfully explains:

Unless Ofcom is prepared to sail a British invasion fleet here and land ground troops, enforcement would indeed have to proceed through American courts. Which presents the following problem for Ofcom:

American courts generally decline to enforce foreign judgments that violate the United States Constitution.

It would be a gift to 4chan if Ofcom decided to show up in an American court after all this, waiving sovereign immunity and thus facing the prospect of an adverse merits ruling in the process. Filing that lawsuit would be suicidal, leading to virtually certain defeat and total loss of enforcement credibility in the United States. It will almost certainly never happen, not for 4chan, and likely not for any other American target, either.

What will happen next is that Ofcom is going to go back to Parliament to ask for the authority to obtain interim business disruption measures --  i.e., more or less unilateral censorship powers to block foreign websites in the UK before starting an enforcement process, rather than after. These powers were explicitly rejected by Parliament the last time around and have even now been repudiated by Nadine Dorries, the former MP who introduced the Bill, having seen what a mess Ofcom has made of it. These powers will also be easily defeated through the use of a VPN.

The UK thus continues its authoritarian backsliding. Sorting out their own country is, ultimately, a matter for the British, and opposing the grant of new powers for Ofcom -- an agency which was held off by a pair of American solo lawyers working for free -- on domestic policy grounds is a task for the growing UK free speech movement to take up, with urgency.

Ofcom bosses also explained to the parliamentary committee that geo-blocking UK users from access to website is as far as censorship actions can go. If a website self-geo-blocks there is little point pursing an ISP block as that effectively adds nothing further to the censorship. UK VPN users will still be able to access the website either way.

 

 

Prime censorship...

Ofcom lines up its next ignorable age verification fines


Link Here 2nd October 2026
Full story: Online Safety Act...UK Government legislates to censor social media
Update on existing investigations: Provisional Decisions

Web Prime Inc

On 29 September 2026, we issued a provisional notice of contravention to Web Prime Inc as the provider of:
  • anysex.com
  • fapality.com
  • mylust.com
  • xcafe.com
  • yourlust.com

This notice sets out our provisional view that we have reasonable grounds to believe that Web Prime has failed to comply with its duty to use highly effective ID/age assurance. We have also provisionally found that Web Prime has failed, and is failing, to comply with its duties  to respond to a statutory request for information.

The websites are currently self blocked to readers with a UK IP address but may be accessed using a VPN.

 

The provider of porntrex.com

Ofcom came to the same conclusion about the website porntrex.com. Again this website is currently self blocked to readers with a UK IP address but may be accessed using a VPN.

 

First Time Videos LLC -- case closure

Ofcom closed its investigation into First Time Videos LLC in relation to its failure to implement adequate ID/age verification. Ofcom had imposed a penalty on First Time Videos of £80,000.

In response to our investigation, First Time Videos LLC has implemented a block to restrict users with UK IP addresses from accessing its service and has advised Ofcom that it will put highly effective age assurance in place on its services. For the moment the FTV websites still give the impression that they are available after paying with a debit card or credit card.

First Time Videos LLC has paid the penalty set out in the Confirmation Decision. This investigation is now closed.

 

 

Whatever steps are taken, its never enough for campaigners and censors...

Pornhub contends that ID/age verification needs to done once per device whilst Ofcom contends that it should be re-done frequently


Link Here 2nd October 2026
Full story: Online Safety Act...UK Government legislates to censor social media

Ofcom launches investigation into Pornhub's age checks

Ofcom has opened an investigation into Aylo -- the service provider of Pornhub -- under the UK's Online Safety Act, to determine whether it has complied with its duties to prevent children from encountering pornographic content.

In May 2026, Pornhub deployed a new age assurance process for some users. This process relies on signals from a third party, in this case Apple, that suggest UK users trying to access Pornhub may have completed Apple's age checks.

The Online Safety Act is clear that it is the service provider's responsibility to ensure that any age assurance process is highly effective -- no matter at what stage an age check occurs.

Providers must also carry out a suitable and sufficient assessment of whether their service is likely to be accessed by children. They must do this before making any significant change to the design or operation of their service, or in response to evidence about reduced effectiveness of age checks.

We are concerned that Aylo may not have conducted sufficient due diligence and testing before implementing its new age assurance process. As a result, we are concerned that Aylo's process may not be highly effective at preventing children from seeing pornography.

Ofcom has decided to open a formal investigation to establish whether Aylo has failed to comply with legal obligations under the Online Safety Act, in particular to:

  • use highly effective age assurance to prevent children from seeing pornography; and complete a suitable and sufficient children's access assessment.

  • As part of our investigation we will consider how Aylo implemented its age assurance process, and whether it conducted the necessary due diligence before deployment. Our investigation will not make a determination on how Apple operates its age checks.

 

In response to Ofcom's announcement

See article from aylo.com Statement by Alex Kekesi, VP Brand and Community, on behalf of Aylo

Four months following our successful launch of age verification on Pornhub for eligible adult users in the United Kingdom (UK) who have confirmed their age through Apple's UK age-verification process, Ofcom informed us that they were launching an investigation into our use of Apple's age assurance in the United Kingdom. We are committed to working constructively with Ofcom and Apple in our shared commitment to child protection.

We trust that the investigation will show Apple's UK device-level age-verification update, which renders devices operating since iOS26.4 kid safe by default, offers one of the strongest and hardest to circumvent protections currently available for helping prevent minors from accessing age-inappropriate content.

In March 2026, Apple demonstrated its commitment to child safety by becoming the first operating system developer to automatically enable adult content website filtering, effectively making adult content websites inaccessible to unverified or minor UK-based Apple iOS and iPadOS users. This update was welcomed with a public statement by Ofcom, in which it praised Apple's decision that the UK be one of the first countries in the world to receive new child safety protections on devices [as] a real win for children and families206Our rules are flexible and designed to encourage innovation, particularly in age assurance. We've worked closely with Apple and other services to ensure they can be applied in a variety of contexts in order to ensure users are protected.

In June, the UK government announced its expectation that all operating system manufacturers should follow this same standard. In September, the UK government further announced it would introduce legislation requiring these device level controls and for them to be enabled by default, reinforcing the strength and importance of Apple's implementation, making this a highly effective age assurance method.

Ofcom's own July 2026 report identifies the fundamental gap: age assurance is effective on individual services when properly implemented, but not yet at an overall system level, due to user migration to non-age assured sites. It recognizes that protection of children requires a system-wide effort, expressly identifying operating systems as having a potential role in strengthening protections. This is why we support Apple's device-level approach: protecting children should not depend on every website they visit choosing to follow the rules.

Given Aylo's well-documented commitment to compliance and to the effective protection of minors, we continue to believe that Apple's implementation presents an opportunity for constructive collaboration and for the UK to establish a meaningful precedent in advancing effective, privacy-preserving online safety. Having experimented in multiple markets with multiple methods of age assurance including in the UK, Aylo believes that Apple's implementation is a pioneering approach for child safety that provides significantly stronger protection than any other age assurance method currently available in the UK market.

As outlined by Lucy Faithfull Foundation, we know that when faced with age verification, some adults are choosing riskier, irresponsible sites to avoid age checks. According to the Free Speech Coalition less than 5% of consumers actually go through with age-verification for adult content. When confronted with a request for a facial scan and government ID, most consumers simply hit the back button and find a non-compliant site outside the mandate or log on to a VPN. The internet is global and it's impossible to patrol millions of different sites based in hundreds of different countries. Site-based regulation is always going to encourage evasion.

The UK government's recent announcements acknowledge this, as does Apple's own announcement that it will deploy the same implementation in Australia. Aylo is prepared to provide the technical evidence, testing and supporting assessments on which that position is based.

Aylo will cooperate fully with the investigation and looks forward to engaging with the case team.


 2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025   2026   Latest 
Jan-March   April-June   July-Sept   July-Sept   Oct-Dec    

melonfarmers icon

Home

Top

Index

Links

Search
 

UK

World

Media

Liberty

Info
 

Film Index

Film Cuts

Film Shop

Sex News

Sex Sells
 
 

 
UK News

UK Internet

UK TV

UK Campaigns

UK Censor List
ASA

BBC

BBFC

ICO

Ofcom
Government

Parliament

UK Press

UK Games

UK Customs


Adult Store Reviews

Adult DVD & VoD

Adult Online Stores

New Releases/Offers

Latest Reviews

FAQ: Porn Legality
 

Sex Shops List

Lap Dancing List

Satellite X List

Sex Machines List

John Thomas Toys