| 30th June |
|
|
| |
Extreme porn ban set to become law in Scotland Permalink
|
Based on
article
from news.bbc.co.uk
|
MSPs
are poised to pass nasty law reforms defined by the Criminal Justice and
Licensing Bill.
The legislation brings in a number of new criminal offences,
including specific action to tackle stalking, people forced into
slavery or servitude and possession of extreme pornography.
The bill also aims to widen the powers of licensing boards and
standards officers.
MSPs will also vote on an amendment brought forward by SNP
backbencher Sandra White MSP on greater restrictions for lap dancing
clubs.
|
| 24th June |
|
|
| |
Dangerous pictures victim gets 4 months suspended jail sentence Permalink
|
Based on
article
from streathamguardian.co.uk
|
A
Streatham man who downloaded porn involving horses and dogs has been
spared an immediate jail sentence.
He was caught with the images of the animals having sex with women when
police raided his home in February last year.
At Inner London Crown Court on Monday, June 14, he was sentenced to four
months in jail, suspended for 12 months. The Iranian was also ordered to do
150 hours of unpaid work.
|
| 23rd June |
|
|
| |
Dangerous porn victim cleared over pictures found in browser cache Permalink
|
See
article
from theregister.co.uk
by Jane Fae Ozimek
|
|
|
A man's got to
know his technical limitations |
Former stand-up comic Michael Silk was charged with six offences of
possessing extreme porn featuring dodgy goings-on between humans and
animals. Silk denied the charges which, it was alleged, had been
committed in May 2009.
For the prosecution, Kent Online reports, Alex Wilson told the judge
at Maidstone Crown Court last Tuesday that, following discussions with
an expert, he would offer no further evidence as he believed there was
no realistic prospect of conviction.
The judge entered formal not guilty verdicts.
A CPS spokesperson told us: It was also apparent from the evidence
that the defendant was not computer literate. At the time the
defendant's computer was seized the material was held in the computer's
internet cache. There was no evidence that the defendant had saved the
images or sought to keep them. In order to 'possess' the images in that
state the law requires knowledge that the images exist and the means or
know-how to retrieve them.
The defendant was in possession of the images at the point in time
that he accessed them and viewed them. On the evidence available in this
case it was not possible to prove that he did so at some time after the
Act came into force. We could not therefore proceed with the prosecution
and we accordingly offered no evidence.
Simply deleting an image will not save you if you are computer
literate enough to retrieve it. Contrariwise, it appears that if you are
a total computer illiterate, that might be enough to get you out of a
fix.
...Read the full
article
Comment:
Punishing the Not Guilty
From Harvey
Yet again we find a person charged and hauled into court only to find the
prosecution offer no evidence. NO EVIDENCE.
I wish judges would be more condemning of prosecutors for bringing charges
before looking to check that the evidence stacks up as it seems to be happening
more frequently. And the CPS fuckwits who do decide to prosecute should be named
so we can see who they are and whether they are just dumb or are serial
offenders. No surprise that this was, yet again, Kent police and prosecutors,
who have form when it comes to "enhancing" the evidence, prosecuting first and
asking questions later.
|
| 3rd June |
|
|
| |
Woman in court for extreme images of the bestial kind Permalink
|
Based on
article
from thisislincolnshire.co.uk
|
A
Lincolnshire woman who planned to sell DVDs showing bestiality with
horses, ponies, dogs, chickens and fish could face a prison sentence.
Police found 1,000 DVDs belonging to Tanya Short which she intended
to sell at Hemswell market, near Gainsborough. 30 of those contained
images of bestiality. Her solicitor said: Of the 30 DVDs it has been
said that a number of those were duplicates.
She pleaded guilty to being in possession of extreme pornographic
images with portrayed in an explicit and realistic way, a person
performing sexual acts animal. She also pleaded guilty to a second
charge of having obscene articles for publication and gain.
Her solicitor John Bradley said he hoped magistrates would see fit to
sentence Short, instead of sending the case to Lincoln Crown Court:
The more serious of these charges is the one under the Obscene
Publications Act 1959 which was decided when values and attitudes were
markedly different than they are today, particularly with the advent of
technology and the internet.That act was intended to address large scale
enterprises – she is small fry.
Magistrates said they could not deal with the case and sent it to
Lincoln Crown Court for sentencing with a date to be confirmed. Short
was released on unconditional bail.
|
| 30th May |
|
|
| |
Tiger Porn defendant miscarriage of justice averted Permalink
|
See article
from backlash-uk.org.uk
|
 |
|
About to be
fucked by a tiger |
The sexual civil liberties organisation Backlash have assisted in
averting a miscarriage of justice.
Andrew Holland was charged with one count of possessing extreme
pornography under the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 at the
Mold Crown Court. He stood to be sentenced for the offence, having
pleaded guilty mid trial under advice from his local legal team in
Wrexham. Backlash contacted Holland to offer advice to discover that he
may have been misadvised by his local legal team; and that he did in
fact have a defence to the charge. Backlash provided funds for
provisional legal advice and research to be performed. We put Holland in
contact with our legal adviser, who is a solicitor specialising in
extreme pornography offences, Myles Jackman of Audu and Co in King's
Cross, London.
Holland transferred representation to the specialist solicitors and
was given leave on Friday the 28th May 2010 by His Honour Judge Rogers
sitting at the Mold Crown Court to vacate his plea from Guilty back to
Not Guilty. That means that he will stand trial again; this time in the
knowledge that he has a defence. However, had he not contacted Backlash
in the first place he would have been sentenced for an offence which he
may have been misadvised that he did not have a defence for.
Holland's case gained notoriety as he had previously been charged
with a second, separate extreme pornography charge relating to a video
clip purportedly depicting a sexual act between a human and a tiger.
This charge was withdrawn when it was discovered that the prosecutor had
failed to listen to the video's soundtrack, whererin one of the
actors made a comment about Tony the Tiger from the Frosties
commercials, proving the video was an elaborate joke and the tiger was
not real; leaving the prosecution deeply embarrassed.
[And of course the Director of Public
Prosecutions, who personally approved the prosecution]
Myles Jackman commented that: it is ridiculous and dangerous that
the CPS are trying to criminalise the posession of dirty jokes.
|
| 22nd May |
|
|
| |
Campaigner Permalink
|
See
article from
erotic-awards.co.uk
|

Congratulations
to Clair Lewis
The public face and voice of the
Consenting Adult Action Network (CAAN) since
its inception in May 2008. She is a disabled woman who is totally
upfront about her sexuality and tireless in her campaigning.
The CAAN statement reads: We believe in the
right of consenting adults to make their own sexual choices, in respect
of what they do, see and enjoy alone or with other consenting adults,
unhindered and unfettered by government.
CAAN demonstrations invariably invite Ben Westwood
to be their centre piece.
|
| 13th May |
|
|
| |
Throwing the extreme porn book at somebody already up for a more serious charge Permalink
|
Based on
article
from heraldsun.com.au
|
A
man from Wales is accused of possessing a photo of a man having sex with a
squid.
He was arrested after police allegedly found a extreme porn on his
home computer, The Sun reported.
He was charged with possessing an extreme pornographic image which
portrayed in an explicit and realistic way a person performing an act of
intercourse with a dead animal, namely a squid, which was grossly
offensive, disgusting or of obscene character.
Prosecutors amended the charge when it was admitted it could have
been an octopus in the picture.
The magistrates court in Swansea, southern Wales, heard the sea
creature was clearly dead when the man was pictured having sexual
intercourse with it.
He was also accused of possessing photographs of people having sex
with dogs and horses, and faced 14 charges of possessing indecent images
of children.
Swansea magistrates committed him to stand trial at a later date. He
was given bail on condition he does not access the internet or have any
contact with a child under the age of 16.
|
| 8th May |
|
|
| |
Bye bye to some departing ex-MPs Permalink
|
|
|
 |
|
Vera Baird
proved a little
rusty on local issues |
The election results saw a fair few MPs depart who were associated with
legislation of particular despite to Melon Farmers.
Jacqui Smith was Home Secretary seeing through several nasty laws. She
was humiliated when seeking re-election in Redditch. More for being an
icon of the expenses scandal, than for her disservices to freedom and
the enjoyment of life. No doubt the dangers of porn will be uppermost in
her mind whenever she reminisces over her failed political career.
In fact it is a common theme amongst the melon farming related departees,
that their departure is little to do with their illiberal laws, but more
to do with more personal issues. Perhaps Melon Farmers can take heart,
that although they seem to get away with treating people like shit with
nasty laws, their bad attitude sometimes catches up with them in other
ways.
Another Home Secretary with a thuggish attitude to peoples rights was
Charles Clarke, who also received the order of the boot. He seems to
have wound up people on his own side in his disaster prone term as Home
Secretary.
Vera Baird was perhaps the highlight of the departure list. She took a
particular interest in issues where enjoyment of life is something to be
banned particularly for men. She was always rumoured as being gifted
with the legal talent to turn mean minded thoughts into carefully open
ended nasty legislation. Perhaps she should have spent a little more
time looking after more immediate basic needs in Redcar, where she was
well stonked.
The two back bench agitators for the Dangerous Pictures Act, Martin
Salter and David Lepper both stepped down at the election. But they can
hardly have been pleased at their legacy. Salter was never a great hit
as a local MP and Labour got stuffed in Reading West. Lepper's Brighton
Pavilion seat fell notably to the Green Party. (Actually Lepper was
reasonably well regarded in Brighton).
One voice that will be missed in parliament though is Evan Harris. He
spoke out against the dangerous pictures laws and helped stick the knife
into blasphemy laws. He was well embroiled in the expenses scandal
though, and was accordingly turfed out by the electorate.
|
| 4th May |
|
|
| |
Tories plan bonfire of Labour's crap laws Permalink full story: Great Repeal Bill...UK government consults on bad laws to repeal
|
Based on
article from
timesonline.co.uk
|
David
Cameron has unveiled a detailed blueprint for the first days of a future
Conservative government as the polls suggest he is on course to win the largest
number of seats in the general election.
In a Sunday Times interview, the Conservative leader revealed the
four pieces of legislation that would dominate his debut Queen's speech.
The centrepiece of the Tories' Queen's speech, to be held within the
next month if the party forms a government, would be a great repeal
bill.
This would scrap ID cards, home information packs and dozens of
rarely enforced criminal offences introduced by Labour over 13 years.
Hopes that the Dangerous Pictures Act
may be on the bonfire list
Thanks to freeworld
Douglas Carswell MP and Daniel Hannan MEP drew up a "great
repeal bill" a couple of years ago, a blueprint of legislation which
should be scrapped.
Carswell seems to be saying that Cameron's announced "legislation
bonfire" has a basis in their "Great repeal bill", so it may be of
interest to people here who haven't seen this document -
The notorious "Dangerous Pictures Act" in Straw's "Criminal justice and
immigration act" of 2008 is listed, and they say this section of the act
should either be abolished or "carefully amended", so the definition
satisfies the tests of "consent or direct harm". It's the inclusion of
patently fictional material for possession, even of clips from
classified movies which cannot be real by definition, which are the
worst aspects of the DPA.
|
| 14th April |
|
|
| |
London cops focus on extreme porn and human trafficking Permalink
|
See article
from theregister.co.uk
by Jane Fae Ozimek
|
A
new command within the Metropolitan Police service will have
responsibility for policing extreme porn and indecent images of
children as well as prostitution and human trafficking.
The creation of the unit is either a vital step forward in the fight
against human trafficking and exploitation, or a serious waste of police
resources, motivated by political correctness, depending on your point
of view.
On 1 April, a new command was launched: SCD9, Human Exploitation and
Organised Crime – bringing together expertise in the fields of clubs and
vice, human trafficking and immigration crime.
...read full
article
|
|
|

The Dangerous Pictures
Act
The UK Government passed the Criminal Justice & Immigration
Act 2008 criminalising the possession of adult, staged, consensual violent pornography
with draconian penalties
of up to 3 years in prison. The law also bans images of bestiality and
necrophilia.
The law applies to England, Wales & Northern Ireland
See Document Index
Public Consultation:
A biased
Government consultation was initiated in 2005 but the unsupportive
responses were sidestepped.
| Support for proposed law? |
No
|
Yes |
| Individuals |
223 |
90 |
| Organisations |
18 |
53 |
| Totals |
241 |
143 |
The Government
then recruited a team of feminists to try and bolster
their case with a discredited
Rapid Evidence Assessment.
Current Status:
The Dangerous Pictures
chapter of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 came into force on January 26th 2009.
Government guidance [pdf] has been published to further explain
what images are considered dangerous to possess.
See also CPS
Extreme Pornography: Legal Guidance
Scotland
Public Consultation:
The Scottish government published its extreme pornography proposal in March
2009.
Responses were published by the Scottish Parliament
in May 2009.
Current Status:
The bill was passed in June 2010 to become the
Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 [pdf].
The clause
came into force on 28th March 2011.
Public guidance has now been published by the Scottish Government
Campaigners:
|
|