Online and Retail
www.NiceNNaughty.co.uk

 Liberty in Brief...
 
Latest

 Hardcore DVD
 Online Sex Shops
 Magazines
Sex Shops List
Satellite X Channels
Internet Video
 
 

Melon Farmers Icon

 Home BBFC
Nutters  Sex & Shopping
 Index TV Liberty  Sex Sells News
 Links UK Criminalising Extreme Porn  Sex Sells Reviews
 Forum World Criminalising P4P  Sex Shops List  

Liberty watch icon

 Liberty Watch Liberty News Liberty in Brief
  Control Freaks Internet Blocking & Circumvention
  Bollox Britain  
  US Watch  

20th November    Give us your Key or we will Break your Legs...
   
Animal rights activist 'invited' to hand over keys
Police brutality
We don't care if you have forgotten the password
Give us the key or we'll break your legs!

An animal rights activist has been ordered to hand over her encryption keys to the authorities.

Section Three of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) came into force at the start in October 2007, seven years after the original legislation passed through parliament. Intended primarily to deal with terror suspects, it allows police to demand encryption keys or provide a clear text transcript of encrypted text.

Failure to comply can result in up to two years imprisonment for cases not involving national security, or five years for terrorism offences and the like. Orders can be made to turn over data months or even years old.

The contentious measure, introduced after years of consultation, was sold to Parliament as a necessary tool for law enforcement in the fight against organised crime and terrorism.

But an animal rights activist is one of the first people at the receiving end of a notice to give up encryption keys. Her computer was seized by police in May, and she has been given 12 days to hand over a pass-phrase to unlock encrypted data held on the drive - or face the consequences.

The woman, who claims to have not used encryption, relates her experiences in an anonymous posting on Indymedia:

Now apparently they have found some encrypted files on my computer (which was stolen by police thugs in May this year) which they think they have 'reasonable suspicion' to pry into using the excuse of 'preventing or detecting a crime'

Now I have been 'invited' (how nice, will there be tea and biccies?) to reveal my keys to the police so they can look at these files. If I do not comply and tell them to keep their great big hooters out of my private affairs I could be charged under RIPA.

 

16th November    Fat Pipes...
   
US makes copy of the entire internet

NSA logoLots of nasty things happen on the internet. So the US National Security Agency (NSA), charged with stopping people doing nasty things, has decided it would be best to have a copy of it. The entire web, that is.

According to a former worker at AT&T, telecommunications companies are feeding the internet records of their customers – e-mail, search and other information – into a giant NSA “sink” for further analysis.

And, much in the fashion of a Robert Ludlum thriller, this all takes place in a room on the sixth floor of an AT&T office block in San Francisco, it is claimed. That was my ‘Aha!’ moment, said Mark Klein, a former technician at AT&T, who saw details of the building’s elaborate wiring. They’re sending the entire internet to the secret room.

Meanwhile....

As U.S. sanctions against Iran begin to heat up, Web companies are following suit: Yahoo Mail and Hotmail have all removed Iran from the list of countries available for their webmail services.

You'd think that if the Americans have got the capability to store all internet traffic passing them by, then they would quite appreciate  email accounts from countries such as Iran being routed via US servers.

 

14th November    Not So Hush Hush...
   
Court order defeats Hushmail encryption

HushMail logoHushmail, a longtime provider of encrypted web-based email, markets itself by saying that not even a Hushmail employee with access to our servers can read your encrypted e-mail, since each message is uniquely encoded before it leaves your computer.

But it turns out that statement seems not to apply to individuals targeted by government agencies that are able to convince a Canadian court to serve a court order on the company.

A September court document (.pdf) from a federal prosecution of alleged steroid dealers reveals the Canadian company turned over 12 CDs worth of e-mails from three Hushmail accounts, following a court order obtained through a mutual assistance treaty between the U.S. and Canada.

The court revelation demonstrates a privacy risk in a relatively-new, simple webmail offering by Hushmail, which the company acknowledges is less secure than its signature product.

A subsequent and refreshingly frank e-mail interview with Hushmail's CTO seems to indicate that government agencies can also order their way into individual accounts on Hushmail's ultra-secure web-based e-mail service, which relies on a browser-based Java encryption engine.

 

28th October    Swilled Down the Pan...
   
OiNK Pre-Release album sharing site raided

OiNK logoBritish and Dutch police have shut down a "widely-used" source of illegally-downloaded music.

A flat on Teesside and several properties in Amsterdam were raided as part of an Interpol investigation into the members-only website OiNK. A man from Middlesbrough was arrested.

The UK-run site has leaked 60 major pre-release albums this year alone, said the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI).

A Cleveland Police spokesman said: This extremely lucrative and creative scheme consisted of a private file-sharing website being set up. Membership was by invitation only.

The site's servers, based in Amsterdam, were seized in a series of raids last week.

 

26th October    Removing Owl Masks...
   
Website owners forced to identify anonymous posters

Sheffield Wednesday shieldDisgruntled fans of Sheffield Wednesday who vented their dissatisfaction with the football club's bigwigs in anonymous internet postings may face expensive libel claims after the chairman, chief executive and five directors won a high-court ruling last week forcing the owner of a website to reveal their identity.

The case, featuring the website owlstalk.co.uk, is the second within days to highlight the danger of assuming that the apparent cloak of anonymity gives users of internet forums and chatrooms carte blanche to say whatever they like.

In another high court case last week, John Finn, owner of the Sunderland property firm Pallion Housing, admitted just before he was due to be cross-examined that he was responsible for a website hosting a scurrilous internet campaign about a rival housing organisation, Gentoo Group, its employees and owner, Peter Walls.

Exposing the identity of those who post damaging lies in cyberspace is a growth area for libel lawyers.

 

16th October    My State is my Enemy...
   
Everyone's Guide to Bypassing Internet Censorship

Everyone’s Guide to Bypassing Internet Censorship coverThe Citizen Lab has released Everyone’s Guide to Bypassing Internet Censorship [pdf]. It was a team effort to produce the guide and I’m very pleased to have contributed to it. I’ve long argued that users can benefit from circumvention technology the most when the carefully select the technology that meets their specific needs.

The guide walks users through the process of assessing their needs and and capabilities and lists clusters of circumvention technology options for users to choose from.

 

8th October   You can't use the O-word...
 

 
Olympic Mind Games bookThe word 'Olympic' has been copyrighted

From Comment is Free see full article by David Edgar

Believe it or not, use of 'Olympic' could be barred under copyright law. And maybe even '2012'

Take care. In reading this article, you may be in receipt of stolen goods. In fact, the organising committee for a certain upcoming sporting event has decided it would be "disproportionate" to prosecute the author of a book called Olympic Mind Games for breach of copy-right. But, under no less than two acts of parliament, it could if it wanted to.

When it discovered that Robert Ronson's children's science-fiction novel was to be published, the organising committee for the previously mentioned happening sent him an email asking that he should use neither the O-word nor the expressions "London 2012, or 2012 etc" in the title. The committee was able to do so under statutes passed in 1995 and 2006, which in effect turn all the elements of its title into a trademark.

 

1st October   Googling for Copyright...
 

 
Google Video logoSorry, your search for -Copyright- was not recognised

From X Biz see full article

The US National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) has sent a letter to congressional officials urging that Google’s copyright controls be examined after the group found hundreds of pirated movie titles available on the search engine’s video site.

The NLPC is a Washington-based nonprofit organization that monitors and reports on the ethics of public officials, as well as various organizations and corporations.

In the letter sent to lawmakers, NLPC Chairman Ken Boehm said, While Google faces numerous legal challenges related to the posting of copyrighted content on its video sharing websites, there is also a growing chorus who believe that evidence of Google’s seemingly indifferent attitude towards Internet video piracy has resulted in a legitimization or ‘mainstreaming’ of video piracy which will have broad and damaging implications for all intellectual property owners. We share those concerns.

 

17th August   Googling for Rip Off
 

 
Google Video logoVideos bought to own from Google now unviewable

From The Register see full article

So much for buying and renting videos from Google. On Wednesday, August 15, the world's most popular search engine waves goodbye to the download-to-own/download-to-rent feature on Google Video.

And as a general consequence of the DRM employed by Google, videos bough to own will no long be viewable.

After summarily shutting down the buy-rent feature on Google Video, leaving customers unable to watch videos they paid good money for over the past 19 months, Google has defended its less-than-satisfying refund policy.

In a recent conversation with The Reg, Google said that customers stripped of their video libraries have received Google-serving online credits (rather than out-and-out refunds) in part because the company can't deal with changing credit card numbers.

If you "purchased" a Google video on or after July 18, the company has indeed given you a full refund. But if you paid for "eternal access" to a clip anytime before that, you get a credit on Google Checkout, the online payment system that lets you buy things from Google partners like Yarn Country and ChristianBookBibles.com.

Update: Full Refund

25th August

After a nudge from The Reg - and what would seem to be thousands of angry emails - Google will now provide full refunds to anyone who purchased clips from the now defunct Google Video store.

On a post to The Official Google Blog, Google Video product manager Bindu Reddy admitted that the company had screwed up, announcing a full refund for all video buyers: When your friends and well-intentioned acquaintances tell you that you've made a mistake, it's good to listen. So we'd like to say thank you to everyone who wrote to let us know that we had made a mistake in the case of Google Video's Download to Own/Rent Refund Policy vs. Common Sense.

 

7th August   Crack down on US mod chip sellers
 

 
US immigration & Customs logoBased on an article from the BBC see full article

US Customs has carried out raids in 16 states to clamp down on the sale of modification or "mod" chips.

In the largest operation of its kind to date US Customs officials raided more than 30 homes, businesses and shops.

When a mod chip is installed on a game consoles it helps circumvent copy protection systems to let owners play pirated or simply out of region games.

Mod chips have been made for the PlayStation 2, Nintendo Wii, Xbox and Xbox 360 game consoles.

The raids followed a 12-month investigation by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) into who was importing the chips and selling them on. Typically the chips are made overseas before being shipped to dealers in the US or other nations.

 

1st August   P2P networks harm national security
 

 
Lime Wire logoFrom CNET News see full article

The US House of Representatives panel chairman charged that peer-to-peer networks can pose a "national security threat" because they enable federal employees to share sensitive or classified documents accidentally from their computers.

At a hearing on the topic, Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman said, without offering details, that he is considering new laws aimed at addressing the problem. He said he was troubled by the possibility that foreign governments, terrorists or organized crime could gain access to documents that reveal national secrets.

Also at the hearing, Mark Gorton, the chairman of Lime Wire, which makes the peer-to-peer software LimeWire, was assailed for allegedly harming national security through offering his product.

 

21st July   European Court protects file sharers
 

 
European CourtFrom The Register see full article

European telcos and ISPs do not have to hand over subscriber information to record labels which are trying to find file sharers.

Advocate General Juliane Kokott, adviser to the European Court, reckons European internet service providers are not obliged to hand over subscriber information when approached by record labels pursuing civil cases. The information should be handed over in a criminal case though.

The Spanish court has asked the European Court for advice. The European Court has still to decide on how to advise Spanish judges, but is likely to follow the legal advice given to it.

 

8th July   Cameron’s Cleanfeed for Copyright
 

 
David Cameron
From Linx Public Affairs see full article

David Cameron, leader of the UK Conservative Party opposition, gave a keynote to music lobby the British Phonographic Industry, in which called for network level content blocking of music download sites.

Cameron said: Let me also speak about one final responsibility too: that of Internet Service Providers. They are the gatekeepers of the internet. Some ISPs claim there is nothing they can do to stop illegal downloading of music. But last month alone, there were eight sites that hosted more than 25,000 illegal downloads. That is clear and visible internet traffic.

ISPs can block access and indeed close down offending file-sharing sites. They have already established the Internet Watch Foundation to monitor child abuse and incitement to racial hatred on the internet. They should be doing the same when it comes to digital piracy.

Comment: Idiot!

From Dan

Cameron basically is saying he'll extend the copyright on music if music bosses censor violent music and lyrics. And he says censorship isn't the answer! Idiot!

 

7th July   Windows Vista Features and Services Harvest User Data for Microsoft
 

 
BadVista logoFrom Softpedia see full article
See also badvista.org

Are you using Windows Vista? Then you might as well know that the licensed operating system installed on your machine is harvesting a healthy volume of information for Microsoft.

In this context, a program such as the Windows Genuine Advantage is the last of your concerns. In fact, in excess of 20 Windows Vista features and services are hard at work collecting and transmitting your personal data to the Redmond company.

 

6th July   Give us your encryption key or else we will break your legs
 

 
Home office logo
From Home Office Security see full article

The UK government has published the final draft of the Code of Practice for implementing the powers to access encrypted data and encryption keys contained in Part III of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA).

This, and Part III as a whole, will come into force on 1st October, subject to Parliamentary approval.

 

6th July   Belgian court orders ISP to block illegal downloads
 

 
Belgium flag
From afterdawn see full article

A court in Belgium has ruled that an ISP has the means to block illegal downloads from P2P networks and must begin doing so within six months. Scarlet (formerly Tiscali) had been fighting a case brought against it three years ago by the body representing authors and composers in Belgium, SABAM. The ISP argued that it would be impossible to monitor and filter the traffic of all its users.

The Judge decided that there was enough technology available for Scarlet to attempt blocking illegal downloads and has given the ISP six months to implement measures. If Scarlet is defiant, it could face a fine of €2500 per day. Scarlet has not yet revealed what it plans to do about the court decision.


24th July   Update: Belgian ISP will appeal order to block file-sharing
 

 
Belgium flag
From Linx Public Affairs

Belgian ISP Scarlet will appeal the court ruling ordering it to block its customers from accessing copyright files over peer-to-peer networks. The surprise court ruling threatens to emasculate the E-Commerce Directive.

“Mere conduit” protection in the E-Commerce Directive says that ISPs should not be held liable for unlawful action by their customers. The Belgian judge said this doesn’t prevent him ordering an ISP to block access to copyright files on peer-to-peer networks, even though the court’s own expert said the only available technology was not designed for ISP network environments.



Liberty Watch

 Liberty News: 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Latest
 Control Freaks: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Latest
 Bollox Britain: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Latest
 US Watch: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Latest
 Liberty in Brief Latest

Liberty watch icon

 Liberty Watch Liberty News Liberty in Brief
  Control Freaks Internet Blocking & Circumvention
  Bollox Britain  
  US Watch  

Melon Farmers Icon

 Home BBFC Nutters  Sex & Shopping
 Index TV Liberty  Sex Sells News
 Links UK Criminalising Extreme Porn  Sex Sells Reviews
 Forum World Criminalising P4P  Sex Shops List