From the Jakarta Post

The Tangerang municipal administrationin Indonesia destroyed thousands of bottles of name-brand alcoholic drinks, pornographic pirated VCDs and six gambling machines confiscated in a string of raids this month.

The raids were made as the introduction to the newly endorsed Bylaw No. 7/2005 that limits the sales of alcohol and includes regulations against piracy and gambling, said Mayor Wahidin Halim who presided over the destruction at his office compound.

Tangerang Police chief Raja Erizman, Council speaker Krisna Gunata, chief judge Suhadi, chief prosecutor Bambang Rajardjo and religious figures also witnessed the mayor and staff as they bulldozed at least 19,000 bottles of liquor and burned 31,061 VCDs and the gambling machines.

The municipal administration has set out to make Tangerang a "religious city" ... therefore I have also ordered officers to seize and destroy pornographic calendars and posters sold by sidewalk vendors, Wahidin added.

From Denmark.dk

An Islamic cultural organisation encouraged its members to boycott Denmark until an official apology was offered for drawings printed in a national newspaper depicting the prophet Mohammed

The Islamic cultural organisation, ISESCO, has encouraged its 51 members to boycott Denmark, Danish daily Information reported on Wednesday.

Abdul Aziz Othman al-Twaijri, the organisation's secretary general, told Arabic TV station Arabiya that a boycott was necessary until an apology was offered for the drawings printed in national newspaper Jyllands-Postent that depicted the prophet Mohammed: We encourage the organisation's members to boycott Denmark both economically and politically until Denmark presents an official apology for the drawings that have offended the world's Muslims.

Tensions between Muslims in Denmark and abroad have run high since the newspaper Jyllands-Posten published 12 cartoons in September that depicted the prophet Mohammed. The newspaper said printing the cartoons was a way to ensure the freedom of speech in the face of intimidation from radical Islamists.

Egypt's ambassador to Denmark, Mona Omar Attiah, warned against not taking the boycott seriously: There is talk of a popular sentiment that could mean people stop buying Danish products.

Lars Erslev Andersen, a Middle East expert, suggested that the international organisation's call for a boycott represented an attempt by individual countries to avoid a confrontation with Denmark.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs told Information, however, that it had not been contacted by ISECO yet, nor could trade organisation Danish Industry report that any of its members had experienced the effects of a boycott.

From the Washington Post

An Afghan journalist who was recently sentenced to two years in prison for publishing controversial magazine articles about Islam, women's rights and the Afghan justice system will be released from jail later this week, officials said.

Before gaining his freedom, however, Ali Mohaqeq Nasab had to confront an agonizing choice: formally apologize for what he had published or risk being sent to the gallows.

Ali Mohaqeq Nasab, pictured in a newspaper photo, was sentenced to two years in prison for publishing offensive articles and is scheduled to be released this week. After refusing for three months to retract his comments, Nasab told an appeals court this week that he was sorry for printing stories that asserted women should be given status equal to men in court, questioned the use of physical punishments for crimes and suggested converts from Islam should not face execution.

A panel of three judges responded Wednesday by shortening his punishment to a six-month suspended sentence, allowing him to walk free.

The case has aroused concern among international human rights groups and stirred contradictory passions in Afghanistan. Religious hard-liners here had called for Nasab's death; free speech advocates, women's rights backers and fellow ethnic Hazaras had asked that he be shown mercy.

As postwar Afghanistan tries to chart a path between religious traditions and modern democracy, Nasab's fate is being seen as an indicator of how much -- and how little -- the country has changed since the ouster of Taliban rule in 2001.

Nasab's release is an encouraging sign, said Nader Nadery, who heads Afghanistan's Independent Human Rights Commission. But the case sets a bad precedent in the area of freedom of expression. It discourages journalists and promotes self-censorship. Nadery said other Afghan journalists had already told him that they have to be very, very careful in the way that they talk.

Afghan news media have proliferated rapidly in the past four years, with newspapers, radio and television stations sprouting after more than two decades of conflict. According to the new constitution, the media have broad freedom to publish and broadcast without fear of reprisal. But local leaders have physically intimidated reporters, and conservative judges have occasionally tried to punish journalists who broach controversial topics.

Nasab returned to Afghanistan last year following a long exile in Iran and began publishing a magazine called Women's Rights. Articles in the May issue attracted the attention of a Muslim cleric, who denounced Nasab as an infidel during Friday sermons.

When Nasab complained to officials in the justice system in September, he was detained on charges of blasphemy. Prosecutors said Nasab's articles -- including one that claimed God, not the courts, should punish those who leave Islam -- proved he had abandoned his religion. They pushed for the death penalty, but a lower court gave him a two-year sentence.

That decision provoked an outcry among religious conservatives. A council of 200 religious leaders in the southern city of Kandahar issued a fatwa , or religious edict, calling for Nasab to be hanged unless he repented. A division of the Supreme Court took a similar step.

Meanwhile, international human rights groups lobbied on Nasab's behalf, and Western embassies here indicated to the government that they were watching the case closely. President Hamid Karzai carefully straddled the line, expressing support for a free press but insisting he could not interfere in the decisions of an independent judiciary.

One of the appeals judges, Abdul Muqeem Atarud, said Thursday that he had heard from many people on both sides of the issue. We told them that if he did not repent, he would be executed. It's the only way. It says in sharia that if someone repents for leaving Islam, he should be forgiven. So that is what happened.

Condoms save lives. I wonder how many more millions of lives would have been saved if Mary had been protected by a delicate veil of latex.

From The Guardian

A British artist has outraged Roman Catholics around the world by advertising a statuette of the Virgin Mary enveloped in a condom in a respected Jesuit weekly.

The artist, Steve Rosenthal, offered readers a chance to buy a "a stunning 22cm statue of the Virgin Mary standing atop a serpent, wearing a delicate veil of latex". It provided an email address at which prospective buyers could register interest.

In a front-page article in the Italian daily Corriere della Sera, Vittorio Messori, a literary collaborator of the late pope John Paul, expressed horror at the way the sperm cup at the end of the condom had been arranged so as to sit on top of the Virgin's head, "like a grotesque cap replacing the royal crown of tradition". The Jesuit weekly, America, which calls itself the US "national Catholic weekly", apologised in its latest issue. A spokesman told the Guardian: We made a terrible mistake by publishing this. We only saw the ad in black and white, so we didn't see how serious it was.

Rosenthal, who is based in London, said last night his work had been "orchestrated" for publication coinciding with World Aids Day on December 1. The primary aim of the work is to highlight the Vatican's continuance of non-advocation regarding the use of condoms. The description of the work was clear from both the text included and the image provided. America magazine happily accepted the insertion and billed me for $391. It has subsequently refused to accept payment."

From the Islington Gazette

Muslims are protesting at the Islington Council's "moronic anti-Christian purge" of Christmas.

The council declined to use the name "Christmas lights" this year - insisting on calling them "festive lights" instead. In Newington Green there was an "inter-faith Celebration of Light" ceremony. Even many Islington schools now refer to the Christmas holiday as "the winter festival".

But Abuse Munassir, of the Al Nehar Mosque in Caledonian Road, King's Cross, said: Blaming Christian traditions for being offensive to Islam is ridiculous and completely untrue. This practice is absolute madness. Islington's councillors must wake up and strive to create harmony and diversity rather than destroying it. My younger Islamic community members are considering marching on Islington Town Hall in a peaceful protest against this anti-Christian moronic purge. I feel race incidents will occur unless this political-correctness nonsense ceases to exist.

Other faith leaders have backed Munassir's comments.

John Bradford, the information manager of the North London Buddhist Centre in Holloway Road, said: I can't imagine any Buddhists getting offended by Christmas lights and people celebrating Christmas. The only sort of people who would get offended are the people who are over-sensitive and get offended by anything. But Buddhists are quite pluralistic about this sort of thing.

Father Jim Kennedy, of the Church of the Blessed Sacrament in Copenhagen Street, King's Cross, added: All faiths support each other's festivals. As a multi-cultural society where, according to the 2001 census, religion is important to 77 per cent of the population, we need to celebrate each others' festivals. Of the 77% of people claiming a faith allegiance, 72% claim Christianity as their faith. Are the majority not allowed to have their fun? What we should be doing is ensuring the minority religions have their fun as well and we should join in. Generally the killjoys are those who have no faith and wish to expunge all concept of faith.

But councillor Laura Willoughby (Liberal Democrat), executive member for communities, said: Christmas is and always has been coming to Islington. The only difference is that this year it's bigger and better than last year.

Based on an article from The Scotsman

Theories of "intelligent design" are based on unscientific, religious beliefs and cannot be taught as an alternative to Darwin's theory of evolution, a United States judge said yesterday in a landmark ruling.

Judge John Jones launched a scathing attack on nutter supporters of intelligent design (ID), accusing them of lying "time and again" about their motivations and condemning the "breathtaking inanity" of a decision by a school board in Pennsylvania to teach teenagers that evolution is not a fact, that is has "gaps" and that ID is a realistic alternative view.

ID holds that some aspects of nature are so complex they must have been the work of an unnamed creator rather than the result of random natural selection. Opponents argue it is a thinly disguised version of creationism - the belief that the world was created by God, as described in the Book of Genesis - which the US Supreme Court has ruled may not be taught in state schools.

The latest "theory of evolution" case, brought by a group of parents against Dover School Board, was one of the highest-profile in the US for 80 years. It was closely watched in at least 30 states where Christian conservatives are planning similar initiatives.

After the ruling, nutters claimed those opposed to their theory were "anti- religious" and wanted to tar people who believe in God as "irrational".

In October 2004, Dover became the first school district in the US to include ID in its science curriculum. Yesterday, Judge Jones ordered that it should be removed. In making this determination, we have addressed the seminal question of whether ID is science. We have concluded that it is not and, moreover, that ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents, he said in a written ruling. We find that the secular purposes claimed by the board amount to a pretext for the board's real purpose, which was to promote religion in the public school classroom. The citizens of the Dover area were poorly served by the members of the board who voted for the ID policy. It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie to cover their tracks and disguise the real purpose behind the ID policy.

To be sure, Darwin's theory of evolution is imperfect, the judge said. However, the fact that a scientific theory cannot yet render an explanation on every point should not be used as a pretext to thrust an untestable alternative hypothesis, grounded in religion, into the science classroom or to misrepresent well-established scientific propositions.

Alan Leshner, chief executive of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and executive publisher of the journal Science, said he was "heartened" by yesterday's decision. It recognises that intelligent design was injected into Dover's biology classes for religious reasons rather than scientific reasons, he said. On behalf of the entire US scientific community, we are grateful for the courage of science teachers and parents in Dover, who worked so hard and took such risks to preserve the integrity of science education in our public schools.

From the Tahlequah Daily Press

Iran's hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has banned all Western music from state radio and TV stations _ an eerie reminder of the 1979 Islamic revolution when popular music was outlawed as "un-Islamic" under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

Today, though, the sounds of hip-hop can be heard blaring from car radios in Tehran's streets, and Eric Clapton's Rush and the Eagles' Hotel California regularly accompany Iranian broadcasts.

No more _ the official Iran Persian daily reported Monday that Ahmadinejad, as head of the Supreme Cultural Revolutionary Council, ordered the enactment of an October ruling by the council to ban all Western music, including classical music, on state broadcast outlets. Blocking indecent and Western music from the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting is required, according to a statement on the council's official Web site.

Music was outlawed by Khomeini soon after the 1979 revolution; Khomeini claimed it was "intoxicating." Many musicians went abroad and built an Iranian music industry in Los Angeles. But as revolutionary fervor started to fade, some light classical music was allowed on Iranian radio and television; some public concerts reappeared in the late 1980s. But later, Khomeini allowed classical music to be played over state radio. Since his death, pop music has been creeping into Iranian shops.

In the 1990s, particularly during the presidency of reformist Mohammad Khatami starting in 1997, authorities began relaxing restrictions further. These days in Iran, Western music, films and clothing are widely available in Iran. Bootleg videos and DVDs of films banned by the state are widely available on the black market.

However, women are prohibited from singing in public, except to a segregated female-only audience. Hard-liners were afraid the voice of a woman soloist might arouse impure thoughts in men. Women are allowed to sing as part of a chorus.

Earlier this month, Ali Rahbari, conductor of Tehran's symphony orchestra, resigned and left Iran to protest the treatment of the music industry in Iran. Before leaving, he played Beethoven's Ninth Symphony to packed Tehran theater houses over several nights last month _ its first performance in Tehran since the 1979 revolution. The performances angered many conservatives and prompted newspaper columns accusing Rahbari of promoting Western values.

Ahmadinejad's order means the state broadcasting authority must execute the decree and prepare a report on its implementation within six months. Ahmadinejad won office in August on a platform of reverting to ultraconservative principles, following eight years of reformist-led rule under Khatami. During his presidential campaign, Ahmadinejad also promised to confront what he called the Western cultural invasion of Iran and promote Islamic values.

The latest media ban also includes censorship of content of films. Supervision of content from films, TV series and their voice-overs is emphasized in order to support spiritual cinema and to eliminate triteness and violence, the council said in a statement on its Web site. The council has also issued a ban on foreign movies that promote "arrogant powers," an apparent reference to the United States.

Based on an article from The Sun

A Christmas magic show has sparked outrage amongst nutters by attempting to recreate Bible miracles. Nutters slammed Channel 4’s The Magic of Jesus – which aims to see if eight New Testament ‘feat’ are really possible. Illusionists raise a headless corpse from the dead, cure a blind person, feed 5,000 football fans with five loaves and two fishes and walk on water.

John "Concentration Camp" Beyer, of mediawatch-uk, said: Channel 4 are, true to form, trying to court controversy by putting on a show like this at Christmas time. An awful lot of people will be upset and this seems to me a calculated attempt to cause offence.

The hour long show from Objective Productions was commissioned by C4 and will be followed by 3BM Television’s controversial Tsunami: Where was God? – scheduled for Christmas Day. C4 has also confirmed that Jamie Oliver will deliver its annual alternative yuletide address on Christmas Day.

From The Independent

Proposals by the Turkish government to ban alcohol in city centres and create "drinking zones" in remote suburbs have enraged secularists and rekindled fears that Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is returning his ruling party to its Islamic roots.

A group of lawyers representing the Ankara Bar Association filed a lawsuit earlier this week to try to prevent some municipalities from forcing restaurants and bars serving alcohol to move out of the city centre. They said the move was unconstitutional and an affront to freedoms. Municipal law allows the local authority to allocate specific areas, the association's complaint said, but doesn't make any reference to alcohol drinking zones.

Secularists have come into frequent conflict with the governing Justice and Development Party (AKP), which they accuse of trying to stamp a Muslim way of life on the country even as it implements Western-style reforms designed to woo the European Union.

Authorities in Istanbul and the tourist town of Antalya, recently given the power by the AKP to ban alcohol at state-run restaurants and cafés, exacerbated the issue by suggesting ridding the cities of alcohol altogether and creating special drinking zones out of town.

The proposals have enraged the secular and business communities of both cities, who fear that such prohibitions would do irrevocable harm to the thriving tourist industry and to Turkey's status as a secular state. The resort of Antalya, run by the AKP, has given into pressure from businesses and designated the city a "wet area" in reaction to the plans.

From The Guardian

According to a survey by the Merkez news agency, there are now alcohol bans in public places in 61 of Turkey's 81 provinces. By law, it would be difficult for the government to issue a blanket ban on alcohol. Raki is the national tipple in Turkey, which also boasts a growing quality wine industry and Efes, a major brewer. Critics complain, however, that the Erdogan government is moving by stealth to institute a ban, to stigmatise drinking, and to step up pressure on the industry.

An opposition leader, Kemal Anadol, argued that it was illegal to segregate alcohol consumption in cafes and restaurants. What they want is Tehran not Luxembourg, he said.

Across Turkey the local authorities still own and administer many leisure facilities such as hotels, restaurants and cafes. It is in such places that alcohol is increasingly being restricted or banished.

The government has not yet moved against privately owned premises, but proprietors complain that bureaucratic and fiscal obstacles to alcohol consumption are being exploited to discourage drinking - cumbersome licensing procedures, inspections, and taxes.

updated 17th December

From the BBC

Religious authorities have began implementing a ban on mixed taxis and busses passed earlier this year. In accordance with Sharia law, men and women are not allowed to travel together on public transport.

The BBC's Ado Sale Kankiya in the city of Kano says some 9,000 religious marshals are on the streets to implement the ban.

Despite the officials and publicity leading up to the implementation of the law, many women are still riding on the bikes, he says. Women say there are not enough public transport alternatives in the state that adopted Sharia law in 2000.

About 500 three-wheeled motorbike taxis and 100 women's-only buses have been introduced, but women say this is not sufficient.

Our correspondent says officials are not arresting or fining offenders, just warning them about the new law. In Zamfara State, though, taxi riders have been lashed when found carrying female passengers.

Kano is one of several Muslim majority states that adopted Sharia law five years ago. The move initially heightened tensions between Muslims and Christians and led to clashes which left thousands dead.

Human rights groups have condemned abuses sanctioned under the law including amputations and flogging, and say it discriminates against women. Sharia law appears to have retained popular support in the north.

But there is significant opposition to the law, especially among the Christian minority. While officially it does not apply to them, many say that in practice they are forced to comply.

From The Guardian

Hundreds of taxi moped operators in the northern Nigerian city of Kano have clashed with Islamic authorities over a ban on women passengers, a new sharia law which they said deprived them of their best customers. A fleet of riders, known as achaba, drove through the city wielding sticks this week in protests which turned violent, leaving 11 people injured and 24 motorised tricycles vandalised.

No amount of intimidation and lawlessness will deter us from carrying out this noble duty of stopping women from riding on achaba, said Yahaya Farouk Chedi of the religious police.

What's the betting that religion is behind this suggestion rather than any notion of caring for the community.

Based on an article from the National

A local government leader in the Western Highlands province of Papua & New Guinea want a total ban on nightclubs, poker machines and alcohol in the province.

Western Highlands Provincial Council of Women president Paula Mek expressed her concern during a ceremony last week. Local leaders who were there supported her opinion saying these areas were the ‘breeding grounds’ for HIV/AIDS and its rampant rise.

Mek said that nothing substantial had been done by any authority to uproot the cause of the disease.
She said parents had invested a lot in caring and raising their children to have good lives but nightclubs, poker machines and alcohol were redirecting them towards early deaths. There are a lot of tears. Parents are crying for their children. Wives are crying for their husbands. Mothers are crying for their sons. Nightclubs, pokies and alcohol have taken away our children and fathers. We’ve called on the provincial government to ban these evil things. So far nothing has being done and many are dying. We’ll keep on making noises.

Mek said the current HIV/AIDS trend warrants the provincial government to take actions on these three issues. We’re talking about our young people’s lives. It’s not their future we’re talking about because there is none if nightclubs, pokies and alcohol are not completely removed from our province. She said though HIV/AIDS was the biggest issue, family and social breakdowns, violence, rapes, poverty and prostitution among others were caused by the three vices.

Based on an article from the BNP

The following is the report received from one of our British National Party representatives who attended the recent meeting, called by concerned Christians to organise protest against next month’s showing of the Jerry Springer “musical” at Plymouth’s Barbican theatre.

The meeting was held in Catherine Street Baptist Church and attended by over a hundred people representing the City’s Christian communities.

The meeting was opened with the motto of the city being read out, taken from Proverbs, “The Name of the Lord is a strong tower”, which continues, “The righteous run into it and they are safe”!

There then followed a shared prayer led by Roy Beaumont of “Prayer for the City”, who had previously highlighted the reasons why Christians find the ”musical” so offensive. He was followed, in addressing the gathering, by Stephen Green of Christian Voice.

Green suggested that a series of activities could be initiated which may persuade the Barbican theatre to abandon the production. He expressed enthusiasm for many activities like letter writing to the theatre and local media, and for leafleting the audiences as they enter the theatre.

The meeting gave a round of applause on being told that Sainsbury’s had withdrawn the DVD of the “musical” from their shelves following representations from Christian Voice.

At one point Councillor David Salter, Conservative member for Plympton Chaddlewood ward addressed the gathering.

Attendees were then invited to ask questions.

However one speaker was emphatic in blaming the City Council for their implicit support of the production, particularly in the degree of financial support that they gave to the theatre and outlined a number of political issues closely related to the subject matter of the meeting.

Councillor Salter predictably, in the opinions of our representatives, rebutted these criticisms of the Council, saying that it could not be blamed for an independent decision of the governing board of the theatre.

In conclusion the gathering was asked if they felt that, after all that had been said, they were in favour of something practical being attempted? The general impression gained by the meeting organisers was in the affirmative. The points were made that everybody should act in accordance with their own consciences and to undertake those protests that they felt able to do.

From Denmark.dk.

Daily newspaper Jyllands-Posten's twelve cartoons of the Muslim prophet Mohammed are causing ripples across the world and worries at the Office of the United Nations' High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour.

Arbour has sent a letter to the Organisation of Islamic Conferences (OIC), an international organisation of 56 Muslim states, which had complained over the cartoons.

In September, Jyllands-Posten called for and printed the cartoons by various Danish illustrators, after reports that artists were refusing to illustrate works about Islam, out of fear of fundamentalist retribution. The newspaper said it printed the cartoons as a test of whether Muslim fundamentalists had begun affecting the freedom of expression in Denmark.

Muslims in Denmark and abroad have protested against the newspaper, calling the caricatures blasphemous and a deliberate attempt to provoke and insult their religious sensitivities.

Arbour said she understood their concerns. I would like to emphasise that I deplore any statement or act showing a lack of respect towards other people's religion, she said.

Daily newspaper Berlingske Tidende reported that it held a copy of the letter, which stated that Arbour had appointed UN experts in the areas of religious freedom and racism to investigate the matter. I'm confident that they will take action in an adequate manner,'Arbour said in her letter to the 56 governments, which have requested the UN to address the issue with Denmark.

A diplomat from one of the countries told the newspaper that the governments were pleased with Arbour's answer.

Foreign Minister Per Stig Møller said Arbour's involvement in the matter was natural, given her position. It's her job. She was contacted by the IOC, and she needs to look into it. The wrong thing to do would have been if she ignored their request.

While Møller said Denmark would cooperate with a UN investigation, he reinforced that freedom of speech was a matter to be decided by the courts. It's up to the courts to decide if Jyllands-Posten is guilty of blasphemy. The government has no say in that, Møller said.

Based on an article from Unison

A group working with women involved in prostitution is campaigning against the opening of Peter Stringfellow's lap dancing club on Parnell Street in Dublin.

RUHAMA is supporting the North Inner City Concerned Nutters in their attempt to prevent the club from being granted a dance license.

RUHAMA spokesperson Geraldine Rowley said it is internationally recognised that such clubs are part and parcel of the sex industry.

Rowley said she is concerned that the club would create yet another breeding ground for prostitution.

She said she knew of women who went to clubs expecting to dance, only to discover that their contract had changed, and that they would not get paid unless they provided private dances.

See Response from John "Concentration Camp" Beyer of Mediawatch-UK

From the Mediawatch-UK response to the Government consultation on the possession of violent pornography.

We agree that the possession of material listed in paragraph 39 of the consultation should be illegal but this list is too limited and should be extended to include material listed by the BBFC as suitable for classification at ‘R18’.

The penalty appropriate for these new offences should be a minimum of three years imprisonment with heavy fines and confiscation of assets and destruction of the guilty person’s pornographic articles, computer and/or video and DVD copying equipment. Penalties should also be available for those who upload such images, Internet Service Providers who host it and telecommunications companies who allow access to it.

Did I read something in the bible along the lines of : If thy neighbour's private bedroom pleasures offend you, then pluck out his eyes and send him to prison for three years?

Even if it does not appear quite like this in the bible I believe that it must have been an error in translation and the sense was indeed as above.

I simply cannot believe the depths of intolerance and persecution that supposedly religious people are descending too. How can any civilised person wish a 3 year prison sentence on the totally harmless bedroom activities of say a couple of million people.

It is about time religious bosses got their act together and stopped their religion from being hijacked by warmongers, torturers, child molestors, terrorists, violent mobs and Mediawatch-UK.

From Christian Today

The Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams has urged the reform of Pakistan’s Blasphemy laws during an eight-day tour primarily of earthquake-stricken regions this week.

The Archbishop expressed his fear that the country’s blasphemy law, which makes desecration of the Koran punishable by death, was being used to “settle private scores”, with many Christians arguing that the law is being used as an excuse to attack them.

The Christian community of Sangla Hill suffered an attack just last week in which around 2,000 Muslims destroyed churches and Christian properties, following allegations that a young Christian man had burned a copy of the Koran.

Dr Williams told reporters the Sangla Hill incident had focussed attention on the problems caused by the blasphemy laws. I think it is widely recognised that the abuse of the blasphemy laws is a major problem which this country has to tackle; the problem is not so much the idea of a law against blasphemy as about a law whose penalty is so severe and whose practice gives so much scope for allowing people to settle private scores. I was able to speak to the President directly about this and the problem is certainly widely recognised.

AFP quoted one Christian community leader, Peter Jacob, as saying: Blasphemy law has always acted as a lethal sword against the minority communities. Its repeal is our longstanding demand.

From Bgay

More than two dozen gay Arab men face strict punishment after being arrested at what police in the United Arab Emirates described as a mass homosexual wedding.

The country, which lies along the Persian Gulf between Saudi Arabia and Oman, has banned openly homosexual behavior. The unfortunate victims could be lashed, forced to undergo hormone treatments and jailed for five years, an Interior Ministry official said as he announced the arrests on Saturday.

Interior Ministry spokesman Issam Azouri said police detained 26 men during a raid earlier in the month as the wedding ceremony was about to begin in a hotel chalet in Dubai. Azouri said the men would probably be tried under Muslim law on charges related to prostitution and adultery, the Associated Press reported.

There have been a series of similar group arrests of homosexuals over the past few years in the United Arab Emirates. The Interior Ministry said the latest detentions stemmed from a tip-off to police. The arrested men were mostly from the Emirates but one came from India and three others were from neighboring Arab countries, Azouri said

From Christian Today

The Catholic Church in Scotland has criticised plans by a condom manufacturer to provide taxi drivers in Edinburgh with condoms to give out to couples for free on their way home after a night out.

If the plans are approved by council officials, the Safe Ride scheme could be launched as early as January, reports the BBC.

The Family Planning Association (FPA) in Scotland has welcomed the scheme, also under consideration by Glasgow City Council, against the concerns of the Catholic Church. FPA spokesman Tim Streets praised the plans: “I don’t really have a problem with people finding it a bit funny, at least at first. Let’s get the giggles out of the way, We’re talking about protecting people’s health and getting them to see that, even after a night out on the town and maybe being inebriated, this is a serious issue.

Edinburgh’s City Council’s licensing committee has been considering the initiative involving Festival City Cars. Company manager David Coutts, said: It seems sensible that the cabbies, if they’re asked by the passenger, would make such facilities available. I appreciate that some people might look upon this as being a bit humorous but it is a serious campaign.”

The Catholic Church in Scotland has raised serious concerns over the campaign, however. This will give the green light to casual sex,” cautioned Church spokesman Peter Kearney. It’s also very dangerous to suggest condoms absolutely prevent sexually transmitted infections as they don’t.

The 5,000 free contraceptives have been distributed to the taxi firm, which has a fleet of 220 cars, by a US contraceptives company. The Edinburgh scheme follows the launch of a similar scheme earlier this year in Brighton, supported by boxer Chris Eubank.

We wouldn't like to think that the French unrest was caused by MPs' own policies now would we. Far better for them to pin the blame on some ludicrous media hook. If some MPs show this level of incompetence in their analysis of the causes of unrest, then it is hardly surprising that they have proven incompetent in policy making.

From the BBC

A French MP has publicly accused rappers of fuelling the country's recent riots with their songs. It comes a day after 200 politicians backed his petition calling for legal action against seven rap musicians and bands it alleges have incited racism.

The petition, handed to Justice Minister Pascal Clement, has been signed by 153 members of the lower house of parliament and 49 senators.

MP Francois Grosdidier said it was no surprise youths "saw red" after listening to violent lyrics. Grosdidier, a member of President Jacques Chirac's conservative ruling UMP party, said songs like Monsieur R's FranSSe incite racism and hatred, and should be banned from radio play. When people hear this all day long and when these words swirl round in their heads, it is no surprise that they then see red as soon as they walk past policemen or simply people who are different from them.

The French Prime Minister, Dominique de Villepin, however dismissed the claims by some of his party colleagues that rap music fuelled suburban rioting in France. de Villepin told French radio that he wanted to avoid finger-pointing about the origins of the unrest. But he said that the courts should deal with lyrics that overstepped the mark.

Speaking on French radio, de Villepin said: I very much wish during this period - it is one of my primary responsibilities - to avoid any sort of confusion or finger-pointing. Is rap responsible for the crisis in the suburbs? My answer is no.

Rapper Monsieur R, one of those singled out in the petition, rejected the idea, saying rap is not a call to violence.
As well as Monsieur R, it names artists Smala, Fabe and Salif and bands Ministere Amer, 113 and Lunatic.

Monsieur R, real name Richard Makela, already faces a separate lawsuit for "outrage to social decency" over the song FranSSe, brought by another conservative MP and to be heard in February. The rapper told LCI television: Hip hop is a crude art, so we use crude words. It is not a call to violence.

Four members of the rap group Sniper were acquitted earlier this year in Rouen, northern France, in a case brought by the Interior Ministry over a song it alleged incited attacks on the police. An appeal is due to be heard next month.

French authorities said the situation had returned to normal last week, following three weeks of unrest that affected dozens of towns and cities. Nationwide, almost 9,000 cars were set ablaze and some 3,000 people were arrested. The French parliament last week approved a three-month state of emergency.

updated 27th November

From The Times

Marlowe's Koran-burning hero is censored to avoid Muslim anger

It was the surprise hit of the autumn season, selling out for its entire run and inspiring rave reviews. But now the producers of Tamburlaine the Great have come under fire for censoring Christopher Marlowe’s 1580s masterpiece to avoid upsetting Muslims.

Audiences at the Barbican in London did not see the Koran being burnt, as Marlowe intended, because David Farr, who directed and adapted the classic play, feared that it would inflame passions in the light of the London bombings.

Simon Reade, artistic director of the Bristol Old Vic, said that if they had not altered the original it would have unnecessarily raised the hackles of a significant proportion of one of the world’s great religions. The burning of the Koran was “smoothed over”, he said, so that it became just the destruction of “a load of books” relating to any culture or religion. That made it more powerful, they claimed.

Members of the audience also reported that key references to Muhammad had been dropped, particularly in the passage where Tamburlaine says that he is “not worthy to be worshipped”. In the original Marlowe writes that Muhammad “remains in hell”.

The censorship aroused condemnation yesterday from senior figures in the theatre and scholars, as well as religious leaders. Terry Hands, who directed Tamburlaine for the Royal Shakespeare Company in 1992, said: I don’t believe you should interfere with any classic for reasons of religious or political correctness.

Charles Nicholl, the author of The Reckoning: The Murder of Christopher Marlowe, said it was wrong to tamper with Marlowe because he asked uncomfortable and confrontational questions — particularly aimed at those that held dogmatic, religious views. Why should Islam be protected from the questioning gaze of Marlowe? Marlowe stands for provocative questions. This is a bit of an insult to him.

Reade said that Farr felt that burning the Koran “would have been unnecessarily inflammatory”. The play needed to be seen in a 21stcentury context, he believed.He said: Marlowe was not challenging Muslims, he was attacking theism, saying, ‘I’m God, there isn’t a God’. If he had been in a Christian country, a Judaic country or a Hindu country, it would be their gods he’d be attacking.

Inayat Bunglawala, the media secretary of the Muslim Council of Britain, disagreed, saying: In the context of a fictional play, I don’t think it will have offended many people.

From The Guardian

The director and adaptor of Tamburlaine ,  David Farr,  responds to yesterday's story in the Times.

It is complete nonsense to suggest, as the Times did yesterday, that my decision to alter the burning-of-the-books scene in Tamburlaine was based on a desire to appease Islamic opinion. As I made clear, my decision to adapt the text was purely artistic. Journalists and academics often forget that theatre directors are dealing with living texts. We constantly adapt, chop, cut and change to make the work vibrant and rigorous for a modern audience, to present our particular vision in as limpid a way as possible.

Marlowe knew how to sell a play. Anti-Turkish feeling was running high in 1587 (think of the Turk's Head pubs still dotted around today). The Ottoman empire was a threat to the great western hegemony - the unknown dark enemy threatening all that was great about Europe. The 23-year-old boy-wonder Marlowe tapped brilliantly into a well of anti-Turk feeling to make his first Tamburlaine (now known as part one) a huge hit, with the lead character as a kind of surrogate Christian avenger tearing the heart out of the dark Ottoman soul.

When the play proved a smash hit, like all good Hollywood writers, Marlowe wrote a sequel (part two), with another Turkish antagonist, more beatings and more cruelty. Marlowe's were not the only Turk-bashing plays of the time (others included A Christian Turned Turk by Robert Daborne and Selimus by Robert Greene), but his were the best. In both parts he gave his audience lashings of anti-Turk delights - brainings, whippings and burnings. Tamburlaine is partly a gleefully racist comedy. And they loved it all the more for that.

Marlowe's play is remarkable, then, in that it is both anti-Turk tosh and a masterpiece of philosophical defiance. What I did in my version was to focus ruthlessly on the philosophical freedom of my lead character in a pared-down version that took the two plays (seven hours) into one three-hour evening. This involved ripping apart the play, and choosing to focus only on what interested me. That's my job. The scene in question is crucial to the play's narrative arc and was kept in - Tamburlaine did burn the Qur'an centre-stage in an old petrol drum - but I wanted to make it very clear that his act was a giant two fingers to the entire theological system, not an piece of Christian triumphalism over the barbarous Turk. So, in our production, Marlowe's "heap of superstitious books" were the books of all religions. His act was a hubristic and nihilistic defiant scream at what he saw as an empty universe.

In our production, Tamburlaine's god does not belong to any religion, for they are all in hell. "Seek out another godhead to adore. The god that lives in heaven, if any god. For he is god alone, and none but he." The phrase "if any god" becomes key. Tamburlaine is positing what Marlowe could never have proposed at that time without literally risking his neck. He is proposing atheism.

One other thing should be made clear. Never in our rehearsal discussions did we receive any pressure from the Muslim community - this was never the question. Never did we receive any pressure from the Young Vic or the Barbican to change any scenes. Never did I receive external pressure of any kind. The decision to focus the play away from anti-Turkish pantomime to an existential epic was artistic, mine alone, and I stand by it.

From The Scotsman

A popular actress has been pelted with sandals, tomatoes and rotten eggs for telling Indian men not to expect their brides to be virgins any more.

Khushboo has also been hauled before a court, banned from making any further public comments or giving interviews and released on bail of £60. She is due back in court in a little over two weeks, although it remains unclear whether she has broken any law.

The married mother of two from southern India caused an outcry after telling a magazine there was nothing wrong with pre-marital sex - as long as it was protected sex.

As a result, conservative political and community groups have staged rowdy demonstrations and filed more than two dozen defamation and public-interest suits, including one accusing her of "corrupting innocence".

Initially, the actress's comments went unnoticed, but a week after the magazine was published, the Tamil-language Sun TV, based in the southern state of Tamil Nadu, ran a story about film industry outrage.

The controversy has at once titillated and outraged Indians. Even the finance minister has been grilled by journalists for his opinion, sidestepping specifics but backing free speech. The Indian Formula 1 driver Narain Karthikeyan and Miss Universe, Russia's Natalie Glebanova, have also come out in support.

Newspapers initially said that tennis star Mirza also from south India, had backed Khushboo, but the Muslim teenager quickly denied saying any such thing. I will like to say clearly on record that I cannot possibly justify pre-marital sex, as it is a very big sin in Islam and one which I believe will not be forgiven by Allah.

From The Times

Islamist murders and threats have transformed the once-tolerant Netherlands into a place of armed bodyguards and fear

A film about gay rights should hardly raise an eyebrow in the Netherlands, which for centuries has prided itself as a beacon of freedom of expression and was the first country to legalise gay marriage. But when Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali refugee turned Dutch MP, starts making a new film about the oppression of homosexuals under Islam, the threat to everyone taking part is deemed so great that there will be no faces shown on screen, no end credits, and the entire production team will remain anonymous. Ali, a “lapsed Muslim” who revealed this week that she has finished the script, lives in a safe house under 24-hour protection.

The precaution is as wise as the courage is extraordinary: Theo van Gogh, the director of Ali’s previous film, about domestic violence under Islam, was killed — repeatedly shot and nearly decapitated in broad daylight in the streets of Amsterdam by an Islamic extremist. Impaled on a knife in van Gogh’s chest was a five-page note declaring holy war on the Netherlands and threatening death to many other public figures deemed “enemies of Islam”.

A year after his murder, the Netherlands is a country transformed. Previously, only the Queen and the Prime Minister had police protection, and ministers cycled to their ministries. Now, many politicians, writers and artists are considered to be in such danger that they have permanent armed guards and are driven around in bomb-proof armoured cars. The Interior Ministry has set up a special unit assessing death threats from Islamic extremists and providing protection squads.

In a democracy, strong opinion-leaders must be able to say what they want to say. Therefore, the Government will take the responsibility to protect them, a spokesman from the ministry said, adding that the number receiving protection was secret.

Police are currently investigating the shot fired at the window of Rita Verdonk, the Immigration Minister, who has become a hate figure among Muslim communities for introducing some of the strictest immigration laws in Europe, and insisting that Muslims should integrate.

In Amsterdam, an alderman,Ahmed Aboutaleb, a Dutch-Moroccan who has said that Moroccans who do not like the Netherlands should leave, is also under permanent protection. “\He never gives interviews on that issue, a spokeswoman said.

Job Cohen, the Mayor of Amsterdam, has tried to build bridges with the Muslim community but, as the country’s highest-profile Jew, he also needs round- the-clock protection.

At Leiden University law school, Professor Afshin Ellian, a refugee from Iran who has called for reform of Islam, and even suggested that comedians should make jokes about it, is hustled through the electronically locked doors to his office by two bodyguards.

The rise in the death threats started in 2002 when Pym Fortuyn, a flamboyant gay right-wing maverick, called for a halt to Islamic immigration. He complained that police did not take the death threats against him seriously, until he was killed, not by a Muslim but by a left-wing activist who said that he did it “for the Muslims”.

It was the first political killing in the Netherlands for three centuries and was seen as a one-off. But the murder of van Gogh two years later convinced people that the threat of political killing had become permanent.

Even if the would-be assassins are foiled by the intelligence services and the protection squads, the death threats are already having some success in silencing criticism. People are very afraid of saying things now, Professor Ellian said. There is self-censorship.

From the Daily Mail
From Hastings Today

Shameful David Cameron has promised to campaign against violent music and computer games if he becomes Tory leader, saying they are fuelling the rise in anti-social behaviour.

The favourite to win the race to succeed Michael Howard said a government must demand help from those who shape popular culture if it is going to have any hope of tackling crime. He said he would build a ‘comprehensive anti-crime policy’ that would ‘not only strengthen the criminal justice system, but re-civilise our society’.

Meanwhile shameful MP Michael Foster is backing calls for a ban which will prevent the video game called Bully being sold in Hastings shops.

Foster believes the game could glamourise bullying and lead to incidents in local schools. The game is due to be released by Rockstar Games. Calls for the ban are being led by the nutter MP Keith Vaz.

Michael Foster said: This game allows the person playing it to take on the persona of a bully, able for instance to kick and punch other pupils and spit in their food. I think that can only encourage young people to find pleasure and excitement in abusing others."

A Rockstar Games spokesman said: Bully is still a work-in-progress, but when it's finished we believe most people will agree it offers an exciting experience and tells an engaging story. More and more people are beginning to recognise the stories in video games have as many themes and plotlines as books and movies. Just as books aren't judged by their covers, video games shouldn't be judged by their titles or individual scenes.

The game would be "submitted to the appropriate bodies" to be rated, he added.

Roger Bennett, director general of the Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers Association, said: As Mr Vaz knows, any game can be automatically referred to the BBFC for a rating. It is disingenuous to suggest any game be banned when the content has yet to be finalised.

Foster said: I understand the company has suggested the game might have an 18 rating but we all know this does not stop children accessing them. I really hope we can take action against this kind of irresponsible game. As a society we should be encouraging children to be compassionate and understanding towards others, not glamourising bullying.

From Iran Focus

A man was publicly hanged in the town of Qazvin, west of the Iranian capital Tehran, a state-run daily reported on Tuesday.

The unnamed man was accused of running a brothel and producing pornographic videos along with his wife, the daily Iran Newspaper wrote.

The couple had both been sentenced to 10 years in prison, five years in exile, 80 lashes and execution for running the prostitution ring and being found in possession of alcohol, drugs, and illicit CDs.

The man’s sentence was carried out in front of the judge that sentenced him in one of the town’s squares on Monday morning, while his wife had been executed in February 2004, the report said.

Based on an biased article from The Times

Anti-gun nutters have called on stores to withdraw a computer game starring the rapper 50 Cent and described as one of the most violent to be released.

The BBFC have given 50 Cent: Bulletproof, released next week, an 18 rating for its frequent strong bloody violence. Players follow the rapper from crack-dealing gangster to superstar by gunning down, stabbing or garroting rivals.

The £30 package includes an album of new material as an inducement to his audience of largely teenage fans. It is expected to be the top seller in a Christmas gaming market that promises  a range of 18-rated games marketed on their violent content.

Nutters are angry that Bulletproof glamorises the “gangsta” lifestyle of 50 Cent. He claims to have been shot nine times and always wears a bulletproof vest.

A profanity-laced voiceover by 50 Cent explains that points are gained by rifling through the pockets of murdered opponents to steal “bling, wallets and weapons”. The advanced graphics allow for a “bullet’s-eye view” of a gunshot as it ploughs into a rival’s exploding cranium. But 50 Cent’s bullet wounds magically heal, angering nutters who deal with gun crime.

Gleen Reid, co-founder of Mothers Against Guns, said: This game glorifies guns and gangs at a time when we are trying to prevent real-life shootings. 50 Cent makes a profit out of the misery of parents who are burying their children. Reid’s son, Corey, was shot dead in a Birmingham nightclub five years ago. She believes the 18 restriction will be easily evaded by children and called on shops to withdraw the game. “Parents should boycott retailers who profit from it, she said.

However, the BBFC, which rates computer games, said it had no problems approving it without demanding any cuts. A spokesman said: The ‘shoot ’em up’ genre is very popular and appropriate for an adult audience. The violence is no more glamorised or amoral than in a particularly violent film.

Vivendi Universal Games is preparing a PlayStation Portable version of the 50 Cent game and anticipates lucrative sequels with the star who has overtaken his mentor Eminem as Britain’s top-selling rap act. Criticised for thuggish lyrics selling a fantasy of urban street life to a mainly white audience, 50 Cent has become one of America’s leading black entrepreneurs. He has amassed a £30 million empire through CD sales and merchandise endorsements, and last week released a semi-autobiographical feature film, Get Rich or Die Tryin, celebrating his rags-to-riches rise.

Based on an article from Scoop

The New Zealand nutters of the Society For Promotion Of Community Standards have been whinging at the censor for passing the internationally successful films of Irreversible and 9 Songs

From a Society For Promotion Of Community Standards press release:

The Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC) - notes in its Annual Report 2005, recently tabled in parliament, that the two films most complained about by members of the public over the last year, were 9 Songs and Irreversible. Both were films that the Society sought unsuccessfully to have banned or cut, by seeking reviews of the classifications by the Film and Literature Board of Review. In both cases the Board unanimously upheld the R18 classifications issued by the Classification Office. The OFLC Report 2005 states:

Most complaints about 9 Songs centred on the fact it contained explicit sex scenes and was to be shown at cinemas....9 Songs attracted the most inquiries and complaints of any individual publication in 2004/05.

The film that attracted the second largest number of inquiries and complaints was Irreversible.... Complainants generally argued that the film should have been banned.

The Society remains convinced that the film should have been banned. The OFLC, the Board and the Courts lacked the will to ban it. spokesman Mike Petrus said:

The widespread complaints over 9 Songs demonstrate that the Society is continuing to play an effective "watchdog" role in the field of film censorship. In its Annual Report 2005 the Chief Censor's Office brushes aside the public's expressed indignation over the sexually explicit content in the film by stating that in fact, any sexually explicit film classified R18 can be exhibited in a cinema. This illustrates how out of touch the Office is with mainstream New Zealanders who do not want such sexually explicit material in public cinemas.

From The Times

She risked torture, imprisonment, perhaps even death to study literature and write poetry in secret under the Taliban. Last week, when she should have been celebrating the success of her first book, Nadia Anjuman, was beaten to death in Herat, apparently murdered by her husband.

The 25-year-old Afghan had garnered wide praise in literary circles for the book Gule Dudi (Dark Flower) and was at work on a second volume.

Friends say her family was furious, believing that the publication of poetry by a woman about love and beauty had brought shame on it. She was a great poet and intellectual but, like so many Afghan women, she had to follow orders from her husband, said Nahid Baqi, her best friend at Herat University.

Farid Ahmad Majid Mia, Anjuman’s husband, is in police custody after confessing to having slapped her during a row. But he denies murder and claims that his wife committed suicide. The couple had a six-month-old son.

The death of the young writer has shocked a city which prides itself on its artistic heritage. It has also raised uncomfortable questions about how much the position of women in Afghanistan has improved since the fall of the Taliban to American-led forces four years ago.

Anjuman’s poetry alluded to an acute sense of confinement. I am caged in this corner, full of melancholy and sorrow, she wrote in one lyrical poem, adding: My wings are closed and I cannot fly.” It concludes: “I am an Afghan woman and must wail.

Afghan human rights groups condemned Anjuman’s death as evidence that the government of President Hamid Karzai has failed to address the issue of domestic violence. It is especially tragic because she was one of a group of courageous women, known as the Sewing Circles of Herat, who risked their lives to keep the city’s literary scene active under the Taliban regime.

Women were banned from working or studying by the Taliban, whose repressive edicts forbade women to laugh out loud or wear shoes that clicked. Female writers belonging to Herat’s Literary Circle realised that one of the few things that women were still allowed to do was to sew. So three times a week groups of women in burqas would arrive at a doorway marked Golden Needle Sewing School.

Had the authorities investigated, they would have discovered that the sewing students never made any clothes. Once inside the school, a brave professor of literature from Herat University would talk to them about Shakespeare, Dostoevsky and other banned writers.

Under a regime where even teaching a daughter to read was a crime, they might have been hanged if they had been caught. Although Afghanistan’s new constitution guarantees equal rights for men and women before the law, its conservative mindset has not changed. This is partly because of the continuing power of the American-backed warlords whose repressive views are similar to those of the Taliban.

If anyone would like to partake in a red light tour of Pattaya, Thailand's City of Fun just let me know. The Melon Farming Travel Service is always ready to take up where Thomas Cook fear to tread.

We don't think of it as prostitution, we here in Pattaya think of it as hiring a short term girlfriend.

No doubt the nutters of the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women think we are in La La Land...And they are are right...we are!

 

 

 

From The Guardian

Thomas Cook, Britain's longest running tour operator, is launching family tours to see prostitutes touting for trade in Amsterdam's red light district. The night-time excursions, which include a briefing about the 'system' from a former prostitute, are open to children of any age, and the company boasts 'under threes go free'.
Last week parents and charities working to protect women in the sex industry reacted with shock and disbelief when alerted to the tours by Escape.

It is sick to propose a "prostitution tour" not only for adults, but even more so for children,'said Esohe Aghatise, the European representative of the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women (CATW), which campaigns against sexual exploitation of women.

A press release issued by Thomas Cook to announce the new Walking Tour Dark Amsterdam' describes how the two-hour tour, leaving at 8pm, will take visitors 'deep into the famous red light district, accompanied by a reliable and trustworthy guide, offering a fascinating insight into the oldest profession in the world!

The brochure details what is included in the experience: Begin with a drink at a prostitute information centre where a former prostitute will explain the system and answer any questions you may have. Then head for the Wallen (red light district) and see for yourself.

CATW argues that taking children to see prostitutes is 'highly irresponsible' and risks traumatising them. The organisation estimates that 50-85 per cent of women in prostitution experience violence and debilitating injuries, and that more than 80 of those working in the Netherlands are of foreign origin, with most of them likely to have arrived there as victims of sex trafficking.

Dr Janice Raymond, co-director of CATW, said: Thomas Cook Tours treats prostitution as harmless fun. Women are sold as commodities in the Dutch sex industry, and Thomas Cook charges tourists to view the marketable products and chuckle at the human merchandise.

Thomas Cook said it has introduced the tour in its 2006 Thomas Cook Signature Cities and Short Breaks brochure in response to feedback from clients. We have added this excursion to our programme so that our clients who do not feel comfortable or safe walking through the red-light district on their own can do so with an experienced guide, not only to escort them but to share his/her knowledge of this city's colourful past and present, said a spokeswoman.

Many politicians harp back to some mythical golden age of morality. In reality such a moral code was maintained not by choice but by abject poverty. There was no divorce as there was simply no option.

Some politicians don't quite get it and make ludicrous connections between modern times and the golden age. As if the clock can be wound back by a few insignificant traditions.  Now that young people have a little more money, it is hardly surprising that they CHOOSE to spend some of it on the pleasures of life such as drink and sex.

The only way that nutter politicians will get their perverse way is to drive people back into poverty. Let us hope that they prove equally ineffective in achieving this as they are in preventing young people from enjoying drink and sex.

Based on an article from the Bangkok Post

An ancient Thai marriage rite in which wives prostrate before their husbands should be revived to bring back the disappearing happy family, Social Development and Human Security Minister Watana Muangsook said yesterday. The minister's latest laughable idea to build a healthy society, was quickly criticised by women's rights activists. They asked why a husband could not pay such respect to his wife.

'A wife showing respect by prostrating at her husband's feet reflects a Thai tradition, but it is viewed as a human rights violation,  Watana told a seminar held by the faculty of medicine at Ramathibodi Hospital. Prostration was a polite Thai way to show respect and had nothing to do with human rights violations. It would be accompanied by other marriage practices, including men being ordained as monks before marriage and husbands living with the families of their wives, he added.

Thai society does not learn ancient wisdom that supports a happy family. Men should stay in the monkhood for three months to learn morality and then live in their wives' houses after marrying because men are stronger than women and should be subdued by wives' relatives, Watana said.

Women's rights advocates and members of the National Human Rights Commission said his idea was odd. I wonder if Mr Watana's wife prostrates at his feet. If she does so, please do it as an example for others, said Ambhorn Meesook, a national human rights commissioner.

Khunying Ambhorn said the minister should not have suggested this idea because prostration should be kept private in each family. The government should not recommend such contentious practices to the public.

Women's rights activist Ticha na Nakon was upset by the minister's idea, saying she was sorry to have to pay taxes to a government which came up with such ideas. Watana should, she said, use his power to launch more useful policies.

Rachadaporn Kaewsanit, chairwoman of the Association for the Promotion of Rights and Equity, said the idea was not practical. If the husband and wife have a quarrel, could prostration solve it? If all men stop such behaviour, I would prostrate.

From MediawatchWatch

The predicted public outcry against the BBC/HBO production Rome has failed to materialise. An insider source informs MediawatchWatch that last night’s episode chalked up one complaint from 4.7 million viewers - and that was about the use of the metric system to describe Hadrian’s Wall. As Hadrian’s Wall didn’t feature in last night’s episode, even that complaint was probably directed at the show which followed Rome, What the Romans Did for Us.

John Beyer must be very disappointed in you all.

updated 3rd November

updated 9th November

comment 11th November

Based on an article from The Telegraph

Hindu nutters are demanding that Royal Mail withdraws one of this year's Christmas stamps, claiming the mother and child image it represents is insulting to their religion.

The 68p Christmas stamp, which would be used to send mail to India, features a man and woman with Hindu markings worshipping the infant Christ.

Ramesh Kallidai, secretary general of the Hindu Forum of Britain, said the image was insensitive, because it showed people who were clearly Hindu worshipping Christ.

The stamps were drawn from religious images around the world. The Hindu stamp was taken from a picture that hangs in Bombay, India, and was painted in the 17th century. It is an Indianised version of a European print of The Holy family with St Anne and the two angels, according to the city art gallery. It has a European theme but a Mughal setting. The entire picture shows St Joseph trying to push aside a huge curtain so that St Anne can behold the baby.

The picture was chosen for Royal Mail by this year's stamp designer, Irene Von Treskow, an Anglican priest in an English-speaking church in Berlin. She said she was fascinated by the image because it was so interesting to see a Mughal painting with a Christian subject. She does not believe the picture is offensive. How can it be? It is 17th-century art. She said she found the painting in a book and then looked up the image on the internet.

Kallidai said the man in the painting has a "tilak" marking on his forehead, clearly identifying him as a Vaishnava Hindu. The woman has the traditional "kumkum" mark on her forehead, identifying her as a married Hindu woman:These are exclusively used by Hindus.

Royal Mail said no offence had been intended. We thought it would be nice to return to a religious theme, a spokesman said.

Based on an article from The Telegraph

Hindus are being urged to attempt to clog up the postal service after the Royal Mail refused to withdraw a supposedly "offensive" Christmas stamp. Ramesh Kallidai, the head nutter of the Hindu Forum of Britain, has asked its members, and members of other Hindu groups, to send unstamped protest letters to Royal Mail's headquarters.

He said he hoped this would cause a logistical nightmare worse than withdrawing the stamp. The group, Britain's largest Hindu body, is also planning a mass protest outside the headquarters.

Royal Mail said yesterday that it was sorry for any "inadvertent upset" caused, but that there were no plans to withdraw the stamp. Many have already been sold. Royal Mail is, of course, more than willing to meet representatives of the Hindu community and we will apologise personally to them for any unintentional offence caused.

However, Hindu nutters said this response was unacceptable. We cannot accept the Royal Mail argument that the stamps cannot be recalled, said Ratilal Chohan, the general secretary of the Hindu Council of the North.

No doubt this will mean massive demand for the stamp from collectors now that it has rarity value.

From MediawatchWatch

As reported in various Indian news sources, the Royal Mail has bowed to pressure from Hindu community leaders and agreed not to print any more of the offending stamps.

Joanne Davis, External Relations Manager of the company, said on Monday:

Following a conversation between Barry Gardiner, Minister for Competitiveness, and the Royal Mail, the company has agreed to revise the arrangements for its special issue of 68 pence Christmas stamp.

The company will now tell Post Office branches not to issue the 68 pence Christmas stamp to customers unless specifically requested. Royal Mail will not carry out a second print run of the stamp. Current stocks will be exhausted in two to three days.

The Royal Mail has also promised to “review its procedures” to make sure that in future no offence is caused to any UK community. This means, no doubt, that it will consult with self-appointed community leaders before printing any more stamps.

This is absurd! Given that the stamp is a copy of an image that's been around for 300 years, this is quite ludicrous. Maybe Christians should now start hassling the Royal Mail.

What is more worrying is that the original work is in a church in India. What if Hindu nutters now decide to destroy it? (This isn't far-fetched. A few years ago the Italian police foiled a plan to blow up San Petronio in Bologna. The church has one of those wall paintings of the Last Judgment in which the blessed sit in heaven with Jesus, looking dead bored, while the damned have a much more interesting time in hell. In this case, the damned included Mohammed, and disaffected Muslims tried to blow up the offensive image!)

  Tolerating Unwed Mothers

Based on an article from the New Straits Times

Muslim unwed mothers who surrender themselves to Welfare Department shelters will not face penalties under religious authorities. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Dr Abdullah Md Zin said Syariah court action was only initiated if complaints were filed.

Abdullah, who is in charge of Islamic religious affairs, said even if a Muslim woman had sex out of wedlock, she would not be detained in the absence of a proper complaint. [I wonder if there is a clerk in the next office who's job it is to generate complaints]

We will only act if there is a report or complaint about her and her partner. We do not go around looking for unmarried pregnant Muslim women to take to court, he said when asked to comment on unwed mothers abandoning their babies instead of seeking help from the various agencies.

The Welfare Department of the Women, Family and Community Development Ministry runs five Orwellian sounding rehabilitation centres specifically for unwed mothers or girls exposed to moral dangers. The five centres, also known as 'Taman Seri Puteri', are located in Kajang, Rembau, Batu Gajah, Miri and Kota Kinabalu.

While most of the Muslim inmates are women who have been rescued from prostitution or caught for close proximity (khalwat), a number of them surrender themselves to the shelters after becoming pregnant.

Welfare Department director-general Datuk Shamsiah Abdul Rahman said such cases were not referred to religious authorities. Once they enter our shelters, they are under our care and are our responsibility, she said.  Up to August, 28 babies were handed over to the centres. A total of 324 babies were received from 2000 to 2004.

From ic Birmingham

Anti-social behaviour laws meant to curb yob behaviour should never have been used against Sikhs protesting over a controversial play highly offensive to their religious beliefs, the High Court was told .

The stage play Behzti, which depicted acts of rape and violence in a Sikh temple, caused alarm to many Sikhs who viewed it as insulting and dangerous when it was performed at the Birmingham Rep, two judges heard yesterday.

University student Pritpal Singh is seeking a declaration that police unlawfully resorted to provisions of the 2003 Anti Social Behaviour Act to curb what was, in effect, a peaceful demonstration against the play on December 16 last year.

Later protests turned violent and thousands of pounds worth of damage was caused over the weekend of December 18-19. The theatre was forced to cancel the play on safety grounds and playwright Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti fled into hiding after receiving death threats.

But the High Court in London yesterday was concerned only with the December 16 demonstration and whether anti-social behaviour laws can be used against peaceful protesters who normally have the right to demonstrate, and freedom of expression under human rights laws.

David Pievsky, appearing for Singh, said there was already a framework of laws designed to achieve a balanced approach to the right to demonstrate, and the use of antisocial behaviour legislation "drove a cart and horse" through that framework, argued Pievsky. He told Lord Justice Maurice Kay and Mr Justice Penry-Davey that the protest on the afternoon of December 16 was peaceful, and the protesters had been allowed to go inside the theatre and hand out leaflets there.

It appeared that the theatre's management then asked police to remove protesters. Once the protesters were removed, they were immediately ordered to disperse, and were banned from returning to the area that day. Pritpal Singh was arrested for failing to disperse and was cautioned before being released.

The hearing continues.

From The Telegraph

A Danish experiment in testing "the limits of freedom of speech" has backfired - or succeeded spectacularly - after newspaper cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed provoked an outcry.

Thousands of Muslims have taken to the streets in protest at the caricatures, the newspaper that published them has received death threats and two of its cartoonists have been forced into hiding.

Jyllands-Posten, Denmark's leading daily, defied Islam's ban on images of the Prophet by printing cartoons by 12 different artists.

The ambassadors of 11 Muslim countries called on Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the prime minister, to take "necessary steps" against the "defamation of Islam". But Mr Rasmussen, the head of a centre-Right minority coalition dependent for its survival on support from an anti-foreigner party, called the cartoons a "necessary provocation" and refused to act. I will never accept that respect for a religious stance leads to the curtailment of criticism, humour and satire in the press.

The Danish debate over how to integrate Muslims has raged for years, but the cartoons satirising the Prophet have injected a dangerous new element into the controversy. This is a pubescent demonstration of freedom of expression that consciously and totally without reason has trampled over the feelings of many people, said Uffe Ellemann Jensen, a former foreign minister and member of Rasmussen's party.

Carsten Juste, the editor of Jyllands-Posten, spurned demands that he apologise, saying he "would not dream" of saying sorry. To demand that we take religious feelings into consideration is irreconcilable with western democracy and freedom of expression. This doesn't mean that we want to insult any Muslims."

Juste commissioned the cartoons after learning of the difficulties a children's writer, Kare Bluitgen, had in finding an illustrator for his book on the Koran and the Prophet's life. Bluitgen said all the artists he approached feared the wrath of Muslims if they drew images of Mohammed.

Based on an article from the Washington Post

One of the hottest-selling T-shirts around the country shows a simply drawn snowman with a menacing expression. The image is popularized by drug-dealer-turned-rapper Young Jeezy and symbolizes those who sell a white substance known on the street as snow: cocaine.

Nutters, anti-drug campaigners and education officials are alarmed, saying the T-shirt and others like it are part of sophisticated marketing campaigns using coded symbols for drug culture that parents and teachers are not likely to understand. Some schools are banning kids from wearing the snowman images.

The shirt was first produced solely for Jeezy by Miskeen Originals, a hip-hop fashion firm in New Jersey, the company says. The owner, Yaniv Zaken, says his artists produced a handful for the rapper to wear on TV appearances. They then sold a larger batch to retailers, but pulled them when Zaken discovered that his employees had not licensed the T-shirt from Jeezy: I wasn't sure what the snowman meant until the artist explained to me that it was a drug dealer, the man delivering snow, Now everyone is selling the snowman, all unlicensed. It's become a street-hood hit worldwide.

A spokesman for Young Jeezy's record label, Def Jam Records, confirmed that the rapper held the rights to the snowman image but declined to comment on complaints that it was sending children the wrong message.

This is part of a phenomena in which parents have no idea what their children are exposed to. There is a code that children are aware of but not parents, says Sue Rusche, president and CEO of the anti-drug group National Families In Action. Rusche's organization has tried to pressure companies that they believed were targeting children with drug messages, like fashion companies marketing "heroin chic" in the 1990s. She was unaware of the snowman T-shirt.

Dr. Gilbert Botvin, director of the Institute for Prevention Research at Cornell University Medical College, has been studying what influences children to use drugs and alcohol. He believes that pop culture does play a role. The research tells us that influences coming from the media can have a profound effect on kids and influence them to use drugs," he says. "All of these things help to convey the impression that engaging in these behaviors using drugs is normal and that drugs might help you be successful or sexy or something.

Botvin says parents need to educate themselves about the media their kids are consuming and pressure schools to monitor what messages they allow students to advertise. But sometimes it's hard to overcome the buzz on the street.

Ali Kourani, a Manhattan wholesale salesman, says the T-shirt is their top seller across the country. It's big money, Kourani said.

Based on an article from Expatica

Nutter opposition to the poster advertising the play Our Sweet Lady of Flanders is gathering strength, attracting now the wrath of the extreme right Flemish Interest. The party is accusing Ghent theatre society Union Suspecte and the Royal Flemish Theatre of deliberately provoking thousands of Flemish people.

The poster advertising the show depicts a veiled Madonna with child in arms and a naked breast. By ridiculing the veneration of the Blessed Virgin in Flanders, the deepest emotions of both Flemish families and Catholics are being hit, Flemish Interest MP Francis van den Eynde said.

The first showing of the play in Brussels sparked a protest by the group Belgium and Christendom — and in its shadow the Francophone extreme-right movement Nation on 30 October. The groups claim the poster of Our Sweet Lady is blasphemous. Some 100 protestors gathered at the initiative of Belgium and Christendom, a group that works to gain respect for the Jewish-Christian movement. Flags of the right-wing Nation groups were also seen among the protest.

The call to protest outside the Royal Flemish Theatre in Brussels was issued by Paul Belien — husband of the Flemish Interest's Alexandra Colen, who is well known for her conservative views. The Flemish Interest has now taken up the protest officially, with Van den Eynde writing a letter to all playhouses and cultural centres who have scheduled the play "to strongly protest" against these sorts "insults". I don't ask for this to be banned, but I have been spoken to by so many of my voters that I had to respond. Politicians must dare to complain about something like this,

However, Christian Democrat CD&V party chair Jo Vandeurzen pointed out there are differences in taste and that politics should not interfere with the cultural sector: The Flemish Interest can evidently not refrain from doing so. That tends towards censorship.

From Hindustan Times

The BBC has been accused of an anti-religious attitude, its reporters having little understanding of religious issues and misreporting the India-Pakistan conflict, the House of Lords select committee considering the future of the corporation, was told.

The BBC was also attacked by members of the committee for treating religion "with kid gloves" and for employing reporters who tried to "fluff their way through complicated matters". Some of its popular serials like EastEnders ridicule religion, the committee heard this week, during the evidence being given by representatives of the Christian, Muslim, Hindu and Sikh faiths - all broadcasters and contributors to BBC Radio 4's Thought for the Day - as well as members of the British Humanist Association, on coverage of faith and the role of religious broadcasting to the committee on the BBC charter review.

Dr Ram Prasad Chakravarthi from the department of religious studies at the University of Lancaster said the anti-religious attitude is apparent in the way religion is featured in the BBC's entertainment output. He said its soaps tend to use stereotypes - the Christians are mad fundamentalists, the Hindus are in arranged marriages. He pointed out that the corporation repeatedly made a fundamental error in reporting the India-Pakistan conflict as a clash of religions, because its reporters lacked adequate understanding of the situation.

Rev Joel Edwards, the general director of the Evangelical Alliance UK and an honorary canon of St Paul's Cathedral, was critical of what he called a pervasive anti-religious attitude that works very vigorously in editing suites (of the BBC) and that the interests of sensationalism often took over.

Dr Indarjit Singh, editor of the Sikh Messenger and patron of the World Congress of Faiths, said: EastEnders' Dot Cotton is an example. She quotes endlessly from the Bible and it ridicules (religion) to some extent. He suggested the BBC should, instead, use its resources to educate people about religion in order to combat prejudice.The BBC should look at the removal of ignorance about religion. We need to know and understand what essential beliefs are and how they contribute to society. The BBC should do a lot more of that. It is so easy in atmosphere of ignorance for prejudice to arise.

The representatives from the faith communities urged the committee for a formal public service commitment to the fair reflection of religion in broadcasting, across the output, not just in religious programmes, to be set down in the BBC's charter.

One select committee member, Lord Maxton, said, religion is treated at the BBC with kid gloves and is rarely criticised. But Lord Peston maintained claims that the BBC was against religion were "ridiculous". However, he agreed there was not enough knowledge about religion at the corporation: The media is full of people trying to fluff their way through very complicated matters, he said.

One of the members the Rt Rev Butler said that without understanding of religion "grave errors" occurred about world affairs and told the committee that BBC staff lacked sufficient "depth of knowledge" about religion.

Dr Mona Siddiqui, the chair of the Scottish religious advisory committee, argued for the BBC to present religion in a way people can identify with, to make programmes about the way people live and believe and to show how religion sits side-by-side in contemporary debates. People are hungry for real debate, they want to know how religion makes a person tick.

The committee also heard Hanne Stinson, the executive director of the British Humanist Association, which represents the interests of non-religious people. She said there was a growing number of people with no religious beliefs who share humanist beliefs but would not call themselves humanists, simply because they do not know the name, and the BBC is partly to blame for that.

She disputed the claim that the large majority of the BBC's coverage was secular. The BBC claims a small percentage of its coverage is religious and the rest is secular. We say a small percentage is religious and the rest is general, for everybody. The gap is positive non-religious belief, she said.

The hearing was a second tier of inquiries into religion, sport, regional broadcasting and the World Service being carried out following the publication of the Lords' report earlier this week, which called the government's plans for the BBC confusing and misguided, and called for a bigger role for media regulator Ofcom in overseeing the corporation.

Based on an article from CBS 2 Chicago

Abercrombie & Fitch, the US clothing retailer is taking heat over its racy catalog.  A state senator is fighting Fitch over some supposedly provocative T-shirts.

Politicians are objecting to Abercrombie’s latest fashion T-shirts -- tees with attitude as they're called.

But the candidate for governor calls them smut. I think that's an unacceptable product, said State Senator Steve Rauschenberger. This is not good for our children. It’s not good for society, Rauschenberger wants to pass a resolution forcing the store to pull the shirts off the market.

A selection of CBS viewers weren't impressed, All felt, government intervention is unnecessary. It's the parent's role to restrict their kids, not our politicians, they said.

Store clerks say the shirts are flying off the shelves.

I can understand people campaigning for less sex/swearing/violence on TV. But I cannot believe the pits of humanity that John Beyer has sunk to.

How can any 'respectful' person suggest that people should be locked up for 3 years in prison for merely viewing R18 hardcore pornography? The amount of misery inflicted on people, their families and society in general would be incalculable. This sadistic wish for the infliction of so much pain on society is surely one of the worst cases of 'extreme pornography' that has been reported to date. Does he also call for concentration camps to house all the people that he wants imprisoned?

From Mediawatch-UK

A new international treaty on Internet content is urgently needed according to mediawatch-uk. In a letter to Home Secretary, The Rt Hon Charles Clarke MP, mediawatch-uk director, John Beyer, said that the corruption of our young people by pornography on the Internet had become a major public concern. He said: It is vital that a new international treaty on Internet content is agreed at the World Summit on the Information Society taking place in Tunis later this month. This represents a most timely and appropriate opportunity for the British government not only to make known again its concern about extreme internet content but also its determination to actively combat the phenomenon with new legislation.

In the letter to Mr Clarke, Mr Beyer said: Our concern that a new treaty be drawn up is heightened by the rapid development of Broadband Television, already being tested in Britain, because such a system of television, via the Internet could circumvent national regulation of broadcasting. If an International treaty were in place, sanctions could be more easily exercised by national governments that had signed up to it.

Our concern, as is yours, is with obscene and violent imagery that undermines human dignity and respect for others. We take this opportunity to acknowledge the Home Office consultation on the possession of extreme pornographic material to which we shall be responding in due course. By way of an initial observation we believe that the scope of the material under consideration should be substantially broadened to include a much wider range of obscene material, for example, that currently permitted by the British Board of Film Classification at ‘R18’.

If the international community is serious about protecting the health and morals of the young and the vulnerable and protecting them from harmful and offensive material on the Internet, we believe that seriously effective international measures are urgently needed.

From Scoop

The New Zealand nutters, the Society For The Promotion Of Community Standards have written to the  new Minister of Internal Affairs, Rick Barker, to replace all nine members of the appeals body, the Film & Literature Board of Review, including the Governor-General's husband Peter Cartwright. Mr Cartwright’s term of office, along with those of seven other board members, expired 15 months ago on 31 May 2004. Their re-appointment can only be made by his wife, Governor-General, Dame Sylvia Cartwright, on the recommendation of the Minister. The Society points out that in the case of the appointment or reappointment of husband Peter, this involves obvious conflict of interests on the part of his wife.

The nutters claim that Mr Cartwright, formerly Chair of the Indecent Publications Tribunal and Chair of the Broadcasting Standards Authority, has demonstrated a consistently liberal approach to the censorship of publications containing sexually explicit content and extreme violence. They cite examples of Baise-Moi, Visitor Q and Irreversible.

The Promotion Of Community Standards outlined their concerns in the letter as follows:

1. The Board has demonstrated an extremely liberal approach to censorship. Rather than acting as a vigilant and competent "gate-keeper," it has given its stamp of approval for the release of films, videos and DVDs for public adult cinema containing: extended, explicit and gratuitous depictions of brutal rape (mainstream release of Baise-Moi , Irreversible, Twenty-Nine Palms), necrophilia, graphic violence involving sexual mutilation (Visitor Q) and the degradation, demeaning and dehumanising of women (e.g. Sinners No Doctor) etc.

Hundreds of such explicit videos, DVDs and films depicting men ejaculating onto the faces of women, multiple penetration (anal and vaginal), oral sex, "anal mania", sadomasochism (S & M), incest, homosexual and lesbian sex, prostitution, young people masturbating, "how-to-do" drug-taking, obscene language etc. are approved every year by the Office of Film and Literature Classification headed by Chief Censor Bill Hastings. The Board gets to review only a tiny fraction of this toxic material approved by Hastings and his team. Publications are generally only referred to it following applications under the Act by concerned groups such as the Society (which has a public "watchdog role") or by film distributors seeking to get the film's rating downgraded for commercial reasons (so it can reach a wider audience). In the last 12 months since 1 October 2005, the Board has only issued ten decisions. The Society was the applicant for four of these publications (Irreversible, 9 Songs, Playboy: The Mansion and Visitor Q).

2. The Board has demonstrated its unwillingness to safeguard the interests of children and young persons accessing computer games that teach kids how to promote and succeed in the pornography trade (Playboy: The Mansion). It has demonstrated its incompetence by approving films for young people that teach them how to indulge in illicit drugs, indulge in promiscuous sex, carry out gang rape etc.

3. The Board members are not representative of mainstream New Zealanders, the majority of whom oppose the dissemination of "objectionable" content found in films like Baise-Moi which was banned in Australia. The Board decisions are almost always unanimous in support of a downgrading of a classification restriction (e.g. Closer) or more often unanimous in opposition to any tightening to the existing OFLC classification rating so that the public good can be safeguarded. The liberal "mindset" appears to be so dominant and entrenched in this Board that any dissent by a member reflecting a more conservative viewpoint is squashed.

4. A number of the important decisions issued by the Board president against granting relief to the Society, have been shown to be wrong in law when tested in the High Court (e.g. Irreversible and Ken Park). A number of the Board's decisions have been found to be wrong in law when tested in the High Court and Court of Appeal (e.g. Baise-Moi and Visitor Q). The Courts have strongly criticised the Board in a number of decisions that span four years of its deliberations.

From the Denmark.dk

Eleven Muslim ambassadors in Denmark looking to meet with Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen to discuss what they call a 'smear campaign' in the media against Islam and Muslims have had their request denied.

The prime minister had otherwise been encouraged by the opposition to meet with the group as a way to increase understanding in an increasingly controversial public debate.

In recent weeks, both the minister of culture and a Copenhagen mayoral candidate have retracted statements they made about Muslims and Islamic culture.

Most recently, national daily Jyllands-Posten has invoked Muslim ire by publishing twelve caricatures of the prophet Mohammed, some of which characterised him as a terrorist. Pictorial depictions of Mohammed are frowned upon by Islam.

This is a matter of principle. I won't meet with them because it is so crystal clear what principles Danish democracy is built upon that there is no reason to do so, said Rasmussen.

Rasmussen reiterated his message that individuals who felt offended by the tone of the public debate should bring their grievances to the courts. As prime minister, I have no power whatsoever to limit the press - nor do I want such a power. It is a basic principle of our democracy that a prime minister cannot control the press.

Based on an article from the BBC

A video game featuring school bullying must be treated in the same way as a violent film, a nutter MP has said. Ex Labour minister Keith Vaz urged the government to refer Bully, which has a pupil fight scene, to the BBFC. Failing that, it should be banned, he told the House of Commons.

Bully's publisher, Rockstar Vancouver, said the game, not yet released, would be an "engaging story" and products should not be "judged by their titles".

Shameful Vaz, MP for Leicester East, asked Commons leader Geoff Hoon: Do you share my concern at the decision of Rockstar to publish a new game called Bully in which players use their on-screen persona to kick and punch other schoolchildren? Will you ask the prime minister to refer this video to the British Board of Film Classification? If they don't make any changes will the government use its powers to ban this video?

Hoon said the game's distributors had yet to put it to the BBFC to consider an appropriate rating. The precise contents, "disturbing though they sound", and the degree to which it might be considered harmful to children were "not yet known", he added.

Liz Carnell, director of the charity Bullying Online, said: Our view is that bullying is not a joke. It is not a suitable subject for computer games. Giving Bully an 18-rating would not stop children playing it, she said.

A Rockstar Games spokesman said: We support and admire the groups who are working hard to address the long-standing problem of bullying. We all have different opinions about art and entertainment, but everyone agrees that real-life school violence is a serious issue which lacks easy answers. Bully is still a work-in-progress, but when it's finished we believe most people will agree it offers an exciting experience and tells an engaging story. More and more people are beginning to recognise that the stories in video games have as many themes and plotlines as books and movies. Just as books aren't judged by their covers, video games shouldn't be judged by their titles or individual scenes. The game would be "submitted to the appropriate bodies" to be rated, he added.

Roger Bennett, director general of the Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers Association, said: As Mr Vaz knows, any game can be automatically referred to the BBFC for a rating. It is disingenuous to suggest any game be banned when the content has yet to be finalised.

...and to disagree is blasphemy

From The Guardian
From Pak Tribune

The editor of a women's magazine, Haqooq-i-Zan (women's rights), has been jailed for two years in Afghanistan after being convicted of publishing anti-Islamic articles, including one challenging a belief that Muslims who convert to other religions should be stoned to death.

On Saturday, Kabul's primary court convicted Ali Mohaqiq Nasab of blasphemy, presiding judge Ansarullah Malawizada said yesterday. The Ulama Council sent us a letter saying that he should be punished so I sentenced him to two years' jail, he said.

The council is Afghanistan's main body of Islamic clergy.

The arrest of the editor in chief of an Afghan women's magazine is causing concern and fear among journalists in the country. Ali Mohaqiq Nasab ran the respected monthly magazine called "Women's Rights" (Hoquq-e Zan).
He was arrested earlier this month for publishing articles deemed blasphemous and anti-Islamic. His arrest has been condemned by organizations defending press freedoms inside Afghanistan and also by international media rights groups, such as Reporters Without Borders and the U.S.-based Committee to Protect Journalists.

Prague - One of the stories published in "Women's Rights" questioned the harsh punishment under Shari'a law for women found guilty of adultery, such as stoning. Another article argued that giving up Islam is not a crime.

The magazine's editor, Ali Mohaqiq Nasab, was arrested on 1 October following a complaint made to the Supreme Court by a religious adviser to Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

Since then, Mohaqiq Nasab has appeared twice in court. The judges in charge of the case have accused him of intentionally publishing anti-Islamic articles and have said he should be severely punished.

Robert Kluyver, the country representative for the Open Society Institute in Afghanistan, believes the case is politically motivated. He said Mohaqiq Nasab ran into trouble with conservative Shi'ite clerics when he was campaigning as a candidate for parliament.

Kluyver said the case sets a disturbing precedent. "Unfortunately, the problem is that there has been no stance on the principles -- first, on the following of legal proceedings in this country, and second, on freedom of press issues," he said. "In other words, this person will be released, but there is absolutely no indication that in a couple of months, another journalist will not be picked up on charges of blasphemy and will be tried by the Supreme Court. [It] is basically not in the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to arrest journalists and put them on trial for blasphemy."

Mohaqiq Nasab is not the first Afghan journalist to be picked up for alleged blasphemy. In 2003, two editors from the Afghan weekly "Aftab" were also detained for allegedly publishing articles that criticized the political use of Islam by conservative leaders. They were later freed, but were forced to leave the country because of threats.

A recent survey by a local media-development organization found that the harassment of journalists in Afghanistan is on the rise. The study found that many of the threats and intimidation tactics used against journalists are initiated by warlords and government officials.

From the BBC
The cartoons can be seen here at Jyllands-Posten

The ambassadors of 10 Muslim countries have complained to the Danish prime minister about a major newspaper's cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.

A letter from the ambassadors said the cartoons published in Jyllands-Posten last month showed the Prophet as a stereotypical fundamentalist.

Pictorial depictions of the Prophet Muhammad are forbidden in Islam.

Danish Muslim community leaders who held talks with Mr Rasmussen in July complained about press coverage of Islam.

A Danish government spokesman said Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen was preparing a response. At the time, he said he could not tell newspapers what to print - or what not to.

On Thursday, the Jyllands-Posten reported that two illustrators who produced the cartoons had received death threats.

The daily published the series of cartoons, after a writer complained that nobody dared illustrate his book about Muhammad. We must quietly point out here that the drawings illustrated an article on the self-censorship which rules large parts of the Western world, the paper said. Our right to say, write, photograph and draw what we want to within the framework of the law exists and must endure - unconditionally!

The ambassadors who signed the letter to the prime minister included a number of Arab countries, Pakistan, Iran, Bosnia-Hercegovina and Indonesia. We hope there will be understanding of Muslims' feelings about Mohammad. And we hope there will be an apology from Jyllands-Posten, Mascud Effendy Hutasuhut, counsellor at the Indonesian embassy in Denmark, told Danmarks radio.

Based on an article from The Camden Chronicle

A nutter priest has hit out at a pornographic art exhibition - branding the display "evil". Father Mark, of St Ann's Roman Catholic Church, in Laxton Place, Camden Town, wants the explicit Candy Broke exhibition scrapped.

It is set to open at the Diorama Gallery in Osnaburgh Street - just a stone's throw from his church.

Pornography is bad and evil, said Father Mark. I'm against it and I'm always warning my parishioners about the dangers of pornography. We live in a Godless society - it's corrupt and evil because people in this country have abandoned God and this is an indication of that. The Devil is loose and our society is very sick. He added: I'm worried that the word will go around and young people will turn up to look at it and it's worrying that pornography has become so mainstream.

Artist Sue Golden admits the exhibition - which includes graphic images of women - is explicit. She said the idea was to provoke debate and encourage people to question how pornography has "permeated society". This exhibition is very much pro women - it's about getting people to think about these things. The exhibition is very sexual but it's presenting pornography that has permeated our society and hopefully it will get people to question it. I think it's an appropriate time to address the issue - more and more girls seem to want to get into pornography.

Based on an article from Wakefield Today

Nude artwork is at the centre of a troubles with nutters in Wakefield.

Student artist Sally Barton took down pictures depicting naked females embracing after police contacted her.
Barton has hit back at the claims her art is pornographic, and can't believe her first exhibition at a Horbury art gallery, has been censored by police.

She said: I am an artist not a pornographer and the work is very tasteful. The people are complaining it's about sex, but that's just what they see in it."

Disgusted nutters inundated councillor Janet Holmes with non-stop phone calls and she contacted the police.

Councillor Holmes said: There are six and seven-year-old children passing the gallery and we do not want children as young as that seeing such images.

From Star Telegram

Ireland's largest bookmaker, Paddy Power PLC, withdrew a billboard campaign Wednesday that portrayed Jesus and his disciples at the Last Supper table - and playing poker and roulette alongside the slogan, "There's a place for fun and games."

The Dublin-based company was responding to legal threats from Ireland's Advertising Standards Authority, which reported receiving scores of complaints from the public in this predominantly Roman Catholic country.

At all 89 locations across Dublin, the offending billboards were replaced Wednesday with new Paddy Power ads that said: "There's a place for fun and games. Apparently this isn't it."

Frank Goodman, chief executive of the Advertising Standards Authority for Ireland, said Paddy Power had breached its guidelines for taste, decency and religion. This apparently has caused widespread offense

The ad provoked laughter and irritation aplenty in this city of 1.3 million. Dublin Archbishop John Neill, of the Anglican-affiliated Church of Ireland, said it "would be offensive to most Christian people."

But on the editorial pages of The Irish Times newspaper, columnist John Waters called the ad a "rather good-humored piece of public nonsense," and warned of the perils of censorship.

The company's main spokesman - who is also named Paddy Power but isn't related to the company's fictional namesake - said the ad campaign was using images where gambling wasn't appropriate. He noted that an accompanying billboard, which wasn't withdrawn, pictured doctors gambling on the sex of a newborn as a woman is about to give birth.

Power said the Last Supper was ideal because it was absolutely the most inappropriate place ever for fun and games. We still don't believe we've pushed the boundaries too far. Some people just take this stuff too seriously.

From Whirlpool News

Days before the federal election, the Western Australian Internet Association (WAIA) has strongly rejected calls from the ultra-conservative "Family First" political party for Internet censorship at all ISPs.

WAIA's Jeremy Malcolm says the policy is poorly thought out and unworkable. Internet content filters at ISP level are expensive and ultimately, the user can get around them, he said.

Family First admits the proposed filtering scheme would have adverse effects on smaller ISPs but claims in its policy document that this isn't important because adequate competition could be maintained with 30 ISPs rather than the hundreds in existence now"

It also wants internet users in Australia to pay $7 to $10 each per year to cover the cost of the filtering. WAIA issued a statement today saying it was appalled at the callousness of this argument. If the same reasoning was used in respect of farmers, there would be national outrage, Malcolm said.

The association has debunked Family First's arguments saying ISP-level filtering can be as ineffective as PC-based filtering. He used China as an example: the country attempts to carry out nationwide filtering but access speeds have simply been slowed down for end users, and many people simply use secure proxies outside of China.

ISPs already cooperate with law enforcement authorities in combatting child pornography and other crimes under Australian law. They have no interest in allowing paedophiles and similar criminals to operate using their network, Malcolm said.

Updated 5th October

From Gay & Lesbian Humanists

In this latest example of rank stupidity and bureaucratic absurdity, I do not blame the whinging whiner, but the authorities who acceded to his ridiculous objection – and those who supported it - need to be shown up for the idiots that they are.

So, what happened? Well, it appears that a Muslim employee of Dudley Council complained about pig-shaped novelty items in the workplace – in this case a stuffed animal ‘stress reliever’ – saying they were ‘offensive to Muslims’. The innocent promotional giveaway, it seems, has now caused anxiety rather than relieving it.

However, it doesn’t stop there. Now calendars showing cartoon pigs, porcelain figurines and even a tissue box with a picture of Winnie the Pooh’s friend Piglet have been ordered removed or covered up by the Council honchos.

According to a report in the Express & Star News, the move has not improved office relationships. On the contrary, one staff member, who remains anonymous, told the paper: It's caused a bit of an atmosphere in the office. The staff did comply but it's just crazy - things like ornaments that have been on desks for years have had to be removed.

But not everyone agrees. Councillor Mahbubur Rahman, a practicing Muslim, said he agreed with the action taken: If it is a request made by an individual and other officers can reason a compromise it is a good thing, it is a tolerance and acceptance of their beliefs and understanding

It is this sort of action that trivialises real oppression and real offence. Few would dispute that a pigs head left on the steps of a Mosque or a Synagogue is a vicious and offensive act, but to ban cartoon pigs on a box of tissues from the workplace on similar grounds? Doesn’t that just make a mockery of tolerance?

Update 5th October, Thanks to David:

Actually, according to a contact who works there, it's *only* the pig-shaped stress reliever that's been banned from Dudley Council offices. The rest of the stuff mentioned in the paper is just the product of a slow
news day, and *not* actually banned.

From The Jakarta Post

The city reminded the management of entertainment centers in the capital to close their business during the holy month as a sign of respect to Muslims.

Jakarta Deputy Governor Fauzi Bowo said that regular bars, nightclubs, discotheques, amusement centers and massage parlors had to remain closed one day before the holy month started on Oct. 4 until one day after it ended on Nov. 2. We have issued a bylaw on that issue and we will cooperate with police to monitor its implementation, Fauzi said at City Hall.

Bylaw No. 10/2004 on tourism, especially Article 30, states that nightclubs, discotheques, saunas, massage parlors, amusement centers and bars must be closed throughout the fasting month of Ramadhan. Under the bylaw, karaoke bars, live music bars and billiard halls may operate during Ramadhan from 8:30 p.m. to 1:30 a.m., except those sharing the same location with nightclubs, massage parlors, discotheques and amusement centers, which have to be closed.

Entertainment centers that are facilities provided by star-rated hotels can operate as usual throughout the holy month, except on seven days -- one day before and the first day of Ramadhan, the Nuzulul Quran (the 17th day of Ramadhan), and from one day before Idul Fitri until one day after.

Other places of entertainment will be open during the Ramadhan, including bowling alleys, golf courses, sports stadiums, ice skating rinks, movie theaters, parks, swimming pools and barbershops. Certain barbershops are often reported to be dens of ill repute, operating as fronts for prostitution.

Questioning the bylaw, Jakarta Police chief Insp. Gen. Firman Gani on Tuesday called for the scrapping of the special treatment given to entertainment centers in star-rated hotels. That will only confuse the public and police, he said. He proposed all entertainment centers in the city be closed down in the first three days of Ramadhan and three days before then end of the holy month.

Firman promised to take stern action against groups taking the law into their hands and attempting to violently force closures of entertainment centers. The hard-line Islam Defenders Front (FPI) has regularly smashed up nightclubs and bars operating during the fasting month during the past five years. Last year, FPI members raided several bars and nightclubs in Jakarta, Bekasi, Tangerang and Depok.

Meanwhile, the Association of the Indonesian Entertainment Center Owners (Aspehindo) secretary-general Adrian Maelite said that the managements of entertainment centers would abide by the regulations. Adrian, however, urged the city administration to help seek alternative solutions for certain business because they employed many people, including waiters. There are at least 1,235 registered entertainment centers employing some 50,000 people across the capital.