| 29th December |
|
|
| |
Radio DJ sacked for cracks during the Queen's speech Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
chortle.co.uk
|
The
comedian behind inept DJ Ivan Brackenbury has been fired from a radio
station – after interrupting the Queen's speech with a gag.
Tom Binns was sacked by the Midlands-based Orion Media after pulling
the plug on the royal Christmas broadcast and saying on air: Two
words: Bor-ing.
A couple of listeners complained – including one who made a death
threat – which was enough for bosses to give Binns the boot.
However, the group of stations, which includes BRMB in Birmingham and
Mercia in Coventry, was never meant to broadcast the Queen's message in
the first place.
Binns told Chortle: I was working on my own on Christmas Day; I'd
even had to let myself into the studio. After the guy before me
finished, we should have taken the news from Sky, and then my show would
start. But instead of the news, we got the Queen's speech. I knew it
shouldn't be there, but having never heard it before, I didn't know how
long it was going to go on for. I'm not trained to make editorial
decisions, but I decided to get rid of it and make a joke. I said, "Two
words: bor-ring"
I then went into an old riff about how people say the royal family
are good for tourism, but the French beheaded theirs and people still
visit France. The next record was George Michael's Last Christmas, so I
made some sort of comment about "going from one Queen to another" as a
parody of a cheesy DJ.
One man got really angry, he sent me a message saying I should be
sent to Basra and hoped I'd get killed by a roadside bomb. That was so
nasty it really got to me, given that it was Christmas and I've seen in
graphic detail the effects those bombs can do as I've worked with
[forces radio] BFBS.
I rang him up – off-air – to give him a piece of my mind; but
other than that almost all the texts we received were in support of what
I'd done.
Nobody would have tuned in to hear the Queen's speech; and I tried to
deal with it in a funny way. After all, they employ comedians to make
jokes.
But it seems a knee-jerk reaction to fire me. Broadcasters are scared
to death of regulators since the Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand affair,
and even though only a very few listeners objected to what I'd said,
that was enough.
It's got to the point where comedians aren't allowed to say anything
that could possibly offend anyone any more.
David Lloyd, Orion Media Group's programme and marketing director,
said: On Christmas Day, one of our presenters, Tom Binns, made some
inappropriate comments surrounding the Queen's speech. We do not condone
what he said in any way; whether said in jest or not. We are making
contact with the small number of listeners who were offended by Tom's
comments and have complained to us to convey our apologies, and have
also apologised on air.
|
| 19th December |
|
|
| |
Vivienne Pattison hypes Coronation Street Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
|
Despite
being one of Britain's most controversial celebrities, Katie Price – aka
Jordan – is deemed so socially important a new Coronation Street
plotline features one of the characters wanting to emulate her.
Rosie Webster, played by actress Helen Flanagan, stuns her family
when she decides she wants to be the new Jordan.
The character, who is 18 in the show, has a test photo shoot, dressed
in 'provocative' outfits. In one photograph, she wears a white and red
cheerleader's top, with the words: Pop My Cherry emblazoned on
the back. While in another, she wears a corset and thigh high stocking
as she hitches up her skirt.
Vivienne Pattison, from Mediawatch-UK, said: This is a
pre-watershed programme – but I don't think this is suitable viewing
before the watershed.
|
| 18th December |
|
|
| |
Strong language hype for Killing in the Name Permalink
|
Thanks to emark
Based on
article
from
guardian.co.uk
|
The
BBC has apologised after Radio 5 live broadcast strong language from
Rage Against the Machine in a live performance of their song Killing
In The Name.
Zack de la Rocha, the US band's singer, was heard swearing four times
on the station's breakfast show.
A BBC spokesman said: We had spoken to the band repeatedly
beforehand and they had agreed not to swear. He added: When they
did, we faded the band out and said sorry immediately. We apologise
again to anyone who was offended.
The band were interviewed in a live link-up with the US on Thursday
morning, before performing the song. As the song was abruptly faded out
during the controversial closing bars of the song, listeners heard
presenter Shelagh Fogarty say, get rid of it. She added:
Sorry. We needed to get rid of that because that suddenly turned in to
something we were not expecting. We are honoured they've chosen our song
to be the rebel anthem to try to topple the X Factor monopoly Tom
Morello Rage Against The Machine. Well, we were expecting it and asked
them not to do it and they did it anyway - so buy Joe's record.
Rage Against The Machine's 90s hit is in the running for the
Christmas number one after a group was set up on website Facebook urging
people to buy it. The group was set up in protest at the dominance of
the X Factor winners singles in the Christmas charts in recent
years.
Guitarist Tom Morello said the internet campaign tapped into the
silent majority of the people in the UK who are tired of being spoon-fed
one schmaltzy ballad after another.
|
| 18th December |
|
|
| |
Hollyoaks storyline changed after complaint from James Bulger's mother Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
news.bbc.co.uk
|
The
makers of Channel 4 soap Hollyoaks have agreed to change upcoming scenes
following a complaint that they bore similarities to the James Bulger case.
A future plot was to have revealed two characters had been living
under false names after bullying a child to death.
But when the mother of murdered toddler James Bulger complained,
production company Lime Pictures agreed to amend certain aspects of
the storyline.
Denise Fergus said she was grateful that they are respecting my
wishes. made it clear that I did not want those scenes
broadcast and I'm pleased to say they clearly understood my feelings,
she told independent news website Click Liverpool.
|
| 10th December |
|
|
| |
Greg Dyke calls for BBC to be regulated by the TV censor Ofcom Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
guardian.co.uk
|
Greg
Dyke, the former director general of the BBC, has called for the BBC
Trust to be abolished with regulation handed to either Ofcom or a new
public service broadcasting watchdog.
Dyke, giving the annual Royal Television Society Christmas lecture,
also argued that Channel Five has no real chance of surviving as
an independent broadcaster and should become part of the ITV family.
He said that the BBC Trust, the corporation's governance and
regulatory body, is an expensive, lumbering entity that has found itself
hamstrung by the impossible dual role of attempting to regulate and
champion the corporation.
The [BBC] Trust is unduly slow and bureaucratic, expensive to run
and creates inbuilt conflict within the organisation [which] has left
the BBC without a supportive board or chairman and the director general
without the 'cover' any chief executive needs, added Dyke.
In any organisation the chairman/chief executive relationship is
all important and here the structure works against it being effective.
Most of all, when the organisation is under attack, as it currently is,
the chairman isn't free to defend it as he should because he's really
the regulator, he said.
Dyke argued that it was more logical for Ofcom to regulate the BBC
and a new board - with a non-executive chairman and executive and
non-executive members - should be responsible for running the
corporation.
|
| 10th December |
|
|
| |
Vivienne Pattison whinges at mild language on daytime TV Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
|
Nutters say too many incidents of bad language and inappropriate
material are capable of being seen by children before the 9pm cut-off.
On Tuesday, art critic Brian Sewell, a guest on The Alan
Titchmarsh Show, which starts at 3pm, said of Victoria Beckham: I
have great respect for David Beckham but his wife is ghastly. She is
just a common little bitch. Alan Titchmarsh apologised to viewers
shortly afterwards.
Later during The One Show, which starts at 7pm, actress Bette
Midler blurted out the word bollocks as she was being
interviewed. She was talking on the BBC show about how happy she
was to be visiting the UK. She said: This is a kind of fabulous place
and I am always happy to come. She then added: Oh bollocks.
Vivienne Pattison, director of pressure group Mediawatch-UK, said:
We know that audiences do not like this kind of language. It should be
made clearer to guests that swearing is not allowed.
Pattison added: Obviously in live TV things happen and we know how
difficult that is and the presenter has to get out of that very quickly.
But I am concerned that it is still happening.
I certainly think that it should be made clearer to guests that
swearing is not allowed. It is quite extraordinary that they are not
allowed to swear on these shows in the States and yet they come over
here and do it. It is down to the editors on live TV show to let their
guests know that this is the case.
Conservative MP, Philip Davies, who sits on the culture, media and
sport select committee, also expressed concerns about the incidents:
I completely understand the anger of viewers, particularly if they are
watching something with their children. It is totally unacceptable.
Parents will be rightly angry to be subjected to this when we do have
watershed. Maybe the broadcasters can do more.
|
| 10th December |
|
|
| |
Whinging about Patrick McGuinness at the Royal Variety Performance Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
|
The Daily Mail reports that audience members including the Queen and
young children were left 'stunned' after comedian Patrick McGuinness
delivered a number of sexual innuendoes during his stand-up routine at
the Royal Variety Performance.
McGuinness made references to his genitalia and included a jibe at
presenter Paul O'Grady's sexuality. He arrived on stage mid-way through
the show. Part of his act included a spoof guide to living in the north
of England, which he directed at the Queen and Prince Philip.
Using a pointer as a prop for the sketch he welcomed the Monarch
before saying: I know what you're thinking. I've got a small pointer.
But my girlfriend always tells me that the smallest acorns make the
biggest oaks.
It drew muted reaction from the 3,000 audience members before he
addressed the Queen once again and made a remark about the sexuality of
Paul O'Grady. In reference to the openly gay Liverpool-born presenter,
he told her: You may be the Queen of our country, but we've got our
own queen here in the north. Paul O'Grady. Royal audience: The Queen
Now ITV producers say that they are considering whether or not the
offending material breaches the company's guidelines and if it is
unsuitable for a family audience.
Nutter groups have said ITV must cut the smutty gags from the show
ahead of its broadcast at 7.30pm next Wednesday.
McGuinness continued with his set before proclaiming the virtues of a
local Indian restaurant telling the gathered crowd: You haven't lived
until you've had eight of Ahmed's peshwari balls in your mouth. The
gag was again greeted with nervous laughter.
A spokesman for ITV said that the show would be edited to adhere to
strict pre-watershed guidelines but said it was too early to say whether
McGuinness's comments would be cut: The Royal Variety Performance
transmits at 7.30pm and programmes comply with all regulatory
guidelines. In addition, the performance is recorded as live, but is
edited so that it fits into the allotted running time.
A spokesman for Mediawatch UK, who campaign for responsible
broadcasting, said that it hoped ITV would ensure the programme was
suitable for a family audience.
Vivienne Pattison said: Broadcasters make a big deal about the
watershed in order to protect children and I'd like to see that taken
seriously. I'd like to think ITV will take all the necessary steps to
make sure that the Royal Variety Show is suitable for a pre-watershed
audience.
A spokesman for Buckingham Palace refused to say whether the Queen
had been offended by any of the comments made on stage by McGuinness.
|
| 7th December |
|
|
| |
I'm a celebrity get me out of court Permalink full story: I'm a Celebrity...TV show done for cruel bush tucker
|
Based on
article
from
news.bbc.co.uk
|
ITV has apologised after a rat was killed and cooked during this
year's I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!
It also said it would tighten up its procedures. The producers will
not face charges over alleged animal cruelty on the show, Australian
police have said. However charges are being brought against the winner,
chef Gino D'Acampo and contestant Stuart Manning after they cooked a rat
to eat. The pair have been ordered to appear in court on 3 February
2010.
The RSPCA in New South Wales said it was not acceptable an
animal had been killed as part of a performance.
The production was asked if a rat could be caught and eaten by the
celebrities in exile camp to supplement the basic rations they had been
provided with for their evening meal, said a spokesman for ITV.
Having sought health and safety advice, the go-ahead was given purely on
this basis... the production was unaware that killing a rat could be an
offence.
He added that ITV accepted that further inquiries should have been
made. ITV apologises for this error, and to the celebrities
concerned, and will put in place procedures for next year's series to
ensure that this cannot happen again.
During the series, the contestants were divided into two groups, one
of which was in exile with meagre rations. D'Acampo decided to
kill and eat the rat to add meat to the group's meal. He told the show's
video diary room, the Bush Telegraph: It's not done by choice but
it's done because we need it. We need some kind of protein, we need some
kind of flavour. I saw one of these rats running around. I got a knife,
I got its throat, I picked it up.
Fellow contestant George Hamilton spoke out in defence of D'Acampo,
telling the Daily Mirror that ITV producers had given them permission to
eat the rodent.
The actor said: I went into the Bush Telegraph and said, 'May we
eat a rat?' They were a bit shocked, thought about it and then said we
could. It was a very good dinner.
|
| 2nd December |
|
|
| |
BBC Trust dismisses complaints against Jo Brand Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
thescotsman.scotsman.com
|
A
complaint about a gag by comedian Jo Brand in which she claimed Lady Thatcher
sounded like a hair removal device has been rejected by the BBC Trust.
The body also decided not to uphold complaints about Brand's comments about
incontinence which she made in the same edition of BBC1's QI earlier this
year, which one viewer claimed were ageist and sexist.
The jokes were broadcast just days after Baroness Thatcher's daughter
Carol had been dismissed from her job as a reporter on The One Show
after using the word golliwog off-air The incident had been
witnessed by Brand, who was a guest on the early evening show.
During the Stephen Fry-hosted QI show, which was broadcast in
February, just two days after Carol Thatcher's dismissal, Brand joked:
It was great actually when she became Lady Thatcher. Because then she
sounded like a device for removing pubic hair. You couldn't take her
seriously after that.
Later in the show she asked: Is there a facility for men to wet
themselves when they cough? Does that ever happen to blokes? Do men wet
themselves when they cough, when they get old?
Controller Jay Hunt said Brand's comments were not poking fun at the
former prime minister but were merely referring to her name.
A complaint to the BBC's Editorial Complaints Unit was originally
rejected earlier this year and now an appeal to the Trust's Editorial
Standards Committee has also been turned down. The committee thought the
play on words and the joke about incontinence were editorially
justified, did not amount to prejudice and did not breach programme
guidelines.
|
| 1st December |
|
|
| |
BBC 1 interrupts film with strong language warning Permalink
|
Thanks to Callum
Based on
article
from
twitpic.com
|
The
Guardian columnist Charlie Brooker noticed that the BBC thought the language was
so strong in the film 25th Hour that it required a warning - in
the middle of the film!
The online reaction is that this seem a tad too far, even considering BBC 1's
propensity for censorship (unlike its sister station BBC 2!).
|
| 30th November |
|
|
| |
A few whinges about Harry Hill and swastika shaped potato crisps Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
dailystar.co.uk
|
Harry
Hill has landed a few whinges over Nazi gags on his TV Burp show.
A few 'angry' viewers contacted TV censor Ofcom after the comic held
up a potato snack in the shape of a swastika while poking fun at BBC1's
Jimmy's Food Factory.
In another episode he compared Jimmy Docherty's Vienetta ice creams
to German tanks invading Poland. A line of Vienettas were then paraded
across the floor.
Ofcom has received complaints from 'shocked' viewers. They claim the
show, which takes a cheeky look at the week's telly, insulted members of
the Jewish religion and those who fought in the world wars. One
protester said: There are certain things you don't joke about.
But Mark Frazer from the Board of Deputies of British Jews said it
had not received any complaints. He said: It just sounds like a load
of silliness.
And ITV spokesman Mike Large said it had not received any complaints
about the German jokes.
Update:
Pardoned
24th December 2009. Based on
article
from
chortle.co.uk
The TV censor has ruled that 13 complaints about the episode of
Harry Hill's TV Burp that compared Viennetta to German tanks did not
breach broadcast rules.
A dozen sensitive viewers took offence at the ridiculous sketch that
compared products coming off the production to tanks rolling into
Poland.
There were also complaints that Hill displayed a potato snack in the
shape of a swastika.
|
| 30th November |
|
|
| |
BBC get all apologetic over background strong language from Geoffrey Boycott Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
timesonline.co.uk
|
The
BBC have apologised to radio listeners after after a minor outburst of
strong language from Geoffrey Boycott during its cricket coverage.
The outspoken commentator was overheard to say fucking tosser
during Radio 5 Live's broadcast of the fourth one-day international
between South Africa and England in Port Elizabeth.
Boycott's comment was understood to have been made after the fall of
South Africa's sixth wicket when Ryan McLaren was caught. The hosts
finished all out for 119.
It was not known who the comment was directed at and Boycott was
unaware comments were being broadcast, a BBC source said.
A Radio 5 Live spokesman said: An off-air comment made by Geoffrey
Boycott in a live broadcast was heard by some listeners which we
apologised for as soon as we realised it had been audible.
|
| 29th November |
|
|
| |
Stephen Fry called to explain Channel 4 News comments to Polish ambassador Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
telegraph.co.uk
|
Stephen
Fry has been summoned to the Polish embassy in London on Monday to
provide the ambassador with an explanation of his supposedly offensive
comments last month about about Auschwitz.
Yes, he is having lunch at the embassy, confirms a spokesman
for the Polish ambassador, Barbara Tuge-Erecinska. This meeting is
connected to Mr Fry's remarks on Channel 4. They will discuss a range of
issues.
In a debate about the Conservatives' links with Poland's Law and
Justice party, Fry appeared to accuse Polish Catholics of being
complicit in the Final Solution . Remember which side of the border
Auschwitz was on, he said.
The Polish embassy had accused Stephen Fry of slander after he
suggested Poles had played a role in the Holocaust.
He made the comments on Channel 4 news while talking about the
Conservative Party's links with Poland's Law and Justice party. The
party has members that have faced accusations of anti-Semitism and
homophobia, and Fry appeared to hint that Poland may hold some
responsibility for the mass murder of European Jews.
Let's face it, there has been a history in Poland of right-wing
Catholicism, which has been deeply disturbing for those of us who know a
little history, and remember which side of the border Auschwitz was on,
he said.
|
| 28th November |
|
|
| |
Comedy writers 'no longer taking risks' Permalink full story: Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross...Winding up Andrew Sachs and Voluptua
|
See
article
from
news.bbc.co.uk
|
Jokes
aren't true - they're lies they're exaggerations, they're distortion,
they're imbalance, they're having a go, they're bullying, they're
insulting, says The Thick of It creator Armando Iannucci
Of course the intention is to cause offence.
The intention is to cause hilarity but, with hilarity, someone,
somewhere along the line will be a bit a miffed.
Iannucci is one of a number of leading figures who fear the rules of
comedy writing in Britain are changing.
...Read the full
article
|
| 28th November |
|
|
| |
An Uncensored History of Swearing on Television Permalink
|
See
article
from
independent.co.uk
by Pete Silverton
|
It
was early evening, a December Wednesday, a time of homework deferred and
dinner (or tea or supper) made (or eaten or cleared). In a TV studio at
the base of a glass and green-granite tower on the northern edge of
central London, Steve, then 21, faced his questioner and said to him:
You dirty sod; you dirty old man. Then: You dirty bastard.
And: You dirty fucker.
In that moment – broadcast live on the first day of the last month of
1976 – things changed. Language – bad language, filthy English – jumped
out of the media shadows it had inhabited and began its journey towards
the light.
It happened shortly before 6.30pm, on Thames TV's Today, a commercial
channel's nightly magazine show, with all the usual local news items –
weather reports, traffic updates, charity eating competitions,
skateboarding ducks. It happened in a Britain in which there were only
three TV channels and families did sit down together to their evening
meal in front of the early evening local news.
Oh, there had been swearing on TV before. In sitcoms and kitchen
sinkers, there had been bloodies and damns and randy scouse gits. And
famously, in 1965, Ken Tynan had said fuck. But he was a theatre
critic, an intellectual, a great writer, a future director of the
National Theatre. His appeared with forethought and deliberation. It
wasn't swearing at all, really. It was a societal intervention. It was a
symbol, a weapon in a war of liberation, part personal, part global.
Steve's was his own language, not a word on display like a brocade
waistcoat. Steve Jones was a guitarist, in the Sex Pistols. He'd been a
thief, and still was sometimes. He was from Shepherd's Bush – a short,
unpleasant walk from the BBC studios in which, 11 years earlier, Ken had
said the same word in front of a late-night TV audience, but a world
away really. Steve wasn't making a point. This was how he talked. This
was how lots of people talked. Had talked. Do talk.
...Read the full
article
|
| 27th November |
|
|
| |
BBC drop segment of The Spirit of Diaghilev ballet Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
entertainment.timesonline.co.uk
|
The
BBC has abandoned plans to screen a ballet featuring a deformed Pope who
rapes nuns that it had announced as one of the highlights of its
Christmas schedule.
Last month the corporation said it would televise In The Spirit Of
Diaghilev from Sadler's Wells as part of a season of ballet
programmes.
The tribute to the Russian impresario comprises four acts, each by a
groundbreaking choreographer, with the entire production due to be
screened on BBC Four next month.
Richard Klein, BBC Four Controller, promised viewers a great watch,
hailing the combination of one of the most inventive and musically
exciting ballet scores being performed by one of Britain's foremost
dance groups.
But it wasn't until the production premiered at Sadler's Wells that
the BBC discovered that one of the acts, Eternal Damnation To Sancho And
Sanchez by Javier de Frutos, centres on a group of horny priests
and a fictional hunchback Pope, who rapes eunuchs and pregnant nuns. The
act prompted boos from the Sadler's Wells audience and a number of
walk-outs.
After extensive discussions within the BBC, the corporation has
decided to drop the de Frutos section. The three other acts will air as
planned during the broadcast on December 18.
A BBC spokesman said: We have decided not to show this particular
work as it contains material unsuitable for the pre-watershed slot for
which the programme was commissioned.
The BBC said it could not show the Pope act in a separate
late-night transmission, with a clear warning, because it would still be
considered inappropriate for a pre-Christmas broadcast.
The three other In The Spirit Of Diaghilev acts, which have been
favourably received, are not narratively linked so the BBC believes that
viewers will not notice the cut.
|
| 24th November |
|
|
| |
Romania whinges at top gear for Borat and gypsies reference Permalink full story: Top Gear...Top Gear and Jeremy Clarkson wind up whingers
|
Based on
article
from
inentertainment.co.uk
|
Jeremy
Clarkson is in trouble again, this time with Romanian government
The production team of the BBC two hit series Top Gear have been asked
by the Romanian government to remove supposedly offensive remarks made
about the country. The Romanian ambassador Dr Ion Jinag was surprised
and disappointed by the references to Borat and gypsies.
When Clarkson and his co-presenters Hammond and May visited the
Romanian countryside, Jeremy put on a pork pie style hat and talked of
entering Borat country. Clarkson said: I'm wearing this hat so the
gypsies think I am one. I'm told they can be violent if they don't like
the look of you.
The presenter was also seen washing his face before he said 'cool,
refreshing communist water'. The Romanian embassy said: We
anticipate a positive response to our request for changes.
|
| 24th November |
|
|
| |
An insidious argument for censorship Permalink full story: Undercover Mosque...Police made false accusations re Undercover Mosque
|
Thanks to pbr
See
article
from
guardian.co.uk
by David Henshaw
|
The
legitimate questions raised by Dispatches deserve better than to be
dismissed as Islamophobia and antisemitism
So what's it like to go from being Britain's top Islamophobe (Dispatches'
Undercover Mosque) to Britain's top antisemite (Dispatches'
Inside Britain's Israel Lobby)? Well, it's a remarkably easy, not to
say facile, ride – as the tide of smears and abuse over the past seven
days has shown. The question is: what does that tell us about the
current state of television journalism, and the maturity, rationality,
and objectivity of the response?
...Read full
article
|
| 21st November |
|
|
| |
Jon Gaunt has a knock at radio censorship Permalink full story: Jon Gaunt and Talksport Nazis...Talksport sack radio presenter over Nazi jibe
|
Based on
article
from
broadcastnow.co.uk
|
Shock
jock Jon Gaunt has launched a blistering attack on the level of
censorship in radio - claiming it will kill the medium and
calling for Ofcom to be scrapped.
The Sun Radio presenter, who has been hauled over the coals by Ofcom
five times and was famously fired from TalkSport for calling a counselor
a Nazi, slammed the regulator as a bunch of busybodies and an
unelected quango - adding, people don't need Ofcom when they have
an off switch.
He also claimed that radio is self-censoring in the wake of Sachsgate,
and that this fear of a scandal will eventually be the medium's undoing.
Do you know the worst thing about the Ross/Brand thing. It's
censorship. And I don't mean censorship by other [organizations], I mean
self-censorhsip, he said. That's what's going to kill radio.
Speaking at The Media Festival in Manchester, Gaunt claimed he has
never been more heavily censored than when he worked at the BBC.
|
| 21st November |
|
|
| |
Is censorship taking over the BBC? Permalink full story: Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross...Winding up Andrew Sachs and Voluptua
|
Based on
article
from
news.bbc.co.uk
by Mark Lawson
|
Classes
on goodies and baddies, endless rows about jokes in poor taste . . . is
an increasingly cautious BBC suffocating new comedy and drama?
On Saturday, it will be one year since the BBC Trust ruled on
Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand's dirty phone calls to Andrew Sachs.
These represented deplorable intrusion with no editorial
justification, the Trust concluded, but no further action was
necessary beyond the three-month suspension that Ross was then beginning
to serve.
At the time, a common view (certainly mine) was that, 12 months on,
Ross might well have found a job elsewhere, but that the BBC's general
panic over editorial guidelines might have calmed down. In fact, it has
gone the other way. Ross remains in his post – a ghost of what he used
to be, because of a strict system of precautionary recording and editing
– while an increasing number of writers and performers are complaining
about the effects of compliance: the system of BBC editorial
defences introduced after Ross/Brand and an earlier run of scandals over
faked or misleading content.
...Read the full
article
|
| 20th November |
|
|
| |
Nutters have an orgasm over teatime clip from When Harry Met Sally Permalink
|
Thanks to Dan
Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
|
A
BBC presenter used his teatime show to broadcast an audio clip of a
woman in the throes of an orgasm.
DJ Steve Harris played the ten-second recording of oohs,
ahhs and yes! yes! yes! when talking about the new drug
flibanserin, described as a female equivalent of Viagra.
But his decision to use the clip of actress Meg Ryan in a famous
scene from the film When Harry Met Sally left a few nutters
whingeing
Steve Masters, editor of the website ukparentslounge.com and father
of girls aged 12 and seven, said: Sometimes it's easy for radio
presenters to forget their audience but they ought to know better than
to play such content at this time of day. On my scale of acceptability,
as a parent, I think a bit of rudeness you can get away with, but
lewdness you can't.
Vivienne Pattison, director of campaign group Mediawatch UK, said the
BBC had made a serious error of judgment: Parents driving in their
cars having just picked up their children from school would have been
horrified to hear the clip. It boils down to a decision taken by the
producers of that particular show. The BBC have a serious responsibility
to their audience but this was totally inappropriate for that time slot.
The clip was broadcast on BBC Radio Solent, which covers Hampshire,
Dorset and the Isle of Wight, at 4.20pm on Monday.
Harris played it immediately after asking listeners: What would
you say if I asked if you were interested in a female version of Viagra?
As the screams of pleasure stopped, he joked: I thought that might
get an enthusiastic response. He then discussed flibanserin with a
health reporter. But when he returned to the subject after playing a
record, Harris was more coy, saying: I think we will stop this now.
This is, after all, a family show.
Last night the BBC said: It wasn't our intention to offend. This
was a lighthearted intro to an informative discussion utilising one of
the best-known film clips of the last 20 years. We've had not a single
complaint or comment.
|
| 20th November |
|
|
| |
School kids try ethanol after seeing the idea on Waterloo Road Permalink
|
Thanks to Dan
14th November 2009.
Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
|
Six
pupils were taken to hospital after drinking ethanol the day after
watching similar scenes in the BBC drama Waterloo Road.
Five girls and a boy, aged 14 and 15, saw the scenes in which a
teenager drinks some of the pure alcohol stolen from a science
department.
The next day, the students did the same thing, stealing the liquid
during a science lesson and spiriting it away to drink.
The alarm was raised by a member of staff at Aldridge School in
Walsall, a specialist science college. The pupils had confessed to the
teacher and also later told headteacher David Mountney they had watched
the episode of Waterloo Road the day before. In the TV show
featuring a fictional school, the girl drinks the ethanol hoping it will
cure her hangover but it makes her violently ill.
A small amount of the chemical is the same as a large number of
normal alcoholic drinks and the immediate effects are nausea, vomiting
and intoxication. In large quantities, it can cause almost immediate
loss of consciousness and even death.
Three ambulances and a paramedic in a rapid response vehicle were
sent to the school to take the pupils to hospital. After blood tests,
they were allowed home and were back at school yesterday.
Yesterday, the BBC was criticised for screening the disturbing scenes
before the 9pm watershed. A parent living near the school, who declined
to be named, said: I was watching the programme and I thought someone
would copy it. It never should have been screened because children are
very impressionable.
The BBC should be punished for this - it could have turned out so
much worse. Vivianne Pattison, director of television watchdog
Mediawatch, said it was worrying that a screen plot had apparently led
to the pupils' actions. People say TV does not have any effect on
real life and then something like this happens, she said.
Broadcasters keep saying viewers can tell the difference between
TV and reality but this shows this is clearly not the case. They need to
know that what they put out does have an effect, especially on young
minds.
A BBC spokesman defended the content of the programme and insisted it
had dealt with an important issue; Waterloo Road has always tackled
serious issues of the day in a responsible manner. Wednesday's episode
clearly showed the dangers of using ethanol and did not glamorise it in
any way. Each storyline is thoroughly researched using experts within
their respective fields.
Update:
Another Round of Drinks
20th November 2009. Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
Four schoolgirls are said to have become seriously ill after drinking
ethanol when copying a scene from the BBC drama Waterloo Road.
It is the second time within a week that pupils have imitated what
they've seen on TV.
In this latest incident the youngsters, who are thought to have found
the potentially lethal neat alcohol in their school's science lab,
reportedly mixed it with Ribena.
The pupils at Highfield School in Letchworth, Hertfordshire, are
believed to have complained of stomach and head pains and were taken to
hospital.
One parent from Letchworth told the Daily Mirror: Everyone here
thinks they must have watched Waterloo Road and tried to imitate it.
Vivianne Pattison of television watchdog Mediawatch said:
Broadcasters need to know what they put out has an effect.
A BBC spokesman said: Last week's episode clearly showed the
dangers of using ethanol and did not glamorise it in any way.
|
| 18th November |
|
|
| |
Thought for the day to continue to deny non-religious thoughts Permalink full story: Thought for the Day...Religion monopoly on Radio 4's god slot
|
Based on
article
from
entertainment.timesonline.co.uk
|
The
BBC should broadcast a version of Radio 4's Thought for the Day
for non-believers, John Humphrys said yesterday.
The Today programme presenter said that Radio 4 should create
an alternative outlet for the irreligious, after the BBC's governing
body ruled that excluding atheists from the three-minute religious slot
did not fall foul of its impartiality regulations.
Humphrys told The Times: As a non-believer, I've always thought
there's an argument for a secular Thought for the Day — but not because
of discrimination. I think we'd get some interesting views.
The BBC Trust rejected 12 complaints, led by the National Secular
Society, against a decision by Mark Damazer, the controller of Radio 4,
that atheists should continue to be barred from Thought for the Day.
Related Links
Terry Sanderson, president of the society, claimed that allowing a
religious monopoly gave speakers a platform on the news programme to
put a biased point of view that no one can question them about.
The trustees said that the necessary impartiality could be achieved
by broadcasting alternative views within Thought For The Day
within the week, or by the presenters referring listeners to other
portions of the Today programme that dealt with conflicting
views.
Richard Tait, chairman of the Trust's Editorial Standards Committee,
which considered the appeals, said: We understand that some people
feel strongly about this issue and have given it careful consideration.
However, we have concluded that the current arrangements do not breach
BBC editorial guidelines and specifically requirements of due
impartiality in content.
|
| 16th November |
|
|
| |
BBC banned Enid Blyton for 30 years for being naff Permalink
|
See
article
from
telegraph.co.uk
by Stephen Adams
|
Enid
Blyton, the best-selling children's author, was banned from the BBC for nearly
30 years because executives thought her a second-rater.
Blyton, the creator of the Famous Five, the Secret Seven and Noddy,
was kept off the radio by executives who dismissed her plays and books
as lacking literary value and being such very small beer.
The censorship has been revealed in a series of letters and memos
released from the BBC archives.
In one internal memo dated 1938, Jean Sutcliffe, head of the BBC
Schools department, wrote: My impression of her stories is that they
might do for Children's Hour but certainly not for Schools Dept they
haven't much literary value.
She thought they were no more than competently written.
There is rather a lot of the Pinky-winky-Doodle-doodle Dum-dumm
type of name (and lots of pixies) in the original tales, she
concluded.
...Read full
article
|
| 15th November |
|
|
| |
Russell Brand unrepentant about Sachs gag Permalink full story: Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross...Winding up Andrew Sachs and Voluptua
|
Based on
article
from
news.bbc.co.uk
|
Comic
Russell Brand said he would never tone down his comedy routine and was not
afraid of censure. As hundreds of fans flocked to a DVD signing session in
London yesterday, Brand leapt to the defence of fellow stand-ups Jimmy Carr and
Frankie Boyle, who were criticised recently for offensive routines.
Frankie Boyle is brilliant and Jimmy Carr is brilliant, he
said. They're not trying to be offensive, no-one is actually
offended, the people saying they're offended aren't actually offended,
the whole thing is constructed.
He added: If you hear it (the joke] delivered cold, like vomit
into the nape of your neck, it might be offensive, but mucking around I
don't think is offensive.
Last year, Brand resigned from his job at BBC Radio 2 after a scandal
surrounding a series of lewd messages he left on actor Andrew Sachs'
answer phone. But he insists Manuel-gate, as Brand prefers to
call it, was just rhubarb and guff and he would do the same
again.
I would've done nothing differently. I apologise for the thing I
did wrong to the person I did it to, but the whole subsequent scandal
was funny. It's just rhubarb and guff.
And he vowed never to tone down his own material for fear of further
censure: I will not lose my edge.
|
| 11th November |
|
|
| |
Richard Herring goes online to avoid BBC censors Permalink full story: Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross...Winding up Andrew Sachs and Voluptua
|
Based on
article
from
digitalspy.co.uk
|
Richard
Herring has complained about the increasing regulations on radio shows since
Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand's controversial phonecall to Andrew Sachs.
The comedian told Metro that greater censorship was the reason for
his new series of online gigs, which are written on Sunday, performed on
Monday and released as a podcast on Tuesday.
He said: Radio shows can take two years to get on air and there
are so many restrictions about content now. Most people don't need
nannying in that way.
It's got worse since the Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand thing but
even on my last show, there were battles. I wasn't allowed to use
Schopenhauer's quote about history being a whore with syphilis as it was
deemed offensive.
|
| 10th November |
|
|
| |
Daily Mail pick up John Beyer's role of identifying good Melon Farming TV Permalink
|
John Beyer recently stepped down from his role of alerting us to
interesting TV shows. There's not much 'outrageous' TV viewing being
pointed out by the Beyer replacement Vivienne Pattison so it looks like
the Daily Mail will be picking the job of identifying good Melon Farming
TV.
Thanks to Dan
7th November 2009.
Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
by Olivia Lichtenstein
|
 |
|
Olivia
Recommends:
True Blood |
Channel 4's latest attempt to seduce us with a mixture of swearing
and sex comes in the form of True Blood, the latest in the long
line of sexually explicit, violent and vulgar programmes that have,
sadly, become the norm on British television.
True Blood is a shocking tale of depravity, explicit sexuality
(bordering on pornography) and vile language.
Even before the opening credits have rolled in the first episode, we
see a young woman pleasuring a young man while driving her car.
The plot is lazily set up at the outset via a television broadcast of
a lady vampire informing us that since scientists have found a way to
make artificial human blood, vampires no longer represent a threat to
society.
As the tale unfolds, we learn there has been a horrifying reversal of
events and that some humans, known as vampire drainers, like to drink
the blood of vampires as it increases their strength, sexual appetite
and performance.
The programme is full of others with fantastical powers. Set in
Louisiana, there's the telepathic waitress, Sookie, and the
shapeshifter Sam. Then there are the fang-bangers - humans
who like having sex with vampires - and the drug dealers.
More offensive than all this is the sheer distasteful nature of the
content. There's oral sex, overt discussion of genitalia, graphic sex
scenes bordering on the deviant, and foul language.
It's animalistic, violent, corrupt and scary, and it airs on Channel
4 at 10pm on Wednesdays.
Comment:
Foul
10th November 2009. From Alan
Nice to see the Daily Mail being so consistent about the evils of
swearing, particularly as the editor-in-chief, Paul Dacre, is known to his
subordinates as "the vagina monologue" on account of the frequency
with which he uses the C-word around the office.
|
| 10th November |
|
|
| |
Having a whinge at children's cartoon violence Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
telegraph.co.uk
|
Cartoons
should be given movie-style age ratings to protect children from the
violence shown in programmes such as Scooby Doo and Batman,
a child safety 'expert' has warned.
Dr Karen Pfeffer, a senior lecturer at Lincoln University, said that
risky behaviour which would normally lead to injury is rarely shown to
have negative consequences in cartoons.
She claims to have found evidence that there children who watch
violent programmes are more likely to engage in risky behaviour and
injure themselves.
Dr Pfeffer, who is also an international mentor for the World Health
Organisation, will address the Royal Society for the Prevention of
Accidents this week and call for children's television programmes,
particularly live action programmes, to carry ratings for parents to
make informed choices for their children.
Among the programmes she deemed to contain the most risky behaviour
were Scooby-Doo, Batman, X-Men and Ben 10.
I have looked at whether television's portrayal of risky behaviour
affects children and have found evidence of children imitating dangerous
TV behaviours, evidence of a positive correlation between amount of TV
viewing and injury rates and evidence that TV viewing can affect
children's perceptions of risk, she said.
TV provides dangerous role models for children, especially boys. It
is recommended that children's television programmes, particularly live
action programmes, include ratings for parents on the portrayal of
injury content. This would assist parents to make informed decisions.
Dr Pfeffer's paper, Risk and injury portrayal in boys' and girls'
favourite television programmes, will be published later this month.
|
| 9th November |
|
|
| |
Latest Gordon Ramsay show loses most of the strong language Permalink full story: Gordon Ramsay...Strong language winds up the nutters
|
Based on
article
from
mirror.co.uk
|
Gordon
Ramsay has cut the strong language on his new series by 90%.
In the first episode of his new series of The F Word, he swore
nine times, including six 'fucks'. Swearing guests took the total expletives
to 12.
One viewer said: It's like he had Tourette's and they found a miracle
cure. He's obviously been told to cut down his swearing.
But Tuesday's The F Word attracted just 1.8m viewers - half the
number it got last summer.
|
| 7th November |
|
|
| |
Channel 4 is the sole guardian of nonconformism and provocation Permalink full story: Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross...Winding up Andrew Sachs and Voluptua
|
Based on
article
from
news.bbc.co.uk
|
Fear
of causing offence has left TV in danger of becoming too bland, Channel
4's programme chief has said.
Julian Bellamy told the Royal Television Society that recent scandals
were preventing broadcasters from taking creative risks.
He said the BBC appeared to avoid controversial ideas like the
plague in the wake of last year's Radio 2 prank calls row: After
a string of scandals about taste and decency, it seems to avoid
disruptive, potentially controversial ideas like the plague. Time and
again, producers tell me this and I believe it.
Bellamy said the industry's compliance spiral threatened to
bland out the medium to no-one's benefit. But he said Channel 4
would continue to take creative risks even when public sentiment
risks being offended. He described it as the sole guardian of
nonconformism and provocation on Britain's most powerful cultural medium.
I genuinely believe if Channel 4 retreats into conservatism we will
cease to be a meaningful cultural force.
|
| 2nd November |
|
|
| |
Rebecca Adlington considers punishment for Frankie Boyle's quip to be inadequate Permalink full story: Frankie Boyle...Whinges about Frankie Boyle and Mock the Week
|
Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
|
Olympic
swimming champion Rebecca Adlington has formally complained to the BBC
that it let comedian Frankie Boyle off with a slap on the wrist
over jokes that caused her deep hurt.
The double gold medal winner at last year's Beijing Olympics has
demanded an explanation from the BBC Trust over why it chose not to
punish the comic for outrageous slurs that left her humiliated.
And her agent has called for the BBC to ban Boyle over his comments.
During an episode of BBC2's satirical show Mock the Week last
year, soon after Miss Adlington's Olympic triumph, Boyle said she
resembled someone looking at themselves in the back of a spoon
and followed up with sexual innuendo.
The comments sparked 75 complaints, but although the BBC Trust
criticised Boyle and agreed that his remarks were unfair and offensive
it took no further action such as barring him from its programmes for a
period.
Miss Adlington has now written to the Corporation, calling its rebuke
no more than a slap on the wrist for comments which fell well
below the standards of common decency. She questioned the
effectiveness of the Trust's disciplinary process and called for the
corporation to take greater responsibility for its stars.
The BBC Trust said last night it had received Miss Adlington's letter
and would consider it, but added: At this stage we have no plans to
review the finding.
|
| 30th October |
|
|
| |
The BBC's censors risk killing off comedy Permalink full story: Frankie Boyle...Whinges about Frankie Boyle and Mock the Week
|
See
article
from
telegraph.co.uk
by Michael Deacon
|
Last
Tuesday, the BBC Trust criticised the panel show Mock the Week
because one of its stars, Frankie Boyle, joked about the facial features
of Rebecca Adlington, the Olympic swimmer.
But even before the ban on derogatory gags, senior figures in
comedy were expressing frustration at the BBC's increasing nervousness
about humour. Take Jimmy Mulville, who runs the company that makes
Have I Got News for You. At the Edinburgh Television Festival in
August, Mr Mulville said it was becoming harder to get risqué jokes past
the BBC's censors. My worry, he said, is that we're having our
tastes set at a dial by the tabloid press.
...Read the full
article
|
| 29th October |
|
|
| |
BBC have gone completely (ginger) nuts Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
by Christopher Hart
|
The
BBC rumpus has already been dubbed Hobnobgate.
On last Thursday night's current affairs programme This Week, presenter
Andrew Neil cheekily compared regular panellists MP Diane Abbott to a chocolate
Hobnob and Michael Portillo to a custard cream.
Neither Abbott nor Portillo complained, but a tiny handful of viewers
did - most of them distinctly custard cream-coloured and hypersensitive
whiteys, I suspect.
The complainants reckoned the quip was racist. Such people can sniff
out hatred and prejudice even in the names of our favourite biscuits.
Did the BBC react with a calm and measured rebuttal, befitting the
dignity of our national broadcasting service?
Did it heck. Instead, it promptly went into one of its
characteristic, panic-stricken tail- spins of wild paranoia and
ludicrous over-reaction.
The programme was instantly pulled from BBC websites as if it had
never been, with all the thoroughness of Joe Stalin rubbing out an
ex-colleague from a group photo.
...Read the full
article
|
| 21st October |
|
|
| |
Joan Bakewell against a diktat on strong language...BUT Permalink full story: Strong Language on TV...Whinging about strong langauge on TV
|
Based on
article
from
broadcastnow.co.uk
|
Journalist
and broadcaster Joan Bakewell has described the BBC's plans to clamp down on
strong language as far too sweeping a diktat.
Bakewell, whose 2001 series Taboo listed the words people find
most offensive, warned there was a major danger of censorship stifling
creativity.
She argued that society needs taboos and spoke up for the
right to shock.
Writing in the Radio Times, Bakewell referred to the Strictly Come
Dancing race row, saying it was right that using insulting words
like paki could get you into trouble as Anton Du Beke
deservedly found out.
She continued: Casual swearing is lazy, ugly, a glib way to let
off steam on the football pitch or in the kitchen. I don't want it on my
television at all. But when it's part of a tense, gritty drama - such as
those set among soldiers at war like Occupation - or of an
uproarious lampoon of our political system such as The Thick of It,
then that's a proper use of the language and should be allowed.
|
| 20th October |
|
|
| |
Mock the Week wins the Golden Spoon Award for Bad Taste Permalink full story: Frankie Boyle...Whinges about Frankie Boyle and Mock the Week
|
Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
|
A
joke about the Queen broadcast on BBC2's satirical panel show Mock the Week
had been cleared by the corporation's TV censor.
Comedian Frankie Boyle joked that you would not hear the Queen say
during her Christmas broadcast: I'm now so old that my p**** is
haunted.
The episode had first been shown in 2007 but was repeated in October
2008 during the Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand furore.
A complainant said the joke was grossly offensive and added: It
would have been objectionable at the best of times but coming as it did
in the midst of the Ross and Brand controversy it was quite
unforgivable.
An initial complaint to the BBC's management had been rejected saying
that, while the joke was near the knuckle, it was in keeping with
the show.
The viewer then took his complaint to the BBC Trust which also
rejected the complaint, despite admitting the joke had sexist and
ageist overtones.
Richard Tait, BBC trustee and chairman of the editorial standards
committee, said the joke was well after the watershed, well
signposted and within audience expectations for the show. He said:
The committee did feel this joke was in bad taste - it had both
sexist and ageist overtones.
However,
a gag on a different episode of Mock the Week about Olympic
swimmer Rebecca Adlington was deemed to have broken rules.
In August last year, Boyle said Adlington looks like someone who's
looking at themselves in the back of a spoon. He also made a sexual
innuendo about the gold medalists' love life, saying Adlington's
boyfriend looked like a male model and continuing: So from that I
have deduced that Rebecca Adlington is very dirty - I mean if you just
take into account how long she can hold her breath...
One viewer told the BBC he was appalled.
The show's producer later responded to the complaint, saying the
ribbing might have gone a tad too far and apologised.
The trust said that 75 complaints were received about the item,
originally aired in the week that Team GB returned from the Olympic
Games. It found that, while Adlington was a public figure, she had not
courted media attention. The judgment said: The joke about her
appearance and the sexual innuendo were humiliating and there was no
demonstration of a clear editorial purpose for the inclusion of these
comments.
The committee also noted that the commissioning editor had made her
views known about preferring not to include the joke. It said it was
concerned she appeared to have been unable to obtain the edits she would
have preferred.
|
| 15th October |
|
|
| |
Amateurish over-exaggerated offence at minor gay quip Permalink full story: X Factor...A talent for whingeing
|
12th October 2009. Based on
article
from
express.co.uk
|
Dannii
Minogue has apologised for a quip about a finalist's sexuality live on X
Factor as fans called for her to be fired.
The judge sparked 'outrage' with a comment about contestant Danyl
Johnson. The teacher had finished a version of Whitney Houston's I Am
Telling You when Dannii referred to reports that Danyl is bisexual.
Talking about the lyrics, she said: No need to change the gender
references, if we're to believe everything we read in the press.
The comment on Saturday's show 'stunned' Johnson and 'incensed' Simon
Cowell.
Thousands of fans logged on to the X Factor forum to vent their
'anger' while a survey showed more than 80% of fans wanted her kicked
off the show.
One fan said: Forget the Strictly row, Dannii is the one that
needs to be sacked. She was live on air and set an extremely awful
example to our children.
Many said they had complained to media watchdog Ofcom.
Dannii said on her Twitter blog she meant no offence and said she was
happy to apologise publicly. In a statement, she said: I want to
clear up exactly what happened on Saturday night's X Factor show
and post my sincere apologies to anyone who took offence. It was meant
to be a humorous moment about the fact he had an opportunity to have fun
with his song. An openly bi-sexual guy singing a song that is lyrically
a girl's song. Danyl and I were joking about the very same thing in
rehearsals on Friday, so it carried on to the show. I'd like to
apologise to anyone that was offended by my comments, it was never my
intention.
Danyl said he was not offended: We're completely cool about it and
chatted after the show. I wasn't upset.
Update:
I'm Telling You, 4000 Complaints
15th October 2009. Based on
article
from
guardian.co.uk
The TV censor Ofcom has now received almost 3,885 complaints from
members of the public about The X Factor judge Dannii Minogue's comment
about contestant Danyl Johnson's sexuality on Saturday night.
Johnson changed the lyrics of Jennifer Hudson's song I'm Telling
You, in which the lyrics refer to a male, so that the song from the
point of view of a man singing to a woman. Minogue subsequently made a
joke with Johnson, who has been the subject of tabloid stories
suggesting he is bisexual, saying that there was no need to switch
the gender reference in that song.
The regulator has not yet decided whether it will launch a formal
investigation into whether Minogue's comment represented a breach of its
broadcasting code.
|
| 14th October |
|
|
| |
BBC is to research the level of violence in its programmes Permalink full story: Eastenders...Eastenders TV programme complaints
|
Based on
article
from
guardian.co.uk
|
BBC
management is to conduct a study into the level of violence in its programmes
after 'concerns' were raised by the BBC Trust and viewers about an EastEnders
storyline that showed a character being buried alive.
Speaking at a Westminster Media Forum seminar in London on offence
and standards on television, the BBC director of editorial policy, David
Jordan, said that the issue of violence on TV was second in importance
only to swearing for viewers: We thought we might be detecting a
greater sensitivity to the threat of violence and being scared,
Jordan added. There was a particular episode of EastEnders where
someone was buried alive. Nobody was hurt. Nobody was brutalised, but
somebody was buried alive.
He was referring to two EastEnders episodes screened on BBC1
over the Easter weekend last year in which a philandering character, Max
Branning, was buried alive by his estranged wife, Tanya.
Jordan said that both the BBC Trust and Ofcom had noticed this trend
for viewers to have a lower tolerance threshold for TV violence: We
thought we should have a look at what levels of violence are acceptable
but also in news programmes too to see what is expected. Do you sanitise
things ... it's not something we've looked at for a while.
Jordan said he expected the research into violence to be carried out
by the end of the year.
Channel 4's viewers' editor, Paula Carter, revealed at the same event
that complaints to the broadcaster are falling. The number of
complaints made to Channel 4 is declining. In the year so far they are
20% down, Carter said. She explained that the main reason is because
of the declining popularity of reality show Big Brother.
Carter also revealed that of about 200,000 to 250,000 calls or emails
made to Channel 4 in a year, only about 10% are complaints about issues
of strong language: Our biggest single issue is in fact scheduling
... If people feel we didn't deliver a programme at the time expected,.
|
| 11th October |
|
|
| |
Channel 4 broadcast suicide episode of Hollyoaks despite calls for postponement Permalink
|
Thanks to Nick
Based on
article
from
digitalspy.co.uk
|
Channel
4's decision to broadcast a Hollyoaks episode featuring a suicide attempt
despite similarities to a real-life incident in Scotland has sparked criticism.
The instalment of the teen soap saw schizophrenic student Newt (Nico
Mirallegro) attempting to take his own life after making a suicide pact
with new friend Rae (Alice Barlow). The troubled character jumped from
an abandoned warehouse into cold dockland water while on the run.
Earlier this week, 15-year-old Neve Lafferty and 14-year-old Georgia
Rowe died after jumping into the River Clyde from the Erskine Bridge.
A spokesman for Bishopton's Good Shepherd Care Home, where the
teenagers lived, has now told The Sun: The decision to air this show
is likely to cause further distress.
The network confirmed that it would transmit the episode as planned
hours before broadcast. Speaking at the time, a Channel 4 representative
said: Any similarities are entirely coincidental and we have
carefully considered how best to proceed. We feel it is appropriate to
continue with the transmission of these episodes as this is not a
one-off programme but an established and long-running series.
|
| 7th October |
|
|
| |
BBC TV to dumb down to please the easily offended Permalink full story: Strong Language on TV...Whinging about strong langauge on TV
|
Based on
article
from
business.timesonline.co.uk
|
BBC
presenters are to be banned from swearing immediately after the 9pm watershed
and from conducting humiliating and intimidating prank phone calls under
sweeping changes to the corporation's editorial guidelines.
The BBC will take the radical step of putting its guidelines out for
public consultation as it tries to pander to nutters after editorial
blunders such as the prank phone calls involving Jonathan Ross and
Russell Brand.
The BBC Trust, the internal regulator, has conducted a review of the
rules governing programming and is proposing new regulations banning the
use of offensive language between 9pm and 10pm except in exceptional
circumstances, and encouraging producers to bleep more swear
words.
Other plans to go forward for public consideration include new
restrictions on risqué breakfast radio presenters, such as Chris Moyles,
whose shows are on air when large numbers of children are listening.
The trust is also insisting that the BBC never condones malicious
intrusion, intimidation and humiliation .
Although much of the public focus will be on the trust's
recommendations for bad language and behaviour, the plans will also
include rules aimed at safeguarding the accuracy and impartiality of the
BBC's factual programming, as well as measures to ensure that children
do not emulate aggressive behaviour of characters in programmes
such as EastEnders. Regulations on ensuring the integrity of phone-ins
and text voting are also proposed.
Once the public consultation period is over, the trust will consider
the responses before coming to a final decision on the use of its
editorial guidelines. It is expected to put the regulations into
operation early next summer.
|
| 7th October |
|
|
| |
Sex scenes are in vogue again on TV Permalink
|
See
article
from
entertainment.timesonline.co.uk
by Andrew Billen
|
Explicit
sex scenes are in vogue again on TV, with new series such as True Blood
and this time women are calling the shots.
When was it that I realised that Percy Filth, as Jack Rosenthal's
sitcom The Lovers called sex around the time that television
invented it, had made a return to the box?
Was it in the early minutes of Rome four years ago when Polly
Walker as the voluptuous Atia energetically turned a freeman into her
sex slave?
Was it two years later when Californication debuted with a nun
performing oral sex on David Duchovny?
Or was it during this summer's run of Desperate Romantics, a
riskily unstuffy drama about the Pre-Raphaelites that required its
actors, in the interests of historical authenticity, to agree to wear
pubic hair wigs?
...Read full
article
|
| 2nd October |
|
|
| |
BBC TV censor rejects complaint about My Penis and Everyone Else's Permalink
|
Based on
article
from
guardian.co.uk
|
The
BBC Trust has rejected a complaint that the BBC should not have screened
full-frontal male genitalia in a programme called My Penis and Everyone
Else's.
The BBC's regulatory body said today that the show, which was
originally broadcast on BBC3 at 9pm in September 2007, had not breached
corporation guidelines on harm and offence.
The complainant claimed that the broadcast of male genitalia was
inappropriate as it could have been seen by children and that a
display of penises and the time spent showing them was gratuitous
and excessive .
But the trust said that while the programme had contained what
some of the audience would have considered challenging material, there
was a clear editorial purpose for it and that adequate steps
had been taken to flag the content beforehand.
|
|
|