|
As judged by the most complaints
|
|
|
 | 28th December
2017
|
|
| Thanks to Nick See article from scotsman.com |
The Scotsman has published Ofcom's top 10 most complained about TV programmes for 2017: 1. Good Morning Britain, ITV, 5 September (1,142 complaints) Dr Michael Davidson described homosexuality as a "sin" and "a
socially constructed concept".
2. Press Preview, Sky News, 20 June (1,063 complaints) British journalist Melanie Phillips suggested that amongst the world's Muslim population "there are millions of people
to try to kill others."
3. Britain's Got Talent, ITV, 1 June (665 complaints) Presenter Amanda Holden offended the easily offended with a sexy dress.
4. Coronation Street, ITV, 27 October
(541 complaints) The murderous Pat Phelan was a little too nasty for some viewers.
5. Comic Relief 2017, BBC 1, 24 March (339 complaints) Comedian Russell Brand said 'fuck' before the watershed
and former Shooting Stars presenter Vic Reeves flashed a fake penis at
6. Emmerdale, ITV, 6 March (275 complaints) Aaron Dingle suffered homophobic abuse from fellow prison inmates before being beaten up.
7. I'm a Celebrity... Get Me Out of Here! ITV, 7 December (243 complaints) Iain Lee and ex-footballer Dennis Wise became embroiled in a bullying row.
8. This Morning, ITV, 13 November (181
complaints) Guest Andrea Williams of the Christian Legal Centre. Williams referred to the transgender identity as "a fad".
9. Good Morning Britain, ITV, 20 June (176 complaints) Good
Morning Britian was criticised for hosting right-wing figure Tommy Robinson who made commented about the Qur'an as a violent and cursed book.
10. Benidorm, ITV, 3 May (137 complaints) The sitcom Benidorm
received a number of complaints following comments towards a character with a cleft lip.
|
|
Ofcom reports on how children use media and how their parents monitor this usage
|
|
|
 | 29th
November 2017
|
|
| See press release from ofcom.org.uk
See Ofcom report [pdf] from ofcom.org.uk |
54% of 12- to 15-year-olds use social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, to access online news, making it the second most popular source of news after television (62%). The news that children read via social media is provided by third-party
websites. While some of these may be reputable news organisations, others may not. 73% of online tweens are aware of the concept of 'fake news', and four in ten (39%) say they have seen a fake news story online or on social media. The
findings are from Ofcom's Children and Parents Media Use and Attitudes Report 2017 . This year, the report examines for the first time how children aged 12 to15 consume news and online content. Filtering fake news The vast majority of
12-15s who follow news on social media are questioning the content they see. Almost nine in ten (86%) say they would make at least one practical attempt to check whether a social media news story is true or false. The main approaches older
children say they would take include:
- seeing if the news story appears elsewhere (48% of children who follow news on social media would do this);
- reading comments after the news report in a bid to verify its authenticity (39%);
- checking whether the
organisation behind it is one they trust (26%); and
- assessing the professional quality of the article (20%).
Some 63% of 12- to 15-year-olds who are aware of fake news are prepared to do something about it, with 35% saying they would tell their parents or other family member. Meanwhile, 18% would leave a comment saying they thought the news story was fake;
and 14% would report the content to the social media website directly. Children's online lives More children are using the internet than ever before. Nine in ten (92% of 5- to 15-year-olds) are online in 2017 -- up from 87% last
year. More than half of pre-schoolers (53% of 3-4s) and 79% of 5-7s are online -- a year-on-year increase of 12 percentage points for both these age groups. Much of this growth is driven by the increased use of tablets: 65% of 3-4s, and 75%
of 5-7s now use these devices at home -- up from 55% and 67% respectively in 2016. Children's social media preferences have also shifted over recent years. In 2014, 69% of 12-15s had a social media profile, and most of these (66%) said their main
profile was on Facebook. The number of 12-15s with a profile now stands at 74%, while the number of these who say Facebook is their main profile has dropped to 40%. Though most social media platforms require users to be 13 or over, they are very
popular with younger children. More than a quarter (28%) of 10-year-olds have a social media profile, rising to around half of children aged 11 or 12 (46% and 51% respectively). Negative online experiences Half of children (49%) aged 12 to
15 who use the internet say they 'never' see hateful content online. [1] But the proportion of children
who have increased this year, from 34% in 2016 to 45% in 2017. More than a third (37%) of children who saw this type of content took some action. The most common response was to report it to the website in question (17%). Other steps included
adding a counter-comment to say they thought it was wrong (13%), and blocking the person who shared or made the hateful comments (12%). ISP Website blocking Use of network level filters increased again this year. Nearly two in five
parents of 3-4s and 5-15s who have home broadband and whose child goes online use home network-level content filters, and this has increased for both groups since 2016, part of a continuing upward trend. Use of parental control software (software
set up on a particular device, e.g. Net Nanny, McAfee Family Protection) has also increased among parents of 3-4s and 5-15s, to around three in ten. More than nine in ten parents of 5-15s who use either of these tools consider them useful, and
around three-quarters say they block the right amount of content. One in five parents who use network-level filters think their child would be able to bypass them, although fewer 12-15s say they have done thisOne in five of the parents of 5-15s
who use network-level filters say they think their child would be able to unset, bypass or over-ride them; more likely than in 2016. This is similar to the number of 12-15s who say they know how to do this, although fewer say they have ever done it (6%).
|
|
Ofcom boss seeks to impose diversity requirements on the BBC
|
|
|
 |
23rd November 2017
|
|
| See article from independent.ie
See Ofcom diversity demands [pdf] from ofcom.org.uk |
| About this proposal for Baywatch Changing Rooms. How is that 'diverse? It celebrates the sexuality of the community of people who are both
transgender and gay. In particular those who are uncomfortable in their roles as straight men and who fantasise about identifying as gay women . |
Ofcom boss Sharon White has urged the BBC to lead the way on diversity in a talk at the Westminster Media Forum. She spoke as the TV censor published revised guidance for broadcasters on promoting equal employment. White told the forum
that nothing has the power to shape our culture, values and national identity as much as television. She said arge numbers of older people, particularly women, say they feel negatively portrayed on screen. And of those who come from an ethnic minority
group, many see themselves portrayed neutrally or negatively. There was an urgent need for broadcasters to reach and reflect every corner of modern Britain, White said. To ensure the BBC delivers on screen, Ofcom is launching an in-depth
review to understand how well the corporation represents and portrays all members of society. She said: We will be looking at the range and portrayal of people on screen (and) on air, including in popular peak-time
shows.
Ofcom is requiring the BBC to implement a new Commissioning Code of Practice for diversity, covering both on-screen portrayal and casting, as well as workforce diversity. |
|
Ofcom get nasty to force TV companies to snoop on the religion and sexuality of workers and contractors so that Ofcom can demand discriminatory policies of who is allowed to work in TV
|
|
|
 | 24th October 2017
|
|
| See complaints bulletin
[pdf] from ofcom.org.uk |
Ofcom threatened: We have investigated 67 licensees in total who failed to respond to our information request by the required deadline, or who provided an incomplete response and we have published our findings on them in this
bulletin. Ofcom considers the breaches we have found to be serious and we will be engaging with these licensees on this matter. We will request diversity and equal opportunities information annually and if the breaches continue,
we will consider the imposition of statutory sanctions. We have examined in detail the arrangements each licensee has in place to promote equal employment opportunities and training, in line with their licence conditions, and we
will be contacting licensees we assess to have inadequate arrangements in place. Monitoring of the radio industry Ofcom has already started engaging with the radio industry to discuss equal
opportunities and diversity and we will begin our monitoring of radio broadcasters shortly. Each licensee will be sent an information request, detailing exactly what information we are collecting, when it is required and what action each licensee needs
to take to comply with the request. Further monitoring of the television and radio industry We've committed to monitoring the broadcasting industry on an annual basis and publishing the results.
Therefore, in 2018 we will be requesting, as a minimum, information on the same protected characteristics of gender, racial group, disability, sexual orientation, age, religion or belief, pregnancy and maternity, and gender reassignment. We are also very
keen to understand the make-up of the industry in terms of additional characteristics such as social, geographic and educational background, and we welcome feedback on how this can be measured and improved. |
|
Ofcom's Patricia Hodgson angles for powers to censor and control internet news distribution by the likes of Facebook and Google
|
|
|
 | 11th October 2017
|
|
| See article from theguardian.com
|
The chairman of the media censor Ofcom has said she believes internet businesses such as Google and Facebook are publishers, and so should be regulated by the state. Patricia Hodgson also revealed that the board of Ofcom discussed how the internet
could be regulated in the future at a strategy day last week, although she said this was ultimately a matter for the government. Hodgson was speaking to MPs at a hearing of the digital, culture, media and sport committee. Asked about the rise of
fake news and whether internet companies should face greater regulation, Hodgson said: Those particular distribution systems [Facebook, Google, Twitter etc] are not within Ofcom's responsibility but we feel very
strongly about the integrity of news in this country and we are totally supportive of steps that should and need to be taken to improve matters. My personal view is I see this as an issue that is finally being grasped -- certainly
within the EU, certainly within this country -- and to my amazement and interest, being asked in the United States as a result of the potential Russian scandals. My personal view is that they are publishers but that is only my personal view, that is not
an Ofcom view. As I said, Ofcom is simply concerned about the integrity of news and very supportive of the debate and the steps that are being taken.
Theresa May's spokesman said Hodgson's comments were a matter for her as an
independent regulator, but indicated that ministers were sympathetic. Sharon White, the chief executive of Ofcom, said she was wary of regulating internet companies. We feel strongly that the platforms as publishers have got more responsibility to
ensure the right content, she said. I don't think it's a question of regulation, which I think has a fuzzy boundary with censorship, but I think we feel strongly that the platforms ought to be doing more to ensure their content can be trusted.
|
|
Ofcom clears an Al Jazeera documentary which revealed political plotting at the Israeli Embassy in London
|
|
|
 | 10th October 2017
|
|
| See article from
theguardian.com See Broadcast Bulletin [pdf] from ofcom.org.uk |
Qatar is under the cosh in the Middle East caught in a deadly pincer movement of a Saudi led coalition of Arab countries on one side and Israel on the other. All these countries object to Qatar's funding of the Al Jazeera news channel which provides
seeming well balanced reporting across the region in both Arabic and English. Its seems that Qatar's neighbours would prefer the news to be dominated by their own, not quite so balanced, news networks, that are a little bit more sycophantic to their own
interests. So perhaps it was hardly surprising that an Al Jazeera documentary investigating the Isreali Embassy in London would be reported to Ofcom for supposed bias. The UK TV censor Ofcom investigated Al Jazeera after receiving complaints
about The Lobby , a four-part documentary investigating the political influence of the Israeli embassy in Britain. The programme showed Shai Masot, an official in the Israeli embassy in London, saying he would take down MPs including Sir
Alan Duncan , the Foreign Office minister who is an outspoken supporter of a Palestinian state. The Israeli ambassador subsequently apologised for the comments and Masot resigned. Ofcom cleared al-Jazeera after concluding it did not make
allegations in the documentary that were based on the grounds of individuals being Jewish and that it had included the view of the Israeli government in the programme. It ruled that al-Jazeera had not breached rule 2.3, which relates to offensive matter,
and rule 5.5 with regards to impartiality. Ofcom said: It was the view of some complainants that The Lobby fuelled harmful stereotypes about Jewish people controlling or seeking to control powerful organisations. These
complainants considered this was antisemitic and offensive. We considered that the allegations in the programme were not made on the grounds that any of the particular individuals concerned were Jewish and noted that no claims
were made relating to their faith. We did not consider that the programme portrayed any negative stereotypes of Jewish people as controlling or seeking to control the media or governments. Rather, it was our view that these individuals featured in the
programme in the context of its investigation into the alleged activities of a foreign state -- the state of Israel acting through its UK embassy -- and their association with it.
An al-Jazeera source welcomed the ruling, saying:
This goes to show that no matter what al-Jazeera's critics say, its journalism meets and exceeds the highest standards of objectivity and balance. We feel vindicated by the rulings and ever more committed to exposing human
rights violations by anyone -- regardless of geography, religion, or the power of their lobbies.
|
|
Ofcom tells the BBC to publish detailed viewer complaints figures about its programmes
|
|
|
 | 7th October 2017
|
|
| See article from dailymail.co.uk
|
The BBC is facing a court battle after it defied Ofcom orders to publish figures on complaints about its shows. Channel 4 and ITV already disclose the numbers, and release detailed information about objections to their programmes every two weeks.
But the BBC nsists on keeping that information a secret. Perhaps this more about revealing political accusations of bias rather than trivial whinges by the 'easily offended. Now TV censor Ofcom has waded in and told the BBC it has no choice but to
become more transparent. Ofcom insiders have also made it clear that they are prepared to go to court over the matter if the BBC digs its heels in. Sharon White, Ofcom's chief executive, regards it as an important point of principle. Kevin
Bakhurst, an Ofcom director and a former BBC news boss, has told Corporation executives they need to comply. In a strongly worded letter, seen by the Mail, he said: The greater transparency we propose is necessary to
build and maintain public confidence in the operation of the BBC... and to provide public accountability.
Ofcom has given the BBC until the November 19 to comply with orders and publish fortnightly complaints bulletins that go into
the same level of detail as Ofcom's reports about Channel 4, ITV, Five, Sky and other broadcasters. BBC bosses will then have to publish the exact number of complaints the Corporation receives about every programme that registers 100 or more
objections. Every time a complaint sparks an investigation, it will also be forced to disclose full details of the complaints, the points of principles at stake and the outcome of its probe. A BBC spokesman has responded:
The BBC is already the most transparent broadcaster on complaints, including publishing data every month and responding on our website, and numbers are often influenced by orchestrated political campaigns but of course we are
considering Ofcom's letter.
|
|
|