|
|
|
|
| 26th September 2019
|
|
|
Leak spells out how social media app advances China's foreign policy aims See article from
theguardian.com |
|
Malaysia's film censors ban for Hustlers for excessive obscene content
|
|
|
 | 21st September 2019
|
|
| See article from bbc.com |
Hustlers is a 2019 USA crime comedy thriller by Lorene Scafaria. Starring Constance Wu, Jennifer Lopez and Julia Stiles.
 Inspired by the viral New York Magazine article,
Hustlers follows a crew of savvy former strip club employees who band together to turn the tables on their Wall Street clients.
Hustlers was banned by Malaysia's film censors of the LPF because of its excessive obscene content.
The board said naked breasts, erotic dances and scenes featuring drugs made it not suitable for public screening. And for comparison the film was uncut and BBFC 15 rated in the UK for sexualised nudity, strong sex references, language, drug
misuse. |
|
Indonesian TV censor ludicrously gets wound up by cartoon violence in Spongebob Squarepants
|
|
|
 | 16th September 2019
|
|
| See article from
coconuts.co |
Children's cartoon Spongebob Squarepants has fallen afoul of Indonesia's broadcasting watchdog. Again. As reported by Kompas, the Indonesian Broadcast Commission (KPI) sent a written warning to local channel GTV for broadcasting scenes
that allegedly portrayed violence in The Spongebob Squarepants Movie. In the warning, KPI said that the movie, first broadcasted by GTV on August 6, portrayed scenes of violence that were inappropriate for children, particularly as it was
aired during a time slot reserved for content suitable for family viewing. In addition, [the movie was aired again] on August 22, 2019 starting at 3:06pm, which contained scenes such as throwing pie at someone's face and hitting someone with a
block of wood, KPI Deputy Chairman Mulyo Hadi Purnomo said. At any rate, KPI ruled that GTV violated several articles in the Broadcasting Code of Conduct and Program Standards (P3-SPS), including the prohibition of content that might encourage
children to learn about inappropriate behavior. It said the TV station only received a written warning because this was its first offense of its kind. |
|
Internet censors demand that AI and algorithms point users towards 'mainstream values
|
|
|
 | 12th September
2019
|
|
| See article from
scmp.com |
China's internet censor has ordered online AI algorithms to promote 'mainstream values':
- Systems should direct users to approved material on subjects like Xi Jinping Thought, or which showcase the country's economic and social development, Cyberspace Administration of China says
- They should not recommend content that undermines
national security, or is sexually suggestive, promotes extravagant lifestyles, or hypes celebrity gossip and scandals
The Cyberspace Administration of China released its draft regulations on managing the cyberspace ecosystem on Tuesday in another sign of how the ruling Communist Party is increasingly turning to technology to cement its ideological control over
society. The proposals will be open for public consultation for a month and are expected to go into effect later in the year. The latest rules point to a strategy to use AI-driven algorithms to expand the reach and depth of the government's
propaganda and ideology. The regulations state that information providers on all manner of platforms -- from news and social media sites, to gaming and e-commerce -- should strengthen the management of recommendation lists, trending topics, hot
search lists and push notifications. The regulations state: Online information providers that use algorithms to push customised information [to users] should build recommendation systems that promote mainstream values,
and establish mechanisms for manual intervention and override.
|
|
New Zealand government to legislate to require age ratings on Internet TV
|
|
|
 | 11th September 2019
|
|
| See article from stuff.co.nz
|
The New Zealand government has decided to legislate to require Internet TV services to provide age ratings using a self rating scheme overseen by the country's film censor. Movies and shows available through internet television services such as
Netflix and Lightbox will need to display content classifications in a similar way to films and shows released to cinemas and on DVD, Internal Affairs Minister Tracey Martin has announced. The law change, which the Government plans to introduce to
Parliament in November, would also apply to other companies that sell videos on demand, including Stuff Pix. The tighter rules won't apply to websites designed to let people upload and share videos, so videos on YouTube's main site won't need to
display classifications, but videos that YouTube sells through its rental service will. In a compromise, internet television and video companies will be able to self-classify their content using a rating tool being developed by the Chief Censor,
or use their own systems to do that if they first have them accredited by the Classification Office. The Film and Literature Board of Review will be able to review classifications, as they do now for cinema movies and DVDs. The Government
decided against requiring companies to instead submit videos to the film censor for classification, heeding a Cabinet paper warning that this would result in hold-ups.
|
|
35 people get into trouble with New Zealand police over Brenton Tarrant's mosque murder video
|
|
|
 | 3rd September 2019
|
|
| See article from pedestrian.tv |
35 people in New Zealand have been charged by police for sharing and possession of Brenton Tarrant's Christchurch terrorist attack video. As of August 21st, 35 people have been charged in relation to the video, according to information released under
the Official Information Act. At least 10 of the charges are against minors, which have now been referred to the Youth Court. Under New Zealand law, knowingly possessing or distributing objectionable material is a serious offence with a maximum
jail term of 14 years. So far, nine people have been issued warnings, while 14 have been prosecuted for their involvement. |
|
Thailand outlines its 'fake news' internet censorship centre set for launch in November 2019
|
|
|
 | 2nd September 2019
|
|
| See article from forum.thaivisa.com
|
Thailand's Ministry of a Digital Economy and Society plans to open a 'Fake News' Center by November 1st at the latest. The minister has said that the centre will focus on four categories of internet censorship. Digital Minister Puttipong Punnakanta,
said that the coordinating committee of the Fake News Center has set up four subcommittees to screen the various categories of news which might 'disrupt public peace and national security':
- natural disasters such as flooding, earthquakes, dam breaks and tsunamis;
- economics, the financial and banking sector;
- health products, hazardous items and illegal goods,
- and of course, government policies.
The Fake News Center will analyse, verify and clarify news items and distribute its findings via its own website, Facebook and Line (a Whatsapp like messaging service that is the dominant in much of Asia). The committee meeting considered
protocols to be used and plans to consult with representatives of major social media platforms and all cellphone service providers. It will encourage them to take part in the delivery of countermeasures to expose fake news. |
|
New Zealand's OFLC reports that loot boxes in video games are evolving to something fairer
|
|
|
 | 2nd September 2019
|
|
| See article from classificationoffice.govt.nz |
Loot boxes in video games have come under fire as method of monetising games. Complainers have attacked them as if they were casino gambling, surely an unjust accusation but nevertheless loot boxes can be a rather ruthless way to extract money. Now
the films censors of New Zealand's OFLC are reporting on an evolution towards fairer monetisation methods. The OFLC speaks about developments in a blog post: You don't know what you are paying for and if you don't get the item
you want then you can end of buying a bunch of them. People have been getting pretty annoyed about this for a while and pressure built up . In early August, a group of companies that make game consoles announced a policy where
they will only allow games that show players their chances of getting items from loot boxes . This chance is commonly called a drop rate by those who talk about video games, as it is the rate at which items will drop. The announcement means that, all
things going to plan, games that are published on the PlayStation, Xbox, and Switch will show drop rates from 2020 onwards. Since the announcement last week, a few game developers have begun removing loot boxes from their games
entirely . Their solution is to replace loot boxes with boxes where players can see what is in them. Last week, popular game Apex Legends removed loot boxes less than a week after adding them in. Players generally view the policy
announcement as a positive step forward, although some commentators have pointed out that showing the drop rate doesn't change the dodgy nature of loot boxes, as they are still based entirely on random chance. The policy appears
to be based off regulations that were in place in China until recently, which also required games to show drop rates. Since then, Chinese regulations have intensified, placing limits on how many loot boxes players can open in a day and making games
increase the drop rate with each box opened. These regulations have proven effective in giving developers pause. Insiders now recommend moving away from loot box mechanics altogether in the Chinese market . The fact that China
felt the need to strengthen its regulations lends credence to the fact that simply showing players drop rates may not fully manage concerns around loot boxes. More troubling is the revelation that game publishers previously
offered to increase drop rates for people whom they paid to open loot boxes on video. By changing the drop rates, viewers are given an inflated idea of what they are likely to get from loot boxes. This suggestion of false advertising taps into why a lot
of players dislike loot boxes and think that they are exploitative and anti-consumer. These changes show that the industry is starting to solidify a focused strategy in order to deal with the potential harms from loot boxes. The
space remains fast-moving. I will do my best to keep on top of it and let you know about more developments as they arise. |
|
Art Exhibition cancelled in South Korea over supposed indecency
|
|
|
 | 1st September 2019
|
|
| See article from freemuse.org
|
On August 1 2019, a South Korean exhibition of drawings and art films was cancelled at the Huam-Garok gallery due to supposed indecency . Rebecca Goyette's Forever Animal solo exhibition, described by the artist as being about sexual
sovereignty, pleasure and healing through connection includes feminist depictions of women, nudity and sexuality. According to Goyette, she had collaborated with Seoul-based curator Yeu Ryang Choi of Yeu & Me since 2017 and together agreed to show
her works to a public South Korean audience at Huam-Garok. Whilst the gallery managers had agreed to show the works, the gallery owner cancelled the show on alleged indecency grounds. In response to viewing the works, Goyette explains that the
owner reacted very negatively and censored my show, stating it was bad for kids. Goyette states that Yeu Ryang Choi has proceeded with a lawsuit against the gallery on the grounds of contract breach. |
|
New Zealand's chief censor entertains TV viewers
|
|
|
 |
26th August 2019
|
|
| See article from
newshub.co.nz |
New Zealand's Children's Minister Tracey Martin has been calling for ideas to modernise internet censorship laws to protect kids from porn. So the country's Chief Censor David Shanks has been on the campaign trail seeking to grab some of those powers
to censor internet porn. Shank's made an interesting pitch when invited on to the AM Show on breakfast TV. Speaking of ideas for porn censorship he noted: Tracey Martin says all options are on the table. There
are ethical dilemmas involved in cutting the supply, however. Are we going to become like China, in terms of state-imposed restrictions? And who decides where the limits to those are? These are difficult questions.
He said he once
stood in front of a room full of people at a conference and outlined a scenario and said: 'I'm the chief censor. Imagine I've got a box with a button on it - a big red button - and if I push that button, I've
terminated all access to pornography for everyone in this country. Should I push the button?' There was a stunned silence from the room, then someone said, 'Who gets to decide what pornography is?' I said, 'I am! I'm the Chief
Censor.' But I think that highlights some of the issues underpinning these questions. No one in the audience urged him to push the button.
A working party has been set up to investigate what can be done,
involving the Office of Film and Literature Classification leads the group, and other agencies involved are Netsafe, the Ministry of Health, Internal Affairs, the Ministry for Women, the Ministry of Social Development, ACC and the Ministry of Education.
|
|
New Zealand has asked Ukraine to censor the Christchurch gunman's banned manifesto.
|
|
|
 | 25th August 2019
|
|
| See
article from unian.info |
The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern has contacted Ukraine's Government after Bellingcat investigative journalists revealed that Brenton Tarrent's manifesto was offered for sale in hardcopies via messengers in Ukraine. New Zealand has
made the request through diplomatic channels. News source MFA Ukraine reports on a response from a Ukrainian diplomat saying that Ukraine is concerned by the emerging reports about the distribution of such material in Ukraine:
We are convinced that there must be no place for racism, neo-Nazism and religious hatred in Ukrainian society. The diplomats also said that they had already approached the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the
Security Service of Ukraine with a request to confirm or deny the fact of the distribution of hardcopies of the manifesto translated into Ukrainian.
|
|
New Zealand's TV censor fines Sky News for broadcasting extensive excerpts from Brenton Tarrant's murderous live stream
|
|
|
 | 20th August 2019
|
|
| See article from
theguardian.com |
New Zealand's Sky News has been fined NZ$4,000 for airing footage from a live stream of the Christchurch massacre. The country's TV censors of the Broadcasting Standards Authority fined Sky NZ $4,000 (£2,100) for airing extensive and obviously news
worthy excerpts from the alleged attacker's live stream video, claiming that the video had the potential to cause significant distress to audiences in New Zealand, and particularly to the family and friends of victims, and the wider Muslim community.
The footage was a retransmission by Sky News New Zealand of a 24-hour feed from Sky News Australia, a separate, independent company. The chief censor Bill Hastings, said the New Zealand television broadcasters faced unprecedented circumstances
in the hours following the attack, and they played a critical role in keeping New Zealanders informed, but they also had to consider their role in protecting the community from undue harm and trauma and they needed to exercise a high level of care and
discretion at all times. Two complaints were also lodged against state funded broadcaster TVNZ who aired short clips from the live stream video but these complaints were not upheld by the authority. |
|
Facebook and Twitter close 950 accounts carrying Chinese propaganda against Hong Kong protests
|
|
|
 | 20th August 2019
|
|
| See article from bbc.com See
China sows disinformation on Hong Kong using porn accounts on Twitter from qz.com |
Twitter and Facebook have blocked what they described as a state-backed Chinese misinformation campaign. Twitter said it removed 936 accounts it said were being used to sow political discord in Hong Kong. It said the accounts originated in mainland
China and were part of a coordinated attempt to undermine the legitimacy and political positions of the protest movement. Facebook said it had, after being tipped off by Twitter, removed seven Pages, three Groups and five Facebook accounts.
Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook's head of cybersecurity policy said: Although the people behind this activity attempted to conceal their identities, our investigation found links to individuals associated with the Chinese
government.
The move came after Twitter was criticised at the weekend for allowing China's Xinhua news agency to buy sponsored posts on the network. Twitter said on Monday it would no longer allow such ads, saying: Going forward,
we will not accept advertising from state-controlled news media entities, |
|
Thailand sets up an internet censorship centre in the name of 'fake news'
|
|
|
 | 15th August 2019
|
|
| See article from xinhuanet.com |
Thailand's Digital Economy and Society Minister Puttipong Punnakanta plans to set up a Fake News Center. The digital minister confirmed that he is looking to create the Fake News Center to: get rid of
fabricated, misleading content on social media which might jeopardize the people's safety and property and violate the Computer Crime Act and other laws. For instance, content on social media about natural disasters and health
care might be fabricated or exaggerated only to confuse and scare viewers. They might be deceived by fraudulent investment scams or lured to buy illegal, hazardous health products online.
He said a dozen government agencies will be
asked to cooperate with the Fake News Center such as the police, the military, the Consumer Protection Board, the Food and Drugs Administration and the Public Relations Department, among others.
|
|
New Zealand ISP Spark says it will unilaterally censor 8chan (should it return to life)
|
|
|
 | 11th August 2019
|
|
| 10th August 2019. See article from
rnz.co.nz See article from rnz.co.nz |
New Zealand ISP Spark says it will block the controversial website 8chan if it resumes service, because it continues to host disturbing material. 8chan is currently down after its web host pulled out in response to 8chan being used by US mass
shooters. However, Spark said if 8chan finds another host provider, it would block access. Spark said: We feel it is the right thing to do given the website's repeated transgressions and continual willingness to
distribute disturbing material. The 8chan internet forum was used by the accused Christchurch mosque gunman to distribute his manifesto and live stream the attack.
However Spark seemed to realise that it would
now become a magnet for every easily offended social justice warrior with a pet grievance and said that the the government should step in: Appropriate agencies of government should put in place a robust policy
framework to address the important issues surrounding such material being distributed online and freely available.
Technology commentator Paul Brislen responded: It's very, very nearly the edge of
what's acceptable for what your internet provider to be doing in this kind of situation. I'm as uncomfortable as they [Spark] are about it. They do really need to find a new way to manage hate-speech and extremist content on the
internet. It's much like the Telecom of old to decide which phone calls you can and can't make. The risk was someone would now turn around and say okay you blocked 8Chan because of hate speech, now I want
you to block this other website because it allows people to access something else. It might be hate speech, it might be pornography, it might be something that speaks out against a religious group or ethnicity. You start down a
certain track of Spark or any of the other ISPs being forced to decide what is and isn't acceptable for the NZ public and that's not their job at all. They really shouldn't be doing that.
Update: New Zealand's
chief censor David Shanks chips in 11th August 2019. See article from classificationoffice.govt.nz
I applaud the announcement by Spark that they are prepared to block access to 8chan if and when it re-emerges on the internet. This move is both brave and meaningful. Brave, because a decision not to provide users with access to a
site is quite a different thing from a decision not to provide a site with the server capacity and services it needs (which is the choice that Cloudflare recently made). Meaningful, because everything I have seen tells me that 8chan is the white
supremacist killer's platform of choice, with at least three major attacks announced on it within a few months. There is nothing indicating that upon re-emergence 8chan will be a changed, safer platform. Indeed, it may be even more toxic.
We appreciate that our domestic ISP's have obligations to provide their customers with access to the internet according to their individual terms and conditions. Within those constraints, as the experience post the March 15 attacks
show, our ISP's can act and do the right thing to block platforms that are linked to terrorist atrocities and pose a direct risk of harm to New Zealanders. I know that ISPs don't take these decisions lightly, and that they do not
want to be in the business of making judgments around the content of sites. But these are extraordinary circumstances, and platforms that promote terrorist atrocities should not be tolerated on the internet, or anywhere else. Spark is making the right
call here. This is a unique set of circumstances, and relying on ISPs to make these calls is not a solution for the mid or long term. I agree with calls for a transparent, robust and sensible regulatory response. Discussions have
already started on what this might look like here in NZ. Ultimately this is a global, internet problem. That makes it complex of course, but I believe that online extremism can be beaten if governments, industry and the public work together
|
|
Art exhibition in Japan closed down after protesters threaten violence over a statue of a 'comfort woman'
|
|
|
 | 7th August 2019
|
|
| See article from hyperallergic.com |
A section of a major art festival, Aichi Triennale 2019, in central Japan featuring a statue symbolizing wartime comfort women shut down on Saturday following protests, the organizer said. The protesters were taking easy offence at the Statue
of a Girl of Peace . This depicted a Korean comfort women, or ianfu in Japanese. The term is a euphemism for the women, including Koreans, who provided sex, generally against their will, for Japanese troops before and during World War II. Aichi Gov. Hideaki Omura, who heads the organizing committee, told a news conference that there are growing worries about safely managing the Aichi Triennale 2019 as it had received a number of threatening emails, phone calls and faxes. One of the faxes it received read:
I will bring a gasoline container to the museum. The statue of the girl was part of an exhibit in the art festival's section titled After Freedom of Expression? Most of the artwork on display in that section could not be displayed in
Japan in the past due to censorship or self-censorship, the exhibitor said.
|
|
Rocketman cut by the Malaysian film censor
|
|
|
 | 2nd August 2019
|
|
| See article from sea.mashable.com
|
Rocketman is a 2019 UK / USA musical music biography by Dexter Fletcher. Starring Bryce Dallas Howard, Taron Egerton and Richard Madden.
 The Malaysian film censor has cut scenes which depicted depicted men kissing and
having sex with one another. Safaruddin Mohammad Ali, head of the Film Censorship Board explained: We do not allow any scenes that promote LGBTQ in films that are for public viewing.
Separately the
film censor commented that although it is about the real life of Elton John, it is not for him to allow the public to see whatever he does or whatever activities he indulges in that is not our culture, The film was also cut by the distributors in
Russia over fears of the country's anti gay laws. Rocket man was also banned in Samoa. |
|
|
|
|
 | 31st July 2019
|
|
|
New Zealand seems to be going well over the top in remanding a man in custody over the possession of the banned mosque massacre video See
article from nzherald.co.nz |
|
|