Over
the past few years, Facebook has come under scrutiny a number of times for its
seeming hypocrisy on what types of groups it deems inappropriate. Although the
site's terms of service (TOS) ban everything from nudity, to speech deemed
hateful, to using a pseudonym to open an account, they are selectively enforced.
The TOS appear only to be enforced when enough users report a group
as inappropriate, and once a group is removed, its creators often find
it impossible to get it back. Users whose personal accounts are removed
sometimes create a new account, only to find it deleted again soon
afterward.
Moroccan activist Kacem El Ghazzali was recently subjected to
Facebook's TOS when a group he had created, entitled Jeunes pour la
séparation entre Religion et Enseignement (youth for the separation
between religion and education), was promptly removed. El Ghazzali
emailed Facebook, but received no response. Two days later, his personal
account had been deleted from Facebook as well. He says that while the
group was live, he received emails from Muslims who opposed the group,
as well as other groups he had created.
El Ghazzali's group, and his account, both appear to have been well
within both U.S. law and Facebook's TOS. Why then, did Facebook delete
them? Was it under pressure from another country's government, or did
enough people simply report the group that Facebook automatically
removed it? In any case, why doesn't Facebook offer recourse for its
users to report accounts and groups removed in error, as other sites
such as YouTube and Blogger do?
Since his account and groups do not appear to be in violation of
Facebook's TOS, it seems that Facebook is now policing speech, possibly
at the behest of a foreign government.
|