World News

As they imprison blogger

Based on an article from International Herald Tribune

In Alexandria, Egypt, a 22 year old student blgger, Kareem Amer was sent to prison for over a month for allegedly defaming the president of Egypt and highlighting inappropriate aspects that harm the reputation of Egypt.

The basic right of individual free expression is sadly not respected in today's Egypt. Yet the authorities' decision to jail an obscure student for his writing reveals a larger struggle for free speech playing out between dissident bloggers and state prosecutors across the Middle East.

Protecting free speech in the Middle East hinges on the fate of young activists like Kareem Amer. Raised in a strict household, Amer was placed in Al-Azhar's religious school system at age six and watched as his sisters were forced to quit school and wear niqab, the full-body veil. After 18 years inside the Al-Azhar system, Amer rebelled. Rather than embrace the religious establishment, he became a critic of discrimination against women and non-Muslims.

Blogging became Amer's outlet, and his downfall. When Al-Azhar officials discovered a blogpost criticizing extremist professors, Amer was expelled and his case referred to the public prosecutor.

Although a human-rights lawyer accompanied Amer to his interrogation, prosecutors made clear they were indicting Amer for his beliefs. Do you fast on Ramadan? they demanded. Do you pray? They even insisted he reveal his opinions on the Darfur crisis. Amer would not retract his blogposts, so prosecutors threw him in jail — and laughed at the human-rights attorney present, openly mocking the concept of standing up for individual rights.

Thailand working alongside China

Opinion from the Bangkok Post

The government policy on internet censorship needs an immediate and sweeping rethink and change. This assumes it has a policy at all, given the current state of efforts to filter and block websites. The current effort to ''filter'' the internet, to use the word of the official censor, does little but add to the foreign perception that Thailand is under strong and constant control of a military government. The zeal of the official censor should alarm everyone whose aim is to establish a government that is accountable for its actions. Until the Sept 19 military coup, internet censors built power and ability. The Thaksin Shinawatra government occasionally tried to turn censorship into virtue by claiming it was all done on behalf of children. This is the familiar claim of all censors of course _ that they selflessly protect victims. But predictably, internet censorship under Thaksin immediately turned from an anti-pornography crusade into a political act.

Today, pornography is more freely accessible on the Thailand internet than ever. Censorship, meanwhile, has expanded into a secret bureaucracy which operates out of unknown offices. Censors provide neither explanation, warning nor appeal. They aim more and more at websites which are neither obscene nor a threat to children.

It was disturbing that military authorities officially appointed the modern Ministry of Information, Communications and Technology as national censor. The zeal and enthusiasm the new ICT minister and senior officials have shown is even more worrying. The ICT ministry was formed to be a leader in encouraging people to use and to develop technology wisely. The sight of such a ministry searching out nasty websites is troubling. That the ICT ministry is working, often alongside China, to develop better technology to block the internet is a setback for a future with information technology.

As official censor, Minister Sitthichai Pokai-udom has closed hundreds of discussion forums including the internationally famous Midnight University. The ministry has intimidated internet providers from carrying national debate or allowing political websites. The minister has made no statement to the public to defend, explain or justify his avid use of the firewall of censorship. Meanwhile, internet news sites now show Thailand as just slightly better than Burma or China at allowing net access by citizens, and far below the openness of Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia.

Before the Police Bureau on High Tech Crime stopped public reports earlier this month, it bragged it had blacklisted 34,437 websites. Of these ''illicit websites'' filtered since 2002, the police themselves said just 60% were pornographic. Nearly 4,000 were ordered closed by police because they allegedly violated national security. This, of course, is a well-known accusation and dodge by Thai censors. It is a carryover catchall, used to shutter newspapers and imprison innocent people decades before the internet came into existence.

The military regime says that its goal is to guide Thailand to a proper democratic system in less than a year. The unique and most admirable quality of democracy is accountability. So here is a suggestion for the government: Make internet censorship accountable. For starters, Sitthichai should explain and justify the actions of his ministry in closing off network access, debate, scientific exchange and discussion among citizens. For example, does a political chat session online equal a gathering of five people in the real world? Is it necessary to ban such sessions, and to close websites that encourage them?

The censors have failed miserably to halt access to online pornography, violence or gambling. Citizens should ask, then, what is the purpose of internet censorship? And the government should answer whether a free society can allow authorities to stifle a sincere exchange of views on the pretext of protecting children. Citizens should debate if there must be any limits on the internet; dozens of countries do well without them. If so, they must be decided openly and by everyone.

   
Censorship to preserve social, religious and cultural values

From the Daily Times

43 illegal Pakistani cable operators have been  closed down for obscene programming. The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) conducted raids on the operators’ offices in Rawalpindi and Islamabad. The authority confiscated the broadcasting equipment of 43 cable TV operators and imposed heavy fines on them.

PEMRA spokesman Muhammad Saleem said on Wednesday that showing pornographic and unethical contents was in violation of the authority’s code of ethics and ordinances

He said the authority had received complaints from the two cities against various legal and illegal cable operators for showing pornographic channels and programmes on their networks. He said the authority had taken many steps to control the propagation of obscenity and pornography by the operators, including about 1,301 licensed operators. He said the operators were informed through letters about the importance of Pakistan’s social, religious and cultural values. He said the authority had warned cable operators to abstain from obscenity, improve their service quality and address public complaints promptly in consonance with PEMRA Technical Standards and Code of Conduct.

   
Turkey continues with repressive freedom of speech law

From the BBC

Four Turks have been acquitted of insulting "Turkishness" in their translation of a book by prominent American writer Noam Chomsky.

Publisher Fatih Tas was found not guilty, along with a translator and two editors, of contravening article 301 of the penal code. Fatih Tas had published a Turkish version of Chomsky's book Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. It examines what part the media plays in setting social agendas, and criticises Turkey's treatment of its Kurdish minority.

Editors Omer Faruk Kurhan and Taylan Tosun, and translator Ender Abadoglu were also acquitted as the judge ruled there was no case to answer.

It followed the acquittal of another author, Ipek Calislar, on Tuesday. Calislar had been accused of insulting modern Turkey's founder, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, by writing that he had once fled disguised as a woman.

The European Union has pressed Turkey to reform the code, which it views as a bar on freedom of expression.

   
For illegally speaking in public before Singapore elections

From The Sydney Morning Herald

Amnesty International has called on the Singapore government to stop using stringent laws and defamation suits to muzzle critics.

The call comes as Chee Soon Juan, leader of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), ends his five-week jail term, for failing to pay a S$5,000 ($A4,159) fine for illegally speaking in public before elections in May.

Amnesty Internationalsaid it is concerned about the continuing use of restrictive laws and civil defamation suits in Singapore to penalise and silence peaceful critics of the government These laws, together with "politically motivated" defamation suits, have created in Singapore a "climate of political intimidation and self-censorship", and belie "the government's repeated claims that it is building an 'open society'.

Singapore bans public gatherings of more than four people without a police permit. Public speaking is also prohibited unless the speaker has been licensed by the government.

Chee, one of Singapore's most vocal opposition politicians, is also facing a defamation suit launched by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his father Lee Kuan Yew over an article in the SDP's newsletter.

He has been jailed five times since 1999 for speaking in public without a permit, and for questioning the independence of Singapore's judiciary.

   
Fiji editor to be deported

From IFEX 

Fiji's Daily Post Editor is to be Deported. The International Press Institute (IPI) is deeply concerned by the ongoing intimidation and censorship of the Fijian press since the military coup d'état of 5 December 2006. In the most alarming development, Fiji's Daily Post Editor-in-Chief, Robert Wolfgramm, is to be deported.

Commenting on these events, IPI director Johann P. Fritz said, At times of crisis the Fijian people must be allowed to rely on an independent media. Wolfgramm's deportation is a flagrant attempt to influence the media's reporting and it is further evidence that the perpetrators of the coup are more interested in protecting their own image than in upholding basic constitutional rights.

We once again urge the Fijian military to respect freedom of expression and the freedom to hold opinions without interference as guaranteed by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Fritz said.

Staff members at the Daily Post were subjected to violent threats in the period leading up to the coup, which forced the newspaper to temporarily close its offices. Although violent threats have stopped since the coup was first carried out, soldiers have been posted intermittently in the offices of media organisations, and journalism is being conducted in an environment, which IPI's sources have described as "paranoid" and "uncertain."

In the most recent development, military officials paid an afternoon visit to the offices of the Daily Post on 14 December to issue instructions to the newspaper's editorial staff. These instructions included an order to cease printing any photographic material showing the Fijian military holding guns, as well as an order to reduce negative reporting of the military's actions.

Approximately one hour later at 4.30 pm local time, the military returned to the newspaper's headquarters and "requested" that Wolfgramm accompany them to the Queen Elizabeth barracks in Fiji's capital, Suva, for a further meeting. During the meeting, Wolfgramm's Australian passport was confiscated and he was informed that he would be deported from Fiji on 15 December.

   
Normal, even in conservative Malaysia

From IBN live

Porn surfing may be admonished in some states, but Malaysia seems to have taken a rather liberal stand on the issue, despite the Islamic state of Kelantan topping the list of users who visit local pornographic websites.

Internet surfers from Kelantan have searched for entries like "bogel" (nudity), "gambar bogel" (nude pictures), "seks Melayu" (sex involving Malays) and "cerita seks" (sex stories).

However, this doesn’t seem to have perturbed Malaysian psychologists who say the phenomenon is “normal.”

University Malaya psychologist Jas Laile Suzana Jaafar says the trend is not alarming, especially in a state like Kelantan that practised conservative policies in sensitive matters like sexuality: If teenagers ask their parents or peers, how much information can they get? In Kelantan, parents are not open to talking about sexuality with their children.

However, she also advised caution in reading into statistics as the data in Google Trends did not give a full picture by not showing information such as the age group of the internet users.

   
Indian court disallows petition to ban adult debate

From The Hindu

Imposing a blanket ban on publishing obscene photographs and material in newspapers will violate the right to freedom of speech and expression enjoyed by the press, the Supreme Court held on Tuesday.

A blanket ban on the publication of certain photographs and news items etc., will lead to a situation where the newspaper will be publishing material which caters only to children and adolescents and the adults would be deprived of their share of entertainment permissible under the normal norms of decency in any society, said a Bench consisting of Justices A.R. Lakshmanan and Tarun Chatterjee.

In his petition, advocate Ajay Goswami drew the court's attention to the publication in the press, in particular in The Times of India and Hindustan Times, of obscene photographs, SMS jokes, and articles on pornography and sex education, categorised to be seen only by adults. He sought a ban on such publications.

Writing the judgment, Justice Lakshmanan said any step to ban publishing certain pieces of news or pictures would fetter the independence of free press, which is one of the hallmarks of our democratic set-up. The incidence of shielding the minors should not be that the adult population is restricted to read and see what is fit for children.

In view of the availability of sufficient safeguards in terms of various legislation, norms and rules and regulations to protect society in general and children in particular from obscene and prurient contents, we are of the opinion that the writ at the instance of the petitioner is not maintainable, the Bench said and dismissed the petition.

 
Nudity per se is not obscenity according to Indian court

From The Hindu

Nudity per se is not obscenity. While considering whether a picture is obscene or not, it is essential to determine first the quality and nature of the material published and the category of readers, the Indian Supreme Court said.

Dismissing a petition seeking a ban on publication of obscene photographs in newspapers, a Bench comprising Justice A.R. Lakshmanan and Justice Tarun Chatterjee said: Where art and obscenity are mixed, what must be seen is whether the artistic, literary or social merit of the work in question outweighs its obscene content. In judging whether a particular work is obscene, regard must be had to contemporary mores and national standards.

Writing the judgment, Mr. Justice Lakshmanan quoted a U.S. Supreme Court ruling and said: Articles and pictures in a newspaper must meet the Miller test's constitutional standard of obscenity in order for the publisher or the distributor to be prosecuted for obscenity. Nudity alone is not enough to make material legally obscene.

A culture of responsible reading should be inculcated in the readers of any news article, the Court observed. A hypersensitive person could subscribe to any newspaper of his choice, which might not be against his standards of morality. The Bench said the Press Council of India had suggested amendments to certain provisions of the Press Council Act to arm the Council with the authority to recommend de-recognition of erring newspapers for government advertisement or withdrawal of the accreditation granted to a journalist. The present scenario provided for a regulatory framework under which punishment was prescribed for the print/electronic media for flouting Press Council standards.

The Bench said the Government should seriously look into the Press Council request and make appropriate amendments in the public interest.

China targets online gaming

From the BBC

China is enforcing more monitoring of online games after some were found to contain banned religious or political material. Some were criticised as pornographic or too violent.

The announcement adds to government controls on Chinese newspapers, television and other media.

China has more than 23 million online gamers, generating revenues of more than $850m (£440m) a year.

Distributors must now obtain approval before releasing new games. Companies must also submit monthly monitoring reports, confirming developers have not added forbidden content.

The latest round of enforcement was prompted by a rash of problems with imported online games, some of which contain sensitive religious material or refer to territorial disputes, Xinhua said.

Pornography bill threatens pluralism in Indonesia

From Asia Media

An alliance of organisations have filed a lawsuit with the Central Jakarta District Court against the House of Representatives over a bill they say endangers the multireligious and multicultural character of Indonesia.

The Alliance of Unity in Diversity Advocates demanded the House drop the highly controversial pornography bill, which they say is based on Islamic values and threatens pluralism in the country.

Lawyers for the alliance said court officials promised to process the lawsuit within three weeks at the latest: It's a big deal because it's the first time that a civil group has filed a lawsuit against a state institution. We hope to teach the House a lesson from this case, lawyer Daniel Panjaitan said: The bill should have dealt with the distribution of pornographic materials, not prescribe how citizens must behave according to the moral standards of a particular religion.

The bill has received strong backing from some Muslim groups, notably hard-line groups that openly seek the adoption of sharia-based laws. But it has been opposed by pro-democracy, women's and human rights groups.

Daniel said lawmakers, in drafting the bill, failed to accommodate input from civil society. The organisation also said the committee deliberating the pornography bill issued two versions of the draft, one having 93 chapters and the other 36 chapters. They say no reason has ever been offered for the different versions.

Alliance coordinator Ratna Sarumpaet said people were tired of the "political games" being played by groups in the House eager to see the bill endorsed: We see a grand scenario behind the bill. It's an attempt to make Indonesia an Islamic state. It has to do with the issuance of sharia bylaws in certain regions. We raised this issue with the (Islamic-based) Prosperous Justice Party faction (in the House) but they were tight-lipped. For us their silence means 'yes,'

It is no longer necessary for the House to pass a pornography law because it is already covered in the Criminal Code and existing laws such as the broadcasting and press laws. Pluralism is the nation's main characteristic and we have to accept local cultures and traditional customs.

She claimed Bali, Papua, North Sulawesi and East Nusa Tenggara, where Muslims are the minority, had threatened to break away from Indonesia if the House pushed through the bill.

China leads the world in imprisoning journalists

Maybe the figures would look a little different though if taken as a percentage of population

From Casper Star Tribune

China, which jails more journalists than any other nation, is challenging the view that information on the Internet is impossible to control, and the implications for press freedom could be far-reaching.

At least 31 journalists are behind bars in China, making it the world's leading jailer of reporters for the eighth year in a row, the Committee to Protect Journalists said in its annual survey.

Three out of four of the journalists were convicted under vague charges of subversion or revealing state secrets, and more than half were Internet journalists. Blogs are often shut down, and those who post articles promoting Western-style democracy and freedom are routinely detained and jailed under subversion charges.

Shi Tao, a former journalist for the Dangdai Shangbao or Contemporary Business Newspaper in the central province of Hunan, was sentenced last year to 10 years on charges of leaking state secrets. Shi was alleged to have e-mailed the contents of a secret official memo about media restrictions to the Democracy Forum Web site. Journalism activists criticized Yahoo Inc. after it emerged that the company had given prosecutors e-mail from Shi's account.

Li Yuanlong, a reporter for the Bijie Daily newspaper in the southern city of Bijie, was convicted in July of inciting subversion and sentenced to two years in prison after he posted essays on foreign Web sites.

Last week, a Beijing court took five minutes to reject an appeal, made by New York Times researcher Zhao Yan, against his three-year prison sentence. Zhao had been convicted of fraud, but press advocacy groups saw his case as a political vendetta for his pre-Times career as a crusading investigative reporter _ and as a warning to Chinese reporters.

The survey found the total number of journalists jailed worldwide had risen to 134 as of Dec. 1, nine more than a year earlier.

Cuba was the second biggest jailer of journalists, with 24 reporters in prison. Nearly all had filed their reports to overseas-based Web sites. Eritrea, which has imprisoned 23 journalists, was third.

Uganda bans adult content from public places

From AllAfrica

The Media Council of Uganda has banned the sale of newspapers with pornographic content from public places.

It ordered that such newspapers be sold only from exclusive stores and not to persons under 18. It said the order was intended to regulate the conduct and promote ethical standards and discipline of journalists, editors and publisher in accordance to the Press and Journalists Act of 1995.

The councildefined pornography as any information or publication or graphic or picture or photograph or literature which depicts an unclothed or underclothed sexually arousing parts of the human body or depicts and describes or narrates sexual intercourse or any behaviour, related to sexual stimulation or describes activities in a manner tending to stimulate erotic feelings.

China looks to a ban on flirtatious eyes

Comment: Isn't that the plot of The Mikado? "Those who flirt or leer or wink..."

From iAfrica

Lawmakers in a northern Chinese province are considering a sexual harassment law that bans looking at women with "flirting eyes", state press said.

The Shaanxi provincial congress is studying a proposal that would define sexual harassment, with casting flirting eyes at women listed alongside actions such as using inappropriate language, the China Daily reported.

Sexual harassment is mentioned in China's national laws, but they fail to specify what constitutes such behavior.

The city government in Shanghai, China's biggest city and premier financial center, is also mulling what could be the country's first comprehensive sexual harassment laws. The city government is reviewing a bill that would outlaw sexually suggestive language, even if used in jest, and the emailing or text-messaging of explicitly sexual pictures. The bill would also ban unwanted advances and public groping, as well as address the issue of domestic violence.

Malaysian bloggers may have to be registered

From International Herald Tribune

All Malaysian news blogs may have to be registered with the Ministry of Information, local media reported, citing Deputy Science and Technology Minister Kong Cho Ha as saying the laws were necessary to dissuade bloggers from promoting disorder in Malaysia's multiethnic society.

But an international media watchdog warns that any crackdown on news blogs would stifle criticism of the government.

Regulating the Internet could push Malaysian bloggers daring to criticize the government to stop publishing or self-censor to avoid possible legal action, the Paris-based media watchdog Reporters Without Borders said in a statement.

Local news media outlets are strictly controlled by the government, and criticism of government policies are rare. A number of mainstream media organizations are owned by parties within the ruling National Front coalition, or via their proxies.

Malaysian bloggers currently enjoy an outspokenness denied to journalists in the traditional media, the Reporters Without Borders statement said. It is vital for the country's democratic life that the Internet is not pushed into self-censorship.

Indonesia wrestle with inanity

From Monsters & Critics

SmackDown, a popular U.S. professional wrestling television show, should be taken off air in Indonesia, a cabinet minister says after speculation a boy may have been killed by children mimicking the fight moves.

SmackDown is produced by U.S.-based World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc., whose shows are seen widely around the globe.

Some parents and leading educators had already called for a ban. However, Lativi has declined to stop running the show, instead pushing the airtime from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. when presumably fewer children are awake to watch.

Indonesia's broadcasting commission has not decided yet whether to stop the show from airing. Since the boy died, Indonesian media have hunted for other stories of injuries to students in fighting games that might be linked to the show.

From Play.tm

Germany's new governing coalition are considering a total ban on all videogames which depict 'lethal violence', according to reports from Europe this week. The politicians have vowed to bring in new laws in order to curb a rise in youth violence, with a focus on the influence of violent media, particularly games.

One MP supporting the proposed ban told a German games magazine that violent games had no place in kids' bedrooms. Andreas Scheuer of the Christian Social Union added that whilst ultimate responsibility must fall upon parents, the government should ban ultra-violent titles in order to aid the less media savvy.

Germany's interactive software association chief, Olaf Wolters, added that he will try to work with the government in order to resolve this concern and negate an outright ban, telling the magazine that As far we are concerned, there are no such things as killer games, but adult games.

Violence in the media has been a sensitive subject in Germany since a nineteen year-old killed sixteen innocent people in a 2002 shooting massacre. Counter-Strike was blamed for the atrocity, the youngster apparently being an avid fan. The game was eventually banned, and strong censorship laws have been in place ever since, with other games occasionally being banned too. Some MPs are calling for stronger enforcements, still.
 

From Gamasutra

In the blame aftermath of a recent school shooting in Germany, the regional governments of Bavaria and Lower Saxony have proposed new legislation that could punish those who make, distribute, or even play video games featuring cruel violence on humans or human-looking characters with a fine and up to a year in prison. The newly drafted bill is scheduled to go before the upper house of parliament next year.

The 18-year old shooter was reportedly an avid player of the popular first-person shooter Counter Strike, attacked the Scholl secondary school on November 20 in the western German town of Emsdetten, and wounded as many as 37 people before killing himself.

Frank Sliwka, the head of the Deutsche E-Sport Bund, a German online gaming organization, commented: We have among the most drastic censorship rules for games. Now we are being labeled as a breeding ground for unstable, dysfunctional and violent youngsters.

An MSNBC report also highlights the fact that Sony could also find itself on the receiving end of this new legislation, should it pass, with its PlayStation 3 console set to debut in the region in March 2007. Activision's Call of Duty 3 and Sony's Insomniac developed Resistance: Fall of Man continue to be the biggest selling titles for the platform, and both would be subject to the law's stringent violent game penalty.

Germany has one of the strictest controls on video games content, with a long history of banning or forcing alterations in games. Previously titles banned in their original form in Germany include Doom 1 and 2, as well as Manhunt and Command & Conquer. More recently, the Xbox 360 releases Dead Rising and Gears of War were both denied an age rating in Germany as well, thus making it possible for the games to be deemed illegal to sell by the German government.

Based on an article from The Times

Computer games depicting brutal and sadistic behaviour, and the ease with which children can obtain them, are to be the subject of a discussion by the European Union.

A new Sony PlayStation game, which shows a young girl being kidnapped and tortured, led to Franco Frattini, the Justice Commissioner, calling yesterday for urgent action to limit the availability of “obscene” material to young people. He has summoned a meeting of EU Home Affairs ministers next month because of his revulsion after watching Rule of Rose.

The game is to be released in Britain on November 24, but is available to order on the internet. It has already sparked an outcry on the Continent: the Mayor of Rome has called for it to be banned.

The game puts the player in the shoes of a teenage girl who is repeatedly beaten and humiliated as she tries to break out of an orphanage. She is bound, gagged, doused with liquids, buried alive and thrown into the “Filth Room”.

It was given a 16-plus rating by the independent Pan European Game Information body (PEGI), but Frattini suggested that voluntary ratings were no longer enough to stop supposedly obscene games falling into younger hands: An increasing number of such games display and even glorify violence, sometimes extreme violence. He singled out Rule of Rose about: a young girl who is submitted to psychological and physical violence. This has shocked me profoundly for its obscene cruelty and brutality.

Frattini hopes that industry representatives will come forward with their own proposals to clean up games aimed at children and find a better way to restrict their distribution to older teenagers: It is first and foremost the responsibility of the parents to protect children from such games, but I nevertheless think that we at member state and European level also have to take responsibility to protect children’s rights. These types of games are dreadful examples for our children.

Sony did not release Rule of Rose in the US for fears of an outcry, particularly over alleged overtones of lesbianism and sadomasochism, but its distribution was taken up by a small independent company. Similarly, the game will be distributed in Britain by an Italian company which has not secured a rating from the BBFC.

A BBFC spokeswoman said: It may not come to us. It’s up to the distributor. If this game is not deemed by the distributor to be gross, they can give it a 16-plus [PEGI] rating.

The EU home affairs ministers’ meeting on December 5 will first look at how to increase awareness of the potential risks of violent computer games with tougher labelling and restrictions on sales to young people. Frattini is suggesting a follow-up conference early next year to consider a voluntary code of conduct on the production of interactive games for children.

His spokesman later added that the PEGI rating was: not sufficient because anybody can buy them. In practical terms, it is not like when you go to a movie and they don’t sell you a ticket.

A spokeswoman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said last night that Britain, with jail or fines for supplying 18-rated games to minors, has got strict measures which we think go far enough at present.
 

From GamesIndustry.biz

Publisher 505 Games has issued a statement inviting politicians and journalists to judge new PS2 title Rule of Rose for themselves following controversy over the level of violence in the game.

Rule of Rose is a horror genre videogame, similar to a number of other videogames and movies on the market today, but does not in anyway incite minors to commit violent acts and does not promote acts of violence towards minors, the statement reads.

Following an in depth analysis by Pan European Game Information, the Interactive Software Federation of Europe and the Video Standards Council, the Rule of Rose videogame was judged to be suitable for European

market distribution. The statement goes on to observe that PEGI awarded Rule of Rose a 16+ rating.

In the UK, Rule of Rose has made The Times and the Daily Mail following Frattini's comments. But it's coverage in Italian publication Panorama which 505 Games has taken exception to - they claim the magazine "erroneously stated" that the winner of the game is the player who buries a young girl alive.

The burial of the protagonist or of any other child does not appear in any scene of the game, not even indirectly, according to 505 Games: The scene that has triggered the discussion is in reality a dream sequence that serves as part of the introduction to the adventure: a non-interactive video sequence in which the protagonist, who is not a minor, is captured inside a crate.

The interactive part of the game is based primarily on exploration and the solving of mysteries. The only sporadic fighting scenes are against monsters.

Rule of Rose is due out in Europe next Friday. 505 Games has announced that it will be inviting politicians and journalists to the game for themselves by attending a preview presentation, to be held on November 23 in Milan.
 

From Spong

505 Publisher of horror-game, Rule of Rose has bowed to England's mainstream media and calls from European Union rightwingers by announcing today that it will not be making the game available for retail in the UK:

Apparently, the mainstream media can now censor just as well as the official censors. The refusal to sell the game legally almost certainly stems from two reports in The Daily Mail and The Times newspapers.

But it is not simply the newspapers that forced the point. Political pressure exerted including European Union Justice Commissioner, Franco Frattini will also have contributed to 505's decision to take Rule of Rose out the back and shoot it in the back of the head, execution style.

Release plans for the rest of Europe are unknown at this moment. But the uncertainty generated surely makes online delivery of games content look more and more appealing.
 

Rule of Rose would probably have been a 15 anyway

Thanks to Byron

PEGI (the European games rating people) saw no problem with Rule of Rose and gave it a 16+. I have played the American version and I am pretty sure the BBFC would have given the game a 15 and described it as strong horror.

Italian pressure to make PEGI ratings legally binding on retailers

Based on an article from Euro Politics

UK interior minister John Reid will add Britain’s weight behind an EU crusade against violent computer games at meeting of Europe’s justice ministers this week. The British home secretary will also urge the EU to do more to protect children from “appropriate content”, child pornography and paedophiles.

John Reid showed a little perspective about  games though and said: There is a wider issue here. The growth of the internet has meant we need to be alert on threats and dangers online. Violent video games are one issue on this spectrum. But I am also concerned about what more we can do to tackle the most extreme and harmful end of the spectrum. In particular I am concerned about child pornography.

Brussels has led demands for parental advisory warnings and age restrictions on the sale of “obscene and perverse” video and computer games. Reid will back the campaign and call on other EU countries to follow British and Dutch legislation forbidding the sale of adult-rated games to minors. While industry operates a self-regulation ratings system for video and computer games retailers in most EU countries are not legally obliged to restrict sale of adult classified products.

Unione Nazionale Consumatori, a consumers association that takes a liberal view of censorship, said it was not sufficient to make it illegal to sell adult games to children. Parents and society have to educate children about the adult world, said Elana Venditti, who represented the association at the meeting. Minors are likely to get access to adult material through other medium anyway, she said, so prepare them properly for the adult world.

European justice commissioner Franco Frattini will back Reid’s call, indicate officials, after he wrote raising the issue to Europe’s capitals two weeks ago. We are not calling for censorship but the sales of cigarettes and alcohol is prohibited to minor why not violent games, said a commission official.

Frattini has been particularly distressed by a Sony Playstation game, The rule of Rose, which with undue exaggeration, “shocked… profoundly for its obscene cruelty and brutality”. The computer game’s detractors claim involves inflicting psychological and physical violence on a young girl has hit the headlines in Frattini’s native Italy and in France.

But Frattini has faced opposition within the Brussels EU executive from his colleague Viviane Reding, Europe’s media commissioner. Reding is reminding Frattini of the PEGI ratings system, run by industry across the EU since 2003, that looks for “informed adult choice”: This is in line with the commission’s view that measures taken to protect minors and human dignity must be carefully balanced with the fundamental right to freedom of expression.

Rule of Rose will be available to UK players

Thanks to Byron

Rule of Rose will be released in other parts of Europe with a English option and will work on UK PS2's. This helps as the PS2 is a bugger to import for as it has no easy method for playing import games.

The game has already been released in France and possibly Germany too

Bollywood movie prosecuted over kiss

From Tonight

A kissing scene from a movie starring Bollywood actors Aishwarya Rai and Hrithik Roshan has irked a lawyer who has filed a criminal case against them, accusing them of obscenity.

Shailendra Dwivedi of Indore, the capital of central Madhya Pradesh state, said the scene from the movie, titled Dhoom 2, lowered the dignity of Indian women and gave an obscene message to youth.: Bollywood actors are conveying vulgarity in the society, These films cannot be watched with our families, they are so vulgar at times.

A local court accepted Dwivedi's petition to punish the actors and said it would hear the petitioner on December 11.

The Indian censor board, which certifies all films, released the movie with a "parental discretion" certificate.

Temporarily relaxing censorship for the Olympics

From International Herald Tribune

China is temporarily relaxing decades-old restrictions on foreign reporters that will give foreign media greater freedom to travel and report in the run up to the 2008 Beijing Olympics.

The regulations, which come into force Jan. 1, temporarily abolish onerous requirements that currently prohibit foreign reporters from traveling or conducting interviews, even with ordinary Chinese, without government approval. Under the new rules, only the consent of the interview subject is needed.

The new rules mark a surprising step forward in addressing a major concern for the Olympic movement and international media: how China, with its penchant for heavy-handed policing and censorship, would deal with the 20,000 foreign media staff expected in Beijing for the Games.
Today in Sports

Significant questions remain about China's reporting environment. China is the world's largest jailer of journalists, with 32 in prison as of Jan. 1. Police retain broad powers to halt coverage by reporters. Foreign reporters have been frequently detained for reporting on a range of topics, from AIDS epidemics in the countryside to protests by urban workers. The new Olympic regulations, as well, contain loopholes and expire on Oct. 17, 2008, a month after the Paralympics end.

IOC officials have privately described arduous negotiations over media rules and credentials with Beijing Olympic organizers. At times, IOC officials have read aloud to Beijing organizers the promise they made in their bidding book for the Games: There will be no restrictions on journalists in reporting on the Olympic Games.

Liu, the Foreign Ministry spokesman, said the government knows that, as with previous Olympics, reporters won't limit their coverage to sports. He broadly interpreted the new rules, which cover reporting on the Games "and related matters", to give foreign media expanded license.

Though officials should no longer question reporters as they travel in China, Liu said that police would still have the authority to intervene, especially during emergencies, protests and other incidents "that suddenly arise.": They will not ask what you are doing there unless there are concerns in terms of public interest and social order, Liu said.

Iran has a purge on books

From The Guardian

Dozens of literary masterpieces and international bestsellers have been banned in Iran in a dramatic rise in censorship that has plunged the country's publishing industry into crisis.

Companies that once specialised in popular fiction and other money-spinners are being restricted to academic texts under a cultural freeze instigated by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Several thousand new and previously published works have been blacklisted by Iran's culture and Islamic guidance ministry, which vets all books.

Newly banned books include translations of Tracy Chevalier's best-seller Girl With a Pearl Earring and Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code, the latter for upsetting clerics within Iran's tiny Christian community. The crackdown also covers classics, such as William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying, and scores of works by Iranian authors.

Another publishing house has been banned from selling a successful series of books featuring lyrics by the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, the Doors, Black Sabbath, Queen and Guns n' Roses. Stores were told to remove the books or face closure. Permission was subsequently denied for the publisher to reprint.

Crisis talks between Iran's publishing union and the culture ministry have failed to ease the situation. We have books on psychology, history, politics and folklore which have been sitting for nine months and still no answer, a publisher told the Guardian.

The clampdown has been headed by the hardline culture minister, Mohammed Hossein Saffar Harandi, a former revolutionary guard and close ally of Ahmadinejad. Opening Iran's national book week festival this week, Saffar Harandi said a tougher line was needed to stop publishers from serving a poisoned dish to the young generation. He said some books deliberately gave Iranians a sense of inferiority and encouraged them to be lackeys of the west.
 

Iran has a purge on websites

From The Guardian

Iran yesterday shut down access to some of the world's most popular websites. Users were unable to open popular sites including Amazon.com and YouTube following instructions to service providers to filter them.

Similar edicts have been issued against Wikipedia, the internet encyclopaedia, IMDB.com, an online film database, and the New York Times site. Attempts to open the sites are met with a page reading: "The requested page is forbidden."

The clampdown was ordered by senior judiciary officials in the latest phase of a campaign that has seen high-speed broadband facilities banned in an attempt to impede "corrupting" foreign films and music. It is in line with a campaign by Iran's Islamist president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to purge the country of western cultural influences.

Critics accuse Iran of using filtering technology to censor more sites than any country apart from China. Until now, targets have been mainly linked to opposition groups or those deemed "immoral" under Iran's Islamic legal code. Some news sites, such as the BBC's Farsi service, are also blocked.

Last week Mohammed Tourang, head of the information bureau's cultural committee, warned Iranian websites of stricter rules by announcing steps to stamp out "immoral and illegal" content. He said site owners would be given official reminders to eliminate forbidden material. Special attention would be paid to content judged to be a threat to national unity or insulting to sacred religious texts and symbols. Students and academics say the move limits their ability to conduct research.

The long reach of China's censors

Based on an article from Monsters & Critics

A Serbian human rights group said that it would arrange a public showing of a Chinese film which was barred from a Belgrade film festival on Beijing's request.

Director Lou Ye's film Summer Palace was scrapped from the international Festival of the Author's Film after the Serbian foreign ministry indicated 'higher national interests' were at stake.

The Belgrade-based Youth Initiative for Human Rights condemned what it described as censorship, asked for an explanation of what the 'higher national interests' were and promised to show Summer Palace in a free screening next week.

China has a bit of a downer Lou Ye and  he has been banned from making films in China for five years for submitting an entry for the Cannes festival without government approval. Lou entered romance Summer Palace for competition without clearing it with China's censors. It was reported that the film would be confiscated along with any income made from it. The film, which features explicit sex scenes, takes place around the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989.

From Silicon

Italian prosecutors have put two Google Italy representatives under investigation as part of an inquiry into how a video of teenagers harassing an autistic classmate surfaced on its video site, a judicial source said.

The two are accused of failing to check on the content of the video posted on the search behemoth's website.

The video, which sparked outrage in the country, showed four teenagers beating and poking fun at a 17-year-old disabled boy in a classroom in the northern Italian city of Turin. Prosecutors have already put the four students and a teacher under investigation. The students have also been suspended until the end of the school year.

A spokeswoman for Google in Europe said the search giant was sorry for the distress caused by the video and had acted swiftly when it was informed of its content: There was this very disturbing video which was posted on Google Video a couple of weeks ago and we promptly took it down when we were notified. Google's policy bans the uploading of violent content but with thousands of videos posted every day on the site it relies largely on users to ensure that is adhered to, said the company spokeswoman.

Italy's education minister Giuseppe Fioroni said the prosecutors had been right to apply to the internet the same legislation that in Italy regulates what can be published in newspapers or broadcast on television.

From Hindustan Times

The Indian government is exploring the possibility of allowing movies certified for adult viewing during late night hours.

The government will soon start consultation with the industry and civil rights group on allowing feature films certified as ‘A’ by the Censor Board.

While the movie channels want that adult movies should be shown after 10:30 pm, the social groups are not willing to allow screening of movies before midnight. There also divergent views on what type of adult content should be allowed on television.

I&B ministry PR Dasmunshi held a meeting with the representatives of television channels on Wednesday and assured that the government will come out with some guidelines on the issue soon.

Showing any sort of adult content on television got banned after the Mumbai High Court directed that only UA or U certified movies could be shown on television.

The court had also said that only movies certified by the Censor Board should be shown on television. Following the order, the I&B ministry issued an notification under Cable Network Act prohibiting showing of any adult content on television.

Six months after the government notification, the television industry has renewed its efforts to get government censorship reduced.

They have got a shot in the arm from the new Minister of State in the ministry MH Ambareesh. He has earlier sought more freedom for television while reducing government censorship. Keeping in view his affinity to film fraternity, Ambareesh has been tasked with section related to films in the ministry.

Adult content on late night shows is on the agenda of the new content code. But, what adult stuff can be shown will be decided only after consultations with the various stakeholders, a senior ministry official said.

Based on an article from China View

A person who was jailed for 12 years for selling pornographic goods was among six people imprisoned in China's latest crackdown on piracy and pornography. The person was also fined 5,000 yuan ($625).

Another person was sentenced to ten months in prison for illegally printing a Chinese dictionary and fined 20,000 yuan ($2,500)

A man who was convicted of selling pornographic DVDs and VCDs was jailed for five years and six months with a fine of 10,000 yuan ($1,250 U.S. dollars).

Two people were each sentenced to one year in jail with a fine of 5,000 yuan ($625) for violating intellectual property rights.

A person was sentenced to two years in prison and fined 3,000 yuan ($375) for selling pirated DVDs and computer software.

Meanwhile, two production lines for pirating DVDs were halted in Nanchang, capital of east China's Jiangxi Province, with the confiscation of more than 100,000 discs and 17 people were detained.

Press release from Cybertip.ca
See also technical paper about how cleanfeed works

Canada’s largest Internet service providers (ISPs) have joined forces with Cybertip.ca, Canada’s
child sexual exploitation tipline, to launch a new voluntary initiative to help in the battle against online child sexual abuse.

The new initiative, named “Project Cleanfeed Canada”, is the latest contribution from the multi-stakeholder Canadian Coalition Against Internet Child Exploitation (C-CAICE). It is intended to make the Internet safer for Canadians and their families by reducing their chances of accidentally coming across images of child sexual exploitation on the Internet.

The participating ISPs, which so far include Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream, Rogers, SaskTel, Shaw Communications Inc., TELUS and Videotron Ltd will install sophisticated new filters designed to protect their customers from inadvertently visiting foreign web sites that contain images of children being sexually abused and that are beyond the jurisdiction of Canadian legal authorities.

Cybertip.ca will establish a list of the sites to be filtered which will be incorporated automatically into the ISPs’ filters. The ISPs will have no involvement in compiling the Cybertip.ca list.

Project Cleanfeed Canada is named after a similar initiative called “Project Cleanfeed” implemented by British Telecom in the UK and subsequently adopted by a number of other European ISPs.

From the BBC

Police in Cairo have detained a blogger whose posts have been critical of the Egyptian government.

Rami Siyam, who blogs under the name of Ayyoub, was detained along with three friends after leaving the house of a fellow blogger. No reasons have been given for Siyam's detention. The other friends were released after being questioned.

Human rights groups have accused Egypt of eroding freedom of speech by arresting several bloggers recently.

Bloggers are at the centre of Egyptian political activism. In recent weeks, bloggers have been exposing what they say was the sexual harassment of women at night in downtown Cairo in full view of police who did not intervene.

The most recently detained blogger, Abdel Kareem Nabil, was detained in Alexandria on 6 November and was charged with disrupting public order, inciting religious hatred and defaming the president.

From E-Commerce Times

The One week after gaining unfettered access to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, Chinese Internet users have been cut off from the service again.

Andrew Lih, a former journalism professor at Hong Kong University who tracks censorship in China, wrote on his blog last week that people throughout the country are unable to contact Wikipedia. The report was confirmed by Rebecca MacKinnon, former Beijing bureau chief at CNN and a research fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School. MacKinnon said that a number of Chinese friends wrote to her complaining about the shutdown.

Based on an article from Malaysia Sun

China will restrict broadcast reporting on vicious crimes so the country's young people have a healthier media environment, the Beijing government says.

We must not let improper crime reporting harm young minds, said Zhang Haitao, vice director of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television.

Reporting of cases that harm public security and cases of vicious crimes, such as kidnap and arson, will be subject to strict controls, he continued. Detailed reports of detective work and investigations by the police will be banned and detailed descriptions and analysis of criminal methods and motives will also be banned.

Zhang added TV programs should not exaggerate violence, murder, pornography and horror scenes and the name, address, photograph and anything else that might reveal the identity of a juvenile delinquent should not be mentioned.

From IFEX

Reporters Without Borders has condemned the "archaic censorship" being implemented by the communications ministry and reiterated its call for the government of Chad to lift the draconian curbs on press freedom that are part of a state of emergency decreed on 13 November 2006.

The publication of newspapers with black strips replacing articles censored by civil servants is a sad spectacle, the press freedom organisation said. Using scissors will not help the government restore peace. It will just radicalise the opposition and give it additional arguments for resisting. We urge President Idriss Deby Itno to order his government to seek negotiated solutions rather than continue with these absurd and depressing measures.

The special unit created at the communications ministry to implement prior censorship of the N'Djamena-based print media began to function on 14 November, the day after the state of emergency was decreed in N'Djamena and six of the country's regions,.

The decision to restore prior censorship of the privately-owned press was prompted by recent articles about the rebels who are fighting government troops in eastern Chad. In early November, the weekly "Notre Temps" published photos of rebel leaders and speculated about each one's possibilities for replacing Deby as president.

From Thai Visa

A new group advocating freedom on the Internet filed a petition with the Thai Human Rights Commission asking for an end to online censorship.

The petition was signed by 30 people, including many academics, and Freedom Against Censorship Thailand (FACT) which said 70 international organisations have expressed their support.

CJ Hinke, the originator of the petition, said: If people don't have all the information, they are not fully informed and without a fully informed public, you can't expect people to make the right decisions.

FACT, which was formed earlier this month, is the first organisation of its kind in Thailand seeking to end the censorship of more than 35,000 websites in the country.

The group said the government blocks 2,500 web pages, including some from the BBC, CNN, Yahoo News and articles from Yale University Press about Thailand's King Bhumibhol Adulyadej. When users in Thailand try to access the pages, they receive a green screen saying the site was blocked.

At least 11% of the websites blocked contained criticism of ousted prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra or his Thai Rak Thai party, the government's handling of the violence in southern Thailand, and the September 19 coup that overthrew Thaksin, the group said.

Hinke said that the government has insisted the sites needed to be blocked "to preserve Thai social harmony". He said if the government refuses to comply with the request, he will sue the ministry. He said the group is also planning to put another petition online and to circulate software that would allow Internet users to access blocked sites.

From IPP Media

The Tanzanian government has said that there is an on-going crackdown against people who possess pornographic materials.

The Deputy Minister for Information, Culture and Sports, Daniel Nsanzugwanko said that a person found guilty of possessing pornographic material in any form was liable to a two-year jail term or a 200,000/- fine. He said that his ministry, in collaboration with that of Public Safety and Security, was conducting an operation to wipe out the pornography business in Tanzania.

Nsanzugwanko said the operation was there to stay and had already borne fruit as eight people had been taken to court. The business is done in a very secret manner between the buyer and the seller. This makes it difficult to net the culprits, he said.

Nsanzugwanko said he was optimistic that the war against pornography would be won because experts who were conducting the operation were quite experienced and innovative.

He called upon the general public to support the government in its war on pornography by revealing the shops or people who sold the illicit material.

From the International Herald Tribune

Thailand's new military-appointed government is threatening to shut down an operatic version of Asia's classic Ramayana epic, ostensibly over fears one of its scenes may bring bad luck, the opera's composer said.

The opera, Ayodhya, premiered Thursday night and is scheduled for a repeat performance on Saturday, albeit with the 'offensive' scene toned down after pressure from Culture Ministry officials.

The composer, Somtow Sucharitkul, said that ministry officials approached him a few days before the show's opening to complain about a scene involving the on-stage death of a key character, the demon-king, Thotsakan.

The officials, whom Somtow did not identify, said that portraying Thotsakan's death on stage was taboo in Thai culture and would be a "bad omen".

Somtow said the officials told him that: If anything happened to anyone in power in Thailand, it would be blamed on this production."

The idea that depicting death will bring misfortune is usually applied to traditional Thai masked dramas known as "khon," according to theater scholars. It is not known to exist in other Asian countries.

Somtow and the opera's stage director, Hans Nieuwenhuis of the Netherlands Opera Studio, agreed to modify the scene so that the audience would not actually see the character die, though "not a note or word of the libretto was changed," Somtow said.

The following day, however, the ministry sent over a new contract including a broad clause saying that if anything in the opera offended the morals of Thailand, they had the right to close down the opera immediately, said Somtow, who signed it

From IFEX

Singapore, a city-state with some of the world's strictest controls on free expression and assembly, plans to tighten laws governing the Internet and public gatherings. The Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA) and Reporters Without Borders (Reporters sans frontières, RSF) have expressed concern about the proposed amendments, which are part of a penal code review.

Under the suggested amendments, bloggers and other Internet users could face prison sentences or fines for defamation, making "statements that cause public mischief" and "wounding" of racial or religious feelings. Documents, including film and sound recordings, sent over the Internet could also be subject to criminal prosecution.

The amendments, which include a provision making it an offence for anyone outside the country to abet an offence committed within the country, would allow the authorities to prosecute Internet users living abroad.

Also of concern to SEAPA and RSF is a proposed amendment to strengthen limits on "unlawful assembly." Outdoor gatherings of more than four people already require a police permit. The amendments would give the government more power to act against public gatherings as it would no longer have to prove in court an intention to cause a disturbance.

The proposals will come before parliament at the beginning of 2007. RSF recently ranked Singapore 146th out of 167 countries in its 2006 Worldwide Press Freedom Index.

Based on an article from Press Release Network

The leader in online identity protection software and services, today announced the launch of Operation Anti-Censorship. This new privacy software, created specifically for UK & Chinese citizens, will enable safe access to the entire Internet by circumventing the Web filters put in place by the government. In addition, the new solution protects users from detection, persecution, and retribution by shielding their personal identities and related information that the UK & Chinese governments are currently able to monitor.

Citizens of China can download the free software today at www.xifuchun.com. Citizens of the UK may use www.anonymizer.com. The success of this program relies heavily on word-of-mouth promotion, and "Tell a Friend" functionality has been added to the site. All people are encouraged to share the news about Operation Anti-Censorship with their friends and family. Bloggers, reporters, and other media outlets are also urged to spread the word by promoting this Web site today.

Lance Cottrell, president and chief scientist, of Anonymizer Inc said: Our goal is to make the Internet an even playing field for everyone, including those under the rule of repressive regimes. We've had great success in other areas of the world, including our current work in Iran, and we're looking forward to bringing safe Internet access to others.

The Web site that currently hosts the software download is www.xifuchun.com, however please note that this URL will be changed on a regular basis to avoid blocking by the UK & Chinese governments. Anonymizer relies on early adopters to share the regularly changing URLs with their friends and family members so the number of people able to safely access the Internet continues to grow.

From the Bangkok Post

The Thai National Legislative Assembly (NLA) yesterday approved in principle a bill which will allow the state to punish people responsible for computer-based crimes including data theft and the dissemination of pornographic materials. A vetting committee is set to scrutinise the bill in seven days.

The bill, accepted by the NLA in a 170 to 4 vote, is sponsored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Ministry. It seeks imprisonment and fines for those found guilty of crimes of theft and destruction of data, dissemination of falsified data, and of pornographic materials. For example, someone forwarding a pornographic email could be sentenced to up to three years in jail and fined up to 10,000 baht if found guilty under the new law.

The bill will govern the use of not only computer-based communications but also devices capable of similar functions including mobile phones.

However, assembly members raised concerns that the legislation should also protect individuals' rights and curb the authority of officials who regulate communications.

Assemblyman Chalongphob Sussangkarn said the legislation should punish only those who intentionally commit an offence. The stipulated 30-day seizure of computers belonging to offenders, and confiscation of relevant equipment and data should also not be based on officials' judgement only, he said.

Another NLA member, Viriya Namsiripongpan, suggested officials be forced to seek a court warrant before making any seizures to prevent unfair treatment.

Assemblyman Borwornsak Uwanno suggested the bill be widened to cover ''improper'' content uploaded to overseas servers and the spread of internet messages originating from overseas-registered domains which offend the monarchial institution.

Another member, Kanchana Silpa-archa, said measures should be put in place to control internet cafes where users need not identify themselves.

From Asian Sex Gazette

Malaysian government leaders have rebuked a local newspaper for publishing a frank expose of sexual attitudes among the country's youth.

The Weekend Mail gave detailed descriptions of favorite sex positions from its survey that delivered on its front-page promise: "You'll be shocked."

I received endless calls and SMS over the articles, Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak told a ruling-party meeting Sunday.

The minister for women, family and community development called the feature irresponsible and "downright vulgar."

The New Straits Times Press Bhd, which prints the Weekend Mail and The Malay Mail daily, apologized unreservedly for the stories and said it would question the editors. The articles were offensive and distasteful, the publisher's chief executive, Syed Faisal Albar, said in the apology displayed on the front page of The Malay Mail on Monday.

From BBS News

The Sudanese government is engaged in an increasingly blatant effort to muzzle and intimidate Sudan's independent press, Human Rights Watch said today.

While international media attention has been focused on Darfur, the Sudanese authorities in Khartoum have been stepping up their harassment of Sudanese journalists and newspapers, said Peter Takirambudde, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. The harassment is symptomatic of Khartoum's fear of mounting popular dissent and frustration at government policies and actions.

In recent months government security forces have carried out numerous acts of censorship, arrests of journalists, and arbitrary inspections of newspaper offices and printing presses.

Since the beginning of 2006 at least 15 Sudanese and foreign journalists have been arrested and detained, and since September the security forces have resumed the practice of pre-print inspections of newspapers in an apparent effort to censor sensitive news. In some instances editions of newspapers have been banned altogether.

In September, newspaper editors were warned not to cover the violent police actions against anti-government demonstrations which took place in Khartoum on August 30 and September 6 following the announcement of price increases for fuel, sugar and other basic goods.

The government also imposed a ban on reporting or comment on the case of Mohamed Taha Mohamed Ahmed, the editor of the Islamist al-Wifaq newspaper, whose decapitated body was found on September 6, a day after he was abducted by a group of armed men from his home in Khartoum.

In addition Sudanese security services have routinely restricted the international and Sudanese media's coverage of the conflict and humanitarian crisis in Darfur. Even once they have obtained visas for Sudan, international media face increasing restrictions on their travel to Darfur and their ability to move freely and interview individuals in the region.

From the Bangkok Post

Government bans on a number of websites that posted criticisms of the Sept 19 coup d'etat violate the basic right of freedom of expression and should be lifted, website operators said yesterday. Somkiat Tangmano, webmaster of the Midnight University website, said the censorship or ban on websites should not be based on the judgements of just a few people.

The university's website was recently closed by an order issued by the Information and Communications Technology Ministry (ICT) under martial law, said Somkiat.

The ICT imposed the ban as it was told by the junta to ban political webboards found to contain provocative messages.

Somkiat and webmasters of other websites which were closed in the aftermath of the coup yesterday criticised the ban during a seminar on the freedom of electronic media organised by the National Human Rights Commission.

Sombat Bunngarm-anong, webmaster of www.19.sep.net, praised online media sources for performing their tasks well during the coup d'etat.

Jiranut Premchaiporn, webmaster of www.prachathai.com, said freedom of expression was a fundamental right of the people and that her website was launched as an alternative for people to receive information during the rule of the Thaksin government.

A representative from True Internet Co said the National Telecommunications Commission should regulate websites. The ICT has shut down several websites but has failed to sufficiently justify any of the closures, she said.

From the BBC

A list of 13 "enemies of the internet" has been released by human rights group Reporters Without Borders (RSF). The list consists of countries that RSF believes are suppressing freedom of expression on the internet.

For the first time, Egypt has been added to the list while Nepal, Libya and the Maldives have all been removed. On a visit to Libya, Reporters Without Borders found that the Libyan internet was no longer censored although it still considers President Maummar Gaddafi to be a "predator of press freedom".

The civil liberties pressure group has organised a 24-hour protest, inviting web users to vote for the worst offending countries.

Visitors to the RSF website are also invited to leave a voice message for Yahoo's co-founder Jerry Yang, expressing their views on the firm's involvement in China. RSF has been outspoken in its condemnation of Yahoo. The search engine has been criticised along with other companies for helping the Chinese authorities block access to some online material.

Egypt is a new entrant and has been shortlisted for its attitude to bloggers rather than specific web censorship, said RSF: Three bloggers have been arrested and detained this year for speaking out in favour of democratic reform. This is an appeal to the Egyptian government to change its position.

From The Independent

Turkey's prime minister met with representatives of trade unions and other non-governmental organizations yesterday  to listen to suggestions for possible changes to an article in the country's penal code that has been used to charge dozens of writers, journalists and academics for expressing their opinions.

The meeting was held just three days before the European Union is to issue a report reproaching the country for dragging its feet on reform and failing to meet minimum human rights standards.

The government indicated this week that it could change the problematic article 301, which has been used to prosecute this year's Nobel prize-winner, Orhan Pamuk, and novelist Elif Shafak on charges of insulting "Turkishness."

Charges against Pamuk were dropped over a technicality earlier this year, and Shafak was acquitted.

If there are certain problems that arise from the abstractness of article 301 of the penal code, we are open to suggestions to make the article more concrete, Erdogan told reporters at the start of the meeting.

Erdogan, however, reiterated his belief that the problem did not arise from the article itself, but with the way it has been interpreted by some prosecutors. The government has long argued that, despite the trials, no one has ended up in prison for expressing opinions.
 

From EU Observer

Freedom of speech in Turkey is not guaranteed, the European Commission has said in a key progress report on Turkey's application to join the EU.

The report is highly critical of restrictions on freedom of speech in the EU candidate country – targeting in particular the notorious article 301 of Turkey's recently adopted penal code, which penalises insults against "Turkishness".

The prosecutions and convictions for the expression of non-violent opinion under certain provisions of the new Penal Code are a cause for serious concern and may contribute to a climate of self-censorship in the country.

Freedom of expression in line with European standards is not yet guaranteed in the present legal framework, Brussels concludes in the document.

From the BBC

A bill of rights for the internet age has been proposed at a United Nations' conference in Athens. The bill would update and restate rights that have been enshrined for centuries, said Robin Gross of civil liberties group IP Justice.

An internet bill of rights has been proposed many times in the last two decades but few concrete steps to enshrine such a bill have been taken.

Professor Stefano Rodota, former head of the Council of European Data Protection Agencies, and a leading campaigner for a bill of rights said it was needed because the net was a "place of conflict": The internet is the widest public space in the history of mankind. It must remain the place to give citizenship and democracy new opportunities.

Professor Rodota said the bill must be created from the bottom up, by individual users, rather than top down from government: The internet bill of rights can not be the product of foreign ministers drafting in security to be introduced to a body like the UN for final approval.

From WSWS

Censorship of filmmakers, artists and writers is escalating in Sri Lanka in line with the Rajapakse government’s intensification of its war against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

In a recent case, the Sri Lanka Ruphavanini Corporation (SLRC), the island’s state-funded television channel, cut dialogue from the weekly teledrama Sudu Kapuru Pethi (White Camphor) early last month and a few days later axed the series entirely, claiming it “disgraced” the military.

The then SLRC chairman Newton Gunaratne told the media the television show had insulted the security forces. Some parts of this teledrama bring disgrace to these soldiers and their self-respect, he claimed. Gunaratne, however, made no attempt to substantiate his claims.

Last month’s axing of Sudu Kapuru Pethi was equally arrogant and provocative. SLRC management did not even bother to tell director Athula Pieris that dialogue had been cut from his show. He only learnt about it during the broadcast of its tenth episode on September 3.

When Pieris protested this violation, management “suggested” he re-edit the entire program. He refused and the show, which had another 13 episodes to run, was summarily cancelled.

The cancellation of Sudu Kapuru Pethi foreshadows further assaults on democratic rights. As it widens its deeply unpopular war, the Rajapakse government is determined to silence any opposition. In this case, the suggestion that ordinary Tamils and Sinhalese share common problems and concerns was enough to provoke the ire of those who are deliberately stoking communal hatreds.

From Gawker

When a user flags a YouTube video as inappropriate, they're presented with five potential reasons (all exclusive of copyright complaints, which are handled separately). The available flavors of naughtiness are "Sexually explicit," "Mature (over 18 only) content," "Other terms of use violation," "Graphic violence," and the recently added "Hate speech." Some of these flags, especially the "Mature" variety, can just result in a clip getting an interstitial warning -- users will henceforth see a screen asking them to confirm their willingness to wallow in the evil video before it plays. Those that fail the appropriateness test completely get deleted. Supposedly, any flagged clip will be reviewed within 24-48 hours.

Activist video flagging got a little attention a couple weeks back when YouTube inadvertently incited a miniature ideological jihad between conservative and liberal blogger types. Fan favorite Michelle Malkin had one of her videos pulled after unfriendly YouTube users flagged it as "inappropriate." Crying censorship, or at least inappropriate censorship (the irony!), other conservative bloggers retaliated by fanning out across YouTube and flagging clips that represented viewpoints they didn't like. You can guess what happened next. Retaliatory flagging has quickly become a standard practice to sabotage your opponents or just piss them off. It wouldn't be surprising if our Ann Coulter clips were flagged and yanked by someone who just doesn't like Ann Coulter. We may just be the victims of friendly fire.

YouTube does not respond to requests for explanation when videos get pulled for inappropriate content, and there's no stated way to appeal the decision (let alone track or confront one's accusers/flaggers). Again, the situation's both different and inconsistent with copyright complaints, which sometimes involve formal notification before a clip gets pulled, and sometimes don't. Still, given YouTube's burgeoning presence and publicity, it's hard to imagine their censorship review department can afford to spend much time splitting hairs, content-wise, when faced with a 48-hour deadline to review every flag.

From Reuters
See the full list at RSF

The Restrictions on civil liberties due to the "war on terrorism" have undermined media freedom in the United States and Russia over the past year, journalists' rights group Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said.

RSF's 2006 Worldwide Press Freedom Index, a survey of censorship, intimidation and violence against journalists, found Finland, Iceland, Ireland and the Netherlands the most media-friendly. North Korea was last again.

Denmark fell from first last year to 19th after a Danish newspaper's publication of cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammad sparked Muslim outrage and threats against reporters.

The United States fell nine places to 53rd in the survey of 168 countries, on a par with Botswana, Croatia and Tonga. It came 17th when the index was first compiled in 2002.

Relations between the media and the Bush administration sharply deteriorated after the president used the pretext of 'national security' to regard as suspicious any journalist who questioned his 'war on terrorism', The zeal of federal courts which ... refuse to recognise the media's right not to reveal its sources, even threatens journalists whose investigations have no connection at all with terrorism, RSF said.

Russia also fell nine places, to 147th, in a year marked by the murder of journalist Anna Politkovskaya, who was fiercely critical of government policy, particularly of Moscow's campaign against the insurgents in Chechnya whom it calls terrorists.

France fell five places to 35th, partly due to an increase in searches of media offices and journalists' homes, RSF said.

The UK is 27th in the list and Thailand is 122nd.

North Korea, Turkmenistan and Eritrea remained the three most repressive countries, clocking up the highest scores. They were the only states to score more than 90 points last year but Iran, China, Burma and Cuba joined them this year.

From AsiaNews.IT

The Chinese government plans to register millions of Chinese Internet bloggers who are using the web to publish their views under a pseudonym, thus forcing them to subscribe to censorship from the central authorities. This was reported today by the official state media.

Under the new system, currently being assessed by legislators, users would be allowed to continue using their online pseudonyms to write their blogs, but must register with the authorities under their real names.

The real name requirement is an “unavoidable choice” if China wants to properly develop its blogging community, according to the head of the Internet Society of China, Huang Chengqing. The Internet Society of China is the state-controlled organisation in charge of developing the new monitoring system.

The government “acknowledges that the decision to register bloggers could create problems of privacy and free-speech concerns”.

Based on an article from IWPR

The Uzbek government has introduced new registration procedures in order to tighten its hold over the media, and has now extended its reach to the internet as well.

Last week, the cabinet of ministers signed off on a resolution requiring 'further improvement' of the procedures for media registration. In comments to state-run domestic media, Otkir Joraev, the deputy chief of the government's Print and Information Agency, explained that the internet needed to be included since in his view, the medium is often used to communicate calls for violent regime change, war, violence, terrorism, religious extremism and separatism.

As one media expert said, the Uzbek government has always regarded the internet as 'one of its most dangerous enemies'. For instance, one can be fined for looking at news websites that the government deems mendacious and hostile. The authorities strive to exert tight controls over access to foreign websites, and block any sites of which they disapprove. The government has recently started developing websites of its own, carrying news and analysis in a bid to fend off external criticism.

From The State

A report by Reporters Without Borders, says Cuban Internet cafes at hotels and the post office allowed mostly unfettered access to Web sites, even those considered 'subversive'. But prices were excessive and security warnings popped up when the names of well-known Cuban dissidents appeared on the screen.

With just 2% of its 11 million people online, Cuba has one of the lowest Internet usage rates in the world, according to Reporters Without Borders. The report said Cuba has 1/13th the Internet usage of Costa Rica, ranking it alongside countries such as Uganda and Sri Lanka.

Cuba currently depends on satellites for Internet service, which offer spotty and slow service to privileged Cubans who have access at work or have the $4.50 an hour it costs at post office Internet facilities.

The price amounts to several weeks' pay and is an effective method of controlling Internet access, said Julien Pain, head of Reporters Without Borders' Internet Freedom program.

Internet is widely available in hotels, but Cubans are prohibited from entering tourist hotels. At the post office, two services were available: a national intranet service which provided e-mail access and cost $1.50 an hour, and an unrestricted international web that cost $4.50.

Keyword trigger a warning flash on the Internet cafe computer, saying it would shut down for "national security reasons". The keyword detection program is installed on the Internet cafe computer and is not limited to internet access. Sure scares people off the web.

From The Scotsman

A British art expert was seized at a Moscow airport when border guards found satirical cartoons in his luggage depicting the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, naked.

Matthew Bown, owner of the Matthew Bown Art Gallery in London's Saville Row, was last night being held at the Sheremetyevo-2 airport. According to initial reports, guards spotted art works which he had bought at the Moscow Marat Gelman gallery the day before.

The pictures included cartoons depicting Putin, the president of the United States George Bush, the terrorist leader Osama bin Laden, the former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and a female suicide bomber.

Bown was prevented from getting on his flight while an inquiry assessed whether the images constitute "anti-government agitation". It was not clear whether he was actually under arrest.

From BBC & Buzzle

Vietnam's communist authorities have banned two newspapers from publishing for a month because of their reporting about the country's new bank notes.

The ministry of culture said the two papers published inaccurate information about alleged mistakes in the notes. It says the papers ignored government instructions to stop making the claims.

The Vietnamese press has run a series of stories about mistakes made in the printing of new notes and about some notes being the wrong size. Others focus on so-far unproven allegations that the son of the central bank governor made money from the printing contract.

The ministry of culture has decided that it has all gone too far and ordered two papers to stop printing for a month from next Wednesday. It is also considering further measures against the two newspapers, Thanh Nien and Tuoi Tre, which have become most vocal in criticising corruption and government failures.

Meanwhile Vietnam has been attempting to control the use of the internet by encouraging providers and users to spy on each other and turn informant if they suspect politically 'subversive' activity, according to a report by Amnesty International.

The communist regime has harassed, detained and imprisoned its citizens for expressing peaceful political views online, leading to widespread self-censorship among the Vietnamese. Owners of the country's hugely popular internet cafes have been described by the organisation Reporters Without Borders as 'police auxiliaries'.

Internet service providers in Vietnam are required to inform on web users; internet cafe owners are required to inform on customers; and web users are required to inform on sites that oppose the state. Laws ban web users from spreading information that causes 'harm to national security or social order'.

Cong Thanh Do, who uses the internet to promote democracy in Vietnam, was arrested on 14 August, accused of attempting to 'implement a terrorist plot to destroy the US General Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City'.

He spent 38 days in solitary confinement in a cramped cell, maintaining a hunger strike for the entire period. American officials said there was no evidence to support the allegation and he was released. Amnesty believes that the arrest of the 47-year-old - who lives in America and travelled to Vietnam regularly but is now barred - was aimed solely at punishing him for expressing his political views.

From The Times

The registrar of the Irish .ie internet domain extension has decided it must try to shield people from smut on the internet and, as a standard-bearing start, has banned use of the word “porn”.

A businessman who tried to register the Porn.ie domain name has been refused under Section 3.4 of .ie naming policy, which states that website addresses must not be offensive or contrary to public policy or generally accepted principles of morality.

According to both the Irish registrar of the .ie internet domain extension and the Companies Registration Office (CRO), the word “porn” is a danger to public morality.

The application to register Porn.ie was made by Stephen Ryan from Dublin: They aren’t saying the act of porn is offensive or immoral, they’re saying the word is. This baffles me for a number of reasons. How is a word immoral? The act of rape is immoral, but the word ‘rape’ isn’t. It’s the same with murder. Why doesn’t this logic apply to porn, whether or not they think porn is immoral?

The Companies Registration Office (CRO) refused Ryan’s application to register the word as a business name, telling him his request was being returned as the name “could be deemed to be offensive to others”.

Ryan said: It doesn’t make any sense. Porn is perfectly legal in Ireland. I don’t know why they feel that they should be outlawing it and I don’t know how they feel they should be allowed to. What do they want us to call it, dirty pictures?”

The IE Domain Registry (IEDR) defended its decision last week, saying it made group decisions on possibly controversial registrations. They said 10 applications for “porn” have been refused since September 2001. But the IEDR says it seems to be the only word refused so far under section 3.4 of the naming policy.

It is now drawing up a list of words that will not be considered for websites on the national .ie domain. The body said sites with names such as fuck.ie or cunt.ie would almost certainly be included.

From The Guardian

Iran's Islamic government has opened a new front in its drive to stifle domestic political dissent and combat the influence of western culture - by banning high-speed internet links.

In a blow to the country's estimated 5 million internet users, service providers have been told to restrict online speeds to 128 kilobits second and been forbidden from offering fast broadband packages. The move by Iran's telecommunications regulator will make it more difficult to download foreign music, films and television programmes, which the authorities blame for undermining Islamic culture among the younger generation.

The order follows a purge on illegal satellite dishes, which millions of Iranians use to clandestinely watch western television. Police have seized thousands of dishes in recent months.

The latest step has drawn condemnation from MPs, internet service companies and academics, who say it will hamper Iran's progress. Every country in the world is moving towards modernisation and a major element of this is high-speed internet access, said Ramazan-ali Sedeghzadeh, chairman of the parliamentary telecommunications committee.

A petition branding the high-speed ban as "backward and unprincipled" bearing more than 1,000 signatures is to be sent to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Scores of websites and blogs are censored using hi-tech US-made filtering equipment. Iran filters more websites than any other country apart from China.

The crackdown comes in an atmosphere of increasing restrictions on the media. Last week, Ahmadinejad launched a fierce attack on the head of the state broadcasting organisation, IRIB, which he blamed for stoking public fears about inflation. Iran's leading reformist newspaper, Shargh, was also closed last month.

From Stuff

Maori mystic Rua Kenana and colourful MPs Peter Fraser and Bob Semple were the best-known New Zealanders snared by sedition laws the Law Commission now wants wiped out.

In a consultation document released today the commission recommended seditious offences in the Crimes Act be repealed and not replaced.

A sedition charge was last used against Timothy Selwyn who in July was jailed for two months, after mounting an axe attack on the Auckland office of Prime Minister Helen Clark.

Ironically, sedition was used to jail Labour Party founding fathers Fraser and Semple in 1916, when they were seen as dangerous trade unionists undermining the state. Fraser's crime was calling for an end to conscription: It is time that the working classes of the different nations were rising up in protest against the ruling classes, he said. He served 12 months, recovering from the experience to in World War II become arguably the most respected of all New Zealand prime ministers.

The commission today gave six reasons for its recommendation:

• The legal profile of the offence was broad, vague, variable and uncertain. The meaning of "sedition" had changed over time.
• The present law invaded the democratic value of free speech for no adequate public reason.
• The present law fell foul of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.
• Seditious offences could be misused to impose a form of political censorship, and they have been used for this purpose.
• The provisions of sedition law have generally fallen into disuse, not only in New Zealand, but other jurisdictions studied. This was a policy indication the law was not needed.
• The law was not needed because elements of it that should be retained were more appropriately covered by other offences.

The commission is calling for submissions of its draft report which close on December 15.

From Turkish Weekly

From IFEX

The Egyptian Organization for Human Rights (EOHR)  expresses its deepest worries concerning the decision of the Egyptian Censorship Office to confiscate the book Modern Sheikhs and the Making of Religious Extremism by Dr. Mouhamed Fattoh, which constitutes a violation to freedom of opinion and expression as stipulated in Articles 47, 48 and 49 of the Egyptian Constitution,

The Egyptian Censorship Office raided the Madbouly bookstore and confiscated 280 copies of the book, claiming that the publisher had not acquired a license from the Islamic Research Council (IRC). There was no official court decision calling for the confiscation of the book. The book criticizes the IRC and its censorship of art and literature. The book also tackled the right of women to lead prayers, and the question of the separation of religion and the state.

Egyptian legislation grants the administrative authorities a wide range of powers and authority, such as banning publications and the distribution of printed materials. The Council of Ministries has the right to ban any foreign publication, or any book that may conflict with religion in a way that could disturb public security. Moreover, Law 40/1977 (Political Parties Affairs) grants the right to suspend political parties' newspapers, which constitutes another restriction to freedom of thought and belief, especially now when we need to open the doors of Ijtihad (personal interpretations of religion) to reform religious ideas and concepts.

Suggestions that the US and UK military may have gone to extreme measures to ensure that independent journalists didn't operate in Iraq during the invasion:

One of Britain's most experienced television correspondents was unlawfully killed by U.S. soldiers in Iraq, an inquest into his death ruled on Friday. Veteran war correspondent Terry Lloyd, 50, who worked for ITN, was killed in March 2003 in southern Iraq as he reported from the front line during the first few days of the U.S.-led invasion.

The driver of a minibus which took Lloyd to hospital, said Lloyd had been shot in the shoulder and his arm was broken from the initial exchange of fire but he had been able to walk to the vehicle. However, the driver said U.S. troops, possibly firing from a helicopter, had shot the journalist in the head while the vehicle was leaving the scene.

During the 10-day hearing, the inquest was also shown footage of the aftermath of the attack, taken by a cameraman attached to the unit accused of firing on Lloyd. A British Royal Military Police investigator said an expert estimated 15 minutes of film might have been cut from the beginning of the tape.

ITN bosses told the court that information might have been withheld about the incident, saying it was felt that both the U.S. and British military did not want "unilateral" journalists -- those operating independent of troops rather than embedded with them -- working in war zones. No U.S. soldiers agreed to appear at the inquest to give evidence.

When Chechen hardman Ramzan Kadyrov turned 30 last week, Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya said his birthday gift should be a criminal trial. Two days later, she was gunned down in her Moscow apartment building.

The high-profile murder of the crusading journalist has drawn increased scrutiny upon Kadyrov. The Kremlin favorite has brought visible improvements to Chechnya, still violent and wrecked by 12 years of war, but critics say he has gained power behind a phalanx of killers and thugs.

Politkovskaya's newspaper on Thursday published an unfinished article on torture in Chechnya that the journalist was writing when she died.

The article in Novaya Gazeta, accompanied by graphic images taken from a video, described the alleged torture by Chechen security services of two young men branded terrorists. Many Chechen security personnel are under Kadyrov's control.

Kadyrov denied on Wednesday any involvement in Politkovskaya's murder, saying it was enemies trying to make him look bad. But less than a month ago he suggested she worked for "enemies of Russia," and he could not put to rest widespread accusations of abductions and abuse by security forces under his control.

Politkovskaya was among those critics who say that Kadyrov's brutal tactics might backfire against accomplishing Russia's goal of turning Chechnya into a stable, loyal subject.

Based on an article from Gulf Times

Indonesian lawmakers have amended controversial pornography legislation that would have jailed women for up to 10 years for showing their arms and legs, and banned public kissing and artwork depicting nudity.

The extremely repressive bill, pushed by Islamic-based political parties and which did not do much to combat the creation and distribution of pornography, caused public outrage and a national debate on Indonesia’s morals and religious values.

A special House of Representatives committee has completed a new version of the bill that members say is more amenable to women, artists and non-Muslims, The Jakarta Post reported.

Rustam Tamburaka, a committee member from the ruling Golkar faction, was quoted as saying traditional body-hugging Javanese attire for women and organ gourds worn by indigenous tribes in Papua were fine.

He also said the bill would not consider art exhibits depicting nudity or events like fashion shows as violating public morality.

Should this version of the bill be endorsed as it is, those models could stay in their professions without having to worry, Rustam said. However, it remained unclear whether articles banning women from wearing skirts or tank tops in public, or swimsuits on Indonesia’s countless beaches, were removed.

However, conservative Islamic political parties, backed by fundamentalist Muslim groups, continue to push legislation based on Islamic law, in hopes of turning Indonesia into an Islamic state by stealth.

Based on an article from Red Bolivia

A list of 13 rules of conduct for journalists in Somalia was issued after the head of the Islamic court's judicial administration, Sheik Hassan Osman, summoned representatives of all privately owned media in Islamist-held areas of Somalia.

The proposed rules forbid journalists from, among other things, reporting information deemed contrary to Islam and from participating in foreign-sponsored seminars or programs without the permission of the Islamic courts' information bureau.

Another rule states that the media may not use terms which, in the words of the courts, infidels use to refer to Muslims such as terrorists, extremists, etc.

The director of the Africa Desk for Reporters Without Borders, Leonard Vincent, says that although most of the rules are aimed at limiting freedom of the press, he finds one of the rules particularly troublesome. The second one says that the media must not disseminate information likely to create conflict between the population and the Islamic courts. That means any information that would be negative for the image that the Islamic courts have of themselves will be considered a crime. I mean, it is impossible to exercise journalism in these conditions. They believe that they are going to restore peace and justice in Somalia. But, in fact, they are going to just plunge Somalia into a blackout of information and into obscurity.

Vincent says it is not clear what type of punishment the Islamic courts would mete out for journalists who disobey the rules. But he says he believes the penalties would be harsh.

Based on an article from ANSA.it

A television prank which threatened to expose widespread drug use among Italian MPs has been banned from broadcast. It was due to be included in Le Iene (The Hyenas), a popular satire show.

The show secretly tested 50 lawmakers for drug use with the results showing that one in three had apparently taken drugs in the previous 36 hours .A total of 12 tested positive for cannabis and four for cocaine, according to Le Iene .

Amid parliamentary uproar over the prank, Italy's privacy authority intervened and ordered the piece to be deleted from the show . Le Iene pulled off the stunt by pretending to interview the parliamentarians about next year's budget .

As one of its reporters engaged willing MPs in conversation, a fake make-up artist secretly carried out drug-wipe tests on their foreheads . The sweat collected on the wipe was then tested for drugs in a method which Le Iene said was 100% foolproof .

Le Iene protested that the show would not have violated the privacy of the MPs because their faces and voices would have been masked during broadcasting .

Alessandra Mussolini, hard-right MP said the privacy regulator's decision amounted to censorship: This is a regime. Censorship of a journalistic investigation is something very serious which I will report to the European Parliament. If a politician takes drugs, then he or she should say so. Indignation suggests this phenomenon is even more widespread than Le Iene suggests.

Radical leader Daniele Capezzone, whose party is one of nine making up the centre-left government, also accused the privacy regulator of censorship: I respect the regulator but demand that the show go on. Privacy is important but freedom of information is even more so," said Capezzone, whose party is lobbying for drug liberalisation . He also accused parliament, which recently approved a crackdown on drugs, of hypocrisy .

Another government party, Italy of Values, also said the piece should be aired: For years, Le Iene has used hidden cameras to show up scams by plumbers, taxi drivers and others and no one has ever asked for these items to be censored. Why should it be any different for lawmakers?

Based on an article from China Daily

A Chinese county has banned of all its cyber cafes to supposedly help net-addicted youngsters.

The remote Fangshan County in North China's Shanxi Province closed down its seven net cafes in May after theyfailed to prevent under 18s from coming in.

The usual bollox of inline games and porn was blamed

The ban had both supporters and critics. Some parents and teachers in the county praised it.

Students who used to indulge in the Internet for hours a day have now returned to school, and are making progress in their studies, said He Xiaoqing, a teacher at the No 2 Middle School in Fangshan.

But some residents who often went to Internet cafes said the ban has made their daily lives inconvenient. Net cafes gave us a platform for communication and getting all kinds of information. Now, with every cafe closed down, our daily lives are less diverse, a citizen surnamed Zhang said on an online forum.

For some experts in law and sociology, banning all Internet cafes was not the best way to deal with the problem of protecting youngsters while at the same time developing the centres. The Internet is an indispensable part of a modern information society. The management of it involves a long-term effort including strict regulations and effective enforcement. A simple clampdown cannot solve all problems, Qiu Baochang, a lawyer with the Beijing-based Huijia Law Firm, told China Daily.

From the New York Times

A growing citizens’ movement is rallying against a 145-year-old law still embedded in the Indian penal code that bans gay sex.

An open letter to the government will call for the repeal of what is known by its official moniker, Section 377, which makes “carnal intercourse against the order of nature with man, woman or animal” punishable by 10 years in prison.  The letter is signed by an eclectic list of Indian writers, filmmakers, lawyers and other luminaries, including the author Vikram Seth, the actress Soha Ali Khan and a former attorney general of the Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party-led government, Soli Sorabjee.

In independent India, as earlier, this archaic and brutal law has served no good purpose,” the letter argues. “It has been used to systematically persecute, blackmail, arrest and terrorize sexual minorities. It has spawned public intolerance and abuse, forcing tens of millions of gay and bisexual men and women to live in fear and secrecy, at tragic cost to themselves and their families.

The statute is being challenged under a lawsuit brought in 2001 by a gay-rights advocacy group called the Naz Foundation, which argued that the law contravenes rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution, including equality, privacy and freedom of expression.

The case was initially thrown out by the Delhi High Court on the grounds that the foundation did not suffer as a result of the law and so had no legal standing to sue. The Supreme Court of India earlier this year tossed the case back, instructing the Delhi court to review the case on its merits. The next hearing is scheduled for Oct. 4.

Section 377 is rarely now used to prosecute gay adults engaged in consensual sex, lawyers and activists say, but it remains a whip with which to threaten, blackmail and jail suspected gay men and lesbians where they gather — in parks, bars and even, on occasion, on the Internet. Strictly speaking, the statute makes it illegal to distribute condoms to gay men or in Indian prisons.

From Scoop

The editor of an iconic New Zealand fashion magazine could find himself in court over an edition featuring images of a semi-naked girl sprawling among toys and pre-teens in provocative poses.

Pavement editor Bernard McDonald claims the photographs are "provocative" rather than pornographic, but child advocacy group ECPAT last week lodged a complaint with the censorship compliance unit claiming images of teenage and pre-teen girls in the magazine's latest issue were "legally objectionable".

Chief censor Bill Hastings said that while he did not want to pre-empt the outcome of any complaint, there was "definitely a prima facie case" over some of the pictures in Pavement's "Lost Youth - the 13th birthday special teen issue".

Under the 1993 Films, Videos and Publications Classification Act, an individual supplying a restricted publication (or even one "likely to be restricted") to someone under-age can be sentenced to up to three months in prison or a fine of $10,000. A company in breach of the law can be fined up to $30,000.

ECPAT chairwoman Maureen Crombie said Pavement's Spring issue pandered to an older male audience with soft child pornography. Crombie said the Pavement issue contained a 10-year-old wearing make-up and expressions that portray her "in a highly sexualised manner" and a semi-naked girl posing erotically among soft toys and dolls.

Hastings said: It doesn't matter what age the model is, if the accessories she is posing with are the toys of a young girl, the intent is surely to suggest that the model is very young. It doesn't matter if the model is an adult - if she looks underage, it's considered to be objectionable. However, one would have to take into account the dominant effect of the publication as a whole: the context, the text itself, who the target audience is, etc.

The 19-year-old model (in that shoot) also wrote the introductory piece, which, he said, put the photos "in context": Pavement is not a magazine for dirty old men in raincoats. If anyone bought it for salacious purposes they would be severely disappointed."

Red 11 model agency co-owner Amanda Betts said Pavement "always pushed the envelope", but she was comfortable with how her models were portrayed.

From Monsters & Critics

Vietnam's government is re-evaluating its strict regulations on internet cafes after protests from business owners who have largely ignored rules requiring monitoring of all users.

The decision, first reported in the state media, was a rare admission of failure in the government's attempts to limit access to pornography and political websites deemed 'hostile' to the communist regime.

Internet cafes were ordered last year to ask all users for identification and record their details under a joint decree by the ministries of Posts and Telecommunications, Public Security, and Culture and Information.

But officials admitted that only a tiny percentage of cybercafes have complied with the order, which also requires installation of software to track what websites users visit.

More than 90% of internet cafe owners in Ho Chi Minh City protested government orders that all patrons must show identification before using the internet, according to the Lao Dong (Labour) newspaper.

Another rule to require internet users under 14 to be accompanied by a guardian had only a little more support - 74% of cybercafe owners opposed that rule.

Vietnam's government firewall is ostensibly to protect users from pornography, but a recent study by the OpenNet Initiative found the vast majority of blocked websites were political.

From Torronto Sun

A shoeless, elderly drunk is tormented by a group of thugs who laugh hysterically as they douse his head with anti-freeze, drop his personal belongings into a storm sewer and knock him to his knees with a milk crate.

In another scene, a young man is dragged from his parked car and beaten repeatedly outside a liquor store; his head stomped into the pavement until he loses consciousness. One of his attackers steals cash from his pocket as he lies helpless in a parking lot.

Roll credits: It's Ghetto Fights 2, one of a series of DVDs that feature real home videos of violent street fights and group beatings, available at your local HMV, Music World and other retail outlets across Canada.

For anti-violence activists and police, these are America's Scariest Home Videos, graphic celebrations of street violence, gang culture, contempt for the law and antisocial behaviour.

They include Ghetto Fights, featuring bloody battles involving mostly young African Americans in a variety of U.S. cities. The series gets a personal endorsement by rappers Method Man and 50 Cent, the latter who is seen brandishing a pistol and aiming it at the camera.

While there's nothing new about violent, underground "reality" videos, their distribution and sale by major corporate players is a change, say industry watchers. For instance, Universal Music Canada and its partner, Navarre Canada, distribute Ghetto Fights and Wildest Street Brawls in that country.

The videos are a "constant seller" and continually on order by Canadian retailers, except in B.C. That province's film classification agency rated them as adult films, which means they can only be sold in adult-only stores, similar to pornographic movies, a spokesman said.

Valerie Smith, a Toronto-based anti-violence nutter at fradical.com, said controversial videos of the past, such as the infamous Faces of Death film, were typically sold by "fringe companies." For someone like Universal to be peddling this, that's outrageous, she said.

The DVDs are created by an obscure California-based film company called RF (Real Fight) Productions, which solicits video footage of violence on its website with an offer of up to $1,000.

As the site states, We are looking for video footage of real street brawls, gang footage, ultimate fighting/ fight club style video, extreme wrestling, girls wrestling, girls mud wrestling, or anything else really outrageous.

From Games.net

While sales of Capcom's gory zombie-killer Dead Rising have done remarkably well here in the United States, even with a Mature rating from the ESRB, in Japan where the game was recently released, copies of the games are hard to find, not because they're flying off the shelves but because stores are choosing not to display them.

As a result of recent changes to the rating system for videogames used in Japan, sales of Z-rated games - those that can only be sold to persons 18 years old and above - are being strictly enforced. Prior to the changes, ratings were used merely as guidelines to inform purchasers of the intended audience of a game.

Dead Rising is one of the first games to be released after the changes made to the rating system. Even with substantial editing of the content, including the removal of decapitations and dismemberment, Dead Rising's Z-rating has supposedly relegated it to being almost completely ignored by retailers for fear of the repercussions of selling the game to a minor.

From the Trinidad Express

No more play! That was the directive handed down to Surinamese playwright Sharda Ganga by the theater after she refused to remove three supposedly profane words from the script of her production, No More Stories, during its scheduled debut at the Port of Spain.

The theatre staff demanded that the well known playwright drop the scene containing the word 'fuck' and threatened to shut off the lights if she failed to comply.

I am shocked and confused, this is the first time in nearly 20 years of theatre that my play has been cancelled, an irate Ganga, who has staged productions in Mexico, Cuba, Holland, Curacao and St Kitts, said: This is censorship, I don't accept it in my country and I would not accept here. You can't judge a play on three words. This play represents three months of hard work in rehearsals by the actors and two months of writing by me before that.

During rehearsals Ganga was stopped and allegedly warned to remove the foul language from the play. Failure to comply, she was told, would see the lights being turned off during her production. The Dancehall Act of 1931 bars all cursing in public spaces and outlines a monetary charge and/or a jail sentence for such an offence.