|22nd March |
Petrol station CCTV set to check cars for tax and insurance before allowing petrol to be sold
See article from
Cameras at petrol stations will automatically stop uninsured or untaxed vehicles from being filled with fuel, under new UK government plans. Downing Street officials hope the hi-tech system will crack down on the 1.4million motorists who drive without
Automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras are already fitted in thousands of petrol station forecourts. Drivers can only fill their cars with fuel once the camera has captured and logged the vehicle's number plate. Currently the
system is designed to deter motorists from driving off without paying for petrol. But under the new plans, the cameras will automatically check with the DVLA's database.
Downing Street officials are due to meet representatives from the major fuel
companies in the next few weeks to discuss the idea.
Some petrol retailers said the proposals were a step too far - claiming they put cashiers at risk. Brian Madderson, from RMI Petrol said: This proposal will increase the potential for
conflict. Our cashiers are not law enforcers.
|9th March |
German police lose their warrantless access to people's cloud data
The German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) has ruled that certain provisions in the Federal Telecommunications Act concerning the disclosure of telecom user data to law enforcement agencies violate the German constitution.
Until now, German law enforcement authorities have had the authority to request data such as personal identification numbers or personal unlocking keys that protect access to devices or storage space on networks.
The current law allows law enforcement to request such data without stating specific conditions or the legal basis for complying with such a request.
According to the Court, however, because law enforcement authorities do not require this
type of data to carry out their duties, the current provisions in telecommunications law allowing these requests are not proportionate and thus violate the constitutional right to informational self-determination.
The Court requested that
the German legislature revise the relevant provisions of the German Federal Telecommunications Act by June 2013.
|8th March |
Firefox add-on to allow internet surfers to watch who is spying on them
article from dailymail.co.uk
|2nd March |
See article from
article from bigbrotherwatch.org.uk
Viviane Reding told the BBC that authorities found that transparency rules have not been applied .
The policy change,
implemented on 1st March, means private data collected by one Google service can be shared with its other platforms including YouTube, Gmail and Blogger.
Google said it believed the new policy complied with EU law. It went ahead with the changes
despite warnings from the EU earlier this week.
2nd March 2012. See
article from privacyinternational.org
Google wants to be able to provide an ID card equivalent for the Internet.
...Read the full article
|22nd February |
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's monitoring of social media services could be a threat to civil liberties and online free speech, several lawmakers said during
See article from mashable.com
|21st February |
3rd party websites can detect if visitors are logged into social networks
article from tomanthony.co.uk
|20th February |
Government revives mega-snooping plan on British internet and phone communications
article from telegraph.co.uk
Details of every phone call and text message, email traffic and websites visited online are to be stored in a series of vast databases under new Government plans. Landline and mobile phone companies and broadband providers will be ordered to store the
data for a year and make it available to the security services under the scheme.
The databases would not record the contents of calls, texts or emails but the numbers or email addresses of who they are sent and received by. For the first time, the
security services will have widespread access to information about who has been communicating with each other on social networking sites such as Facebook. Direct messages between subscribers to websites such as Twitter would also be stored, as well as
communications between players in online video games.
Rather than the Government holding the information centrally, companies including BT, Sky, Virgin Media, Vodafone and O2 would have to keep the records themselves. Under the scheme the security
services would be granted real time access to phone and internet records of people they want to put under surveillance, as well as the ability to reconstruct their movements through the information stored in the databases. The system would track
who, when and where of each message, allowing extremely close surveillance. Mobile phone records of calls and texts show within yards where a call was made or a message was sent, while emails and internet browsing histories can be matched to a
computer's IP address , which can be used to locate where it was sent.
Labour shelved the project - known as the Intercept Modernisation Programme - in November 2009 after a consultation showed it had little public support.
the same time the Conservatives criticised Labour's reckless record on privacy. A called Reversing the Rise of the Surveillance State by Dominic Grieve, then shadow home secretary and now Attorney General, published in 2009, said a Tory government
would collect fewer personal details which would be held by specific authorities on a need-to-know basis only .
But the security services have now won a battle to have the scheme revived. They are known to have lobbied Theresa May, the Home
Secretary, strongly for the scheme.
Sources said ministers are planning to allocate legislative time to the new spy programme, called the Communications Capabilities Development Programme (CCDP) , in the Queen's Speech in May.
|18th February |
CRB Vetting is Completely Out of Control
article from dailymail.co.uk
|13th February |
Camden council turns off CCTV speaker facility that threatens to report residents for using communal areas
article from liberalconspiracy.org
|6th February |
European Advertising Standards Alliance define new rules to inform web surfers that adverts they see are determined via snooping
See article from
When new rules governing the way companies collect and use data about our movements online come into force, a little i symbol will appear on screen to reveal adverts generated by cookies . Many internet users find these digital devices,
which are used by websites to create personal profiles based on use of the Internet, intrusive.
The data is used for Online Behavioural Advertising, allowing companies to direct their display adverts at individuals who, through the websites they
have visited, have indicated an interest in certain goods or services.
The warning system, to be introduced by the European Advertising Standards Alliance and the Internet Advertising Bureau of Europe, will allow users to opt out of all Online
like Yahoo!, have already begun using the triangle icon on a voluntary basis in Britain but from June all ad networks will be required to display the symbol or face sanctions.
|5th February |
British MPs note their concern about Google's plundering of private data
See article from
A small group of British MPs have signed up to an Early Day Motion voicing concern that Google are set to plunder user data for advert serving purposes.
The primary sponsor is Robert Halfon and the motion reads:
is concerned at reports in the Wall Street Journal that Google may now be combining nearly all the information it has on its users, which could make it harder for them to remain anonymous;
Google's new policy is planned to take effect on 1 March 2012, but that this has not been widely advertised or highlighted to Google's users and customers, who now number more than 800 million people;
and therefore concludes
that Google should make efforts to consult on these changes and that the firm should be extremely careful in the months ahead not to risk the same kind of mass privacy violations that took place under its StreetView programme, which the Australian
Minister for Communications called the largest privacy breach in history across western democracies.
The motion has been signed by
- Campbell, Gregory: Democratic Unionist Party Londonderry East
- Campbell, Ronnie: Labour Party Blyth Valley
- Caton, Martin: Labour Party Gower
- Clark, Katy: Labour Party North Ayrshire and Arran
- Connarty, Michael:
Labour Party Linlithgow and East Falkirk
- Corbyn, Jeremy; Labour Party Islington North
- Halfon, Robert; Conservative Party Harlow
- Hopkins, Kelvin; Labour Party Luton North
- McCrea, Dr William; Democratic Unionist Party
- Meale, Alan; Labour Party Mansfield
- Morris, David; Conservative Party Morecambe and Lunesdale
- Osborne, Sandra; Labour Party Ayr Carrick and Cumnock
- Rogerson, Dan; Liberal Democrats North Cornwall
- Vickers, Martin; Conservative Party Cleethorpes
- Williams, Stephen; Liberal Democrats Bristol West
|2nd February |
So why do iPhone and iPod keep an unencrypted file detailing your location over the last year? And why do they back it up on your computer?
See article from
See also iPhone Tracker application for download from
Security researchers have discovered that Apple's iPhone keeps a record of where you go -- and saves every detail of it to a secret file on the device which is then copied to the owner's computer when the two are synchronised.
contains the latitude and longitude of the phone's recorded coordinates along with a timestamp, meaning that anyone who stole the phone or the computer could discover details about the owner's movements using a simple program.
For some phones,
there could be almost a year's worth of data stored, as the recording of data seems to have started with Apple's iOS 4 update to the phone's operating system, released in June 2010.
Apple has made it possible for almost anybody -- a jealous
spouse, a private detective -- with access to your phone or computer to get detailed information about where you've been, said Pete Warden, one of the researchers.
Although mobile networks already record phones' locations, it is only available
to the police and other recognised organisations following a court order under the Regulation of Investigatory Power Act.
Warden and Allan have set up a web page which answers questions about the file, and created a simple downloadable application
to let Apple users check for themselves what location data the phone is retaining.
The Guardian has confirmed that 3G-enabled devices including the iPad also retain the data and copy it to the owner's computer.
|15th January |
Council sets up entry system to control and snoop on visitors to residential homes
See article from
After Newham in London, Aberdeen Council has introduced a video system that gives council staff first sight of every visitor to residential properties.
Previously the video entry system connected the person at the door with the property they were
trying to enter, and the person inside was able to see a video image of the person outside and, if they wished, remotely open the door.
Aberdeen Council has now written to residents informing them that they are going to change the system so it is
a council operator who controls access, and gets to see who is visiting you. The letter reads:
When a non-resident calls your flat from the entrance, the call would be diverted to a centralised control room, where we
will also monitor the current CCTV cameras in your building 24 hours a day. A member of staff from the control room would contact you directly and ask if you agreed to the non-resident being allowed access to the building.
a council official be able to see the visitors to your flat before you do? It's no business who you have into your own property and the last thing residents need is a council official scrutinising everyone they invite round for a cup of tea.
Following the intervention of
Big Brother Watc h, the council has confirmed that residents who do not wish their visitors to be seen by a council official in the control room will be able to opt-out of the system.
|14th January |
Revealing what smart meters get to know about electricity users
See article from
article from nakedsecurity.sophos.com
Researchers have found that so called smart electricity meters can be used to determine what TV programmes people are watching.
German researchers have been looking over meters from the company Discovergy. They found that the fluctuating
brightness levels of a film or TV show when displayed on a plasma-screen or LCD TV created fluctuating power-consumption levels. This creates a power/consumption signature for a film that might be determined from the readings obtained by Discovergy's
The researchers also found that Discovergy apparently allowed information gathered by its smart meters to travel over an insecure link to its servers. The information -- which could be intercepted -- apparently could be interpreted to
reveal not only whether or not users happened to be at home and consuming electricity at the time.
This was revealed during a presentation by researchers Dario Carluccio and Stephan Brinkhaus at the 28th Chaos Computing Congress (28c3) hacker
conference in Berlin late last month.
During the talk, entitled, Smart Hacking for Privacy , the researchers explained that they came across numerous security and privacy-related issues after signing up with the smart electricity meter
service supplied by Discovergy.
Because Discovergy's website's SSL certificate was misconfigured, the meters failed to send data over a secure, encrypted link - contrary to claims Discovergy made at the time before the presentation. This meant
that confidential electricity consumption data was sent in clear text.
In addition, the researchers discovered that a complete historical record of users' meter usage was easily obtained from Discovergy's servers via an interface designed to
provide access to usage for only the last three months. The meters supplied by the firm log power usage in two-second intervals. This fine-grained data was enough not only to determine what appliances a user was using over a period of time -- thanks to
the power signature of particular devices -- but even which film they were watching.
The researchers concluded that the two-second frequency of power readings was unnecessary for Discovergy's stated goals. One has to ask why the sample rate was
fast enough to determine customers viewing habits and what devices they are using and why a complete history of such information is being kept.
|9th January |
Track the movement of mobile phones in and around shopping centres
Shopping centres have triggered a Big Brother row after installing equipment that allows them to track customers using their mobile phone signals.
The technology has raised privacy concerns after it emerged that major shopping centre owner Land
Securities has installed it at ten of Britain's biggest malls.
These include the giant Cabot Circus, Bristol; Gunwharf Quays, Portsmouth; Princesshay, Exeter; Buchanan Galleries, Glasgow; Bon Accord & St Nicholas, Aberdeen; and The Centre,
Livingston. Malls using the FootPath system in the London area include One New Change and New Street Square in the City; Cardinal Place, Victoria; and The Galleria, Hatfield.
A tiny yellow sign in Exeter's Princesshay shopping centre is the only
warning customers receive that their mobile phone signal is being tracked by Footpath's scanners. There is no way to opt out except not to enter or to turn off your mobile
Path Intelligence, which developed the system in the UK, said it
includes safeguards to prevent spying on individuals and that no personal information is collected. Rather, it is designed to track people's movements to better understand what shops and services they find most interesting or useful.
of privacy and civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, said the law needs to be tightened to cope with new mobile phone tracking systems:
People are right to be worried that their mobile phones can be turned into
tracking devices very easily, without their permission or knowledge.
While we have been given assurances that the FootPath technology is not capable of capturing personal information or sending communications to people's phones,
other technologies which would allow this are available.
Such tracking and communications would be a significant intrusion on privacy.