The Financial Times reports that the U.K. is once again demanding that Apple create a backdoor into its encrypted backup services. The only change since the last time they demanded this is that the order is allegedly limited to only apply to British
users. That doesnt make it any better. The demand uses a power called a 'Technical Capability Notice' (TCN) in the U.K.s Investigatory Powers Act. At the time of its signing we noted this law would likely be used to demand Apple
spy on its users. After the U.K. government first issued the TCN in January, Apple was forced to either create a backdoor or block its Advanced Data Protection feature--which turns on end-to-end encryption for iCloud--for all U.K.
users. The company decided to remove the feature in the U.K. instead of creating the backdoor. The initial order from January targeted the data of all Apple users. In August, the US claimed the U.K. withdrew the demand ,
but Apple did not re-enable Advanced Data Protection. The new order provides insight into why: the U.K. was just rewriting it to only apply to British users. This is still an unsettling overreach that makes U.K. users less safe
and less free. As weve said time and time again , any backdoor built for the government puts everyone at greater risk of hacking, identity theft, and fraud. It sets a dangerous precedent to demand similar data from other companies, and provides a runway
for other authoritarian governments to issue comparable orders. The news of continued server-side access to users' data comes just days after the UK government announced an intrusive mandatory digital ID scheme , framed as a measure against illegal
migration. A tribunal hearing was initially set to take place in January 2026 , though its currently unclear if that will proceed or if the new order changes the legal process. Apple must continue to refuse these types of
backdoors. Breaking end-to-end encryption for one country breaks it for everyone. These repeated attempts to weaken encryption violates fundamental human rights and destroys our right to private spaces.
| 
