A
nightclub in Watford won permission to offer customers striptease and lap
dancing, despite the council's nutter aspirations to create a family
friendly town centre.
Members of Watford Borough Council said the decision to grant Vogue permission
to host adult entertainment felt like wearing handcuffs, tied by the
Licensing Act 2003.
Under the law, applications can only be rejected if they are judged to be in
violation of four licensing objectives. These are the prevention of crime
and disorder, public safety, the prevention of public nuisance and the
protection of children from harm.
Speaking against the application, Neil Fitton, of Elm Court, whimpered:
Because of the large number of people who already visit Watford to various other
establishments, I think this will cause additional visitors in an overcrowded
area where it could give rise to alcohol-related violence. Due to the nature of
activities, it could also give rise to intimidation and harassment of other
females that are out in town.
However, Julian Skeens, representing Opal Leisure and Neil Campbell, owner of
Vogue, offered to reduce the venue's maximum capacity to 150 people from 240,
and said it would not be a place where people get drunk, referring to its
minimum pricing policy for alcohol, where a beer costs £4.
Skeens revealed that at the venue, all patrons will be seated at all times, with
waiter service at the bar. There will also be private dancing booths and a VIP
area with a dancing pole, alongside the main stage.
Conditions were imposed on the licence. These include those contained in the
premises' operating schedule; a code of conduct for dancers drawn up by the
venue; that the licensee shall not allow distribution of flyers containing
photos or other images which suggest that strip tease or similar entertainment
takes place on the premises and which may be offensive; and the maximum capacity
of the premises shall be limited to 150 whilst adult dancing is taking place.
|