Switzerland's Supreme Court has dealt a blow to naked hikers as it sided with an eastern canton that fined a man for strolling unclothed through the mountains. The court was far from unanimous, with a verdict eventually reached by three votes to
two. Ultimately though, the Supreme Court ruled that the decision by canton Appenzell-Ausserrhoden to ban naked hillwalking was not unconstitutional. It is not arbitrary [on the canton's behalf] to consider naked hiking in public a gross breach
of decency and convention, the court said. The case began in Appenzell-Ausserrhoden in October 2009 when Local authorities fined a naked hiker 100 francs ($109), but the naturist refused to pay. His case was heard by the cantonal court
in Appenzell in May 2010. He admitted he had been hiking without clothes, a practice he said he had indulged in for two years, but denied he had been acting indecently. The judge acquitted him, arguing that the case was beyond the canton's jurisdiction
since the Swiss Penal Code regulates all crimes involving sexual integrity. But the prosecutor decided to take the case to the court of appeals, which disagreed with the acquittal, concluding it was the duty of the local authorities to uphold
public morality and ordering the man to pay 200 francs ($218) for indecent behaviour. It was this ruling that prompted the hiker to take the case to the Supreme Court.
|