eBay
has won a four-year legal battle with Tiffany over the jeweller's
complaint that the online website amounted to a "rat's nest" auction of
counterfeit watches, bracelets and necklaces.
A judge in New York ruled yesterday that eBay could not be held
responsible for policing the contents of its site, and that it was
Tiffany's role to draw fake designer jewellery to the auctioneer's
attention.
The verdict is a relief to eBay which lost a similar case in Paris two
weeks ago when a French court ordered it to pay €38.6m (£30m) in damages
to the luxury goods manufacturer LVMH for allowing the sale of fake
bags, perfumes and designer clothes.
In a written ruling, US district judge Richard Sullivan said: Tiffany
must ultimately bear the burden of protecting its trademark. But he
said he was not unsympathetic to Tiffany's complaint, and hinted
that US law might need a fresh look: Policymakers may yet decide that
the law as it stands is inadequate to protect rights owners in light of
the increasing scope of internet commerce and the concomitant rise in
potential trademark infringement.
The dispute between eBay and the 170-year-old jewellery boutique dates
from June 2004 when Tiffany lost patience with the quantity of silver
merchandise available on the internet which claimed to bear its brand.
eBay did not deny that counterfeit items sometimes appeared on its site,
but argued it removed them swiftly whenever they were flagged up.
Update:
Appeal
14th August 2008
Jewelry giant Tiffany & Co. is appealing a recent federal court decision
that cleared eBay from responsibility for counterfeit items which appear
on the online auction site.
Update:
Fake L'Oreal products
17th May 2009
eBay has won an important legal case when a French court ruled that it
was not liable for the sale of fake L'Oreal products through its
website.
The Paris-based cosmetics company claimed not enough was being done to
crackdown on couterfeit goods sold on eBay.
Ebay had already lost similar cases in France brought by Hermes and
Louis Vuitton.
But today's ruling found that the internet giant had complied with its
obligations and acted 'in good faith' to tackle the problem of fake
goods.
Update:
Fake L'Oreal products on UK eBay
26th May 2009. See
article
from
google.com
A British court has ruled that eBay is not liable for bogus beauty
products sold on its Web site, dealing a blow to cosmetics company
L'Oreal's campaign against the online auction giant.
L'Oreal SA has taken eBay Inc. to court across Europe, suing in Britain,
Germany, France, Belgium and Spain over the sale of fake fragrances and
cosmetics on the site.
L'Oreal claims there is an increasing volume of counterfeit goods being
sold on eBay. The online auctioneer said negotiations between the
companies on the issue broke down because L'Oreal was being
unreasonable.
Justice Richard David Arnold ruled in London's High Court that eBay
Europe was not liable for trademark infringements committed by its
users.
|