My
Daughter's a Cocksucker is a 2006 US adult DVD by Bobbi Rinaldi
With Daisy Marie, Sierra Sinn, Vixen, Kylee King, Chloe Morgan, Carly Kaleb,
Megan Joy, Morgan Simpson and Mischa Mckinnon.
It was banned by the BBFC in September 2009.
The BBFC have now added an explanation for their ban:
My Daughter's A Cocksucker is an
explicit sex work featuring a number of very similar scenes in which
young women perform acts of fellatio on men (shot so their faces are not
seen) while frequently looking into the camera and asking questions of
the viewer such as are you proud of me now Daddy, Am I a good
little cocksucker daddy?, My older sister isn't as good as this,
is she daddy? Mommy taught me well, Am I good enough to teach the
little sister? and are you jacking off to your little princess?.
The female performers also make comments to the viewer such as Daddy
always likes it when I choke , Daddy told me to do it just like
this and Daddy always said a wet blow job's the best blow job.
The context makes it clear that Daddy is
being used to refer to a familial relationship and not as mere term of
endearment for an older lover. The Board's judgement is that in this
work the dialogue encourages the male viewer to be aroused by, among
other things, the idea of instructing and watching his daughter in the
act of fellatio. This effect is potentially heightened by the
implication that the daughter also finds this paternal interest
arousing. The Board has concluded that such sequences constitute
material (including dialogue) likely to encourage an interest in
sexually abusive activity (for example, paedophilia, incest or rape)…
The work also features a number of sequences
(including in the bonus scene, which does not feature dialogue of
the nature described above) in which women gag and choke during deep
throat fellatio while their heads are firmly held by the male
performer, preventing them from easily ending the activity. The evident
discomfort of the female performer is presented as, at best, an
irrelevance or, at worst, as a feature designed to heighten the arousal
of some viewers. In the view of the Board these sequences also
constitute material […] likely to encourage an interest in sexually
abusive activity.
It is therefore the Board's carefully
considered view that to issue a certificate to this work, even if
confined to adults and supplied to them only in licensed sex shops,
would be inconsistent with the Board's Guidelines, would risk potential
harm and would be unacceptable to the public. The Board considered
whether its concerns could be dealt with through cuts. However, it
concluded that a central concept of the work was unacceptable and that
the cuts required to remove all the unacceptable content would be
extensive.
