Keith Vaz meanly outed as a buyer of sex by the Sunday Mirror
||7th September 2016 |
5th September 2016. See
article from theguardian.com
See article from lawandsexuality.wordpress.com
article from thesun.co.uk
Keith Vaz use to feature frequently on Melon Farmers due a series of ludicrous whinges blaming video games for all Britain's ills. He has wisely kept quiet on the topic for the last few years though.
Now he has rather rudely been by outed as a gay
customer of sex workers by the Sunday Mirror. This rather conflicts with his chairmanship of the influential Commons Home Affairs parliamentary select committee which is looking into Britain's laws governing sex work.
He conceded on Sunday that he
would have to relinquish his post as chair committee, at least temporarily. Although he said he would not be making a formal announcement until he meets the committee on Tuesday, he effectively confirmed that he would have to stand aside when he issued a
statement saying he did not want to be a distraction .
The Labour MP also condemned the conduct of the Sunday Mirror, saying it was deeply troubling that a national newspaper should have paid individuals who have acted in this way .
Vaz has not been overly hypocritical about sex work law, it is not as if he has been pushing for the criminalisation of people who buy sex. In its interim report on prostitution in July, the home affairs committee said:
We are not yet convinced that the sex buyer law would be effective in reducing demand or in improving the lives of sex workers, either in terms of the living conditions for those who continue to work in prostitution or the
effectiveness of services to help them find new ways to earn a living.
Evaluations of the impact of sex buyer laws are largely based on data about street prostitution, and therefore offer little insight into the large parts of the
sex industry which take place in various indoor environments, and there are indications that the law can be misused to harass and victimise sex workers, who are the very people whom the law is seeking to protect.
Vaz also argued in
parliament that poppers should not be included in a list of substances banned by the Psychoactive Substances Act and in the paper he is quoted as telling the escorts that he did not use them himself.
Chris Ashford in his
lawandsexuality blog points out that the Vaz evening of fun was not particularly unusual amongst the gay
It actually doesn't sound like that unusual night for many gay men who might engage in group sex bareback encounters, with some guys using class A drugs, many using poppers and perhaps some guys there who
are sex workers (who may or may not be performing that identity). The problem here is that Vaz is married to a woman and has as Pink News noted , apparently been outed by this story. Vaz has generally taken liberal positions on sex work and so there's
arguably no hypocrisy there.
However Journalist and equality campaigner Paris Lees
commented to thesun.co.uk that Vaz was not totally above a bit of hypocrisy when
he grilled her as chainman of the Home Affairs committee. She said:
This is same Keith Vaz who told me, last May, that he 'couldn't believe' I'd never met a prostitute that hadn't been forced into it.
I told him that during my time on the game, I never met a prostitute who HAD been forced into it.
Why is he paying prostitutes for sex if he thinks they are forced into it?
Offsite Comment: The outrage against Keith Vaz is nothing but Victorian puritanism
6th September 2016. See
article from politics.co.uk by Ian Dunt
He has a range of views on a range of topics. Some of them, like his obsession with violent games, are very silly. Some are downright morally reprehensible, such as his help in whipping up outrage against Salman Rushdie over the Satanic Verses. Some are
perfectly commendable, such as his continued commitment to people lost and betrayed by the asylum and immigration system.
Regardless of their relative validity, they earned him enemies, who will now get involved in picking away at
the remnants of his career. Not the least of these will be anti-prostitution groups, who were dismayed by a recent home affairs committee report which recommended decriminalising sex work completely. They are likely to use the story to discredit that
See article from politics.co.uk
Keith Vaz's sex life does not matter
7th September 2016. See article from medium.com
In the wake of the news there are a lot of people saying uninformed shit. People who weren't there trying to rewrite Home Affairs Select Committee's hearings on prostitution. I was called to give evidence. Maybe you remember; it was in a lot of papers.
Here is what really happened back in May.
All media coverage from May noted how me and @ParisLees had to stomp hard on bullshit lines of questioning from hostile MPs to get any of our points across. We went there fully expecting,
and pretty much got, a beasting. Compare to the easy questions lobbed at Kat Banyard at the first hearing, who was never a sex worker and has never worked with a prostitution charity or outreach...as far as anyone can tell, her only firsthand experience
with sex workers is having met me in a BBC green room once.
When I called out the committee for visiting Sweden and Denmark without meeting local sex worker-led orgs, Keith Vaz had the audacity to claim that they had. I know he
was wrong; sex work organisations were shut out of the consultation visits. Why? Because Vaz had been a vocal supporter of the Swedish model. Now people are trying to imply Vaz gave us a helping hand in the results? As if.
...Read the full
article from medium.com
Update: Banned from Parliament
1st November 2019. See
article from politicshome.com
Keith Vaz has been banned from Parliament for
six months -- but could still stand for Labour in December's snap election.
The Committee on Standards recommended the record suspension after Mr Vaz was found to have offered to buy cocaine for two male escorts
The Standards Committee
report into Mr Vaz said there was compelling evidence he offered to pay for a class A drug and paid for sex.
Nutter MPs, perhaps too quick to believe everything they read in the Daily Mail, ludicrously accuse Google of not blocking child abuse images
|1st June 2013 |
See article from
See also anyone
you see demanding that Google should be doing more to block child porn hasn’t got the first fucking clue what they’re talking about. from ministryoftruth.me.uk
Vince Cable, the business secretary, has said Google and other internet companies must be more proactive about policing content. He has become the first cabinet minister to intervene over the supposed shocking availability of illegal child abuse
images online, urging Google to take more action to police explicit material. He spouted:
I think probably where there is some scope for taking action is getting the companies that host these sites, Google and the rest
of it, to be more proactive in policing what is there.
A senior Google spokesman angrily denied it does not take appropriate action to remove illegal and extreme material from its search results. He explained that Google is regularly
sent lists of illegal abuse sites and search terms from the industry-funded body, Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), which it then bans. The company said it had an internal structure operating around the clock to tackle these images.
Google's director of communications outside America, said:
The SafeSearch filter, which is designed to prevent sexually explicit material of all kinds from showing up in your search results, should not be conflated or
confused with our dedication to keeping illegal abuse imagery out of our products. We don't rely simply on filtering technology to block child abuse images; we go beyond that.
We are very proactive and work with the right people,
including the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children in the US and the IWF, to keep child abuse content off all of our sites. Any implication we aren't doing anything or we refuse to be part of removing this material is wrong.
Keith Vaz, chair of the Commons home affairs select committee, similarly chipped in that he was appalled that child abuse images were so readily accessible online and urged the government to adhere to a commitment to establish a
code of conduct with internet service providers:
The Mark Bridger case has shown that we need to act to remove such content from the internet. The committee has in the past recommended that the government establish a
code of conduct with internet service providers to remove material which breaches acceptable behaviour standards. I am very disappointed that although the government said it would engage with the industry on this issue, we are yet to see any action
resulting from this.
Meanwhile the IWF have reported low numbers of sites and views of illegal material, but have indicated an unsurprising reluctance to report child abuse images. Presumably massive reactions to the crime create the
perception that those reporting it may get risk getting caught up in fallout.
Apparently more than 1.5 million internet users in the UK mistakenly viewed child abuse images online last year, according to the IWF -- but only 40,000 items were
reported to its hotline. Google and other companies block around 1,000 sites over illegal sexual abuse imagery in a list compiled by IWF.
Have 1.5 million adults really “stumbled across” online child porn? from
Keith Vaz asks in Parliament whether Anders Breivik's use of video games for combat training will result in further restrictions
|23rd May 2012
See article from
House of Commons, Questions re Culture, Media and Sport, 16th May 2012.
Keith Vaz (Leicester East, Labour)
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport whether his
Department has any plans to place further restrictions on the content of video games following the testimony of Anders Breivik.
Edward Vaizey (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Culture, Communications and
Creative Industries), Business, Innovation and Skills; Wantage, Conservative)
The Government is currently moving towards strengthening the laws in respect of video game regulation. We have recently announced our intention to
designate officers of the Video Standards Council as the authorities responsible for the classification of video games. When that process is complete, it will for the first time be a legal requirement for all video games suitable for those aged 12 or
over to be classified. It will be an offence to supply a video game in breach of its classification. In addition, there is one extra safeguard in the UK that is not part of the general Pan European Games Information scheme that we will be using: in the
UK, there will be the option of refusing classification where a video game cannot fit within the published PEGI criteria. If a game that |s not exempt has no classification, it will be an offence to supply it to anyone.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport how many representations his Department has received from the Pan European Game Information Service in relation to newly-published video games.
The Pan European Games Information system is the mechanism by which video games are rated. The bodies that implement the scheme are independent of Government and have not made
any representations about newly-published video games
|30th April |
Recommended by Keith Vaz in yet another parliamentary EDM
See article from
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 is available at UK Amazon
Early day motion 3014: VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES (No. 2)
Primary sponsor: Keith Vaz
That this House is reminded of the consequences of the ineffectual Pan European Game Information (PEGI) classification
system for video games following the testimony of Anders Breivik about the tragic events in Norway in July 2011;
notes that in his submission of evidence to the court Breivik describes how he trained for the attacks using the video game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare ;
is disturbed that Breivik used the game
to help hone his target acquisition and the suggestion that the simulation prepared him for the attacks;
is concerned that PEGI as a classification system can only provide an age-rating and not restrict ultra-violent
content; recognises that in an era of ever-more sophisticated and realistic game-play more robust precautions must be taken before video games are published; and
calls on the Government to provide for closer scrutiny of
aggressive first-person shooter video games.
Bottomley, Peter Conservative Party Worthing West
Hopkins, Kelvin Labour Party Luton North
McDonnell, John Labour Party Hayes and Harlington
Russell, Bob Liberal Democrats Colchester
Vaz, Keith Labour Party Leicester East
|26th February |
Keith Vaz has a parliamentary knock at PEGI games ratings
article from parliament.uk
Keith Vaz has been casting doubt on PEGI ratings suggesting that these require further government scrutiny
As usual Vaz has voiced his concerns via an Early Day Motion 2761 in Parliament saying:
That this House notes that:
Tiga, the trade body representing independent UK video games developers, has come out in support of targeted tax relief for the games industry;
encourages tax relief for small and medium-sized
enterprises for its role in generating and safeguarding jobs, especially in these current difficult times;
remains concerned that regulation of the video games industry is lacking in comparison to other industries; is anxious
that the Pan European Game Information (PEGI) classification of video games is taken as seriously as the British Board of Film Classification by both retailers and shoppers;
wishes the public was more aware of the risks to
children and young adults;
and calls on the Government to place more scrutiny on the PEGI classification system.
The only signature supporting the motion so far is sponsor Mike Hancock.
|12th February |
Keith Vaz has another knock at the Top Gear Christmas Special about a trade mission to India
See article from
Keith Vaz has had another knock at the Top Gear Christmas Special that featured a few jokey comments about India.
Vaz has tabled an Early Day Motion in Parliament saying:
That this House is deeply concerned by recent events
which have served to undermine the excellent relationship between India and the UK;
notes that the Top Gear India Christmas Special, featuring the unhelpful comments of Jeremy Clarkson and Dow Chemicals' sponsorship of the London 2012 Olympics in particular have had a very negative reaction in India;
is concerned that Indian student applications to UK universities are falling;
is disappointed by Britain's failure to secure the fighter jet contract from India despite the efforts of
successive defence ministers;
and calls on the Government to re-energise this vital, special and enduring relationship which ought to be one of the closest and most beneficial in the world.
|19th January |
Keith Vaz kicks off yet another Early Day Motion to take a pot shot at video games
See article from parliament.uk
Early Day Motion 2606
Primary sponsor: Keith Vaz
Sponsors: Bob Russell
That this House is deeply concerned by recent research which suggests that frequently using the internet or videogames can have a
physical effect on the brain, similar to that of drugs or alcohol; notes that both neuronal connections between brain areas and brain functions including emotions, decision-making and self-control are affected; calls for further research to be conducted
into these serious findings; and further calls for the NHS to provide effective support to those who suffer from internet or gaming addictions.
|3rd December |
Keith Vaz calls for a debate on violent computer game censorship
article from theyworkforyou.com
Business of the House
House of Commons
1st December 2011
Keith Vaz (Leicester East, Labour)
Could we have a debate next week about the harmful effects of violent video games? Last
week, the university of Indiana published research that showed that regularly playing those games resulted in physical changes in the brain. At a time when parents are thinking of purchasing video games for Christmas, does the right hon. Gentleman not
think that it is important to hold a debate on this matter? This is not about censorship---it is about protecting our children.
George Young (Leader of the House of Commons, House of Commons; North West
I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman, and I know that this is an issue that he has pursued with vigour for some time. I cannot promise a debate next week. Home Office questions, I think,
will be held on 12 December, but in the meantime I will draw his concern to the attention of the Home Secretary.
Last week Game Politics pointed out that the research cited was in fact supported by the Center for Successful Parenting,
Indiana. This is in fact a nutter group with a website that is designed for parents to learn about the negative side effects of violent video. See article about
the cited research from melonfarmers.co.uk .
|24th November |
Inevitable parliamentary motion to whinge at the new video game, Modern Warfare 3
21st November 2012. See article from
Keith Vaz, perennial whinger about computer games has compiled his usual parliamentary motion call for more censorship of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3.
Early Day Motion 2427
Primary sponsor: Keith Vaz
Sponsors: Jeremy Corbyn, Alan Meale, Bob Russell*
That this House:
is deeply concerned about the recently released video game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 , in which players engage in gratuitous acts of violence against members of the public;
particular the harrowing scenes in which a London Underground train is bombed by terrorists, bearing a remarkable resemblance to the tragic events of 7 July 2005;
further notes that there is increasing evidence of a link
between perpetrators of violent crime and violent video games users; and
calls on the British Board of Film Classification to take further precautions when allowing a game to be sold.
Supported by Martin Caton, Mike Hancock, Kelvin Hopkins, Dr William McCrea, Sandra Osborne and David Simpson
24th November 2011. See
article from parliament.uk
Tom Watson gamely proposes to amend the Vaz EDM by replacing it entirely.
EDM Amendment 2427A1 - CALL OF DUTY 3
Primary sponsor: Tom Watson
Sponsors: Julian Huppert, Kerry McCarthy
That this House notes:
that the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) gave the video game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 an 18 classification, noting that 'the game neither draws upon nor resembles real terrorist attacks on the underground;
further believes that the game has an excellent user interface and challenges the gamers' dexterity as well as collaborative skills in an outline setting; and
encourages the BBFC to uphold the
opinion of the public that whilst the content of video games may be unsettling or upsetting to some, adults should be free to choose their own entertainment in the absence of legal issues or material which raises a risk or harm.
|27th January |
Handover of games censorship from BBFC to VSC delayed at least until September
Indecision over whether games featuring video content still need a BBFC certificate has temporarily derailed the implementation of PEGI ratings.
The handover from the BBFC to the VSC will not now occur until September at the very earliest.
A new government proposal states that interactive entertainment which features linear content (such as trailers) would require a BBFC rating. That means a game that features a video in it will need to have both a PEGI and BBFC label on the box.
UKIE representing UK games producers condemned the proposal, saying in a statement:
Any dual labelling is contrary to the principles that were established in having PEGI introduced into the Digital Economy
Act and if this proposal were implemented we believe it would only cause unnecessary and potentially harmful consumer confusion.
|14th January |
Keith Vaz turns up at a pro-gaming parliamentary event
See article from
Keith Vaz surprised a few parliamentarians when he turned up an event in support of gaming.
Parliament Games Day was organised by pressure group Gamers' Voice to bring together politicians and the industry to promote the cultural and economic
strengths of British software.
Vaz told Eurogamer: I've never been against games. I've been against violent games that are able to fall into the hands of young people who are perhaps not able to understand the implications of what they're
I don't oppose games, he inisted. I just think it's very important that people respect and acknowledge the age limits. And the campaign has always been about ensuring there is proper labelling so that people know exactly what
kind of games they should have.
Asked if he was happy with the new games classification system – still waiting to be passed into law – Vaz said he felt it was moving in the right direction . When we started this campaign
the age limit was the size of half a, I think, a 5p coin, which was very small, he explained. Obviously we want to see what PEGI does, but the more that they can draw to the attention of young people the need to respect the age limit better
– and if you're over 18 you can do what you want. No-one wants to stop you playing your games.
|10th November |
Keith Vaz raises another anti-games EDM after a trivial newspaper comment about the Malmo gunman
Based on article from
See also EDM from
Keith Vaz has widened his blame game in Swedish territory. He has posted the following Early Day Motion before the British parliament
VIDEO GAMES AND SHOOTING 27.10.2010
That this House notes with concern that the recent race shootings in Malmo, Sweden have been associated with the violent video game Counter-Strike; further notes that the internet-based, first-person shooting game that pits a counter-terrorist team against terrorists was previously banned in Brazil and in 2007 was associated with US College Campus massacres; recognises the potential impact of violent video games on those under 18 years; and calls on the Government to ensure the purchase of video games by those under 18 years is controlled and that parents are provided with clear information on the violent content of certain games.
The background is that police in the Swedish city of Malmo have confirmed that an as yet unnamed 38 year old man has been arrested in connection with a series of gun attacks on people with ethnic minority backgrounds.
Prior to the arrest, local police had suspected that more than a dozen unsolved shootings over the last year, in which one person died and eight more were wounded, may have been the work of lone gunman. The man arrested at the weekend has now been charged with one count of murder and seven attempted murders.
So how do we get from racist nutjob shooting at the local migrant population to a three-year old video game?
It appears to have been The Times that decided to have a bit of dabble in stirring up a faux moral panic by quoting the opinions of
a Mr Ahmad al-Mughrabi in its coverage of the story…
I am sure that this is down to some crazy kid who plays that sniping game Counterstrike all day. I don't believe in the lone Nazi theory
So who is our mysterious Mr al-Mughrabi? Is he a police officer? A city official? A representative of the Swedish Justice Ministry?
No, as far as anyone has managed to ascertain, to date, he's just some bloke that The Times picked
off the street at random and that's all the evidence that Keith Vaz needs to put down an EDM and start banging on about violent video games, yet again.
|17th July |
Keith Vaz submits another games related Early Day Motion
article from edmi.parliament.uk
Early Day Motion EDM 340
Submitted by Keith Vaz
That this House
- notes with grave concern that despite the 18 rating that the most violent video games carry, some children and teenagers are still able to acquire them;
- congratulates the work of
Mothers Against Violence with regard to their campaign to increase parental awareness of violent games;
- urges the Government to support the promotion of parental awareness of the violent content of video
games which are 18-rated; and
- calls on the Government to urge Pan-European Game Information to take further steps to highlight the inappropriate content of these games for under 18s.
|9th May |
Keith Vaz found out
playing games with expenses
See article from telegraph.co.uk
|18th March |
MPs take pot shots at bad guy Vaz
Based on article from
Keith Vaz looked increasingly isolated last night after his position as chairman of an influential Commons committee was called into question by senior MPs.
He is likely to come under pressure to stand down at a meeting of the Home Affairs Select
Committee following revelations in the Daily Mail that he intervened in a court case on behalf of a crooked friend.
In line with Parliamentary convention, members of the committee are refusing to criticise him publicly. But such is the level of
anger that some have sanctioned friends to make their feelings clear.
One said last night: Vaz limps from drama to drama and it is about time he looked at his position. Another said that they expected Vaz's conduct to be brought up in a
closed session today, while a third source close to an MP on the committee claimed that the chairman's behaviour stinks.
As the pressure on him increased throughout, Vaz also faced a censure motion from the Commons over claims he abused
Tory MP Douglas Carswell said: If these press reports are true, Vaz must quit as chairman of the Commons select committee. His position is simply not tenable, and the longer he stays, the more he brings the entire farcical
Commons into yet further disrepute.
Fellow Tory MP Andrew Robathan added: It is entirely inappropriate that the chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee should write to the Royal Courts of Justice expressing an opinion on a case
before the courts.
Vaz is likely to escape a full-scale sleaze inquiry because he has already been cleared of wrongdoing over his links to Mireskandari by Parliamentary Standards Commissioner John Lyon.
The greatest pressure is likely
to come from colleagues in the Commons, including those on the committee. Vaz did not receive the consent of fellow committee members to make his attempt to help Mireskandari, a convicted conman.
One MP said: If anyone writes in the capacity
of a position on a select committee, then that letter should be circulated so that it has the agreement of the committee as a whole. Failing to do so deserves at the very least a warning and admonishment, and such actions could be considered a sacking
Vaz has so far refused justify his intervention as select committee chairman.
|20th September |
Censorial Keith Vaz in the sleaze poo again
article from dailymail.co.uk
|4th July |
Keith Vaz gets a plush new office
full article from the
Gordon Brown tells Keith Vaz I didn't try to bribe you.
Keith Vaz, the chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Committee, has challenged Gordon Brown to confirm he was not bribed ahead of the vote on 42 days.
Keith Vaz was originally
opposed to the proposed counter-terrorism measures but later offered his full backing
Appearing alongside other committee chairman at their regular grilling of the Prime Minister, Vaz asked Brown about the Telegraph's revelation that he received
a letter from Geoff Hoon, the Chief Whip, saying he hoped he would be "rewarded" for supporting the Government's anti-terror plans: Is it the case that you authorised or offered any backbench Member of Parliament a peerage or a knighthood or
honour, or even the Governorship of Bermuda in order to vote for your legislation?
Brown replied: Not at all. Nor do I recall sending any letters to anyone.
full article from the Daily Mail
Keith Vaz has been given a plush new office in
Westminster. He moved into the sought-after room – which boasts a Thames view – following the death of its previous occupant Gwyneth Dunwoody.
However, both Geoff Hoon and Gordon Brown vociferously denied that the office was his reward for doing
|3rd July |
Rumours of a knighthood may be somewhat premature
full article from the
Censorial MP Keith Vaz is fighting to cling on to his position following the leak of a letter to The Daily Telegraph which suggested he could expect to be “rewarded” for backing the Government in a crucial vote on anti-terrorism laws.
the chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, received a handwritten note from Geoff Hoon, the chief whip, which said he hoped Vaz would be appropriately rewarded for supporting laws to detain terror suspects for 42 days without charge.
Members of the Home Affairs Select Committee have said that Vaz had questions which need to be addressed.
David Cameron, the Conservative leader, is understood to be “appalled” at the contents of the letter and raised the issue in the House
|13th June |
Rumours that Keith Vaz was offered knighthood
full article from MCV
Gordon Brown attempted to bribe MP with honour to push through terror legislation, alleges UK press
Censorship nutter MP Keith Vaz has been offered a knighthood by Prime Minister Gordon Brown, UK national newspapers have alleged.
According to The Times and The Guardian, there have been ‘strong hints’ that Vaz was offered the honour as part of a series of bribes from Brown to Labour MPs, in return for them voting for his controversial new terror detention laws.
Vaz, MP for Leicester East , has ‘strongly denied’ the rumour.