| |
But presumably it is all worthwhile so as to hype up 'online harms' and the need for a UK internet censor
|
|
|
 | 30th December 2019
|
|
| See article from
dailymail.co.uk |
Britain's first police unit for tackling supposed online hate crime has brought charges against less than 1% of the cases it has investigated. Scotland Yard's online hate crime hub has logged 1,851 incidents since its launch in April 2017 and 17
cases, or 0.92%, resulted in charges. And of those seven have led to prosecutions, Freedom of Information figures show. There are three more cases pending a charging decision from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). The £1.7million scheme, launched
by London mayor Sadiq Khan, has however resulted in 59 being given youth referrals, harassment warnings or have been noted as apologising. The Metropolitan Police said the £326,344 needed for the pilot year of the hub was funded by the Mayor's Office
for Policing and Crime (MOPAC). Following the trial, a unit of five officers led by a detective inspector was given a £323,829 budget for 2018/19 and £363,000 in 2019/20 by the police force. Scotland Yard said the unit now deals with both online and
offline cases, reviewing every hate crime reported to the Met on a daily basis. The low number of charges is thought to be due to the high CPS charging threshold for online hate, and the difficulties investigators face in obtaining information from
social media companies. |
| |
Canadian TV broadcaster cuts a Donald Trump cameo in Home Alone 2
|
|
|
 | 27th December 2019
|
|
| Thanks to Gavin See
article from cbsnews.com
|
Donald Trump's cameo in the 1992 movie Home Alone 2: Lost in New York was cut from a Canadian television channel's recent broadcasts. The scene shows Trump walking through the Plaza Hotel in New York City -- which he owned at the time -- giving
directions to Macaulay Culkin's character, Kevin McCallister. Twitter users watching the movie on CBC this holiday season pointed out that Trump's scene didn't appear. The CBS-owned site Comicbook.com reported the broadcaster acknowledged cutting the
scene and provided an unlikely sounding explanation. CBC spokesperson Chuck Thompson claimed: As is often the case with feature films adapted for television, Home Alone 2 was edited for time. The scene with Donald
Trump was one of several that were cut from the movie as none of them were integral to the plot. These edits were done in 2014, when we first acquired the film and before Mr. Trump was elected president.
|
| |
Great, they'll now have enough time in the schedules to treat Dutch viewers to a re-run of Little House on the Prairie
|
|
|
 |
30th November 2019
|
|
| See article
from dailymail.co.uk |
A Dutch broadcaster has banned seduction-based reality shows after claiming the programmes encourage sexual harassment New episodes of Love Island and The Villa have been cancelled by RTL after male contestants were accused of ignoring
refusals to their sexual advances. RTL have temporarily pulled the plug on any shows in which sexual seduction plays the main role, the broadcaster said. These kind of programmes no longer fit in the era of #MeToo, said Tina Nijkamp, a
former director of Dutch broadcaster SBS6. I was already surprised that RTL had ordered even more of such programmes. |
| |
Guardian feminists hope that the extra hassle will mean the end of the nude scene
|
|
|
 | 24th November 2019
|
|
| See article
from dailymail.co.uk
|
The professional body for UK directors has released its first set of guidelines for directing nudity and simulated sex in TV and film. Directors UK has advised a ban on full nudity in any audition or call back and no semi-nudity in first
auditions, and have instead suggested performers wear a bikini or trunks and bring a chaperone. The group also suggested that if a recall requires semi-nudity, the performer and their agent must have 48 hours' notice and the full script. And that the production must also obtain explicit written consent from the performer prior to them being filmed or photographed nude or semi-nude.
The release of guidelines follows the #MeToo movement, and the revelation that some in the industry demanded sexual favours for work. It all seems reasonable enough, but a feminist columnist in the Guardian is rather hoping that the rules
will lead to the end of the nude scene. Barbara Ellen writes in an article from theguardian.com :
All of which is commendable, but shouldn't audiences also change their attitudes? As it is, certain men weirdly seem to presume that they have a right to see women naked. Guys, calm down -- you bought a television
subscription or a cinema ticket, not a VIP seat at a lap-dancing show. Let's face it, most nude scenes are gratuitous -- even when integral to the story, nudity could usually be suggested without anyone actually being naked. Yet
here we are, two years since #MeToo, and actresses are still not only having to strip but being denounced for hating doing it. While on-screen nudity is a choice, and some are fine about it, too many others feel uncomfortable and obliged.
Perhaps the new guidelines will help people such as Clarke in the simplest, most effective way possible -- making it a damn sight more difficult to justify asking them to get undressed in the first place.
|
| |
Police are challenged in court about their unjust recording incidents as hate crimes as decided by the person being easily offended
|
|
|
 | 23rd November
2019
|
|
| See article from bbc.com |
The unfair and unjust way that police record non-crime hate incidents has been challenged in the High Court. Former police officer Harry Miller was contacted by Humberside Police in January following a complaint over supposedly transphobic tweets.
The court heard he was told he had not committed a crime, but his post was being recorded as a hate incident. He is taking action against the College of Policing and Humberside Police. Miller argued that the guidelines breached his human rights
to freedom of expression. His barrister, Ian Wise QC, told the court his client was deeply concerned about proposed reforms to the law on gender recognition and had used Twitter to engage in debate about transgender issues. Wise said Humberside
Police had also sought to dissuade him from expressing himself on such issues in the future. This, he said, was contrary to his fundamental right to freedom of expression. Miller has never expressed hatred towards the transgender community, he
said. He has simply questioned the belief that trans women are women and should be treated as such for all purposes. His views, he added, form part of a legitimate public debate and cannot sensibly be regarded as 'hate speech'. The hearing was
schedule overr two days.
Offsite Comment: Putting the thought police on trial 23rd November 2019. See article from spiked-online.com
|
| |
Venue manager resigns as mayor overturns ban allowing Roy Chubby Brown to perform in home town Middlesbrough
|
|
|
 | 18th November 2019
|
|
| 9th November 2019. See article from bbc.com |
The head of Middlesbrough Town Hall resigned in protest at the town's mayor lifting a ban on controversial comedian Roy Chubby Brown. Mayor Andy Preston made the heroic decision in August, and free speech denier Lorna Fulton, who had run the council
venue since May 2018, resigned September as a result. On Tuesday, Mayor Preston said the comic, from Middlesbrough, could come home. Last year, Middlesbrough Town Hall said there was currently no place in the programme for this show. 'Defend his
right to perform', but in a Facebook post on Tuesday, Preston said Brown would perform there in the New Year. He explained Many big comedy names are controversial - in fact, that's really part of what comedy is. Many
comedians say things that some people may find offensive. Personally, Chubby Brown's act isn't my cup of tea - but I respect and will defend the right of Chubby to perform his act and for those who do find him funny to spend their
hard-earned cash on tickets to see him. If you find Chubby Brown's act offensive, there's a simple answer - don't go to see him.
Brown's manager Tony Jo told Teesside Live : I'd like to thank the mayor for his support in clearing the situation up and Roy is looking forward to his return. He's absolutely delighted. It will be a very emotional night for him and he can't wait.
Offsite Comment: That Terrible Moment When You Have To Defend Roy Chubby Brown
18th November 2019. See article from reprobatepress.com |
| |
Speculation put to rest that the Lady and the Tramp will be censored for the new streaming service Disney+
|
|
|
 | 18th November 2019
|
|
| 11th November 2019. See article from reclaimthenet.org
|
rDisney is promising an extensive near complete library of its films to be made available on its new streaming service, Disney Plus. This has necessitated a review of content in order to bring it up to date with modern-PC sensibilities. It has
already been reported that a very notably absent film from the catalogue will be the Oscar-winning 1946 animated musical Song of the South , that deals with the post civil war period in the United States and the abolition of slavery. It inevitably
included themes and depictions that are now forbidden. Also for the chop is the Dumbo scene featuring the character of Jim Crow, a charcater naming referencing US racial segregation laws. Then there's the seduction of twin Barbie dolls in
Toy Story 2 -- where a character by the name of Stinky Pete is seen promising the Barbies roles in Toy Story 3 . This was judged out of order on #MeToo grounds. A new addition to the list is the cartoon Lady and the Tramp from
1955. The film has a song featuring a short appearance of two conjoined cats called Si and Am. The term 'Siamese Twins' is now frowned upon so it seems likely that this allusion will have to be overdubbed for release on Disney Plus. According to
IMDb, an early pre-release cut of the film had a much longer appearance featuring the cats, but this was mostly deleted in 1955 as it was decided that the awkward restricted movement of the cats didn't really fit in with the rest of the film.
Update: Warnings not cuts 14th November 2019. See
article from theverge.com The Disney+ streaming service has now started and so commentators have been finding out ho Disney has addressed 'inappropriate content'. Well the good news is that Disney has opted for warnings over cuts. The
Verge writes: Some of Disney's older movies streaming on Disney+ will include disclaimers about the cultural context of certain scenes that are considered outright racist and prejudiced today. The disclaimer on certain titles is found within the
description box, and reads, This program is presented as originally created. It may contain outdated cultural depictions. The Verge also notes that warning only runs before the movie and does not appear again in the video. One popular
example floating around Twitter is Disney's 1941 animated feature film, Dumbo . An infamous scene at the end of the movie finds a group of crows singing about seeing an elephant fly. The scene relies on a series of racist stereotypes to get through the
song, including naming the lead character Jim Crow, a mocking term used to insult black men. The scene is still in the version streaming on Disney+. It's encouraging to see Disney acknowledge the darker elements of its past film and TV content,
but this disclaimer is also the bare minimum, writer, critic, and Disney expert Josh Spiegel told The Verge: Frankly, a lot of Disney+ subscribers might not even notice the disclaimer, instead of just clicking Play on
a title.
Update: Grunkle Stan's Fez 18th November 2019. See article from
piratesandprincesses.net
Gravity Falls , a popular Disney cartoon series, has been on the receiving end of Disney's censorship blade. The series ended only a couple of years ago, but the character of Grunkle Stan has had the symbol removed from his fez in the first part
of Season 1. The symbol was supposed to be a fish but the theory behind the change was that maybe it too closely resembled the crescent moon, the symbol of islam. It seems unlikely that there was anything intended by the resemblance.
|
| |
|
|
|
 | 28th October 2019
|
|
|
Morrissey performs in LA wearing a 'Fuck the Guardian' t-shirt See article from theguardian.com
|
| |
So Oxford students took that as a yes and banned applause in favour of 'jazz hands'
|
|
|
| 26th October 2019
|
|
| See article from classicfm.com |
Traditional applause is being discouraged at Oxford University, as students vote to replace triggering clapping with jazz hands. Students at the University of Oxford, studying diverse subjects such as hydro-crystallisation and the psychology of easy
offence, voted to replace noisy appreciation with the British Sign Language equivalent -- a wave of both hands, palms forward. Union officers claimed clapping can be 'triggering' for some students, including those with anxiety. The motion
to mandate the encouragement of silent clapping was successfully passed by student union representatives at their first meeting of the academic year. |
| |
And the fall of venues willing to show the observational documentary
|
|
|
 | 22nd October 2019
|
|
| |
The Rise Of Jordan Peterson is a 2019 Canada documentary by Patricia Marcoccia. Starring Jordan Peterson.

A rare, intimate glimpse into the life and mind of Jordan Peterson, the academic and best-selling author who captured the world's attention with his criticisms of political correctness and his life-changing
philosophy on discovering personal meaning. Christened as the most influential public intellectual in the western world, University of Toronto psychology professor Jordan Peterson skyrocketed to fame after he published a controversial viral video series
entitled "Professor Against Political Correctness" in 2016. Within 2 years, he sold over 3 million copies of his self-help book, 12 Rules For Life, and became simultaneously branded by some as an academic rockstar selling out theatres around
the world, and by others as a dangerous threat to progressive society. THE RISE OF JORDAN PETERSON intimately traces the transformative period of Peterson's life while visiting rare moments with his family, friends and foes who share their own versions
of the Jordan Peterson story. Although the documentary itself is observational rather than political, the politics of Jordan Peterson is controversial for his stance against political correctness. The film hasn't been banned by
official censors but has routinely been refused venues for screening. US: Uncut and MPAA Unrated for:
- 2019 Gravitas Ventures RA Blu-ray at US Amazon released on 29th October 2019
- 2019
Gravitas Ventures R1 DVD at US Amazon released on 29th October 2019
UK: Passed 12A uncut for infrequent strong language, discriminatory references:
UK: BBFC rating not yet published for:
A Review See article from quillette.com by Carol Horton Given
today's downward cultural spiral, it's disturbing but not surprising that the makers of a thoughtful new documentary about Jordan Peterson are having a hard time finding somewhere to show their film. Many mainstream and independent cinemas have refused
to screen it because they're fearful of controversy or morally concerned. One theater in Toronto cancelled a week-long showing after some of the staff took issue with it. A theater in Brooklyn cancelled a second screening, despite the fact that the first
sold out and received good reviews, because some staff were offended . . . and felt uncomfortable. It isn't a conventional talking heads-style documentary. It doesn't seek to hammer an agenda into its audience. Instead, the film
honors the complexity of both of Peterson, his supporters, and his critics. See the full article from quillette.com
|
| |
Bizarre PC censorship from Ofcom about a Pakistani comedy take on Chris Gayle
|
|
|
 | 21st October 2019
|
|
| See Broadcast Bulletin [pdf] from
ofcom.org.uk See video from YouTube |
Nawab Ghar PTV Global, 29 March 2019, 18:25 Nawab Ghar is a situation comedy series on PTV Global which is available on satellite in the UK. PTV Global is an Urdu language general entertainment channel aimed at a Pakistani
audience. The title of this comedy programme translates to The Lord's House, the central character is called Nawab, which translates to Lord. This programme included members of Nawab's family hoping to secure a partner for
marriage. Chris Fail, who is presented as a distant relative, visited Nawab's home with his niece in order to arrange her marriage. The Chris Fail characters seems to be a take on the cricketer Chris Gayle. During the visit to
Nawab's home, Chris Fail falls in love with Guddo, Nawab's sister-in-law. Ofcom received a complaint about racially offensive references in the above programme. The complainant felt that the programme was racially offensive due to the use of 'blackface'
In this programme, Chris Fail was described as a visitor from Africa. Chris Fail was portrayed as having dark skin (which appeared to have been achieved with dark make-up) and long grey curly hair (a wig) under a black headscarf.
In the programme he sang and danced when he started conversations with other characters. Ofcom considered Rule 2.3: broadcasters must ensure that material which may cause offence is justified by
the context206Such material may include206offensive language206discriminatory treatment or language (for example on the grounds of206race206). Appropriate information should also be broadcast where it would assist in avoiding or minimising offence.
Ofcom Decision: Breach of Rule 2.3 We considered that the more general portrayal of Chris Fail was based on a stereotypical view of a black-African person. The factors that contributed to this
included: • the dark make-up apparently applied to his skin; • the significance of his name, which we understood to be a play-on-words of the West Indian cricketer Chris Gayle; • the tribal-style drumming
played in the background when he sang and danced; and, • the way he chanted and shouted over the tribal-style drumming.
we considered that the fact that the programme was a situation comedy with a range of
fictitious characters and guests from different backgrounds did not, in itself, provide sufficient editorial justification for a stereotype of this nature to be used. We considered that the way Chris Fail's character had been
broadcast as a clearly stereotypically black-African person did not reflect the care that broadcasters should take in portraying culturally diverse people and was not editorially justified. We also considered that the likely audience of the channel,
which is aimed at Pakistani people, some of whom would be living in the UK, would not have expected this portrayal. Ofcom's Decision is that this potentially offensive material was not justified by the context and was therefore a
breach of Rule 2.3.
|
| |
Ludicrous academics call for sex robots to be designed with a 'consent module' [and no doubt programmed with robot headaches too]
|
|
|
 | 20th October
2019
|
|
| See paper from researchgate.net |
 | Warning...the T-3000 model is equipped with a
summary justice module
|
Designing Virtuous Sex Robots By Anco Peeters and Pim Haselager Abstract We propose that virtue ethics can be used to address ethical issues central
to discussions about sex robots. In particular, we argue virtue ethics is well equipped to focus on the implications of sex robots for human moral character. Our evaluation develops in four steps.
First, we present virtue ethics as a suitable framework for the evaluation of human - robot relationships.
Second, we show the advantages of our virtue ethical account of sex robots by comparing it
to current instrumentalist approaches, showing how the former better captures the reciprocal interaction between robots and their users.
Third, we examine how a virtue ethical analysis of intimate human - robot
relationships could inspire the design of robots that support the cultivation of virtues. We suggest that a sex robot which is equipped with a consent-module could support the cultivation of compassion when used in supervised, therapeutic scenarios.
Fourth, we discuss the ethical implications of our analysis for user autonomy and responsibility.
|
|
|