14th December | | |
Which? magazine files complaint against bullying Davenport Lyons
| Based on article
from hellmail.co.uk |
Consumer magazine Which? has complained to the solicitors' watchdog about a London law firm that sent bullying letters to hundreds of innocent consumers.
Davenport Lyons has been hunting for internet users who it believes have
illegally shared copies of video games and gay pornography. The alleged file-sharers received letters from the law firm demanding payment of £500 compensation for copyright infringement.
However, letters sent out rely on IP addresses and
with so many unsecured wireless networks and file sharing sites which spoof IP addresses, serious questions are being asked about the validity of evidence put forward by Davenport Lyons, evidence already discredited by at least two other European
countries.
The case was featured on BBC's Watchdog programme this week, and both Watchdog and The Real Hustle have highlighted the relative ease with which many home networks can be breached. Many of those wrongly accused by
Davenport Lyons say that their claims of innocence are ignored completely and simply followed with continued demands for money.
Michael Coyle, solicitor advocate with Lawdit who is currently representing hundreds of UK citizens who have received
threatening letters, says that using IP addresses alone to pinpoint file sharers is a nonsense and that Davenport Lyons are using heavy-handed tactics.
Which? has written to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority complaining about what
it describes as bullying and excessive , pointing out that during a recession, more and more companies will be looking to make money from individuals and that the SRA should take decisive action. Which? has invited anyone wrongly accused by
Davenport Lyons to contact whichcomputingnews@which.co.uk.
A number 10 petition has also been created.
Steve Lawson, editor for Hellmail the
postal industry news site said: Its a disgrace that an apparently respected firm of solicitors is relying on such poor evidence and sending out letters to frighten the wits out of people that in many cases have done nothing wrong at all, and then for
those people to discover that they are not even being listened to.
|
10th December | | |
Danish high court continues the ISP block on PirateBay
| Thanks to Nick From Computerworld Danmark |
The Danish Eastern High Court ruled last week that it is up to Internet service providers to ensure that their customers do not use the Swedish torrent-tracking site The Pirate Bay to download illegal content.
This ruling upholds a previous
court order in the case between the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and the Danish ISP Tele2.
Since February this year, Tele2's customers have not been able to access the Pirate Bay because an injunction forces Tele2
to block access at the DNS level.
Last week's ruling upholds this decision and will probably cause the IFPI to insist that all Danish ISPs block access to the site.
|
3rd December | | |
Sarkozy strikes down 3 strikes protection suggested by European Parliament
| Based on article from
torrentfreak.com |
An amendment designed to protect Internet users from the anti-piracy lobby has been rejected by President Sarkozy of the European Council. The rejection goes against the will of the European Parliament, where 88% of the members already voted in
favor of the amendment, which was originally destined to protect file-sharers from Internet disconnection under the ‘3 strikes' framework. This was much needed, as in recent years, anti-piracy lobby groups have called for tougher monitoring of Internet
users and are actively working to erode their rights further.
The amendment, drafted by Guy Bono and other members of the European Parliament, was supposed to put a halt to the march of the anti-piracy lobby. However, despite the fact that is was
adopted by an overwhelming majority, with 573 parliament members voting in favor with just 74 rejections, the European Council went against this democratic vote.
In September, Bono stated in a response to the vote: You do not play with
individual freedoms like that, going on to say that the French government should review its three-strikes law. Sarkozy had other plans though, and in his position of President of the European Council, he convinced his friends to reject the proposal.
|
2nd December | | |
Nasty letters inaccurately targeted at alleged porn downloaders demand unreasonable damages
| Based on article from
guardian.co.uk |
Innocent people are getting letters from lawyers claiming they should pay for films they've never seen. A Hertfordshire couple in their 60s were horrified to receive a letter last week from lawyers at Davenport Lyons accusing them of
downloading a hardcore gay porn movie. It demanded they pay £503 for copyright infringement or face a high court action. The 20-page pre-settlement letter from Davenport Lyons, acting on behalf of German pornogaphers, insisted they
pay £503 to their clients for the 115 minute film Army Fuckers which features Gestapo officers and Czech farmers.
The bewildered couple contacted Guardian Money. We were offended by the title of the film. We don't do
porn - straight or gay - and we can't do downloads. We have to ask our son even to do an iTunes purchase.
But this Hertfordshire couple are not alone. A large number of people have received this letter, provoking a massive outcry on web
forums such as slyck.com and torrentfreak which estimate 25,000 of these letters have been sent out. If all the recipients paid up, it would net £12.5m - more than almost any porn film has made.
Media expert Michael Coyle at
Southampton-based solicitors Lawdit, is fighting on behalf of individuals who have received the letter from Davenport Lyons. Owners of films, music and computer games obviously have to protect their rights and prevent illegal copying, otherwise
everyone would get all sorts of content for free.
"But many of these letters have been sent to people who have no idea what a download is. We've had straight pensioners complain, and a mother who had the shock of having to question her
14-year-old son about gay porn because he was the only apparent user of the internet connection that was registered to her.
Coyle says Davenport Lyons represent DigiProtect, a German company with rights to both pornographic films. He
questions the amount demanded and methods used to identify computers alleged to have downloaded material. He believes the sum demanded is out of all proportion to the alleged injury. In one case, Davenport Lyons wanted £500 for a £20 game.
The alleged file-sharing would have cost only about £50 - the rest is legal costs.
Coyle offers a £50 service for those who refuse to cave in to the demands as he believes some of the firm's successes are due to consumers paying
up because they cannot afford the legal costs of defending themselves. They have won court cases including a high-profile £16,000 on a games download. But these have not been defended. My advice is to deny file sharing to any such request.
|
23rd November | | |
Toyota attempt at bullying backfires
| Based on article from
torrentfreak.com |
Toyota, one of the biggest car companies in the world aspires to also being known as one of the biggest bullies of the world. Desktopnexus, a site that provides desktop backgrounds, has been contacted by Toyota. In perhaps one of the most wildly
arrogant demands in DMCA history, Toyota's lawyers are demanding the withdrawal of all wallpapers that feature a Toyota, Scion, or Lexus. The site's owner, Harry Maugans contacted Toyota to clarify. He was told that all images featuring Toyota
vehicles should be removed, even images with copyright belonging to others.
Yet, Toyota has also been cagey. These demands have not been sent in the form of a DMCA notice. While sending such a notice would require the takedown, it also requires
that the person sending the notice legally certify that they are legal representatives for the copyright holders at issue. Making a false statement is punishable under penalty of perjury, which is not taken lightly in US courts.
From
desktopnexus.com After long discussions and feeling I was getting no where with [Toyota lawyer] Mr. Biggs, I finally decided to email a few blogs who might be interested
in this DMCA butchering story. After this started spreading around, I followed the story and started reading all the comments that came flooding in. I was amazed by how this backfired on Toyota, and how much negativity was being thrown around.
As I said earlier, viral events can be a PR nightmare for a company… especially one like Toyota who invests to much into preserving their brand name. Based on
article from torrentfreak.com Sometimes a company can
be pressured into accepting mistakes, and this is the case here. With a large amount of negative publicity. Toyota contacted TorrentFreak and DesktopNexus, expressing their apologies for the incident.
From: Scott DeYager, Toyota Motor Sales, USA
The recent request Toyota made to have certain photos of Toyota vehicles removed from the public wallpaper site, DesktopNexus, was the result of an internal miscommunication.
To protect the legal rights and
agreements we have with the photographers we hire, we ask that the photographs not be used for direct consumer advertising, sales brochures and the like.
If people wish to post their own photos of one of their own vehicles, that's their right. In
fact, we're pleased that people would want to show their Toyota vehicles to the world. So have at it. Consider the wallpapers on DesktopNexus to be fair game for personal use.
Please let your readers know that we offer a sincere apology to the
DesktopNexus site and its users for any inconvenience or disruption this miscommunication may have caused.
|
15th November | | |
Microsoft reject modded consoles from Xbox Live service
| Based on article
from gamesindustry.biz
|
Xbox Live's Major Nelson has revealed that Microsoft has recently banned number of Xbox 360 consoles modified to play pirated games.
In his blog, Major Nelson explained that any modification to an Xbox 360 was a violation of the terms of
service and that action needed to be taken against software piracy in order to protect the games industry.
|
8th November | | |
Italian court finds that ISPs are not required to block PirateBay
| Based on article from
publicaffairs.linx.net
|
An Italian appeals court has overturned a preliminary ruling by an investigating magistrate that ordered ISPs to block access to the controversial Bittorrent site The Pirate Bay. The Appeal Court upheld the finding that The Pirate Bay breached
copyright, but held that creating a specific obligation on innocent third parties (ISPs) was not justified.
|
5th November | | |
UK ISP bans open WiFi
| No doubt the government will also get arsey about open WiFi if it messes up their communications database monstrosity. Based on
article from torrentfreak.com
|
Open wireless networks have served as a successful defense strategy for several alleged filesharers, as it is often impossible for content owners to prove that the person they accuse, has actually distributed the files they claim they did. Unfortunately,
for the customers of the UK ISP Karoo, running open WiFi might also get them disconnected - even if it's unintentional.
Not all ISPs are happy with customers who have open WiFi, however, and some even threaten to disconnect those who do. In the
September 2008 terms and conditions of UK ISP Karoo, we read: We shall be entitled to terminate the Service immediately if We discover that you have permitted (whether knowingly or not) a third party (or third
parties) to access the Service using a wireless connection over Your Communications Line.
Should an ISP be entitled to demand this? Karoo leaves its customers no choice, and simply forbids them to leave their network unsecured,
despite the fact that this will be practically impossible for them to enforce. Not only that, people who have no idea about router security are now wide open to summary disconnection by this ISP.
Some would argue that having an open wireless
network is the right thing to do. Earlier this year, security expert Bruce Schneier wrote an extensive essay on why it's a good thing. Some of his key arguments were that it is basic kindness, and that the risk of running into abusers is extremely low.
Also, when someone abuses the open WiFi to do something illegal, it is easy to defend yourself.
|
2nd November | |
| French 3 strikes law marches on
| Based on article from
theregister.co.uk
|
The French Senate has overwhelmingly voted in favour of disconnecting Internet pirates, despite European Parliament's direct opposition to the punishment.
Under France's proposed three-strikes or graduated response law, Internet users
accused of stealing content online for the first time would receive a cautioning email. A second time results in a warning letter delivered by post, and a third claim requires the user's ISP to cut access for a year.
Many ISPs have been fighting
such proposals because it thrusts responsibility of policing online copyrights on their shoulders.
The legislation passed on a vote of 297 to 15, but still needs approval by the National Assembly before it becomes law.
French legislators
also rejected an amendment authored by senator Bruno Retailleu that would replace the bill's Internet kill-switch punishment with a monetary fine.
|
2nd November | |
| Pre-Owned games sales said to be defrauding games industry
| Based on article from
gamesindustry.biz
|
Frontier founder and creator of Elite , David Braben, has said that he thinks HMV's move into selling pre-owned games is "shocking", and that the increasing emphasis on the pre-owned market is a serious threat to the games industry.
Speaking to Eurogamer.net, Braben said: The shops are not giving us a way of distinguishing between pre-owned and new. So the shops are essentially defrauding the industry.
Braben acknowledges that the prevalence of pre-owned games is
one factor pushing his company towards digital distribution: We've got a lot of retailers eating our lunch and refusing to sell full-priced games. On HMV's move into selling pre-owned titles - the first non-specialist retailer to do so -
Braben said: That is shocking, and I think the games industry has to do something about it soon: There are a lot of studies that suggest it's anywhere between 8 and 12 or 15 times a pre-owned game goes round. If you think that the industry's getting a
tiny percentage of those 12 or 15 sales - typically from the sale of a GBP 40 game, the industry only gets GBP 20 anyway, in round figures. That is lost to the system.
He's not a proponent of DRM - personally, I detest DRM, he said -
but understands that publishers are being forced into a corner. Look at EA. They have been crucified for the admittedly draconian DRM on Spore , but they're in a very difficult position. They need to do something.
Instead, he argues
that the games industry should move to a similar model to that used by the film industry for DVD and video sales. They brought out rental copies, and copies not for resale or rental. That distinction is really important in the video market, and all of
the chains honour it because they know it's more than their life's worth not to, he said.
My argument is that for every game there are two versions. One is personal, not for resale and it's made abundantly clear you can't sell it. And it's
made available for something like GBP 25. And a resale and rental copy, which in film is actually about GBP 80.
Braben also thinks that the pre-owned market, along with piracy, is pushing developers and publishers towards exclusively online
gaming strategies.
|
2nd November | |
| Fallout 3 claims limited use of SecuROM DRM
| Based on article from gamepolitics.com |
There has been some talk around the Net this week that the PC version of Fallout 3 is sporting SecuROM, the same intrusive copy protection scheme that caused so much controversy for Spore last month.
But a post on publisher
Bethesda's blog claims that Fallout 3 only uses SecuROM to verify the disc:
For Fallout 3's copy protection on PC, we use the same security model as we did for Oblivion - a simple disc check. We only use SecuRom's disc check
functionality for copy protection. We do NOT limit the number of installs. We do NOT use online authentication or any other SecuROM functionality except for a disc check when you install the game and when you launch the game. We do not install any other
programs and we don't have anything that runs in the background while you're playing the game. Update: GTA IV on PC 3rd December 2008. See article from
gamepolitics.com Regarding GTA IV's SecuROM, an unnamed Rockstar spokesperson told IGN:
GTA IV PC uses SecuROM for protecting our EXE until street date has passed, to ensure the retail disk is in the computer drive... Product
Activation is a one time only online authentication when installing the game. GTA IV has no install limits for the retail disc version... and that version can be installed on an unlimited number of PCs by the retail disk owner... All versions of the game
will use SecuROM for Product Activation. Downloadable versions of the game will have additional code if the vendor requires it, such as Valve's Steam program.
|
31st October | | |
Media companies falsely accuse people of file sharing
| Based on article from
news.bbc.co.uk |
Games firms are accusing innocent people of file-sharing as they crack down on pirates, a Which? Computing investigation has claimed.
The magazine was contacted by Gill and Ken Murdoch, from Scotland, who had been accused of sharing the game
Race07 by makers Atari.
The couple told Which they had never played a computer game in their lives. The case was dropped, but Which estimates that hundreds of others are in a similar situation.
The illegal sharing of music, movies and
games has become a huge headache for copyright owners. They are monitoring peer-to-peer sharing networks, such as Gnutella, BitTorrent, and eDonkey, that allow games, music and video to be shared.
The lawyers in the Atari case turned to
anti-piracy firm Logistep, which finds those people illegally sharing files via their IP address - the unique numbers which identify a particular computer.
In the case of the Murdochs, a letter was sent giving them the chance to pay £500
compensation or face a court case. Gill Murdoch and her husband, aged 54 and 66 respectively, told Which: We do not have, and have never had, any computer game or sharing software. We did not even know what 'peer to peer' was until we received the
letter.
According to Michael Coyle, an intellectual property solicitor with law firm Lawdit, more and more people are being wrongly identified as file-sharers. He is pursuing 70 cases of people who claim to be wrongly accused of piracy and
has spoken to "hundreds" of others, he told the BBC.
Most commonly problems arise when a pirate steals someone else's network connection by "piggybacking" on their unsecured wireless network, he said. While prosecutors argue
that users are legally required to secure their network, Coyle dismisses this: There is no section of the Copyright Act which makes you secure your network although it is commonsense to do so.
Some question whether an IP address on its own
can be used as evidence. The IP address alone doesn't tell you anything. Piracy is only established beyond doubt if the hard-drive is examined," said Coyle.
Firms that facilitate file sharing, such as Pirate Bay, have been undermining
efforts by anti-piracy investigators to track down file sharers. Pirate Bay makes no secret of the fact that it inserts the random IP addresses of users, some of who may not even know what file sharing is, to the list of people downloading files, leading
investigators up a virtual garden path. Update: Inaccurate IP 28th November 2008. From hellmail.co.uk According to The Register, Atari have apparently
dropped London-based solicitors Davenport Lyons, which had been representing Atari in a mass offensive on UK P2P file sharers.
Davenport Lyons seemed reliant on lists of IP addresses supplied by Swiss company Logistep, evidence that was at best
flimsy, and at worst totally inaccurate, and gave rise to a spate of furious and innocent internet users seeking legal advice after receiving letters from Davenport Lyons saying pay up or face court action.
Perhaps Atari figured that the
costs involved in securing names via ISP's for a case that had never actually been tried in a UK court was becoming a good deal more expensive than they had actually budgeted for. Davenport Lyons was also clocking up additional costs replying, template
fashion, to hundreds of queries from outraged internet users who knew nothing of the game they'd been accused of sharing. One presumes that Atari were footing the bill on all of this.
|
23rd October | |
| Media multinationals line up against publican subscribing to Greek Nova TV for football
| From thepublican.com
|
UEFA and four major media companies could get involved in the European test case showdown on foreign satellite football – now likely to be heard around June or July next year.
The European football body has lodged an application with the European
Court of Justice to intervene in the case against two suppliers of foreign satellite equipment, according to the solicitor acting for one of the suppliers.
Meanwhile Sky, Setanta, Canal+ and the Motion Picture Association are believed to be in
the process of lodging an application with the court to also have their say in the case.
The case against suppliers QC Leisure and AV Station was referred to the European Court in July by the High Court in London.
Portsmouth licensee
Karen Murphy, who is appealing a conviction for showing foreign satellite football using a Greek Nova card, will have her case heard at the same time.
At a House of Commons meeting hosted by John Grogan MP yesterday, Paul Dixon, of legal firm
Molesworths, Bright, Clegg, who represents Murphy and AV Station, revealed the five other parties were applying to intervene in our proceedings so they can have their 30 minutes of fame, because it's not just about sports rights.
Kate
Nicholls of the Association of Licensed Multiple Retailers also addressed the All-Party Parliamentary Beer Group meeting, looking at the legal and regulatory issues around screening sport in pubs. Nicholls urged everyone to respond to a further
consultation on the issue, which ends December 9.
|
21st October | | |
|
US Law analysis of selling 2nd hand CDs See article from thelegality.com |
15th October | | |
Google prevents download of Chrome to sanctioned countries
| Based on article from
pbs.org |
Google has blocked the download of its new web browser, Chrome, in Syria.
It seems like a strange move for a company that has focused so intently on the Middle Eastern and North African markets, with versions of Knol, Blogger, iGoogle, Docs, and,
most recently, Chat in Arabic.
Remarkably, the block wasn't the work of the Syrian government but that of Google itself. According to a Google spokesperson, in order for the company to abide by U.S. export controls and economic sanctions:
we are unable to permit the download of Google Chrome in Cuba, Syria, North Korea, Iran, and Sudan.
It seems silly to block the download of free and widely available software like Chrome, but we can't blame companies for trying to comply
with the law. However, information travels fluidly on the Net, so the law has a hard time keeping up. And that's troubling, because the U.S. can be seen as inhibiting access to information or possibly even stifling free speech in the very countries whose
censorship and repression it condemns.
|
14th October | | |
German copyright cases goes against Google Image Search
| Based on article from
blogoscoped.com
|
Bloomberg reports that Google lost two court cases in Germany over the display of thumbnails in their image search results.
Google's preview of a picture by German photographer Michael Bernhard violates his copyrights, the Regional Court of
Hamburg ruled, his lawyer Matthies van Eendenburg said in an interview today. Thomas Horn, who holds the copyrights on some comics that were displayed in Google search result.
“It doesn't matter that thumbnails are much smaller than
original pictures and are displayed in a lower resolution,” the court said in its ruling for Bernhard. By using photos in thumbnails, no new work is created, that may have justified displaying them without permission.
In the US, fair
use laws make it possible to offer such third-party services without specifically asking for permission. Adult magazine Perfect 10 once lost a case against Google in these regards, after an original decision was reversed. (In any case, Google's bots
respect the “robots.txt” protocol, where webmaster can disallow the spidering of images.) A Google rep said: The ruling of the Regional Court of Hamburg is bad for internet users and users of image search engines in Germany in general – just as
it's bad for thousands of site owners who based their business on image searches.
Charges were also brought against other provides of image searches, such as AOL, T-Online, Yahoo. With this ruling, the court of Hamburg throws German internet
users back into the digital stone age. And this is not just in regards to Google image search, but all of them. We are confident that the Regional Court will correct the ruling in the appeals procedure.
|
12th October | | |
Pool, darts, watching TV and drinking
| Based on article from
scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com
|
Slanj, which has shops in Glasgow and Edinburgh is one of the country's most talked-about designer outlets for their contemporary kilts and humorous T-shirts.
But their interpretation of the 2014 Commonwealth Games has not gone down well with
the organisers.
The company set up to run the Glasgow Games are now threatening Slanj with legal action unless they withdraw a range of T-shirts that depict characters taking part in traditional Glaswegian sporting pursuits.
Four
white boxes over the words Glasgow 2014, Commonwealth Games , contain figures playing pool and darts, watching TV and sinking a pint of beer.
Slanj owner Brian Halley said: We specialise in quirky T-shirts and this is just meant as a
joke, our take on the real games that real Glaswegians indulge in. It was an attempt to join in the fun surrounding Glasgow getting the Games.
But a spokesman for Glasgow City Council, which is part of the partnership company running the
event, said the Glasgow Commonwealth Games 2014 logo had been registered in the UK as a trademark, a design and a wordmark to prevent unauthorised material being sold: It therefore has legal protection in all these categories. In the instance of
Slanj, if they are selling 2014 Games branded materials, then this will be followed up through the 2014 legal team. The organising company would not be against a little bit of humour or harmless fun, ...BUT... use of the brand means that it could
not ignore this application. We would ask Slanj to remove the items from sale.
Halley said he was sorry if the T-shirts had caused offence. After the current batch had been sold, the design would be changed.
|
9th October | | |
The R4, Nintendo DS, and DSi
| Based on article
from independent.co.uk
|
The R4 is a tiny Chinese-made device – costing around £14 – that for more than seven million owners of Nintendo's hand-held console, the DS, has blown wide open its capabilities. Combined with a small memory card and plugged into the back of
the DS, it enables the console to play MP3s and videos, as well as store copies of games you already own.
Crucially, however, it also enables the user to play pirated games from the internet which can be downloaded for free. Add to this that it's
simple to use, and available through retailers such as Amazon, and you can see why the R4 and devices similar to it are bringing video game console piracy to the mainstream.
Nick Welsh has two young children who love their computer games and own
a Nintendo DS. He heard about the device from another parent while on holiday. For Welsh, buying a R4 solved both a logistical and a financial problem. The trouble with kids is you pay £20 or £30 for a game, and they could only play it
once, he says. Let's say I sit down and download 10 new games, the way it ends up is they'll only really play one or two or those, and the others get replaced. I wouldn't be able to afford that number of games.
Since all the games can
be stored on one memory card, which stays in the device, it also offers convenience. You can have 70 or 80 games on a 2GB card, says Welsh, and they're all on the back of the machine. There's no fiddling around with cartridges – it's all there
to hand.
Jodi Daugherty, Senior Director for Anti-Piracy at Nintendo, has been tackling pirates for 14 years and believes the fight against the R4 is one of the most challenging she has faced. What is different with these devices is how
they're distributed and the impact they have with regards to the internet, she says.
As well as issuing warning letters to the websites on which the games are hosted, Nintendo is also targeting both the Chinese manufacturers and the
distributors who sell the devices, and have conducted several raids on factories. Last July, Nintendo – along with some 50 game producers – launched a lawsuit in Japan against distributors of the R4 and similar devices.
Daugherty also says that
Nintendo are working with online retail giants Amazon to curtail the global sales/distribution of game copying devices which violate our intellectual property rights. Update:
Banned in Japan 1st March 2009 Bowing to a request from Nintendo, the government of Japan has outlawed sales of the R4 flash card Region Locking to be Introduced on
DSi As a frequent traveller I find that geographical functionality sucks. I wonder who the smart arse is at Google who thinks that Blogger menus should be shown in Thai language just because I happen to be browsing in Thailand. Based
on article from slashgear.com Nintendo's new DSi console launch is disappointing in that DSi titles will be region-locked.
According to a Nintendo spokesperson, while normal DS titles will continue to be region-free (i.e. games you buy in Japan will work on European and US handhelds) apps and software for the DSi will be region-locked. That includes both downloads
from the new DSi Store and any cartridges that are DSi-specific.
Nintendo's justification for this is that they plan custom internet-connected software and functionality that will be unique to the different regions. Presumably that will include
geographically-specific language translations. Titles will also be assigned different age recommendations, depending on region.
|
1st October | |
| $222,000 fine for making 24 songs available for upload to be re-assessed
| Thanks to Nick Based on article
from macworld.co.uk |
A federal judge in Minnesota has ordered a new trial in a copyright infringement case involving a woman who was told by a jury to pay $222,000 to various record companies for illegally copying and distributing just 24 songs.
In doing so, US
District Judge Michael Davis also rejected a key argument used by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in the Minnesota case and numerous others - namely, that the mere act of making music available for download in a shared computer
folder constitutes illegal distribution.
Davis' ruling is being seen as a setback for the RIAA's controversial campaign against music piracy, especially since he is now the third federal judge to have flatly rejected the trade group's making
available argument. What isn't clear, though, is the extent to which his ruling will actually benefit the defendant in this particular case.
|
27th September | |
| The European Parliament votes against 3 strikes internet access ban
| Based on article from
torrentfreak.com |
The European Parliament has voted in favor of an amendment that will prevent member states from implementing three-stikes laws. Disconnecting alleged file-sharers based on evidence from anti-piracy lobby groups restricts the rights and freedoms of
Internet users, according to the amendment.
The power of anti-piracy lobbyists has grown significantly across Europe this year. In the UK, six major ISPs are working together with the music industry to start mass warning file-sharers. France has
gone even further, and proposed a law that will enable the entertainment industry to disconnect alleged pirates on their third warning.
Both the MPAA and RIAA have pushed other countries to adopt similar legislation as well, but it will be hard
for them to succeed in Europe. In April, the European Parliament spoke out against these anti-piracy measures, by saying it would be conflicting with civil liberties and human rights and with the principles of proportionality, effectiveness and
dissuasiveness. This statement was backed up by an official vote.
The amendment, drafted by Guy Bono and other members of the European Parliament, was adopted by an overwhelming majority. 573 parliament members voted in favor while only 74
rejected. Satisfied with this outcome, Bono stated in a response to the vote: You do not play with individual freedoms like that, and said that the French government should review its three-strikes law.
It is scary to see how lobby groups
are awarded powers that should only belong to law-enforcement agencies. Evidence should never be collectedly by parties who gather it in their own interests, and it is a relief to see that the European Parliament agrees on this.
|
18th September | | |
Future Electronic Arts games will ease up on the DRM
| Based on article from
pc.ign.com |
Electronic Arts is going to ease up slightly on its digital rights management (DRM). The upcoming Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3 will still use SecuROM as used in Mass Effect and Spore. But 5 installs will be allowed rather
than the previous 3.
Premier Executive Producer Chris Corry responded to Spore's backlash and wrote on EA's official support forums that Red Alert 3 would ease up on its copy protection. In addition to allowing two more installs, the game will
only require a one time online authentication. The EA published Mass Effect for the PC previously required users to authenticate their game online every 10 days, this requirement was later removed.
A first for the Command & Conquer
series is that Red Alert 3 will no longer require users to insert a disc to play. In addition, if owners need to install the game more than five times, EA Customer Service will be on hand to supply additional authorizations on a warranted case
by case basis.
|
17th September | | |
Media industry developing a more flexible DRM
| Based on article from
yro.slashdot.org |
Music and movie studios are attempting to develop a new type of DRM that would allow customers more flexibility in playing content on multiple devices. The Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) would establish a list of devices in your
personal "domain", and minimizes or removes restrictions within that domain. TechCrunch summarizes DECE and notes that many of the big corporations have decided to support it. The goal is to create for downloads the same kind of
interoperability that's been true for physical products, such as CDs and DVDs. Where it gets really interesting, though, is the group's stated intention to make digital files as flexible and permissive as CDs, at least within the confines of
someone's personal domain. Once you've acquired a file, you could play it on any of your devices -- if it couldn't be passed directly from one DECE-ready device to another, you'd be allowed to download additional copies. And when you're away from
home, you could stream the file to any device with a DECE-compatible Web browser.
|
16th September | | |
OiNK file sharing site admin charged with defrauding record industry
| Based on article from
theregister.co.uk |
Cleveland police have charged Alan Ellis, the former administrator of the defunct BitTorrent tracker site OiNK, with conspiracy to defraud the record industry.
Ellis will face magistrates at a committal hearing on 24 September, a police
spokeswoman said. Five individuals who were arrested in June for uploading music torrents to OiNK will also appear to answer charges of criminal copyright infringement.
All the alleged offences could carry prison sentences.
The charges
follow a lengthy investigation code-named Operation Ark Royal . Ellis was arrested in October 2007 in a raid on his Middlesbrough home. Coordinated raids by Dutch authorities seized the servers that hosted OiNK.
Police at the time alleged
that running the BitTorrent tracker had been extremely lucrative, making hundreds of thousands of pounds.
OiNK was operated on an invitation-only basis, and accepted donations from members. It was prized by members for the high
quality encoding of many of the files it tracked, and for its frequent pre-release uploads. Update: Sentenced 28th January 2009. See
article from torrentfreak.com Four of the OiNK
uploaders plead guilty at Teesside Crown Court last December, where they were all charged with copyright infringement offences. The four have now been sentenced.
Steven Diprose was sentenced to 180 hours community service, and has to pay
£378 in Court costs. Michael Myers was ordered to pay a £500 fine. Mark Tugwell has to undertake 100 hours community service and has to pay £378 Court costs. The fourth uploader, James Garner was sentenced to 50 hours community service
and also has to pay £378 Court costs.
For one other uploader and OiNK admin Allan Ellis the wait continues. Their cases have been adjourned and they will appear before court in March.
We were further told that, if the defendants had
not had such good references and strong legal representation, the Judge would have seriously considered a custodial sentence. This ruling, the first of its kind in the UK, will most certainly be used as a precedent for future cases.
Update: Acquitted 17th January 2010. See article
from technology.timesonline.co.uk A man accused of running a sophisticated music piracy website used by more than 200,000 members was acquitted of conspiracy
to defraud today. Alan Ellis, 26, was accused of making hundreds of thousands of pounds from the Oink website, which he ran alone from his own bedroom. But a jury at Teesside Crown Court unanimously cleared the software engineer of the
charge. Mr Ellis, from Middlesbrough, smiled as the jury foreman returned the not guilty verdict. During the trial, Mr Ellis had told the jury that he set up Oink in his home in an effort to brush up on his computing skills while a student at
Teesside University. Related Links. When police raided his terraced house in October 2007, they found almost $300,000 in his accounts.
|
14th September | | |
Spore DRM encourages sharing
| Based on article from
torrentfreak.com |
Spore was without doubt the most anticipated game of the year. The game itself has blown away the people who have played it, but the DRM encouraged thousands to get their copy illegally. Already Spore has been downloaded more than 500,000 times on
BitTorrent, and this number is increasing rapidly.
Users aren't too happy with the absurd DRM restrictions that come with the game. EA decided that people who buy a legitimate copy of the game, are only allowed to install it three times.
The idea behind DRM is that it will stop people from pirating the game, but in reality, it often has the opposite effect. As Forbes points out, many commenters on various BitTorrent sites now legitimize downloading this game because the official copies include some heavy and intrusive DRM.
You have the power to make this the most pirated game ever, to give corporate bastards a virtual punch in the face, deathkitten writes in a comment on The Pirate Bay. He or she is spot on. Spore has been the most downloaded torrent on The
Pirate Bay for over a week, which is unique for a game.
|
13th September | | |
Swedish fracas about murdered child pictures via Pirate Bay
| Thanks to Nick Based on article from
blog.wired.com
|
The Pirate Bay, the controversial BitTorrent tracking site in Sweden, has become ensnared in a grisly, high-profile scandal involving the online circulation of autopsy pictures of two murdered children.
The Swedish media are focusing on The
Pirate Bay's refusal to remove the links to the torrents of photos uploaded to the internet by its users of photos of two dead children.
The photos are from a police case file concerning the murder of two toddlers. The father of the children has
asked the operators of the site to remove the links, but they've declined to do so, based on the group's anti-censorship policies.
The Pirate Bay's co-founder Peter Sunde in a post on his personal blog asks why the Swedish media isn't focusing
either on the individual who had uploaded the photo, or on the country's laws regarding the way the government classifies information and provides access to government documents. In this case, someone had accessed the police investigation file, uploaded
a torrent file of the photo onto the internet, and linked to the torrent on The Pirate Bay. Under Swedish law, most documents generated by the government are made available to the public unless specifically deemed secret by the courts. In this case, the
documents were not sealed by the court.
The operators of the site announced on their blog Friday that they would no longer speak with the media after an incident on a Swedish television station, which Sunde effectively characterized as an ambush.
Sunde had participated in a television interview with Sweden's TV4 Thursday night, as he recounts on his personal blog. He says that he was promised that the interview would focus on policy and the issues of censorship and what gets published on
the internet.
But when he arrived at the studio, he was faced with the father of the children who was participating remotely, and asked what he had to say to him, he recounts in a long and angry blog post.
Pirate Bay has been described
in Swedish media as 'publisher' of the photos, which is technically not correct, says Mikael Pawlo, an internet entrepreneur based in Stockholm who's been following the case. But Pirate Bay only provides aggregated tracking information on the
torrents, which are in turn distributed peer-to-peer, without ever being relayed through Pirate Bay. But he adds: Pirate Bay is also in practice the main distributor of information on how to download the photos.
Sunde takes exception
and writes on his blog that the media characterizes the operators of The Pirate Bay as terrorists, and as people totally without emotion, and as bloodthirsty devils. Shame on you Sweden. And shame on you in the media .
|
11th September | | |
New Spore game rated as 1 star after being crippled by DRM
| Based on article from gamepolitics.com |
Frustrated Spore users are slamming Will Wright's new release with poor, 1-star reviews on Amazon.com.
Of 642 user reviews posted as I write this, 586 are of the 1-star variety, hardly what one would expect for such a hotly-anticipated game.
The negative reviews invariably mention the digital rights management (DRM) system built into Spore. This one, posted by Amazon user dwemer22, is fairly typical. I was EXTREMELY excited about this game... Then I
got on Amazon and noticed that a large number of the forums devoted to Spore were complaining of something called "SecuROM." I did a little digging and discovered that SecuROM is a piece of [DRM] software that is installed along with the game
to prevent you from installing the game more than three times, in an attempt to combat piracy.
I read further through the forums and the Wikipedia article and discovered that SecuROM does a number of other things too, including sending mysterious
packets of data back to the company from your computer (identity theft, perhaps?), prevents you from using certain programs, such as DVD and CD burners, makes it impossible for you to modify your root drive and, worst of all, will NOT uninstall without
the help of a third party application. So I cancelled my order...
The pirate version, now available without the nastiness, is therefore, ironically, a superior product. |
9th September | | |
YouTube take down videos critical of scientology
| Thanks to lolwhut Based on
article from eff.org |
Over a period of twelve hours, American Rights Counsel LLC sent out over 4000 DMCA takedown notices to YouTube, all making copyright infringement claims against videos with content critical of the Church of Scientology. Clips included footage of
Australian and German news reports about Scientology, A Message to Anonymous/Scientology, and footage from a Clearwater City Commission meeting. Many accounts were suspended by YouTube in response to multiple allegations of copyright infringement.
YouTube users responded with DMCA counter-notices. At this time, many of the suspended channels have been reinstated and many of the videos are back up. Whether or not American Rights Counsel, LLC represents the notoriously litigious Church of
Scientology is unclear, but this would not be the first time that the Church of Scientology has used the DMCA to silence Scientology critics. The Church of Scientology DMCA complaints shut down the YouTube channel of critic Mark Bunker in June, 2008.
Bunker's account, XenuTV, was also among the channels shut down in this latest flurry of takedown notices.
|
2nd September | |
| Good reasons not to turn on Automatic Updates
| Thanks to Nick Based on article from Slashdot
|
In a bid to deter people from using copy versions of Windows XP, Microsoft is now updating its Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) tool to introduce a few uncomfortable niggles for users of pirated versions of Windows. These include replacing the
desktop wallpaper with a black screen every 60 minutes. As well as this, copies of Windows deemed to not be genuine will also have a translucent watermark above the system tray, which Microsoft calls a 'persistent desktop notification.'"
According to the blog, the scheme will be
focusing on the productA edition that is most often stolen, which is apparently Windows XP Pro. Users of this OS, according to Microsoft, have the highest likelihood of having a non-genuine copy.
|
29th August | | |
Apple iPhone control freakery means reduced internet availability
| Based on article from
news.bbc.co.uk
|
A television advert for the iPhone misled consumers, the Advertising Standards Authority has ruled.
Two complaints to the watchdog noted that the advert said all the parts of the internet are on the iPhone.
But the ASA said because
the iPhone did not support Flash or Java - two programs that form part of many webpages - the claim was misleading.
The iPhone employs a web browser called Safari, which is built on freely available software. Many webpages, however, employ small
software programs like Flash and Java to display graphics and animations.
Those programs are proprietary software, and Apple does not allow unapproved software to run on the iPhone. The result is that pages viewed with Safari are missing the
parts of the webpage generated in Flash or Java.
The ASA said the advert gave a misleading impression of the internet capabilities of the iPhone. It must therefore not be aired again in its current form, it said.
|
17th August | | |
Italian government bans Pirate Bay
| Based on article
from product-reviews.net |
The Italian government has banned the daddy of illegal torrent sites, Pirate Bay. However it seems as if the Italian government might have to face the file sharer's underworld, as they are not happy about this.
In a letter on the Pirate
Bay website, the owners are venting their anger at the court of Italian Supremo Silvio Berlusconi; they have labeled him a fascist. They also go on to say that he is part of a corrupt dictatorship that is intent on quashing the Internet’s right to
remain free of censorship.
At the end of the letter, the letter explains to wannabe Italian downloader’s how to get around this block. Pirate Bay is also asking fans of their site to complain to their ISP. They say that they should demand
that the site be reinstated. Update: Pirate Appeal 25th August 2008, based on
article from torrentfreak.com The Pirate Bay has decided
to fight the decision of an Italian judge after it ordered ISPs to block access to the popular tracker. The blocks didn’t prove particularly effective as traffic from Italy only increased but nevertheless, The Pirate Bay is determined to reverse
the decision.
The Pirate Bay have filed an appeal against the decree that forced Italian ISPs to block the BitTorrent tracker. Pirate Bay’s lawyers Giovanni Battista Gallus and Francesco Micozzi are convinced that they have a strong case.
The decree can be defined as ‘original’ or ‘creative’ at best they told TorrentFreak. A Tribunal of three judges will now look into the appeal, and a decision is expected in a few weeks. After that, the decision of
the Tribunal can be further appealed by both parties before the Higher Court.
|
16th August | |
| Consultation to increase online copyright infringement fine to ฃ50,000
| Based on article
from ipo.gov.uk See also PDF version of consultation |
To reflect the commercial damage that large scale copyright infringement causes, the UK-Intellectual Property Office is consulting on increasing the level of fine handed down by a Magistrates’ Court from ฃ5,000 to a maximum of ฃ50,000.
This consultation takes forward Gowers Review recommendation 36, which recommended matching penalties for online and physical copyright infringement by increasing sanctions for online infringements. Scotland does not have Magistrates’
Courts; therefore the consultation considers introducing maximum levels of fines for Scottish summary courts that deal with equivalent cases in Scotland. Send any responses to the consultation, by 31 October 2008 to
gowers36consultation@ipo.gov.uk Or fax or post to the following address; Gowers 36 consultation Copyright and Enforcement Directorate Concept House Cardiff Road
Newport South Wales NP10 8QQ Fax: +44(0) 1633 814922
|
3rd August | | |
ASDA turns the screws on magazine publishers
| Based on article
from guardian.co.uk
|
Asda has come under fire from independent magazine publishers for proposed alterations to distribution arrangements that include the supermarket being given editorial space in the publications it stocks.
MediaGuardian.co.uk has seen an email memo
from Asda's newspaper and magazines buyer sent to some magazine distribution companies that includes a series of demands for a new relationship with the supermarket giant.
Publishers supplying magazines to Asda branded the supermarket's demands
"outrageous" and not "economically viable".
The proposals were due to be discussed at a meeting between representatives of Asda, magazine distributors and publishers. Asda's demands include a request for two pages of editorial
or advertising space each month in titles of the company's choosing.
Another is that shop space given over to a distributor's titles will be subject to a "space contribution" of ฃ10,000 paid to the supermarket. Asda is asking for
a space contribution for each new Asda store opened of ฃ2,500 per magazine title to be paid to the supermarket. The supermarket company is also demanding that any new title distributed in its stores will be subject to an "item set up"
charge of ฃ2,464. According to the email memo, the supermarket is also requesting that a turnover bonus to the value of 2% of its magazine suppliers' total business with Asda be paid quarterly to the supermarket and backdated to January 1
2008. In addition to these charges Asda is also seeking a "hurdle rate" for new titles carried in stores, so if sales of the magazines are 20% less than forecast the supermarket will be compensated with the difference.
Asking for a
contribution for each line [magazine title] in a new store is just not economically viable, a senior magazine publishing source told MediaGuardian.co.uk. The source added that it was "absurd" of Asda to expect editorial teams to give
control away to the retailer.
The most annoying thing is asking for editorial space in magazines. The implications of that are huge because Tesco and Sainsbury would want it too and then all of a sudden magazines are full of advertorials, they said.
|
29th July | | |
The demise of Yahoo Music Store
| From weblog.infoworld.com
|
Yahoo Music Store has sent a message to customers saying they will turn off their DRM servers after September. It joins MSN Music, Sony's Connect music store and other online music services in eventually cutting off customers who purchased DRM-wrapped
tunes.
At least the music industry is starting to get the message that DRM doesn't really work, wrote one reader recently. Vendors who insist on using DRM have just been shooting themselves in the foot, say readers. I used to
occasionally buy a DRM tune from iTunes, but only because I knew I could copy it to CD if I wanted to, wrote another reader. I'd have never bought a song from iTunes without that capability. But still, it was infrequent. Since iTunes Plus arrived,
with its DRM-free high-quality content, I've purchased whole albums from iTunes, something I'd never have done had they been DRM (and 128 bit encoding). If a song doesn't say iTunes Plus on it now, I'll continue looking for something else that does.
The real purpose of DRM is to lock the consumer into a company's product line, wrote another reader. It is meant to extinguish the consumer's property right to first sale and fair use.
|
18th July | | |
Last minute compromise to strip personal ID from date handed to Viacom
| Thanks to Nick See full article from
The Register
|
Two weeks ago, federal judge Louis L. Stanton ordered Google to share over 12TB of YouTube viewing records with Viacom, including account names and IP addresses. But now, the two companies have agreed that all personally identifiable info should be
scrubbed from the records before they change hands.
In the past, Google has publicly questioned whether IP addresses are personal. And Judge Stanton used these comments against Google as part of his maniacal data offensive. But the Googlers now
want you to know that they fully realize how important it is to keep your IP addresses private. It's a convenient change of heart.
We are pleased to report that Viacom, MTV and other litigants have backed off their original demand for all
users' viewing histories and we will not be providing that information, reads a post from YouTube.
Along with several other media-happy operations, the TV and movie giant Viacom s suing YouTube for $1bn, claiming the video-sharing site
encourages people to violate its copyrights. The company demanded access to YouTube's 12TB "logging database" in an effort to show just how many web surfers are pirating its stuff.
|
17th July | | |
eBay are judged not primarily responsible for protecting copyrights
| See full article from the
Guardian |
eBay has won a four-year legal battle with Tiffany over the jeweller's complaint that the online website amounted to a "rat's nest" auction of counterfeit watches, bracelets and necklaces.
A judge in New York ruled yesterday that eBay
could not be held responsible for policing the contents of its site, and that it was Tiffany's role to draw fake designer jewellery to the auctioneer's attention.
The verdict is a relief to eBay which lost a similar case in Paris two weeks ago
when a French court ordered it to pay €38.6m (£30m) in damages to the luxury goods manufacturer LVMH for allowing the sale of fake bags, perfumes and designer clothes.
In a written ruling, US district judge Richard Sullivan said: Tiffany
must ultimately bear the burden of protecting its trademark. But he said he was not unsympathetic to Tiffany's complaint, and hinted that US law might need a fresh look: Policymakers may yet decide that the law as it stands is inadequate to
protect rights owners in light of the increasing scope of internet commerce and the concomitant rise in potential trademark infringement.
The dispute between eBay and the 170-year-old jewellery boutique dates from June 2004 when Tiffany lost
patience with the quantity of silver merchandise available on the internet which claimed to bear its brand.
eBay did not deny that counterfeit items sometimes appeared on its site, but argued it removed them swiftly whenever they were flagged up.
Update: Appeal 14th August 2008 Jewelry giant Tiffany & Co. is appealing a recent federal court decision that cleared eBay
from responsibility for counterfeit items which appear on the online auction site. Update: Fake L'Oreal products 17th May 2009 eBay has won an important legal case when a French court ruled that it was not liable for the sale of fake L'Oreal products through its website.
The Paris-based cosmetics company claimed not enough was being done to crackdown on couterfeit goods sold on eBay.
Ebay had already lost similar cases in France brought by Hermes and Louis Vuitton.
But today's ruling found that
the internet giant had complied with its obligations and acted 'in good faith' to tackle the problem of fake goods. Update: Fake L'Oreal products on UK eBay
26th May 2009. See article from
google.com A British court has ruled that eBay is not liable for bogus beauty products sold on its Web site, dealing a blow to cosmetics company L'Oreal's campaign against the
online auction giant.
L'Oreal SA has taken eBay Inc. to court across Europe, suing in Britain, Germany, France, Belgium and Spain over the sale of fake fragrances and cosmetics on the site.
L'Oreal claims there is an increasing volume of
counterfeit goods being sold on eBay. The online auctioneer said negotiations between the companies on the issue broke down because L'Oreal was being unreasonable.
Justice Richard David Arnold ruled in London's High Court that eBay Europe was not
liable for trademark infringements committed by its users.
|
14th July | | |
Protesting against Sweden's state snoops
| See full article from
TorrentFreak
|
In June the Swedish parliament passed a controversial surveillance law that gives authorities a mandate to read all email and listen in on all phone calls without warrant or court order. In response to the law, The Pirate Party organized rallies,
bloggers and journalists turned into activists, and even Google decided to relocate their servers.
The aftermath of the vote on wiretapping legislation has been turbulent, to say the least. Bloggers have not wasted a minute in their criticism,
mainstream media eventually caught up and the newspapers are now running stories and editorials every day. Various viral campaigns have flourished along with grassroots activism and The Pirate Party has hauled full sails to catch the wind that will blow
them straight into European Parliament during the elections of 2009.
That's not all. Google and former public telecoms company Telia moved their servers out of Sweden. Belgium says it will sue Sweden since Belgian citizens may be wiretapped
without any apparent reason. Anne Ramberg, secretary-general of the Swedish Bar Association, has called for challenges to the law in Swedish and European courts and similar demands have been heard from several other interest groups, like the Journalist's
Union. See full article from Slashdot
The Swedish government has kept curiously quiet about the new law's objectives but sources close to the intelligence community say that Russia is the prime target. 80% of Russia's contacts with large parts of the world travel through cables in Sweden.
That is the core of the issue, said one source.
|
10th July | |
| France proposes its 3 strikes law for EU Telecoms Package
| See full article from
The Register |
France has suggested an amendment to the pan-European Telecoms Package, which would bar broadband access to anyone who persists in illegally downloading music or films.
Last month, the government of Nicolas Sarkozy insisted on a similar three-strikes-and-you're-out
scheme for France. Under a cross-industry agreement, ISPs would have to cut off access for up to a year for third-time offenders. Sarkozy believes there is no reason that the internet should be a lawless zone .
The French legislation,
which still needs to be examined by the Senate and eventually by the National Assembly, is facing fierce criticism. The French ISP association says it is against the law.
Now Sarkozy, who took over the European presidency this week, is trying to
stretch the measure across Europe through amendments to the Telecoms Package, a review of European telecoms law currently in the European Parliament.
The Industry Committee and Internal Market Committees will vote on the telecom package on
Monday. The plenary discussion and vote for the whole package will take place in September.
|
9th July | | |
Ofcom ready to join battle against file sharers
| Based on article from
PC Pro
|
Ofcom boss Ed Richards says the telecoms censor is ready to play a constructive role in the ongoing debate over online music piracy.
To date, Ofcom has not made a lot of public noise about the piracy issue, Richards said in a speech
to telecoms bosses. But that should not be mistaken for a lack of interest or concern. Our formal focus may be limited. But this sort of piracy is something that affects network operators, ISPs, content creators and consumers - and as the converged
regulator we have of course
Not surprisingly, Ofcom comes down on the side of the industry, claiming file sharing is clogging up networks. The issue is critical. An operator investing in next-generation networks will not want it clogged up
with illegal peer-to-peer content if that means no-one will pay to ensure a return on the investment, as we have seen in some Asia Pacific markets, Richards said: And content providers, self evidently, do not want illegal traffic undermining their
investment in IPR.
As the converged communications regulator, if we can play a constructive role in helping to find a common solution in the best interests of companies and consumers we would be very happy to do so.
|
8th July | | |
Virgin Broadband threaten their customers with disconnection
| See full article from Out-Law
|
Virgin Media has said that a threat sent out to 800 of its customers that they could be disconnected from the internet because of alleged copyright infringement was a mistake.
The envelope containing a letter warning subscribers that their
account was being used for illegal file-sharing was printed with the words Important. If you don't read this, your broadband could be disconnected.
A Virgin Media spokeswoman told OUT-LAW that the message was a mistake: We are not
accusing our customers of doing anything, we are alerting them to the fact that illegal file sharing has been tracked to their account. This could have been someone else in the house or an unsecured wireless network. This is an education campaign .
The company has shared information with music rights holders' group the BPI in order to identify accounts which may have been used for copyright-infringing file sharing. The spokeswoman said, though, that no names or addresses were passed to the
BPI and that it had been responsible for the envelope, a mistake that it was "rectifying immediately".
|
7th July | |
| Viacom to examine YouTube logs for copyright transgressions
| See full article from the
Guardian
|
Google is being forced to hand over the personal information of every person who has ever watched a video on the YouTube website as part of a billion-dollar court case in the US.
A judge in New York has ordered that Google, which owns YouTube,
must pass on the details of more than 100 million people to Viacom, the US broadcasting company which owns channels including MTV and Nickelodeon.
The data will include unique internet addresses, email accounts and the history of every video
watched on the website, giving Viacom's experts the ability to conduct a detailed examination of the viewing habits of millions of people around the world.
The decision is the latest twist in a long court battle between the two companies over
claims that Google encourages copyright infringement on the video sharing website. Judge Louis Stanton, who is presiding over the $1bn lawsuit, said the data handover was required in order to allow Viacom to build its case.
While information on
who has watched YouTube's countless videos of sneezing pandas and laughing babies may seem trivial, civil liberties campaigners fear the ruling could set a precedent for the level of privacy afforded to people using the internet, and that internet
companies could now be sued in order to get hold of sensitive personal data.
In a statement yesterday, Google said it would lobby for the data it provides to be scrubbed clean of personal information: We are disappointed the court granted
Viacom's overreaching demand for viewing history. We will ask Viacom to respect users' privacy and allow us to anonymise the logs before producing them under the court's order .
|
2nd July | |
| Maker of overpriced handbags wins case against eBay
| See full article
from the New York Times |
Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, a maker of high-end goods and fashion and luxury products, successfully challenged eBay for a second time in the French court, arguing that 90% of the Louis Vuitton bags and Dior perfumes sold on eBay are fakes. The court ruled that eBay was not doing enough to stamp out counterfeit sales. The decision, while costly, is unlikely to have a drastic effect on the way eBay conducts business because it has already made changes to police its site for counterfeit goods.
EBay said it would appeal the French court's order that it pay 38.6 million euros.
EBay said in a brief statement issued after the decision that the case went beyond counterfeiting to include manufacturers proscribing the territories in
which its products could be sold.
When counterfeits appear on our site we take them down swiftly, and today's ruling is not about our fight against counterfeiting, eBay said. It's about an attempt by LVMH to protect uncompetitive
commercial practices at the expense of consumer choice and the livelihood of law-abiding sellers that eBay empowers every day. We will fight this ruling on their behalf.
In January 2007, after being sued again in Paris by Moët Hennessy
over Louis Vuitton handbags, eBay changed course on counterfeiting. Under the rules introduced then, eBay sellers in a certain number of critical categories, like luxury goods and clothing, were limited on the number of items they could sell and could
not hold the shorter one-day auctions, a favorite of swindlers who hope to take their money and disappear. EBay also introduced geographical restrictions, preventing sellers in China and Hong Kong, for example, from listing those items at all.
EBay also began delaying some listings from being published to the site to give its employees time to review the items. That tactic has ended up aggravating many honest sellers, who complain the delay cuts into their profits. EBay now says it has over 2,000 people worldwide to tackle counterfeiting and that 95% of fraudulent listings are removed before the auction ends. The company also said that last year it suspended about 50,000 sellers and blocked 40,000 previously suspended sellers from returning to the service.
|
29th June | |
| Work underway to pinpoint the location of internet users
| From Linx Public Affairs
|
| You have visited Playboy.com in contravention of Acacia Avenue community standards. Guilty! Police dispatched. Pack for 3 years hard labour! |
Ray Bellis at Nominet offers a clear description of work underway that could lead to ISPs running location services, which would provide an accurate geographic location of the current user of an IP address at a given moment. He suggests
regulation to require ISPs to provide such a service is necessary so that when VoIP telephony users call the emergency operator for a blue-light service, the operator will know the caller’s location without asking, just as currently happens on the PSTN.
Alex Bligh raises some relevant technical objections. However this proposal also raises some interesting policy questions:
- If ISPs ran a location service, to what other uses might it be put? Could this become a new revenue stream? Might the ability to obtain accurate location information about a user be employed to enable segmentation of the Internet, in the same way
other markets are geographically segmented? For example, should non-Americans be allowed to access NBC’s online coverage of the Olympics, when European broadcasters have paid for exclusive coverage in their jurisdiction?
- In this context, what
control should a user be given about their location? Should they be able to make their ISP lie about their location? Should they be able to force their ISP to refuse to disclose their location, or should the ISP be able to obtain a notional consent from
the user through the Terms of Service? If so, should location services be opt-in or opt-out for the user?
However in the first instance the questions are likely to relate to protecting users seeking blue-light services. It’s entirely possible the wider ramifications will only be considered when it’s too late to do much about it. |
23rd June | | |
MPAA claim to be able to extort copyright damages without proof
| See full article from
Wired |
The Motion Picture Association of America, MPAA, said that intellectual-property holders should have the right to collect damages, perhaps as much as $150,000 per copyright violation, without having to prove infringement.
Mandating such proof
could thus have the pernicious effect of depriving copyright owners of a practical remedy against massive copyright infringement in many instances, MPAA attorney Marie L. van Uitert wrote to the federal judge overseeing the Jammie Thomas trial.
It is often very difficult, and in some cases, impossible, to provide such direct proof when confronting modern forms of copyright infringement, whether over P2P networks or otherwise; understandably, copyright infringers typically do not keep
records of infringement, van Uitert wrote on behalf of the movie studios, a position shared with the Recording Industry Association of America, which sued Thomas, the single mother of two.
A Duluth, Minnesota, jury in October dinged Thomas
$222,000 for "making available" 24 songs on the Kazaa network in the nation's first and only RIAA case to go to trial. United States District Court Judge Michael Davis instructed the 12 panelists that they need only find Thomas had an open
share folder, not that anyone from the public actually copied her files.
Judge Davis suggested last month that he might have erred in giving that "making available" jury instruction, and invited briefing from the community at large. A
hearing is set for August, and the judge is mulling whether to order a mistrial.
|
20th June | | |
Three strikes and you're out of broadband access
| Based on article from the Times
|
Anyone who persists in illicit downloading of music or films will be barred from broadband access under a controversial new law in Framce
There is no reason that the internet should be a lawless zone, President Sarkozy told his Cabinet
yesterday as it endorsed the three-strikes-and-you’re-out scheme that from next January will hit downloaders.
Under a cross-industry agreement, internet service providers (ISPs) must cut off access for up to a year for third-time
offenders.
In a classical French approach the scheme will be enforced by a new £15 million a year state agency, to be called Hadopi (high authority for copyright protection and dissemination of works on the internet).
The law has
strong backing from Sarkozy, who has taken a close interest in artists’ rights since marrying Carla Bruni, a nude model and folk singer. However, it has run into opposition from a range of bodies including the state data protection agency,
consumer and civil liberties groups and the European Parliament. Big web companies, including Google, and Dailymotion, the video-sharing firm, refused to sign up to the 40-member industry accord last November.
Mocking the scheme yesterday
Libération newspaper gave warning that families could be stripped of their internet and broadband telephone and television if a neighbour’s teenager uses their wireless router to load his iPod.
Under the accord, the entertainment industry
will also drop existing copyright protection on French material so that music or videos bought legally online can be played on any sort of device.
|
19th June | | |
Rock band Kiss refuse to make new records until music sharing stops
| Sounds more likely that they have run out of new ideas for songs Thanks to Nick Based on
article from NME
|
The rock band Kiss have declared that the record industry is "dead".
Bassist Gene Simmonds explained that his band were refusing to record new material until illegal downloading ceases, calling the act of downloading
"uncivilised".
The record industry is dead, the Daily Star reported the singer saying: It's six feet underground and unfortunately the fans have done this.
They've decided to download and file-share. There is no
record industry around so we're going to wait until everybody settles down and becomes civilised. As soon as the record industry pops its head up we'll record new material.
Singer Paul Stanley went on to defend the band's policy of only
playing old hits live: With any classic band that hits the road, the last thing you want to hear is their new songs.
|
18th June | | |
Press agency to meet with bloggers over fair use
| See
full article from
Wired
|
The Associated Press, following criticism from bloggers over an AP assertion of copyright, plans to meet this week with a bloggers' group to help form guidelines under which AP news stories could be quoted online.
Jim Kennedy, the AP's director
of strategic planning, said that he planned to meet Thursday with Robert Cox, president of the Media Bloggers Association, as part of an effort to create standards for online use of AP stories by bloggers that would protect AP content without
discouraging bloggers from legitimately quoting from it.
The meeting comes after AP sent a legal notice last week to Rogers Cadenhead, the author of a blog called the Drudge Retort, a news community site whose name is a parody of the prominent
blog the Drudge Report.
The notice called for the blog to remove several postings that AP believed was an improper use of its stories. Other bloggers subsequently lambasted AP for going after a small blogger whom they thought appeared to be
engaging in a legally permissible and widely practiced activity protected under "fair use" provisions of copyright law.
|
17th June | | |
Press agency harangue website over 'unfair use' of content
| Clearly of massive interest to the internet world. Maybe because of its syndicated nature, AP get little direct benefit from link backs etc.
Blogger's links are more likely to be directed to the newspapers publishing AP stories rather than AP themselves. So where BBC and major newspaper websites become massively dominant, partly through millions of sites linking to them, AP tend to miss out.
See full article from the Guardian
|
The US news agency Associated Press has found itself at the centre of a furious debate over the fair use of material by bloggers after its lawyers issued a takedown notice to a small, independent news site that it claims had quoted too heavily from its
news stories.
AP said six instances of copyright violation have taken place on Drudge Retort – a leftwing comment site set up as an alternative to the Drudge Report – including one post that pasted 18 words from a story on Hillary Clinton
followed by a 32-word direct quote. The news agency's vice-president and director of strategic planning, Jim Kennedy, appeared to acknowledge the upset over the weekend, telling the New York Times that AP didn't want to "cast a pall over
the blogosphere by being heavy-handed".
AP is understood to have suspended its attempts to challenge bloggers until it can review its guidelines, but Kennedy said it has not withdrawn its legal notice to Drudge Retort.
Cutting
and pasting a lot of content into a blog is not what we want to see, he told the New York Times: It is more consistent with the spirit of the internet to link to content so people can read the whole thing in context.
|
16th June | | |
Canada unveils law against DRM cracking
| See full article from
The Register |
The Canadian government today unveiled a controversial proposal to update the country's copyright laws.
Bill C-61 seeks to fight piracy over the internet by giving companies even more power over where digital content can be moved.
While
it reduces the maximum fines for criminals actually caught violating intellectual property laws — the bill makes it illegal for anyone to break the digital locks (DRM) that restrict how media (even legitimately purchased) can be used.
Canada's
government sought to introduce similar copyright reforms in December, 2006, but back-pedalled quickly. Outraged opponents claimed the the government was simply copying the US Millennium Copyright Act and pandering to US lobbyists and record labels.
This time around, ministers delivering the bill stressed the "made-in-Canada" approach again and again in the announcement.
The bill proposes to reduce the liability for an individual from Canada's current maximum fine of $20,000
for each infringement to just $500 per case, even if it involves multiple offenses. (Assuming the offending files are for private use only.) That means, for example, an individual caught downloading 20 songs illegally would still be fined a maximum $500.
But if that person was caught having circumvented any DRM on those files, the current $20,000 maximum damages per infringement would once again apply.
In addition, any person caught making, selling or distributing technology designed to
crack DRM protections are subject to criminal charges.
The bill states that it is not an infringement to record audio or video being broadcast for personal use, unless it was available solely over the internet or circumvents any DRM. Recording
television shows that are flagged by broadcasters is also illegal.
According to Canada's The Globe and Mail, the legislation is unlikely to be passed by the minority Conservative party. Parliament is also set to break soon for summer, presumably
leaving the bill to die.
|
15th June | | |
Supporting the hype for Metallica's next album
| See full article from
Strangeglue |
Heavy metal band, Metallica, have been trying to shoot themselves in the foot.
The initial trouble started when the band's label invited a small group of journalists to listen to previews of the new album, only to demand that blog articles
reviewing the tracks were taken down.
In a further twist the band have issued a climbdown blaming their management for the foolish decision to try and censor articles. In a statement published on Metallica's website they said:
While we
occasionally enjoy reading the various comments, rumors, speculation, reviews, gossip and all the good that the internet brings, rarely do we feel the desire/need to respond to the “blogosphere” . . . hey, everyone is entitled to have their thoughts and
opinions, right?
However, once we re-surfaced on Tuesday after a few weeks on tour in Europe, we were informed that someone at Q Prime (our managers) had made the error of asking a few publications to take down reviews of the rough mixes
from the new record that were posted on their sites.
Our response was WHY?!!! Why take down mostly positive reviews of the new material and prevent people from getting psyched about the next record. . . that makes no sense to us!
|
14th June | | |
Virgin to spy on their customers for the music industry
| Thanks to Nick See full article from
BoingBoing
|
Virgin Media, the UK's largest cable-modem provider, has decided that it will spy on its users to protect the record industry. It is sending out letters to thousands of customers warning them that infringement has been detected on their network
connections (Virgin customers who leave their WiFi open will be collateral damage in this fight). Virgin is under no obligation to do this. The law is clear that they bear no liability for downloading on their network, nor do they have any duty to
spy on users or send out warnings. This is entirely off their own bat, and will come straight out of the company's bottom line. Of course, the British record industry is ecstatic and sees this as the first step in getting a law passed that will require
every ISP to spy on every Internet user in the country and cut off infringers.
The campaign is a joint venture between Virgin Media and the British Phonographic Industry (BPI), which represents the major record labels. The BPI ultimately wants
internet companies to implement a "three strikes and out" rule to warn and ultimately disconnect the estimated 6.5 million customers whose accounts are used for regular criminal activity.
|
12th June | | |
MPAA wants to ban new release HD films from being copied off TV
| See full
article from ars technica
|
At the request of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have quietly launched a proceeding on whether to let video program distributors remotely block consumers from recording recently released
movies on their DVRs. The technology that does this is called Selectable Output Control (SOC), but the FCC restricts its use. The MPAA wants a waiver on that restriction in the case of high-definition movies broadcast prior to their release as
DVDs.
The Petitioners' theatrical movies are too valuable in this early distribution window to risk their exposure to unauthorized copying, MPAA wrote to the FCC last month. Distribution over insecure outputs would facilitate the
illegal copying and redistribution of this high value content, causing untold damage to the DVD and other 'downstream' markets. Less than a month after the request, the FCC has given MPAA a public comment period on the question that will last through
July 7.
The MPAA promises that once said movies have reached the home video sale/rental stage, the blocking will stop.
The FCC wants comments and oppositions to MPAA's proposal by June 25 and replies to comments by July 7.
|
8th June | |
| UK File sharers using OiNK arrested and bailed
| See full article
from Pitchfork Media |
OiNK was a file sharing website specialising in pre-release music CDs
A series of recent reports on blog Torrent Freak indicates that six former OiNK users were arrested in late May by British authorities for sharing music via the website. They
are currently out on bail.
The Cleveland Police confirmed the arrests to Torrent Freak; the six persons in question include five males and one female. In each case, suspects were taken in, interrogated by police, and required to provide
fingerprints and DNA samples.
The arrests apparently took place as part of Operation Ark Royal, the ongoing investigation of a "massive piracy scam" (i.e. OiNK) undertaken by the Cleveland Police's Organized Crime Unit in conjunction
with the RIAA-affiliated International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and the British Phonographic Industry (BPI). These mark the first OiNK-related arrests since that of site founder Alan Ellis, whose legal team has reportedly offered
free counsel to some of recent arrestees. (Torrent Freak reports that Ellis has yet to be charged with any crime.)
The six people arrested were all suspected of sharing albums prior to their release dates. Torrent Freak reports that at least
two of the arrests are for the alleged uploading of a single album.
The BPI shared the following statement with The Register: The BPI and IFPI worked with the police in order to close down the OiNK tracker site last October. The illegal
online distribution of music, particularly pre-release, is hugely damaging, and as OiNK was the biggest source for pre-releases at the time we moved to shut it down.
Concerns are myriad at this point, ranging from how authorities can prove
their cases using the easily manipulated user data seized during the initial OiNK raid, to why the police are involved at all in what some have suggested is merely a matter that calls for civil action, to, of course, whether the arrests will continue--
and, if so, who will be next.
|
7th June | |
| The nastiness that is the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
| See full article from
BoingBoing See Draft ACTA
from Wikileaks |
Wikileaks has the full text of a memo concerning the dread Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a draft treaty that does away with those pesky public trade-negotiations at the United Nations (with participation from citizens' groups and public interest
groups) in favor of secret, closed-door meetings where entertainment industry giants get to give marching orders to governments in private.
It's some pretty crazy reading -- among other things, ACTA will outlaw P2P (even when used to share works
that are legally available, like my books), and crack down on things like region-free DVD players. All of this is taking place out of the public eye, presumably with the intention of presenting it as a fait accompli just as the ink is drying on the
treaty.
Honestly, it's becoming clearer and clearer that the entertainment industry is an existential threat to the idea of free speech, open tools, and an open communications network.
|
1st June | | |
Gadget shop threaten legal action to gag negative comments
| Thanks to lolwhut See full
article from The Inquirer
|
Online Gadget Shop, Redsave, has responded to a rash of complaints about its services and practices by insisting that at least two well-respected consumer feedback sites remove any posts relating to its business under threat of further legal action.
MoneySavingExpert.com, which has removed any posts relating to the company, said that Redsave had made: repeated threats of legal action because of the enormous amount of people who have posted comments warning people away from using this company
.
Asked if he was caving in to a legal threat, Martin Lewis, the man behind MSE said that he had commissioned a leading financial investigative journalist to research all complaints, look into Redsave and see if the complaints are justified.
Hotukdeals is in a similar situation with redsave insisting that the site's ISP get involved in the fight. An administrator on the site posted the following a couple of days ago: Redsave have complained to
our ISP about comments made by our members and given a take-down notice.
We are taking legal advice and will be corresponding with Redsave's lawyers.
Pending the outcome of that correspondence and other inquiries, we have temporarily
removed the content.
Once we have completed the compliance process, we will repost your comments, in whole or part, as permitted by our lawyers. We anticipate this will be within a fortnight.
We believe HotUKDeals members have a right to
comment on their truthful experience with merchants and we are committed to defending that right vigorously even when faced with legal threats. We believe that if truthful but negative comments cannot be published for fear of legal action, the ability of
consumers to inform themselves is fundamentally eroded.
We believe that both consumers and merchants have the right to fair and free speech and we will not be intimidated by legal threats which attempt to impinge on this right.
Many of the complaints from consumers seem to be relating to Redsave's 'Shopping Pass' which allows users to buy at heavily-discounted prices for a £19.99 monthly subscription.
Anyone who elects to buy a product at the
Shopping Pass price automatically signs up for a free 30-day subscription to the service.
If the 'free' subscription isn't cancelled within that 30-day period, then the purchaser's payment card will be debited ad infinitum.
Consumers have
complained that they have to go to "extreme lengths" to cancel the rolling fees with some desperate people allegedly resorting closing bank accounts in order to stop the charges. We're not sure how this one will pan out but, if the men
in grey suits do get their way, and people are prevented from expressing their opinion of a product or service, it will be a sad day for the internet's consumer power indeed.
|
31st May | |
| Viacom sue Google over copyright issues
| See full article from the Telegraph
|
Google has claimed that a billion dollar lawsuit filed against YouTube, the video-sharing website it owns, threatens internet freedom.
The claim follows legal action by Viacom, an US entertainment company, which is suing YouTube for breach of
copyright.
Viacom claim that more than 150,000 unauthorised clips of its copyrighted material have been found on YouTube, and that YouTube and Google, its parent company, had done “little or nothing” to stop infringement.
Google' s
legal team said that Viacom' s action threatens the way hundreds of millions of people legitimately exchange information across the internet, and that it had gone far beyond its legal obligations in assisting content owners to protect their
works.
Viacom filed the initial lawsuit last year, and tabled an amended version last month. It said that YouTube had consistently allowed unauthorised clips of television shows such as South Park and SpongeBob SquarePants to be
posted on the site and watched thousands of times.
It also stated that the Al Gore documentary, An Inconvenient Truth , had been illegally uploaded to YouTube, and received an “astounding” 1.5 billion views by site users.
Google is
willing to see the matter resolved in the US Supreme Court, said David Eun, vice president of content partnerships. The search giant claims that making service providers liable for the actions of users would threaten the way hundreds of millions of
people legitimately exchange information, news, entertainment and political and artistic expression.
Google also claims that it has abided by the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, which protects service providers from liability for copyright
infringement as long as they act swiftly to remove that material once it has been reported. Viacom, however, argues that the entire business model for the YouTube site relies on copyrighted content, and that it is unable to keep sufficient track of the
unauthorised clips uploaded to its pages. Last year, Google introduced a content-checking system to try and prevent copyrighted clips being uploaded in the first place, by matching videos against a library of original content to identify copyright
infringement.
|
20th May | | |
BBC move to exterminate fans knitting behind the sofa
| See full article from the
Guardian
|
A Dr Who fan blogging as Mazzmatazz has for some time been posting knitting patterns on the internet to show others how to recreate cuddly versions of the villainous Ood and Adipose aliens from the current BBC series. The BBC, however, has taken
exception to this since someone tried to sell one of her patterns on eBay. This, the broadcaster evidently felt, represented a clear and present danger to the £800m a year its commercial arm makes through its intellectual property and merchandising
rights every year and it has unleashed its lawyers on her.
The readiness of giant corporations to confuse an excess of enthusiastic fandom with an insidious commercial threat is not heartening. Update:
Designed to Appease See full article from the Times , 25th May 2008 A report in The Times and a very British public outcry persuaded the BBC to adopt the knitting patterns used to create
the Doctor Who monsters – instead of threatening to force them out of existence.
The report generated a string of comments from Times readers, who questioned why the BBC was threatening one of its licence fee payers. Lawyers had previously said
that there was little doubt that Mazzmatazz had broken the BBC' s Doctor Who trademark by mentioning it on her website.
Only three days later, the BBC is exploring whether it can help to generate some money out of the designs, with a
spokesman for the Corporation saying that it was never interested in stifling fan creativity in any way. The woman behind the patterns for the fat, white Adipose and the squid-faced Ood characters has been invited to meet BBC executives
with a view to creating a limited edition of exclusive promotional products for the public to buy.
On her website, Mazzmatazz, who has chosen not to reveal her real name, said that she just wanted to thank everyone who has sent me a
message of support over the past few days and confirmed that she was currently discussing matters with the BBC.
|
16th May | | |
Judgement reserved in foreign satellite subscription case
| See full article from
Morning Advertiser
|
The Judge in the landmark High Court legal battle between the Premier League and foreign satellite suppliers QC Leisure and AV Station has retired to consider his verdict.
The Premier League is seeking a ban on importing, selling, hiring,
advertising, installing and maintaining decoders.
The defendants deny breaking copyright law and claim that the attempt to stop them selling the decoder cards is in breach of the EC Treaty, which guarantees the right of free trade between member
states.
It is not known when Mr Justice Kitchin will deliver his verdict.
|
19th April | |
| Putting commercial interests above free trade
| Based on
article from the
Independent
|
The Premier League has launched a High Court action yesterday to ban cheap live televised matches. The League is seeking damages and an order to stop companies supplying equipment which enables British viewers to receive the games via a foreign
broadcaster rather than the more expensive domestic broadcaster BSkyB.
James Mellor QC, representing the Premier League, told Mr Justice Kitchin at the London court: It is a good old-fashioned rip off. He said QC Leisure and AV Station are
supplying domestic decoding cards from Greece and North Africa which allow British viewers access to broadcasting services to which they are not entitled. In this country you can watch Premiership football courtesy of Sky. You pay your Sky
subscription.
He said that if publicans want to show the matches to customers, they have to pay a more expensive commercial subscription. If a publican takes a domestic Sky card and uses it to display Premiership football in his pub, he is
obtaining unauthorised access. It is a breach of contract and a criminal offence. There have been upwards of 180 prosecutions of publicans who have used domestic Sky cards for commercial purposes.
The companies claim that European law allows
the free movement of goods throughout the community and if the cards are available on the market, then they can be sold anywhere within the EC.
Mellor said the case is not about free movement of goods but about illegal infringement of copyright.
It is about dealers making a fat profit. All they do is get hold of a foreign card and apply a substantial mark up of up to 100 per cent. They are just acting as a postal service. How do they get hold of these cards? They get them through deception.
He said the defendants provide false names and addresses in Greece and North Africa to apply for the cards. The cards cannot be sold outside the particular country where they are issued and when the authorised suppliers find out about the
deception, the contracts are terminated and the service is switched off, he said.
The case is expected to last up to two weeks.
|
18th April | | |
Sky makes 'anti-piracy' change to HD set top box
| Thanks to Nick From Digital Spy
|
Component video outputs have been dropped from the newest version of Sky's high definition boxes in an apparent anti-piracy move.
Older Sky HD boxes have both HDMI and component outputs; however, of the two, only the HDMI connection supports HDCP
- high bandwidth digital content protection - which is designed to make copying content in high definition move difficult.
HDMI is now a standard connection on high definition televisions but older equipment may only support component video. It
is thought Sky left such connections on earlier models for this reason; in 2005, Sky told Digital Spy that all programming would be available over the component outputs.
Sky has amended the Sky HD user guide with an explanation stating that a
minor adjustment has been made by removing the HD analogue component video connection.
It added: This change was made to help prevent the illegal copying of HD programmes and movies, and enable Sky to continue to bring you quality
entertainment.
|
17th April | | |
European parliament opposes loss of internet for fie sharers
| Based on article from the
BBC
|
European politicians have voted down calls to throw suspected file-sharers off the net.
The idea to cut off persistent pirates formed part of a wide-ranging report on creative industries written for the European parliament.
But in a
narrow vote MEPs backed an amendment to the report which said net bans conflicted with civil liberties and human rights.
It puts MEPS at odds with governments planning such action against file sharers.
The vote shows that MEPs
want to strike a balance between the interests of rights holders and those of consumers, and that big measures like cutting off internet access shouldn't be used, said a spokeswoman for the European Parliament after the vote.
The amendment
was added to the so-called Bono Report on the Cultural Industries. This was written by French MEP Guy Bono to inform forthcoming European parliament policy that would encourage growth in the region's creative industries. The amendment called on the EC
and its member nations to avoid adopting measures conflicting with civil liberties and human rights and with the principles of proportionality, effectiveness and dissuasiveness, such as the interruption of internet access.
The vote has no
legal force and leaves national governments free to implement their own anti-piracy plans. But, said the Open Rights Group, it does "signify resistance" among European law makers to the strict measures that nations such as France are
implementing.
|
20th March | | |
Japan joins countries considering ejecting file sharers from the internet
| See full article from Google News
|
Japanese companies plan to cut off the Internet connection of anyone who illegally downloads files in one of the world's toughest measures against online piracy.
Faced with complaints from the music, movie and video-game industries, four
associations representing Japan's Internet service providers have agreed to take drastic action, the Yomiuri Shimbun said.
The newspaper, quoting unnamed sources, said service providers would send e-mails to people who repeatedly made illegal
copies and terminate their connections if they did not stop.
The Internet companies will set up a panel next month involving groups representing copyright holders to draft the new guidelines, the report said.
|
17th March | | |
Record companies attack Eircom over filesharing
| See full article from
Linx Public Affairs |
The four major record companies have launched a lawsuit against Eircom, the largest ISP in Ireland, alleging that it is “making available” copyrighted music tracks through its network. The lawsuit aims to force Eircom to introduce network level blocking
of peer-to-peer filesharing.
According to reports on The Irish Times, Eircoms lawyers have said that the company has no knowledge of specific instances of illegal activity infringing on the rights of the record company, and reasserted Eircom’s
protection from being forced to monitor its network under the terms of the Electronic Commerce Directive.
Eircom has refused to institute network level content controls, citing the same Directive. As a “mere conduit”, Eircom cannot be held liable
for content that it merely carries over its network. If continued to judgment, this case may set an important precedent: whereas the recent Belgian case of Sabam v Scarlet was widely criticised as being wrongly decided at first instance because it was
brought against a smaller ISP with inadequate legal defense resources, Eircom is a fully-funded former monopoly national telecoms operator.
|
16th January | |
| UK Government stick and carrot for copyright protection
| From The Register see
full article See also Proposed changes to Copyright Exceptions
|
The government have turned up the heat on internet providers, warning that laws to force disconnection of illegal filesharers are already being drafted for a parliamentary debut in November.
Lord Triesman, the minister for intellectual property,
said that if ISPs can't agree a voluntary scheme with the music and film industries by the end of summer, he will press Gordon Brown to introduce legislation in the next Queen's speech. It's the first time Triesman has put a public timescale on
the threat he made last autumn to bypass self-regulation.
Triesman emphasised that the government speaks with one voice on illegal filesharing. We're not prepared to see the kinds of damage that will be done to the creative economy, he
said.
If a joint settlement to monitor and cut off persistent copyright infringers isn't signed voluntarily, legislation imposing rules would likely be rubber-stamped by MPs. Triesman also revealed that the UK government is working
with the French on their anti-infringement legislation - measures which Nikolas Sarkozy promised in his presidential manifesto.
The proposed laws create an enforcement body that French ISPs will turn over filesharing data to. The "three
strikes" system will see infringers disconnnected if they don't sign and stick to a promise not to share copyright material.
Triesman said: The French are plainly very serious about this, it's really interesting. We will actually do quite
a lot of work alongside them - not neccessarily to reach exactly the same objective, but I think we've got a desire to share evidence and analyses. There's no point repeating each other's research.
|
15th January | | |
UK government propose changes to copyright exceptions
| From the BBC see
full article See also
Proposed changes to Copyright Exceptions
|
Copying music from a CD to a home computer could be made legal under new proposals from the UK government.
Millions of people already "rip" discs to their computers and move the files to MP3 players, although the process is technically
against copyright law.
Intellectual property minister Lord Triesman said the law should be changed so it "keeps up with the times".
Music industry bodies gave a cautious welcome to the proposals, which are up for public
consultation until 8 April.
The changes would apply only to people copying music for personal use - meaning multiple copying and internet file-sharing would still be banned.
Owners would not be allowed to sell or give away their original
discs once they had made a copy. To allow consumers to copy works and then pass on the original could result in a loss of sales, the proposals warn.
UK music industry body the BPI said it supported the move to clarify the law for
consumers, but warned that any changes should not damage the rights of record companies.
The Association of Independent Music (Aim) said the proposals did not go far enough - pointing out that CDs could become obsolete in the next decade. It said
that, once CDs are replaced, the law could be misused to "open the floodgates to unstoppable copying", adding that it would like to see copyright holders compensated when music was copied.
Lord Triesman said the proposed changes would
explore where the boundaries lie between strong protection for right holders and appropriate levels of access for users.
|
8th January | |
| Paid for DRM movies deleted on a whim
| From David Freeberg see
full article
|
Hollywood isn’t thrilled about my new High Def monitor and they’ve decided to punish me by revoking my Watch Now privileges from Netflix. [Streaming film rentals]
When I tried to launch a streaming movie, I was greeted with an error message
asking me to “reset” my DRM. Luckily, Netflix’s help page on the topic included a link to a DRM reset utility, but when I went to install the program, I stopped dead in my tracks when I saw this warning.
“this will
potentially remove playback licenses from your computer, including those from companies other than Netflix or Microsoft” I decided to call Netflix’s technical support and they confirmed my worst fears. In order to access the Watch Now
service, I had to give Microsoft’s DRM sniffing program access to all of the files on my hard drive. If the software found any non-Netflix video files, it would revoke my rights to the content and invalidate the DRM. This means that I would lose all the
movies that I’ve purchased eg from Amazon’s Unbox.
Netflix’s software allows them to look at the video card, cables and the monitor that you are using and when they checked mine out, it was apparently a little too high def to pass their DRM
filters.
Because my computer allows me to send an unrestricted HDTV feed to my monitor, Hollywood has decided to revoke my ability to stream 480 resolution video files from Netflix. In order to fix my problem, Netflix recommended that I downgrade
to a lower res VGA setup.
As part of their agreement with Hollywood, Netflix uses a program called COPP (Certified Output Protection Protocal). COPP is made by Microsoft and the protocol restricts how you are able to transfer digital files off of
your PC.
The irony in all of this, is that the DRM that Hollywood is so much in love with, is really only harming their paying customers. When you do a DRM reset, it’s not your pirated files that get revoked, it’s the ones that you already paid
for that are at risk. I’m not allowed to watch low res Netflix files, even though I have the capability to download high def torrents? How does this even make sense? It’s as if the studios want their digital strategies to fail.
|
6th January | | |
Sorry, your search did not match any Google concepts
| From the Guardian see
full article
|
There was plenty of hysteria this week about the fact that Google Reader (RSS/News reader) shares private data and has ruined Christmases...
The basic problem is that Google unilaterally changed the system so that links you thought you were
sharing with your spouse or a few close friends were actually shared with anyone you'd ever chatted with via Gtalk, or possibly all your Gmail contacts.
Google has tried to defuse the resulting hostility. This culminated in a Boxing Day blog post
that admits: We'd hoped that making it easier to share with the people you chat with often would be useful and interesting, but we underestimated the number of users who were using the Share button to send stories to a limited number of people.
It's an amazingly arrogant response. Google should have just reverted to the old system and provided an opt-in for people who preferred the new way to do things. That would have silenced the angry mob while giving it time to produce an acceptable
system.
This highlights a problem that is almost always ignored by the people flogging online services: that you are making yourself completely dependent on them. They can change the service however they like, without asking you first. In
reality, you probably don't even have copies of your own data, and can lose access to it at any time.
The larger problem for Google is that Google Reader has now highlighted its attitude to privacy. Privacy International rates Google the worst of
the major Web properties, giving it a black rating for Comprehensive consumer surveillance & entrenched hostility to privacy.
|
1st January | |
| Government pirating French ideas
| From the Times see full
article
| Internet users who download copied films
or television series could soon see their service suspended as huge political pressure grows on broadband service providers to stop illegal downloads.
The Government has given notice of its concern at the “huge cumulative effect” of illegal
downloads and called on internet service providers (ISPs) to examine ways to reverse the trend.
MPs are also calling for the use of camcorders in cinemas to be made a criminal rather than a civil offence, as nine out of ten pirate films first
appear in the market as a camcorded copy.
ISPs are to be brought to negotiations in the new year over plans by film companies to suspend the service of those who break the law.
Until now, broadband companies have been deeply reluctant to
step in, arguing that it is impractical to monitor the activities of users and would infringe privacy.
ISPs are no more able to inspect and filter every single packet passing across their network than the Post Office is able to open every
envelope, insists ISPA, the industry association. However, this argument has been undermined by developments in France, where an industry initiative backed by President Sarkozy could result in internet subscribers who download music, films and other
content without paying for them being banned from having access to the web.
Denis Olivennes, the chairman of Fnac, the DVD retailer, who conducted a review for the French Government, called for a “three-strikes-and-you’re-out” policy for
individuals found guilty of internet piracy. He argued that ISPs are culpable because they encourage subscribers to take advantage of the amount of free material on the web.
Some broadband companies have indicated that they are willing to enter
negotiations. A spokesman for Virgin Media said: As a responsible ISP, Virgin Media would always openly negotiate with any interested party or governing body such as Ofcom. A spokesman for BT said: Copyright infringement is a civil not a
criminal offence and the infringed party should seek compensation. This is a matter for the rights holders and not for the ISPs.
|
|
|