The
BBFC has rejected the DVD
The Texas Vibrator Massacre which means that it cannot be legally
supplied anywhere in the UK.
From Alan:
Texas Vibrator Massacre Nonsense
This idiocy defies belief. I just visited the BBFC website. The first
clause of the first sentence ["the independent regulator of the film
and video industry in the UK". ] is a piece of smug, sanctimonious
self-congratulation on their own "independence". So "independent" that
they work within the crippling framework of the Obscene Publications
Acts and the Video Recordings Act. So "independent" that I understand
that their leading lights include Lord Taylor of Warwick, Sir
Somethingor other and Mrs Janet Double-Barrel. This shower are fully
integrated within the establishment, intent upon doing its dirty work,
and couldn't demonstrate real independence if their lives depended on
it.
I can't be more precise about names because the BBFC website appears not
to identify any of the jobsworths. Remember the lamented
www.bbfc.org.uk? These unsavoury jobsworths got the "Ban the Board of
Film Censors" site shut down. It identified some of these scumbags
impertinently telling other people what they can and can't watch and
tried to encourage whistleblowing among the body's employees. Something
similar is urgently needed.
From the Melon Farmers:
Establishment or What?
Thinking of being part of the establishment, you can't get much more
establishment than the BBFC appointee vice president, Gerard Lemos, he
is a director of the Crown Prosecution Service!
Gerard Lemos is a Partner in Lemos and Crane
Social Research and Visiting Professor in International Social Policy at
Chongqing Business and Technology University, China. He is also a
non-executive Director, Crown Prosecution Service; Chairman of the
Banking Code Standards Board and Deputy Chair of the British Council.
From
Dan: Beyer Happy
As usual Beyer's only happy with the BBFC when it's banning things.
From
Mediawatch-UK
Speaking today John Beyer, director of mediawatch-uk, praised the
BBFC's decision to reject this film. He said: We are delighted by
this decision and we hope it will go some way to restoring confidence in
the Board and it's Classification Guidelines. It shows that some extreme
material is still outside the very broad scope of what the Board finds
acceptable for public exhibition."
|