Aggregate
reviews from the forum
Just watched this crap, it was, as expected, sensationalist journalism
at its worst.
Partly about Coutts and partly about a man addicted to porn trying to
quit his addiction.
Several times the program said that Coutts addiction lead to his
murdering Jane Longhurst and the only corroboration was a cop who
declared that he was convinced the porn made Coutes do it and an
American psychologist who has studied sexual criminals and said that
they all seemed to to use porn. One person saying extreme porn
'normalises' violence and another that looking at extreme porn could
lead to wanting to commit violence.
A pretty grim and harrowing resume of the Longhurst case, I have to
report. More generally, the show starts by saying how 4 million men
regularly use porn, but fails to mention how it's use amongst women is
actually the biggest growth area. Not a word of dissent was presented to
challenge the central view of "porn being damaging" in the whole hour
long spectacle.
It wasn't just bad that the Coutts coverage was one-sided, but that they
conflated it with the very separate issue of porn addiction at all. The
show would've been a bit better if they'd just made it a story on some
people's struggle with porn addiction, without trying to conflate it
with the very political issue of Coutts' case, or trying to scaremonger
it into "Porn is bad!"
The whole thing reminded me of the parody propaganda film in Futurama's
I Dated A Robot - if you watch women On The Internet, you will
lose interest in real girls and won't hold down a job!
|