 |
|
Poland are abusing Euro
warrants
We'd better invade |
An Australian wanted in Germany for alleged Holocaust denial should not be
extradited because he has committed no crime under UK law, a court has
heard.
Dr Gerald Toben was arrested at Heathrow Airport by British police, acting
on behalf of a German court.
His lawyer told the extradition hearing that Dr Toben should only be
extradited if he had made his claims in Germany or had posted them on a
German website.
Police were acting on an EU warrant that provides for "fast-track"
extradition of suspects who have committed alleged offences in other
European countries.
The historian is wanted for publishing material online of an anti-semitic
and/or revisionist nature - a crime punishable by imprisonment in
Germany, but not in the UK. Dr Toben's material appears on his
Australian-based website, which the German authorities say can be accessed
in Germany.
His lawyer, Ben Watson, questioned the validity of the EU warrant and said
that there was not enough information within the warrant to justify Dr
Toben's extradition.
District Judge Daphne Wickham remanded Toben in custody until a further
hearing on 29 October when she will give her judgment on whether the case
should be thrown out.
Offsite:
Extradition will make Dr Toben a martyr
See
article
from
indexoncensorship.org
by Chris Huhne
The legal controversy does not end with the use of the warrant. Dr Toben is
accused in Germany but his offence is to post on an Australian website.
Germany has taken on itself the role of censor, because of the capacity to
download content in Germany. It is hard to see where such an attempt to
extend jurisdiction might end, or what its chilling effects on freedom of
speech might ultimately be.
The legal technicalities may yet stop Dr Toben’s extradition. The arrest
warrant is designed to respect each European Union country’s legal system by
allowing automatic extradition, although it allows British courts to assess
whether someone’s fundamental rights are being challenged. A clause in the
legislation also allows our courts potentially to refuse extradition because
the offence was committed outside the territory of the issuing member state,
and does not allow prosecution here.
At least one member state — Belgium — has already said that it will look
behind a warrant to assess whether it should be executed. Poland issues
about a third of all European arrest warrants, and are said to treat
abortion as murder. However, the Belgians have said that they will not
execute warrants for abortion or euthanasia. Belgium’s attitude provides a
precedent for refusal.
...Read full
article
Comment:
Crack-brained legal fiction
20th October 2008. From Alan
Interesting article by Huhne.
I particularly noticed this bit: The legal controversy does not end with
the use of the warrant. Dr Toben is accused in Germany but his offence is to
post on an Australian website. Germany has taken on itself the role of
censor, because of the capacity to download content in Germany. It is hard
to see where such an attempt to extend jurisdiction might end, or what its
chilling effects on freedom of speech might ultimately be.
Trouble is, the UK is in no position to moan about this. as Huhne, a
prominent MP, ought to be aware. R v. Perrin is a leading case on obscenity.
Poor old Perrin was thrown in prison in England for a gay porn site he ran
in the USA, on precisely the basis that it could be accessed here. A
crack-brained legal fiction holds that any material which can be downloaded
here is "published" here.
|