BritVids
5 unrestricted Downloads £27.50
3500 titles available

www.BritVids.co.uk
 

 Lady Howe...
  TV Policy Archive

 Hardcore DVD
 Online Sex Shops
 Magazines
Sex Shops List
Satellite X Channels
Internet Video
 
 

Melon Farmers Icon

 Home BBFC
Nutters  Sex & Shopping
 Index TV Liberty  Sex Sells News
 Links UK Criminalising Extreme Porn  Sex Sells Reviews
 Forum World Criminalising P4P  Sex Shops List  

TV

 TV Censorship  TV & Radio News  Contact Regulators
    Ofwatch  Films On 4
    Internet TV  IMCB regulating Phone TV

 

Lady Howe

A slight but enlightening interview with Lady Howe, chairman of the Broadcasting Standards Commission.

Based on article in the Sunday Times by Cosmo Landesman (3.1.99)


Elspeth HoweLady Elspeth Howe is the chairman of the Broadcasting Standards Commission (BSC). This week she will be launching the commission's new report on what the public thinks about what sex on our screens. Howe has no doubts about which way we are headed. As an issue of social concern, sex on television has gone down a bit. Our new report shows that there is a greater acceptance of sex as long as it is relevant to the story line.

Deciding what is relevant and what goes too far is a crucial part of Howe's work. When Disgusted Of Tunbridge Wells wants to protest about the sight of some three-in-a-bed romp on television, Howe is the lady he can turn to. Already she has received complaints about the Christmas Day edition of Men Behaving Badly, with its quips about masturbation and pornography.which topped the day's ratings but had fewer viewers than in previous years.

What did she think of that episode?

I'm sorry but we've had complaints so I can't comment about that particular episode.

But did it make her laugh?

Bits of it did. That particular programme I thought was the least funny.

Has she sympathy for those who say that we need more programmes suitable for all the family at Christmas time?

In the great tradition of watchdogs, she admits: I didn't watch much TV over Christmas, so I have a rather jaundiced view. But I have to say that I think it's important that when families are together there should be more suitable stuff for them to watch.

She tells me that she's no prude and that showing us what goes on beyond the bedroom door can be quite instructive. In terms of parents and children and being more open with each other.

But she does believe that there are limits. The question is - where does she draw the line?

We are able to draw the line by doing lots of research into what the public thinks is acceptable at any given time. The basic question that we always ask is - was this amount of sex necessary in showing something important or is it just gratuitous? You have to consider quality of the drama as a whole, the general morality of the thing, before you make a decision.

I point out that you can have serious high-minded drama that will still shock your maiden aunt. Context or thematic depth doesn't make a pair of naked breasts any less offensive for some. At this she sounds impatient.

Look. Of course the sight of a naked body is bound to upset somebody. You have to get the balance right between the rights of those who want more realistic scenes of sex and those who want less.

Is she saying that the BSC would defend the right of people to watch more sex on TV?

Indeed. If they want to watch it.

Howe has no doubt about the need for fair regulation. And though she admits that standards of taste and decency are hard to define, she still believes it can be done. But look at the vast amount of sexually explicit material we see on our screens - simulated oral sex, sadomasochist practices. Hasn't the battle to preserve taste and decency already been lost?

She takes this in her stride and says: Are you suggesting, as it were, that there isn't any further to go?

Has she discovered any new areas of human depravity then?

Well, for my sins I've had to watch some of the late-night adult channels. The point is broadcasters are always pushing the boundaries. And over time, taste and what the public will accept changes, too.

Critics of the commission say that it epitomises the kind of nanny-state mentality we want to get away from. Is Howe the Mary Poppins of the small screen?

Look, everybody in this sort of role will be regarded as part of the nanny state. But our research shows that the Brits who don't like being bossed about still say, 'Yes we think regulation is necessary for quality and for standards.'

There is already an effective means of regulation - it's called the on and off switch. Shouldn't people be responsible for what they watch on television and not some quango of the great and the good?

No doubt all libertarians would say that. But you could be sitting with your great-aunt and switch on the TV and see something shocking.

Has that ever happened to her?

Oh yes! she says with a nervous twitter. I can't remember what it was, but I was embarrassed.

What did she do?

I rushed off to make a pot of tea - which is a very British thing to do.

Is Howe the right person for the job? Does she ever spend much time watching television. Does she like it?

Oh I love television, I like everything. I've always been a bit of a TV addict.

She is asked for a few examples.

Well, says Howe and then goes silent. She seems rather stumped by this.

Finally she comes up with a pretty unconvincing answer.

In the old days, I liked Birds of a Feather and Panorama and. . .

Never mind.



 

TV

 TV Censorship  TV & Radio News  Contact Regulators
    Ofwatch  Films On 4
    Internet TV  IMCB regulating Phone TV

Melon Farmers Icon

 Home BBFC Nutters  Sex & Shopping

Bedtime Heaven
Sex Toys

 Index TV Liberty  Sex Sells News
 Links UK Criminalising Extreme Porn  Sex Sells Reviews
 Forum World Criminalising P4P  Sex Shops List